An Investigation of Theses and Dissertations About the Statistics and Probability Learning Area in Turkey

Yıl 2023, Cilt: 17 Sayı: 1, 120 - 173, 30.06.2023

Ayşe Yaldız , Nadide Yılmaz

https://doi.org/10.17522/balikesirnef.1242577

Öz

A document analysis was used in this study to examine Turkish theses/dissertations on probability and statistics.126 graduate theses/dissertations were analyzed by subjecting them to both content and descriptive analysis. According to the findings, theses/dissertations were not distributed evenly by publication year. The majority of theses/dissertations were written in the learning area of statistics. There was a great deal of interest in the keyword "probability". Most of the theses/dissertations examined how teaching practices affected the development of components. A large amount of research was conducted using quantitative methods. Most of the students in the study were middle schoolers, with the sample group ranging from 0 to 100 people at most. There was greater use of technology-supported teaching environments than other teaching environments. Both students and teachers exhibited misconceptions and a lack of knowledge regarding statistics and probability. Because of the teaching practices that were fulfilled, students' performance increased significantly.

Anahtar Kelimeler

thesis, dissertation, document analysis, statistics and probability

Türkiye’de İstatistik ve Olasılık Öğrenme Alanına İlişkin Hazırlanan Lisansüstü Tezlerin İncelenmesi

Öz

Bu çalışma, Türkiye'de olasılık ve istatistik öğrenme alanına ilişkin lisansüstü tezlerin eğilimini incelemeyi amaçlamıştır. Çalışmada doküman analizi yöntemi kullanılmıştır. Toplanan verilerin analizinde nitel veri analizi yöntemi kullanılmıştır. Tezlerin yayın yılına göre dağılımının düzenli olmadığını ortaya çıkmıştır. Tezlerin çoğunun istatistiğin öğrenme alanında yazıldığı tespit edilmiştir. "Olasılık" kelimesi tezlerde kullanılan en popüler anahtar kelime olmuştur. Tezlerin daha çok "öğretim uygulamalarının farklı bileşenlerin gelişimi üzerindeki etkilerini incelemek" amacıyla yazıldığı görülmüştür. Tezlerde çoğunlukla nicel araştırma yöntemi tercih edilmiştir. Çalışmalara katılan katılımcı sayısının en fazla 0-100 aralığında olduğu ve çalışmalarda seçilen en fazla tercih edilen katılımcı grubunun ortaokul öğrencileri olduğu tespit edilmiştir. Teknoloji destekli öğretim ortamının diğer öğretim ortamlarına göre daha fazla kullanıldığı ortaya çıkmıştır. Sonuçlar genel olarak incelendiğinde hem öğrencilerin hem de öğretmenlerin/hizmet öncesi öğretmenlerin istatistik ve olasılık kavramları hakkında yanlış anlamalara ve bilgi eksikliğine sahip oldukları fark edilmiştir. Uygulanan öğretim uygulamaları öğrencilerin başarılarında çoğunlukla anlamlı bir artışa neden olmuştur.

