Özel Eğitim Öğretmenleri Ve Teknoloji: Bir Metafor Analizi

Yıl 2022, Cilt: 16 Sayı: 1, 64 - 87, 30.06.2022

Seda Özer Şanal

https://doi.org/10.17522/balikesirnef.887466

Cited By: 1

Öz

Bu çalışma teknolojinin özel eğitim bağlamındaki yerine odaklanmış ve özel eğitim öğretmenlerinin teknolojiye yönelik algıları metafor analizi aracılığı ile incelenmiştir. Çalışma verileri 164 özel eğitim öğretmeninden elde edilmiştir. Olgu bilim kapsamında yürütülen bu çalışmada katılımcıların teknolojiye yönelik algıları olarak bir metafor ve bu metaforun gerekçesi çözümlenmiştir. Özel eğitim öğretmenlerinin teknolojiye yönelik belirttikleri metaforlar (1) Süreç, (2) Materyal, (3) Gereklilik ve (4) Yaklaşım olmak üzere dört kategoride toplanmıştır. Özel eğitim öğretmenlerinin ilk sırada gelişen, geliştiren, değişen, değiştiren, üreten, büyüyen özelliklerini atfederek teknolojiyi süreç olarak algıladıkları görülmüştür. Materyal kategorisinde araç gereç, bilgisayar, ansiklopedi gibi metaforlar sıklıkla aktarılmıştır. Gereklilik kategorisinde ise, öğretim sürecini, öğretmeni ve öğrenciyi zorlayan ve bu zorlamanın güncel gelişmeleri takip etmek, ek eğitimler almak, sertifika programlarına katılmak, kişisel hobiler edinmek gibi alanlarda olduğu vurgulanmıştır. Yaklaşım kategorisi ise teknolojinin bir yaşam biçimi, bir felsefe ya da inanç olarak ifade edilmesini kapsamıştır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Eğitim teknolojisi, öğretim teknolojisi, özel eğitim, teknoloji entegrasyonu

Special Education Teachers And Technology: A Metaphor Analysis

Öz

In this study conducted within the scope of phenomenology, a metaphor as the participants' perceptions towards technology and the rationale of this metaphor were analyzed. Study data were obtained from 164 special education teachers. The metaphors that special education teachers stated for technology were grouped into four categories: (1) Process, (2) Material, (3) Necessity, and (4) Approach. It has been observed that special education teachers’ perceive technology as a process by attributing its developing, changing, and producing. In the material category, metaphors such as tools, computers, and encyclopedias were frequently conveyed. In the category of necessity, it was emphasized that the teaching process is challenging the teacher and the student, and this challenge is in areas such as following up-to-date developments, receiving additional training, participating in certificate programs, and acquiring personal hobbies. The category of approach included expressing technology as a way of life, a philosophy or a belief.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Educational technology, , instructional technology, special education, technology integration

