Üstbiliş Destekli Tartışma Tabanlı Öğrenme Yaklaşımının Fizik Eğitiminde Kavramsal Değişim ve Üstbiliş Üzerine Etkisi

Yıl 2021, Cilt: 15 Sayı: 1, 144 - 185, 27.06.2021

Erdoğan Özdemir Sabri Kocakülah

https://doi.org/10.17522/balikesirnef.902038

Öz

Kavramsal değişim süreci, öğrencinin ön kavramının bir problemi çözmede yetersiz kalması ile başlar. Öğrencinin bilimsel kavramı kabul ederek ön kavramını terk etmesi ile son bulur. Kavramsal değişim kuramı ve değişkenleri tanımlanmış olmasına rağmen, kuramın sınıf ortamında nasıl uygulanacağı tanımlanmamıştır. Bu nedenle bu araştırmada, kavramsal değişim kuramına uygun üstbiliş stratejileri ile desteklenmiş tartışma yaklaşımı tasarlanmış ve uygulanmıştır. Araştırma deseni olarak nicel baskın statülü karma model kullanılmıştır. Araştırmaya bir ortaöğretim kurumunun 10. sınıfında öğrenim gören 51 öğrenci katılmıştır. Araştırma verileri “Özel Görelilik Kuramı Tanı Testi”, “Üstbiliş Özyeterlilik Ölçeği” ve yarı yapılandırılmış görüşmeler ile toplanmıştır. Verilerin analizi sonucunda, uygulanan öğretimin öğrencilerin kavramsal değişimine olumlu katkısı olduğu sonucuna ulaşılmıştır. Uygulanan öğretimin öğrencilerin üstbilişine özellikle izleme, değerlendirme ve planlama boyutunda katkı sağladığı tespit edilmiştir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

fizik öğretimi, özel görelilik kuramı, ön kavramlar, kavramsal değişim, üstbiliş

The Effect of Metacognitive Supported Argument-Based Learning Approach on Conceptual Change and Metacognition in Physics Education

Öz

The process of conceptual change begins when a preconception of a student fails to solve a problem. It ends when the student abandons his preconception and accepts a scientific concept. Although the theory and variables of conceptual change have been defined, how the theory would be implemented in a class environment has not been defined. For this reason, a course incorporating an argumentation approach supported with metacognitive strategies in accordance with the theory of conceptual change was designed and implemented for the subject of special relativity theory. A qualitatively dominant status mixed-method approach was used as the research design. The participants of the study were 51, 10th-grade students studying at a secondary school. Data were collected with qualitative and quantitative measurement tools. It was concluded that the applied course contributed positively to the students' conceptual changes and regulation of cognition (planning, monitoring, evaluating).

Anahtar Kelimeler

teaching physics, theory of special relativity, preconceptions, conceptual change, metacognition

