CONDITION OF INDIAN MUSLIMS IN BRITISH ARMY AFTER THEY WERE CAPTURED IN THE WAR OF KUT AL AMARA

Öz

During the First World War, the soldiers of the Ottoman Empire had to fight many fronts because of its geopolitical importance and breadth of its territories. One of these fronts was Iraq and specifically in the region of Kut and Imara. Conflicts in this region changed the course of history. The clashes here clearly resulted in the victory of the Ottoman forces. The victory of Kutü'l-Amare, as the Turks call it, was one of the most important victories won by the Turkish Army during the First World War. Defeating the British Army which sought to occupy Baghdad not only increased reputation and glory of The Turkish Army, but also caused losing prestige of the British Army.

The Great Britain, which had emerged from the Industrial Revolution and gained many colonies, wanted to secure the colonial India where had rich mineral resources. Therefore, she tried to control the route which was from the Mediterranean to India. It also known as the “Imperial Road” in 20th century. In line with these ambitions, she made various plans to occupy to the Ottoman territories. Indeed, the Persian Gulf was occupied before the Ottoman Empire entered the war. Accordingly, a division including Indian soldiers were landed in Bahrain for this purpose in October 1914. Afterwards, she invaded to Basra and started to move towards Baghdad.

Since Kurna as a strategic place where the Euphrates and the Tigris meet was seized by the British forces, Süleyman Askeri Bey was sent to Iraq by Enver Pasha, who was a Minister of War and Deputy Commander, in order to maintain effective fight against the British and liberate Basra.

Süleyman Askeri Bey, a commander of Iraq, believed the achievement of unconventional warfare methods. Therefore, he tried to fight against the British with supports of volunteers of Teşkilat-ı Mahsusa. His attack which was supported by 10.000 volunteers Arab mujahid to liberate Basra was stopped by the British forces in January 1915. It was suffered serious casualties. Indeed, he also was injured. Even though his first attempt was unsuccessful, he began to preparation to cut return ways of British forces in Kurna and capture Basra. In April 1915, he started to collect his troops around Nasıriyye in the Valley of Euphrates. In the meantime, it was received instructions from Istanbul in order to supply deficient weapons and ammunition from military troops in the region.

The military landing operation from from the Persian Gulf to the North resulted in heavy losses in the conflicts in Selman-ı Pak and started rapid British withdrawal process. The commander of British forces, General Townshend, retreated 150 kilometers in a week and reached the castle of Kut. British troops that took refuge in the Kut Castle. The castle was besieged on the 5th December, 1915.

The Turks besieged the British troops here and forced them to surrender. There were a total of 13,309 people; 204 Indian officers, 6,988 Indian privates, 3,248 non-combatant assistants, 5 British generals, 272 British officers and 2,592 British privates.

The British soldiers, captured by Ottoman soldiers in Kutü’l Amare, were an Indian division, and most of them were Indian. The population of the Indian division was 13,309, there were only 2,900 British officers and soldiers. The rest of them were Indian. Among these Indians, there were about 200 Muslim soldiers, from Punjab. Some of the Muslim Indian soldiers escaped during  the siege of the Kutü’l Amare and joined the Turkish Army. some of those who tried to escape to the Turkish side were shot by the British, and those who were arrested were executed.

On the afternoon of April 29, the Turkish troops under the command of Major Nazmi Bey sang the national anthems and entered Kutü’l Amare. With the joy and cheer of the people in Kut town, they raised the Turkish flag to the government mansion. British soldiers who had undergone individual health checks, afterwards they were given some food. Turkish soldiers were very kind and respectful to General Townshend, who surrendered with all his soldiers. His sword was returned to him, so his military honor was not damaged. Iraqi Group Commander Halil Pasha himself was very kind to Townshend, shook hands with him and had lunch together in his tent.

Indian Muslim soldiers in the British Army were reluctant to fight against the Ottoman Empire, the Muslim Turks, the soldiers of the Caliph in Iraq. Because there are many holy places for Shiite Muslims in Iraq and these places are close to the war zone, especially Shiite Muslim Indian soldiers did not want to fight in this region. In fact, between 1914 and 1916, three Indian regiments rebelled in order to not fight against the Turks in Iraq. Their dissatisfaction and reluctance derived from Pan-Islamist propaganda in the North West India before the war.