Anahtar Kelimeler

lisansüstü tezler, doküman incelemesi, istatistik ve olasılık

Kaynakça

• Ader, E. (2016). Programlardaki veri öğrenme alanı içeriklerine bakış: Program verilerinin karşılaştırmalı incelemesi [Overview of data learning domain contents in programs: Comparative analysis of program data]. In M. F. Özmantar, A. Öztürk, & E. Bay (Eds.), Reform ve değişim bağlamında ilkokul matematik öğretim programları (pp. 267-292). Pegem Akademi.
• Ader, E. (2018). Programlardaki veri ve olasılık öğrenme alanı içeriklerine karşılaştırmalı bir bakış [A comparative look at data and probability learning area contents in programs]. In M. F. Özmantar, H. Akkoç, B. Kuşdemir Kayıran, & M. Özyurt (Eds.), Ortaokul matematik öğretim programları: Tarihsel bir inceleme (pp. 275-306). Pegem Akademi.
• Albayrak, E. (2017). Descriptive content analysis of mathematical modeling research published in the field of mathematics education in Turkey [Unpublished master thesis]. Atatürk University
• Albayrak, E., & Çiltaş, A. (2017). Descriptive content analysis of mathematical modelling research published in the field of mathematics education in Turkey. International Journal of Turkish Education Sciences, 2017(9), 258-283. https://dergi.org.tr/tr/pub/goputeb/issue/34356/380612
• Arık, R. S., & Türkmen, M. (2009). Eğitim bilimleri alanında yayınlanan bilimsel dergilerde yer alan makalelerin incelenmesi. International Congress of Educational Research, Çanakkale On Sekiz Mart University, Antalya, 1, 16.
• Atasever, D. (2019). Analysis of the graduate which made between 2014-2018 years in mathematics education in Turkey [Unpublished master thesis]. Bolu Abant İzzet Baysal University.
• Aziz, A. M., & Rosli, R. (2021, March). A systematic literature review on developingstudents’ statistical literacy skills. Journal of Physics: Conference Series,1806(1), 012102. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1806/1/012102
• Baki, A., Güven, B., Karataş, İ., Akkan, Y., & Çakıroğlu, Ü. (2011). Türkiye’deki matematik eğitimi araştırmalarındaki eğilimler: 1998 ile 2007 yılları arası. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 40(1), 57-68. http://www.efdergi.hacettepe.edu.tr/shw_artcl-394.html
• Bakker, A.; Hahn, C.; Kazak, S. & Pratt, D. (2018). Research on probability and statistics education, Dreyfus, T., Artigue, M., Potari, D., Prediger, S., & Ruthven, K. (Eds.). Developing Research in Mathematics Education: Twenty Years of Communication, Cooperation and Collaboration in Europe, (pp. 46-59). Routledge.
• Bargagliotti, A., Franklin, C., Arnold, P., Gould, R., Johnson, S., Perez, L., & Spangler, D. (2020). Pre-K-12 Guidelines for Assessment and Instruction in Statistics Education (GAISE) report II. American Statistical Association and National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
• Becker, B. J. (1996). A look at the literature (and other resources) on teaching statistics. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 21(1), 71-90. https://doi.org/10.2307/1165256
• Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2008). Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (3rd ed.). SAGE. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452230153.
• Çiltaş, A. (2012). Content analysis of the graduate thesis and dissertations in mathematics educatiob in Turkey between 2005-2010. The Journal of Academic Social Science Studies, 5(7), 211-228. https://doi.org/10.9761/JASSS235.
• Çiltaş, A., Güler, G., & Sözbilir, M. (2012). Mathematics education research in Turkey : A content analysis study. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 12(1), 565-580. https://www.idealonline.com.tr/IdealOnline/pdfViewer/index.xhtml?uId=1922&ioM=Paper&preview=true&isViewer=true#pagemode=bookmarks
• Dinç, S. (2021). Analysis of postgraduate theses in data processing and probabilty learning areas [Unpublished master thesis], Kocaeli University.
• Doğan, M. (2018). The examination of postgraduate thesis on classroom training in Turkey between 2013-2017 [Unpublished master dissertation], Gaziantep University.
• Fraenkel, J. R., & Wallen, N. E. (2006). How to design and evaluate research in education. McGraw-Hill.
• Franklin, C., Kader, G., Mewborn, D., Moreno, J., Peck, R., Perry, M., & Scheaffer, R. (2005). Guidelines for Assessment and Instruction in Statistics Education (GAISE) Report: A Pre-K–12 Curriculum Framework. American Statistical Association.
• Franklin, C., Kader, G., Mewborn, D., Moreno, J., Peck, R., Perry, M., & Scheaffer, R. (2007). Guidelines for assessment and instruction in statistics education (GAISE) report: A pre-K-12 curriculum framework. American Statistical Association.
• Gal, I. (2002). Adults' statistical literacy: Meanings, components, responsibilities. International statistical review, 70(1), 1-25. https://doi.org/10.2307/1403713.
• Gall, M., Gall, J., & Borg, R. (2007). Educational research: An introduction (8th ed.). Pearson Education.
• Garfield, J., & Ahlgren, A. (1988). Difficulties in learning basic concepts in probability and statistics: Implications for research. Journal for research in Mathematics Education, 19(1), 44-63. https://doi.org/10.2307/749110.
