Öz

Bu çalışmada, Lorenz sistemi gibi lineer olmayan adi diferensiyel denklem sistemlerinin yaklaşık analitik çözümlerini elde edebilmek için homotopy perturbation ve varyasyonel iterasyon yöntemleri uygulandı. Homotopy perturbation yöntemi varyasyonel iterasyon yöntemi ile mukayese edildi. Varyasyonel iterasyon yöntemi perturbation yöntemi olarak bilinen diğer non lineer yöntemlerden daha üstündür. VIM yönteminin temel özelliği lineer olmayan denklemleri doğru ve uygun çözebilecek esneklikte olmasıdır. Bu yöntemde genelde Lagrange çarpanları sistemler için düzeltme fonksiyoneli ile elde edildi. Çarpanlar varyasyonel teori ile belirlendi. VIM ve HPM yöntemlerini karşılaştırmak için bir kaç tane grafik sunuldu

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Varyasyonel iterasyon yöntemi, Homotopy perturbation yöntemi, Lorenz sistemi

Variational iteration and homotopy perturbation method for solving Lorenz system

Öz

In this paper, homotopy perturbation method and variational iteration method are implemented to give approximate and analytical solutions of nonlinear ordinary differential equation systems such as Lorenz system. Homotopy perturbation is compared the variational iteration method for Lorenz system. The variational iteration method is predominant than the other non-linear methods, such as perturbation method. The main property of the VIM method is in its flexibility and ability to solve nonlinear equations accurately and conveniently. In this method, in general Lagrange multipliers are constructed by correction functionals for the systems. Multipliers can be identified by the variational theory. Some plots are presented to compare of the VIM and HPM

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Variational iteration method, Homotopy perturbation method, Lorenz system

Kaynakça

1. [1] M. Rafei , H. Daniali, D.D. Ganji, “Variational iteration method for solving the epidemic model and the prey and predator problem”, Applied Mathematics and Computation. 186 (2007) 1701–1709
2. [2] R. Barrio,_, S. Serrano, A three-parametric study of the Lorenz model, Physica D 229 (2007) 43–51
3. [3] J.H. He, A coupling method of homotopy technique and perturbation technique for nonlinear problems. Int J Non-Linear Mech 2000;35:37–43. [4] D.W. Jordan, P. Smith, Nonlinear Ordinary Differential Equations, third ed., Oxford University Press, 1999.
4. [5] J. Biazar, “Solution of the epidemic model by Adomian decomposition method”, Applied Mathematics and Computation 173 (2) (2006) 1101–1106.
5. [6] MSH. Chowdhury, I. Hashim, Application of homotopy-perturbation method to Klein–Gordon and sine-Gordon equations. Chaos Solitons & Fractals, in press.
6. [7] J.H. He Homotopy perturbation method for solving boundary value problems. Phys Lett A 2006;350:87–8.
7. [8] J. Biazar, M. Ilie, A. Khoshkenar,” A new approach to the solution of the prey and predator problem and comparison of the results with the Adomian method”, Applied Mathematics and Computation 171 (1) (2005) 486–491.
8. [9] J.H. He, “A new approach to nonlinear partial differential equations, Communications in” Nonlinear Science and Numerical Simulation 2 (4) (1997) 230–235.

9. [10] J.H. He, X.H. Wu, “Construction of solitary solution and compacton-like solution by variational iteration method”, Chaos, Solitons & Fractals 29 (1) (2006) 108– 113.
10. [11] J.H. He, “Approximate analytical solution for seepage flow with fractional derivatives in porous media”, Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 167 (1–2) (1998) 57–68.
11. [12] J.H. He, “Approximate solution of nonlinear differential equations with convolution product nonlinearities”, Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 167 (1–2) (1998) 69–73.
12. [13] J.H. He,” Variational iteration method—a kind of nonlinear analytical technique”: some examples, International Journal of Nonlinear Mechanics 34 (4) (1999) 699–708.
13. [14] J.H. He, Some asymptotic methods for strongly nonlinear equations, International Journal of Modern Physics B 20 (10) (2006) 1141–1199.
14. [15] M.A. Abdou, A.A. Soliman, Variational-iteration method for solving Burger’s and coupled Burger’s equations, Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics 181 (2) (2005) 245–251.
15. [16] J.H. He, Homotopy perturbation method for solving boundary value problems. Phys Lett A 2006;350:87–8.
16. [17] A.A. Soliman, A numerical simulation and explicit solutions of KdV–Burgers’ and Lax’s seventh-order KdV equations, Chaos,Solitons & Fractals 29 (2) (2006) 294– 302.
17. [18] M. Inokuti et al., General use of the Lagrange multiplier in non-linear mathematical physics, in: S. Nemat-Nasser (Ed.), Variational Method in the Mechanics of Solids, Pergamon Press, Oxford, 1978, pp. 156–162.
18. [19] J.H. He, Semi-inverse method of establishing generalized principles for fluid mechanics with emphasis on turbomachinery aerodynamics, International Journal of Turbo Jet-Engines 14 (1) (1997) 23–28.
19. [20] B.A. Finlayson, The Method of Weighted Residuals and Variational Principles, Academic press, New York, 1972.
20. [21] He JH. Homotopy perturbation technique. Comput Methods Appl Mech Engrg 1999,178,257–62.
21. [22] He JH. A coupling method of a homotopy technique and a perturbation technique for non-linear problems. Int J Non-linear Mech 2000,35(1),37–43.
22. [23] E Coskun, M Merdan. Global stability and periodic solution of a viral dynamic model. Journal of Science of science and art faculty, 2007,2(2),256-267.
23. [24] Dadfar MB, Geer J, Andersen CM. Perturbation analysis of the limit cycle of the free Van der Pol equation. SIAM J Appl Math 1984;44(5).
24. [25] Dadfar MB, Geer J, Andersen CM. Perturbation analysis of the limit cycle of the free Van der Pol equation. SIAM J Appl Math 1984;44(5)