Kaynakça

• Alsop, S. & Watts, M. (1997). Sources from a somerset village: A model for informal learning about radiation and radioactivity. Science Education, 81(6), 633–650.
• Anandaraj, S. & Ramesh, C. (2014). A study on the relationship between metacognition and problem solving ability of physics major students. Indian Journal of Applied Research, 4(5), 191–193.
• Arslan, H. O., Ciğdemoglu, C. & Moseley. C. (2012). A three-tier diagnostic test to assess preservice teachers’ misconceptions about global warming, greenhouse effect, ozone layer depletion, and acid rain. International Journal of Science Education, 34(11), 1667–1686.
• Çetinkaya, M. & Taş, E. (2016). “Vücudumuzda sistemler” ünitesine yönelik üç aşamalı kavram tanı testi geliştirilmesi. Ordu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Sosyal Bilimler Araştırmaları Dergisi. 6(15), 317-330.
• Dole, J. A. & Sinatra, G. M. (1998). Reconceptualizing change in the cognitive construction of knowledge. Educational Psychologist, 33(2/3), 109–128.
• Duit, R., & Treagust, D. F. (1998). Learning in science-from behaviourism towards social constructivism and beyond. In B. J. Fraser & K. Tobin (Eds.), International handbook of science education, part 1 (p. 3–25). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
• Eggen, P., & Kauchak, D. (2001). Strategies and Models for Teachers Teaching Content and Thinking Skills. Boston: Pearson.
• Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring. American Psychologist, 34 (10), 906–911.
• Fowler, M. (2012). Fowler’s physics applets. University of Virginia physics. Retrieved from http://galileoandeinstein.phys.virginia.edu/more_stuff/Applets/home.html
• Gregoire, M. (2003). Is it a challenge or a threat? A dual-process model of teachers’ cognition and appraisal process during conceptual change. Educational Psychology Review, 15(2), 147–179.
• Hennessey, M. G. (1993). Students’ ideas about their conceptualization: Their elicitation through instruction. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching. April 15-19, Atlanta, GA. USA.
• Hestenes, D., & Halloun, I. (1995). Interpreting the force concept inventory: A response to Huffman and Heller. The Physics Teacher, 33(8), 502–506.
• Jayapraba, G. (2013). Metacognitive instruction and cooperative learning strategies for promoting insightful learning in science. International Journal on New Trends in Education and Their Implications, 4(1), 165–172.
• Johnson, R. B., Onwuegbuzie, A. J. & Turner, L. A. (2007). Toward a definition of mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(2), 112-133. Kapartzianis, A. S. (2012). Designing conceptual change activities for the physics curriculum: The Cyprus paradigm. Master of Science in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education (Unpublished masters’ thesis). University of South Africa.
• Kramarski, B. & Mevarech, Z. R. (2003). Enhancing mathematical reasoning in the classroom: The effects of cooperative learning and metacognitive training. American Educational Research Journal, 40(1), 281–310.
• Khun, T. (1970). The structure of science revolutions. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
• Kural, M. (2015). Teaching for hot conceptual change: An example of grade 11 modern physics (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Balıkesir University, Balıkesir, Turkey.
• Onwuegbuzie, A. J. & Collins, K. M. T. (2007). A typology of mixed methods sampling design in social science research. The Qualitative Report. 12(2), 281-316.
• Osborne, J., Erduran, S. & Simon, S. (2004). Enhancing the quality of argumentation in school science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(10), 994–1020.
• Özcan, Ö. (2011). Pre-service physics teachers’ problem solving approaches in special theory of relativity. Hacettepe University Journal of Education, 40, 310–320.
• Özcan, Ö. (2017). Examining the students’ understanding level towards the concepts of special theory of relativity. Problem of Education in the 21st Century, 75(3), 263–269.
• Özkan, E. C., & Bümen N. T. (2014). The effects of ınquiry based learning in science and technology course on students’ achievements, concept learning, metacognition awareness and attitudes towards science and technology course. Ege Education Journal, 15(1), 251–278.
• Özdemir, E., Kural, M. & Kocakülah, S. (2014). The effect of teaching metacognition strategies of 10th grade modern physics unit on teaching special relativity theory concepts. Paper presented at the annual meeting of XI. Science and Mathematics Education National Congress. September, 11-14, Adana, Turkey.
• Palmer, D. (2005). A motivational view of constructivist-informed teaching. International Journal of Science Education, 27(15), 1853–1881.
• Panse, S., Ramadas, J. & Kumar, A. (1994). Alternative conceptions in Galilean relativity: Frames of reference. International Journal of Science Education, 16(1), 63–82.
• Pardede, P. (2018). Mixed method research designs in EFL. Proceeding of EED Collegiate Forum.