Kaynakça

• Allsopp, D. H., Alvarez Mchatton, P., & Cranston-Gingras, A. (2009). Examining Perceptions of Systematic Integration of Instructional Technology in a Teacher Education Program. Teacher Education And Special Education, 32(4), 337-350.
• Almeida, C. M., Jameson, J. M., Riesen, T., & McDonnell, J. (2016). Urban and rural preservice special education teachers' computer use and perceptions of self-efficacy. Rural Special Education Quarterly, 35(3), 12-19.
• Alzrayer, N. M., & Banda, D. R. (2017). Implementing Tablet-Based Devices to Improve Communication Skills of Students with Autism. Intervention İn School And Clinic, 53(1), 50–57.
• Arslan M. M. Ve Bayrakçı M. (2006). Metaforik Düşünme Ve Öğrenme Yaklaşımının Eğitim-Öğretim Açısından İncelenmesi. Milli Eğitim. 171 (Yaz), 100 -108.
• Aslan, C. (2018). Özel Eğitim Öğretmenlerinin Yardımcı Teknolojilere Yönelik Tutumları. Eğitim Teknolojisi Kuram Ve Uygulama, 8(1), 102-120.
• Bağlama, B., Yıkmış, A., & Demirok, M. S. (2017). Special Education Teachers’ Views on Using Technology in Teaching Mathematics. European Journal Of Special Education Research.
• Bauer, W. I. (2013). The Acquisition of Musical Technological Pedagogical And Content Knowledge. Journal of Music Teacher Education, 22(2), 51-64.
• Belknap, B., & Taymans, J. (2015). Risk and Resilience in Beginning Special Education Teachers. The Journal of Special education apprenticeship, 4(1), 1.
• Botha, E. (2009). Why Metaphor Matters in Education. South African Journal Of Education, 29, 431-444.
• Brantley-Dias, L., & Ertmer, P. A. (2013). Goldilocks and TPACK: Is the construct ‘just right?’. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 46(2), 103-128.
• Brownell, M. T., Sindelar, P. T., Kiely, M. T., & Danielson, L. C. (2010). Special Education Teacher Quality And Preparation: Exposing Foundations, Constructing A New Model. Exceptional Children, 76(3), 357-377.
• Buabeng-Andoh, C. (2012). Factors Influencing Teachers Adoption and Integration of Information and Communication Technology into Teaching: A Review Of The Literature. International Journal Of Education And Development Using ICT, 8(1).
• Cifuentes, S. C., S. G. García, M. P. Andrés-Sebastiá, J. D. Camba, and M. Contero. 25–28 July 2016. “Augmented Reality Experiences in Therapeutic Pedagogy: A Study with Special Needs Students.” Paper presented at the 2016 IEEE 16th International Conference on Advanced Learning
• Colston, H., & Gibbs, W. (2017). Metaphor Processing. The Routledge Handbook of Metaphor and Language, 457-471.
• Creswell, J.W. (2007). Qualitative Inquiry A Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches, 2nd Ed.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publishers.
• Cumming, T., Rodríguez, C. D., & Strnadová, I. (2014). Aligning iPad applications with evidence-based practices in inclusive and special education. In Assistive technologies: Concepts, methodologies, tools, and applications (pp. 397-420). IGI Global.
• Çavaş, P., Çetin, G., Palabıyık, E., & Çavaş, B. Exploring Preservice Teachers’ Science And Technology Concepts By Metaphors. Necatibey Eğitim Fakültesi Elektronik Fen Ve Matematik Eğitimi Dergisi (EFMED) 13 (2), 1239-1272.
• Drigas, A., & Kostas, I. (2014). On Line and Other I CTS Applications for Teaching Math in Special Education. International Journal Of Recent Contributions From Engineering, Science & IT (İjes), 2(4), 46-53.
• Durukan, Ü. G., Hacıoğlu, Y. Ve Usta, N. D. (2016). Bilgisayar ve Öğretim Teknolojileri Öğretmeni Adaylarının “Teknoloji” Algıları. Journal Of Computer And Education Research, 4(7), 24 - 46.
• Ergen, B. Ve Yanpar-Yelken, T. (2015). Metaphoric Perceptions of Primary 3rd Class Students About Technology Concept. The Journal Of Academic Social Science Studies, 39, 509-527.
• Ertmer, P. A. (1999). Addressing first-and second-order barriers to change: Strategies for technology integration. Educational technology research and development, 47(4), 47-61.
• Evgin, Ç. A. Y., Yıkmış, A., & Özgüç, C. S. Özel Eğitimde Teknoloji Kullanımına İlişkin Özel Eğitim Öğretmenlerinin Deneyim ve Görüşleri. Eğitimde Nitel Araştırmalar Dergisi, 8(2), 629-648.
• Feenberg, A. (2009). What is Philosophy Of Technology?. In International Handbook Of Research And Development İn Technology Education (Pp. 159-166). Brill Sense. Florian, L. (2008). Inclusion: Special Or Inclusive Education: Future Trends. British Journal Of Special Education, 35(4), 202-208.
• Fullan, M. (2011). Whole System Reform For İnnovative Teaching And Learning. Microsoft-ITL Research (Ed.), Innovative Teaching And Learning Research, 30-39.
• Goksu, İ., & Koçak, Ö. (2020). Öğretmen Adaylarının Öğretim Teknolojilerine Yönelik Metaforik Algıları. Öğretim Teknolojileri Ve Öğretmen Eğitimi Dergisi, 9(2), 125-143.
• Gök, B., Ve Erdoğan, T. (2010). Investigation Of Pre-Service Teachers’ Perceptions About Concept Of Technology Through Metaphor Analysis. The Turkish Online Journal Of Educational Technology, 9(2), 145–160.
• Günay, D. (2017). Teknoloji Nedir? Felsefi Bir Yaklaşım. Yükseköğretim Ve Bilim Dergisi, 7(1), 163-166.
• Hess, K. L., Morrier, M. J., Heflin, L. J., & Ivey, M. L. (2008). Autism Treatment Survey: Services Received By Children With Autism Spectrum Disorders İn Public School Classrooms. Journal Of Autism And Developmental Disorders, 38(5), 961–971.