The Ottoman Empire kept the officers and soldiers of the allied states in camps in accordance with the international law. Indian Muslim officers and soldiers who were taken prisoner in Kutü'l Amare battles due to their religious identity were treated in a different way. In spite of non-Muslim British captives and other religions of Indian religions, they were more freed in their host cities. They were allowed to wander freely in the cities, engage in social activities and even come together to read the Qur'an and create masjids to worship. In accordance with the relevant provisions of the Mudros Armistice signed on 30 October 1918, British and Indian Muslim prisoners in the hands of the Ottoman Empire were released and began to return to their countries.

This study focuses on the sixth Indian Division which was taken captive in Kutü'l Amare and the captivation process of General Townshend and his British and Indian soldiers. It seeks to put forward the factors affecting the positive results of the relations of Turks with Indian Muslims at an unusual time. In this study, memories, secondary sources and archival documents were used.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Kut Al Amara,English forces,Ottoman state,Indian Muslims

KUTÜ’L AMARE’DE ESİR ALINAN İNGİLİZ ORDUSUNDAKİ HİNTLİ MÜSLÜMAN ASKERLERİN DURUMU

Öz

Birinci Dünya Savaşı’nda Osmanlı Devleti askerleri, hem jeopolitik hem de sahip olduğu toprakların genişliği dolayısıyla pek çok cephede savaşmak durumunda kalmıştır. Kutü’l Amare Zaferi, Birinci Dünya Savaşı’nda Türk Ordusu’nun kazandığı en önemli muvaffakiyetlerden birisiydi. Bağdat’ı fethetmek için yola çıkan İngiliz kuvvetlerinin teslim alınması, Türk Ordusu’na itibar ve şan kazandırdığı gibi İngiliz ordusunun prestij kaybına uğramasına sebep olmuştu.

Kutü’l Amare muhasarasında teslim olan İngiliz kuvveti; 5 General, 272 İngiliz subayı, 2592 İngiliz eri, 204 Hint subayı, 6988 Hint eri, 3.248 muharip olmayan yardımcı sınıflardan hizmet erleri olmak üzere toplam 13.309 kişiden oluşmaktaydı.

Kutü’l Amare’de esir alınan İngiliz askerleri bir Hint tümeniydi ve askerlerinin çoğu Hintli idi. 13 bin kişilik Hint tümeninde subay ve er olarak yalnız 2.900 İngiliz vardı. Geri kalanı Hintli idi. Bu Hintliler içerisinde çoğu Pencap Bölgesi’nden yaklaşık 2.00 Müslüman asker bulunuyordu. Bu Müslüman askerlerden bazıları Kutü’l Amâre’de muhasara altındayken kaçarak Türk ordusuna katılmıştı. Kuşatma boyunca bu ilticalar sürmüş, Türk tarafına kaçmaya çalışanlardan bazıları vurulmuş, yakalananlar idam edilmişti.

Bu çalışmada temel olarak Kutü’l Amare’de esir alınan İngiliz 6. Hint Tümeni ve bu tümenin komutanı General Townshend’la beraber esir düşen İngiliz ve Hintli subay ve erlerin esir alınış süreci ve bilhassa Hintliler arasında bulunan Müslüman askerlere karşı takip edilen esaret politikası ele alınmış ve incelenmiştir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Kutü’l Amare,İngiliz Kuvvetleri,Osmanlı Devleti,Hintli Müslüman Askerler,Esaret Politikası

Kaynakça

1. Kutü’l- Amare Kuşatması ve Zaferi, Askeri Tarih Belgeleri Dergisi, Genelkurmay Başkanlığı ATASE yayınları, s.198, Belge No.59-2,, Ankara 2016.
2. Ahmed İzzet Paşa, Feryadım, Cilt I, Nehir Yayınları, İstanbul 1992.
3. Ahmet İzzet Paşa, Feryadım, C.II. , Nehir Yayınları, İstanbul-1993.
4. Avcı, Orhan, Irak’ta Türk Ordusu 1914-1918, Vadi Yay., Ankara 2004.
5. Balkış, Behzat ve Fırat, Nezihi, Birinci Dünya Harbi’nde Türk Harbi Irak-İran Cephesi, C. I-III. Gnkur. ATASE Bşk.lığı Yay., Ankara 1979.
6. Bayur, Yusuf Hikmet, Türk İnkılâbı Tarihi, C. III, Kısım I, Ankara 1983.
7. Belen, Fahri, Birinci Cihan Harbinde Türk Harbi, 1915 Yılı Hareketleri, C. II, Kara Kuvvetleri Yay., Ankara 1964.
8. Birinci Dünya Savaşı’nda Türk Harbi, C:3, Irak-İran Cephesi 1914-1918, I. Kısım, Genelkurmay Basımevi, Ankara 1979.