• Garfield, J., & Ben‐Zvi, D. (2007). How students learn statistics revisited: A current review of research on teaching and learning statistics. International statistical review, 75(3), 372-396. https://doi.org/41509878
• Garfield, J., & Ben-Zvi, D. (2008). Developing students’ statistical reasoning: Connecting research and teaching practice. Springer Science & Business Media.
• Hardy, G. H. (2004). A mathematician defense. Tübitak Popüler Bilim Kitapları.
• İnceoglu, G. (2009). Evaluation of theses in the field of mathematics education and mathematics teaching. Education Sciences, 4(3), 1046-1052. https://doi.org/19827/212432.
• İncikabı, L., Serin, M. K., Korkmaz, S., & İncikabı, S. (2017). A research on mathematics education studies published between 2009-2014 in Turkey. Adıyaman University Journal of Educational Sciences, 7(1), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.17984/adyuebd.325368.
• Jin, Y. (2004). The development of the China network digital library of theses and dissertations. Online Information Review, 28(5), 367-370. https://doi.org/10.1108/14684520410564299.
• Judi, H. M. & Sahari, N (2013). Student centered learning in statistics: Analysis of systematic review Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 103, 844 – 851. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.10.406.
• Kadın ve eğitim. (2008). T.C. Başbakanlık Kadın Statüsü Genel Müdürlüğü. Politika Dokümanı.
• Karadağ, E. (2009). A Thematic Analysis on Doctoral Dissertations Made In the Area of Education Sciences, Ahi Evran University Journal of Kırşehir Education Faculty, 10(3), 75-87. https://doi.org/59508/855693.
• Karakaş, G. (2021). The thematic, methodological and statistical analysis of flipped learning theses and dissertations in Turkey [Unpublished master thesis], Maltepe University.
• Kayaly, D. E. (2013). Towards more real-live teachings of business statistics: a Review of Challenges, Teaching Innovations and Strategies for Reform in Egypt, Working Papers 2013/21, Maastricht School of Management.
• Kayhan, M., & Özgün-Koca, S. A. (2004). Research subjects in mathematics education: 2000-2002. Hacettepe University Journal of Education, 26, 72-81. https://doi.org/8600/107083.
• Koç, D. (2020). An investigation on theses and dissertations on mathematical modeling in Turkey the last two decades [Unpublished master thesis]. Middle East Technical University.
• Kutluca, T., Hacıömeroğlu, G., & Gündüz, S. (2016). Evaluation of basic filed studies on computer assisted mathematics teaching in Turkey. Journal of Theory and Practice in Education, 12, 1253-1272
• Küçüközer, A. (2016). An overview of the ocdtoral thesis in science education, Necatibey Faculty of Education Electronic Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 10(1), 107-141 . https://doi.org/10.17522/nefefmed.54132.
• Leavy, A., Meletiou-Mavrotheris, M., & Paparistodemou, E. (2018). Statistics in early childhood and primary education: Supporting early statistical and probabilistic htinking. Springer.
• Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage.
• Lubienski, S. T., & Bowen, A. (2000). Who's counting? A survey of mathematics education research 1982–1998. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 31(5), 626-633. https://doi.org/10.2307/749890.
• Miles, M, B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded Sourcebook (2nd ed). Sage.
• Ministry of National Education [MoNE] (2005). İlköğretim matematik dersi (6-8. sınıflar) öğretim programı [Elementary mathematics (6th-8th grades) curriculum]. Devlet Kitapları Müdürlüğü Basımevi.
• Ministry of National Education [MoNE] (2020). TIMSS 2019 Türkiye Preliminary report, Education Analysis and Evaluation Reports Series.
• National Council of Teachers of Mathematics [NCTM] (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. NCTM.
• Ozan, C., & Köse, E. (2014). Research trends in curriculum and instruction. Sakarya University Journal of Education, 4(1), 116-136. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/suje/issue/20635/220033
• Özey, K. (2019). Examination of graduate thesis in algebra learning: Turkey sample between 2010-2018 [Unpublished master thesis]. Bursa Uludağ University.
• Özkaral, T. C., & Mentiş-Taş, A. (2017). Examination of master’s theses in the field of social studies and comparative education: A metasynthesis study. Electronic Turkish Studies, 12(25), 651-670. https://doi.org/10.7827/TurkishStudies.12143.
• Rhoades, E. A. (2011). Literature reviews. The Volta Review, 353-368. https://Rhoades2011LiteratureReviews-PrinterProof.pdf.
• Sevencan, A. (2019). Investigation of theses and dissertations in the field of mathematics education in Turkey [Unpublished master thesis]. Necmettin Erbakan University.
• Sevinç, B. (2001). Postgraduate education practices, problems and suggestions in Turkey. Ankara University Journal of Faculty of Educational Sciences (JFES), 34(1), 125-137. https://doi.org/10.1501/Egifak_0000000052.
• Shaughnessy, M., J. (2007). Research on Statistic learning and reasoning. In F. Lester (Ed.) Second Handbook of Research on Mathematics Teaching and Learning (pp.957-1002) National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