• Karaçam, S., & Aydın, F. (2014). Ortaokul Öğrencilerinin Teknoloji Kavramına İlişkin Algılarının Metafor Analizi. Gaziantep University Journal Of Social Sciences, 13(2).
• Kennedy, M. J., & Deshler, D. D. (2010). Literacy İnstruction, Technology, And Students With Learning Disabilities: Research We Have, Research We Need. Learning Disability Quarterly, 33(4), 289-298.
• Kobak, M., Ve Taşkın, N. R. (2012). Prospective Teachers’ Perceptions Of Using Technology İn Three Different Ways.Procedia - Social And Behavioral Sciences, 46, 3629–3636.
• Koç, M. (2013). Student Teachers’ Conceptions Of Technology: A Metaphor Analysis. Computers & Education, 68, 1–8.
• Koehler, M. J., Mishra, P., & Cain, W. (2013). What is Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK)?. Journal Of Education, 193(3), 13-19.
• Koh, J. H. L., Chai, C. S., & Lim, W. Y. (2017). Teacher Professional Development For TPACK-21CL: Effects On Teacher ICT İntegration And Student Outcomes. Journal Of Educational Computing Research, 55(2), 172-196.
• Korkmaz, F. Ve Ünsal, S. (2016). Okul Öncesi Öğretmenlerin ‘‘Teknoloji’’kavramına İlişkin Metaforik Algılarının İncelemesi. Mustafa Kemal Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 13(35), 194-212.
• Kurt, A. A. Ve Özer, Ö. (2013). Metaphorical Perceptions of Technology: Case of Anadolu University Teacher Training Certificate Program. Journal Of Theory And Practice İn Education, 9(2), 94-112.
• Kutlu, M., Schreglmann, S., & Cinisli, N. A. (2018). Özel Eğitim Alanında Çalışan Öğretmenlerin Özel Eğitimde Yardımcı Teknolojilerin Kullanımına İlişkin Görüşleri. Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 15(1), 1540-1569.
• Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (2003). Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: The University Of Chicago Press.
• Lämsä, J., Hämäläinen, R., Aro, M., Koskimaa, R., & Äyrämö, S. M. (2018). Games For Enhancing Basic Reading And Maths Skills: A Systematic Review Of Educational Game Design İn Supporting Learning By People With Learning Disabilities. British Journal Of Educational Technology, 49(4), 596-607.
• Leko, M. M., Brownell, M. T., Sindelar, P. T., & Kiely, M. T. (2015). Envisioning The Future Of Special Education Personnel Preparation İn A Standards-Based Era. Exceptional Children, 82(1), 25-43.
• Mastropieri, M. A., Scruggs, T. E., Mills, S. A. R. A., Kauffman, J. M., & Hallahan, D. P. (2011). Special education teacher preparation. Handbook of special education, 47-58. Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Sage.
• Miller, S. (2003). Analysis Of Phenomenological Data Generated With Children As Research Participants. Nurse Researcher, 10(4), 68-82.
• Okolo, C. M., & Diedrich, J. (2014). Twenty-Five Years Later: How İs Technology Used İn The Education Of Students With Disabilities? Results Of A Statewide Study. Journal Of Special Education Technology, 29(1), 1-20.
• Özyurt, M., & Badur, M. (2020). İlkokul Öğrencilerinin “Teknoloji” Kavramına İlişkin Metaforik Algıları Ve Öğrenme Süreçlerinde Teknoloji Kullanımları. Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 20(2), 1161-1177.
• Rose, P., Beeby, J. & Parker, D. (1995). Academic Rigour in The Lived Experience Of Researchers Using Phenomenological Methods İn Nursing. Journal Of Advanced Nursing, 21, 1123-1129.
• Russak, S. (2016). Do İnclusion Practices For Pupils With Special Educational Needs in The English As A Foreign Language Class in Israel Reflect Inclusion Laws and Language Policy.Requirements?. International Journal Of Inclusive Education, 20(11), 1188-1203.
• Sadler‐Smith, E., & J. Smith, P. (2004). Strategies For Accommodating İndividuals’ Styles And Preferences İn Flexible Learning Programmes. British Journal Of Educational Technology, 35(4), 395-412.
• Siyam, N. (2019). Factors Impacting Special Education Teachers’ Acceptance and Actual Use of Technology. Education And Information Technologies, 24(3), 2035-2057.
• Starcic, A. I., & Bagon, S. (2014). ICT-Supported Learning For Inclusion of People with Special Needs: Review of Seven Educational Technology Journals, 1970–2011. British Journal Of Educational Technology, 45(2), 202–230.
• Şahin, A. (2019). Eğitimde Bilişim Teknolojisi Kullanımına İlişkin Öğretmen Görüşleri: Metafor Çalışması. Adıyaman Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, (31), 121-159.
• Teo, T. (2011). Factors Influencing Teachers’ Intention to Use Technology: Model development and test. Computers & Education, 57(4), 2432-2440.
• Thibodeau, P. H., Crow, L., & Flusberg, S. J. (2017). The Metaphor Police: A Case Study of The Role of Metaphor in Explanation. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 24(5), 1375-1386.
• Usta, N. D., Durukan, Ü. G., & Hacıoğlu, Y. (2016). Bilgisayar Ve Öğretim Teknolojileri Öğretmeni Adaylarının “Teknoloji” Algıları. Journal Of Computer And Education Research, 4(7), 24-46.
• Wang, C. H., Ke, Y. T., Wu, J. T., & Hsu, W. H. (2012). Collaborative Action Research on Technology Integration for Science Learning. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 21(1), 125-132.
• Yıldırım, A. & Şimşek, H. (2013). Sosyal Bilimlerde Nitel Araştırma Yöntemleri. (9. Baskı). Ankara:Seçkin Yayıncılık.