• PCMH Research Methods Series (2013). Mixed methods: Integrating quantitative and qualitative data collection and analysis while studying patient-centered medical home models. AHRQ Pablication No. 13-0028-EF.
• Pintrich, P. R., Marx, R. W. & Boyle, R. A. (1993). Beyond cold conceptual change: The role of motivational beliefs and classroom contextual factors in the process of conceptual change. Review of Educational Research, 63(2), 167–199.
• Pintrich, P. R. (2003). A Motivational Science Perspective on the Role of Student Motivation in Learning and Teaching Contexts. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(4), 667–686.
• Planinic, M., Krsnik R., Pecina P., & Susac, A. (2005). Overview and comparison of basic teaching techniques that promote conceptual change in students. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the 1st European Physics Education Conference. Bad Honnef, July 4-7, Germany.
• Posner, G. J., Strike, K.A., Hewson, P.W. & Gertzog, W.A. (1982). Accommodation of a scientific conception: Toward a theory of conceptual change. Science Education, 66(2), 221–227.
• Ryan, R.M, & Deci (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68-78.
• Sari, N.V.N. & Abdurrahman, S. (2019). Developing and validating of the three tier diagnostic test based 'higher order thinking skills' instrument. Dinamika Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Dasar, 11(2), 87-93.
• Scherr, R. E., Shaffer P. S. & Vokos, S. (2001). Student understanding of time in special relativity: Simultaneity and reference frames. American Journal of Physics, 69(S1), 24–35.
• Schraw, G., Crippen, K.J. & Hartley, K. (2006). Promoting self-regulation in science education: Metacognition as part of a broader perspective on learning. Research in Science Education, 36, 111–139.
• Selçuk, G. S. & Çalışkan, S. (2010). Relationship between second year university students’ conceptual understanding of special relativity and modern physics attitudes. Balkan Physics Letters, 18, 345–353.
• Selçuk, S. G. (2011). Addressing pre-service teachers' understandings and difficulties with some core concepts in the special theory of relativity. European Journal of Physics, 32(1), 1–13.
• Serway, R. A. (1996). Physics for scientist & engineers with modern physics. (3rd ed.). Florida: Harcourt Brace Jovanovic publishing.
• Sinatra, G. M., & Pintrich, P. R. (2003). The role of intentions in conceptual change learning: Intentional conceptual change. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
• Seraphin, K, D., Philippoff, J., Kaupp, L. & Vallin L. M., (2012). Metacognition as means to increase the effectiveness of inquiry-based science education. Science Education International, 23(4), 366–382.
• Thomas, G., Anderson, D. & Nashon, S. (2008). Development and validity of an instrument designed to investigate elements of science students’ metacognition, self-efficacy and learning processes: The SEMLI-S. International Journal of Science Education, 30(13), 1701–1724.
• Turkey Ministry of National Education (2008). 10th grade physics course cirriculum. Ankara: Republic of Turkey Ministry of National Education, Turkey.
• Turgut, U., Gurbuz, F., Salar, R. & Toman, U. (2013). The viewpoints of physics teacher candidates towards the concepts in special theory of relativity and their evaluation designs. International Journal of Academic Research, 5(4), 481–489.
• Tyson, L. M., Venville, G. J., Harrison, A. G. & Treagust, D. F. (1997). A multidimensional framework for interpreting conceptual change events in the classroom. Science Education, 81, 387–404.
• Ültay, N., Durukan, Ü. G. & Ültay, E. (2015). Evaluation of the effectiveness of conceptual change texts in the REACT strategy. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 16(1), 22–38.
• Kızılcık, H. Ş. ve Yavaş, P. Ü. (2017). Investigating the reasons of difficulty understanding of students in special relativity topics. Çukurova University Faculty of Education Journal, 46(2), 399–426.
• Venkatesh, V., Brown S. A. & Sullivan, Y. W. (2016). Guidelines for conducting mixed-methods research: An extension and illustration. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 17(7), 435-494.
• Villani, A., & Arruda, S. (1998). Special theory of relativity, conceptual change and history of science. Science & Education, 7(1), 85–100.
• Yeşilyurt, E. (2019). İşbirliğine dayalı öğrenme yöntemi: Tüm teknikleri kapsayıcı bir derleme çalışması. Turkish Studies Educational Sciences. 14(4), 1941-1970.
• Yıldız, E. (2008). The effects of metacognition during the instruction based on conceptual change used with 5E model: an application regarding the force and motion subject in the 7th grade (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Dokuz Eylül University, İzmir, Turkey.
• Zhou, G. (2010). Conceptual change in science: A process of argumentation. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science& Technology Education, 6(2), 101–110.