• Sotos, A. E. C., Vanhoof, S., Van den Noortgate, W., & Onghena, P. (2007). Students’ mis conceptions of statistical inference: A review of the empirical evidence from research on statistics education. Educational Research Review, 2(2), 98-113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2007.04.001.
• Suri, H., ve Clarke, D. (2009). Advancements in research synthe’s is methods: From a methodologically inclusive perspective. Review of Educational Research, 79(1), 395-430. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654308326349.
• Tabuk, M., İnan, M. & Tabuk, M. (2018). Examining the mathematical skills in preschool children in terms of some variables. Erzincan University Faculty of Education, 20(1), 184-201 . https://doi.org/10.17556/erziefd.290963.
• Tarman, B., Acun, İ. & Yüksel, Z. (2010). Sosyal bilgiler eğitimi alanındaki tezlerin değerlendirilmesi. Gaziantep Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 9(3), 725-746.
• Tereci, A. (2017). Comparative analysis of post-graduate theses conducted between the years 2010-2017 in the field of mathematics education in Turkey according to certain standards [Unpublished master thesis]. Gaziantep University.
• Tereci, A., & Bindak, R. (2019). Comparative analysis of post-graduate theses conducted between the years 2010-2017 in the field of mathematics education in Turkey according to certain ctandards. Muğla Sıtkı Koçman University Journal of Education, 6(1), 40-55. https://doi.org/10.21666/muefd.485737.
• Tatar, E., Akkaya, A., & Kağızmanlı, T. (2011). An analysis of the materials constructed with geoGebra by primary prospective mathematics teachers and their views about dynamic mathematics software. Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education, 2(3), 181-197. https://doi.org/10.17762/turcomat.v2i3.31.
• Tishkovskaya, S.,& Lancaster, G. (2010). Teaching strategies to promote statistical literacy: Review and implementation. In C. Reading (Ed.), Data and context in statistics education: Towards an evidence-based society. Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Teaching Statistics (ICOTS8, July, 2010), Ljubljana, Slovenia. Voorburg: International Statistical Institute, 20(2). www.stat.auckland.ac.nz/~iase/publications.php
• Tosun, T., & Ünal, D. Ö. (2019). A content analysis of the studies about data and probability learning areas. Ege Journal of Education, 20(1), 244-261. https://doi.org/10.12984/egeefd.489275.
• Ulutaş, F., & Ubuz, B. (2008). Research and trends in mathematics education: 2000 to 2006. İlköğretim Online, 7(3), 614-626.
• Van der Merwe, L., & Wilkinson, A. (2011). Mapping the field of statistics Education research in search of scholarship. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching ve Learning, 5(1), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.20429/IJSOTL2011.050129.
• Wach, E. (2013). Learning about qualitative document analysis. https://opendocs.ids.ac.uk/opendocs/bitstream/handle/20.500.12413/2989/P%20InBrEf%202%20QDA%20FINAL2.PDF?sequence=4.
• Watson J., M. (2006). Statistical Literacy at School, Growth and Goal. Lawrence Erlbaum Assocıates, Publishers. 27-53.
• Wild, J. C.; Utts, M. J. & Horton, N. J. (2018). What Is Statistics? In D. Ben-Zvi, K. Makar & J. Garfield (Eds) International Handbook of Research in Statistics Education (pp.5-36) Springer.
• Yıldırım, A., Özgürlük, B., Parlak, B., Gönen, E., & Polat, M. (2016). TIMSS 2015 National mathematics and science preliminary report Grades 4 and 8.
• TIMSS 2015 Ulusal matematik ve fen bilimleri ön raporu 4 ve 8. Sınıflar. Ministry of National Education, General Directorate of Assessment, Evaluation and Examination Services.
• Yücedağ, T, & Erdoğan, A. (2011). Investigation of mathematics education studies according to some variables studied between 2000-2009 years in Turkey. Gaziantep University Journal of Social Sciences, 10(2) , 825-838. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/jss/issue/24242/257013?publisher=gantep%3B.
• Yaşar, Ş. & Papatğa, E. (2015). The analysis of the graduate theses related to mathematics courses. Trakya University Journal of Education, 5(2), 113-124. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/trkefd/issue/21482/230218.
• Yıldırım, A. & Şimşek, H. (2011). Qualitative research methods in the social sciences. Seçkin Yayıncılık.
• Zamora Araya, J. A., Aguilar Fernández, E., & Guillén Oviedo, H. S. (2021). Educación Estadística: tendencias para su enseñanza y aprendizaje en educación secundaria y terciaria. Revista Educación, 46(1), 518–537. https://doi.org/10.15517/revedu.v46i1.43494
• Zieffler, A., Garfield, J., Alt, S., Dupuis, D., Holleque, K., & Chang, B. (2008). What does research suggest abou the teaching and learning of introductory statistics at the college level? A review of the literature. Journal of Statistics Education, 16(2). https://doi.org/10.1080/10691898.2008.11889566.
• Zieffler, A., Garfield, J., Delmas, R. C., Le, L., Isaak, R., Bjornsdottir, A., & Park, J. (2011). Publishing in SERJ: An analysis of papers from 2002–2009. Statistics Education Research Journal, 10(2), 5-26. https://doi.org/10.52041/serj.v10i2.345.