9. Duman, Selçuk, II. Meşrutiyetten İngiliz Mandaterliğine Irak, Berikan Yay. Ankara 2010.
10. Durak, Durdu Mehmet, Birinci Dünya Savaşı’nda Türk İngiliz İlişkileri, Babil Yayınları, Ankara 2005.
11. Genelkurmay Harp Tarihi Başkanlığı, Türk İstiklal Harbine Katılan Tümen ve Daha Üst Rütbedeki Komutanların Biyografileri, Ankara 1972.
12. Görgülü, İsmet, On Yıllık Harbin Kadrosu 1912-1922, TTK Basımevi, Ankara 1993.
13. Halil Paşa, Bitmeyen Savaş, (Haz.: Taylan Sorgun), Kamer Yay. İstanbul 1997.
14. Kanatlı, Şükrü, Irak Muharebelerinde 3’ncü Piyade Alayı Hatıraları, Genelkurmay ATASE Yayınları, Ankara 2006.
15. Keleşyılmaz, Vahdet, Teşkilât-ı Mahsusa’nın Hindistan Misyonu (1914-1918), Atatürk Araştırma Merkezi Yay., Ankara 1999.
16. Koloğlu, Orhan, Bedevi, Lavrens, Arap-Türk, İstanbul 1993.
17. Mutlu, Cengiz, I. Dünya Savaşı’nda Amele Taburları (1914-1918), IQ Kültür Sanat Yayıncılık, İstanbul 2007.
18. Özçelik, Mücahit, Birinci Dünya Savaşı’nda Türkiye’deki Esirler, Türk Tarih Kurumu Yay., Ankara 2013.
19. Sabis, Ali İhsan, Harp Hatıralarım, C. 2, Güneş Matbaası, Ankara 1951.
20. Sabis, Ali İhsan, Birinci Dünya Harbi, Nehir Yay., İstanbul 1991.
21. Sanders, Liman Von, Türkiye’de Beş Sene, (Haz.: Mustafa Albayrak), Yeditepe Yayınları, İstanbul 2006.
22. Taş, Necati Fahri, Nurettin Paşa ve Tarihi Gerçekler, Nehir Yay., İstanbul 1997.
23. Taş, Necati Fahri, Nurettin Paşa, Atatürk Araştırma Merkezi Başkanlığı, Ankara 2014.
24. Tetik, Ahmet, Teşkilat-ı Mahsusa (Umur-u Şarkıyye Dairesi) Tarihi, 1914-1916, C. I, Türkiye İş Bankası Yay. İstanbul 2014.
25. Townshend, Charles V.F., Irak Seferi ve Esaret, Yeditepe Yayınevi, İstanbul 2007.
26. Townshend, Charles V.F., Mezopotamya Seferim, Kurna, Kutülamare ve Selmanı Pak Muharebeleri, (Çev.: Gürol Koca), Türkiye İş Bankası Yay., Ankara 2012.
27. Akkor, Mahmut, “I. Dünya Savaşı’nda Kocaeli’nde İngiliz Esirleri,” Uluslararası Gazi Akçokoca Sempozyumu Bildiri Kitapçığı, Kocaeli 2016, ss. 849-867.
28. Çelik, Akın, ve Selçuk, Mustafa, “Tarafların Basınında Kutü’l Amare Zaferi”, Tarihin Peşinde, , S. 15, 2016, ss. 301-327.
29. Demir, Enes, “Kutü’l Amâre’de Esir Alınan İngiliz Birlikleri ve Esirlerin Durumları”, Kutü’l Amâre Zaferi’nin 100.Yılı Münasebetiyle I. Dünya Savaşı’nda Irak Cephesi Uluslararası Sempozyumu 28-29 Nisan 2016 Bildiri Kitabı, (Yay. Haz. Orhan Neçare), Ankara 2016, ss. 127-152.
30. Küçükvatan, Mahir, “İngiliz Basınında Osmanlı’nın Kutü’l Amare Zaferi”, Çağdaş Türkiye Tarihi Araştırmaları Dergisi, C. XIII/26, Bahar Sayısı, İzmir 2013, ss. 55-85.
31. Özçelik, Mücahit “Kut’ül Amare Zaferinin Türk Basınına Yansımaları”, Turkish Studies, 10/9, Ankara 2015, ss. 367-388.
32. Sakin, Serdar, “Birinci Dünya Savaşı’nda Irak Cephesi’nde Osmanlı Devleti İle İngiltere Arasındaki Çarpışmalar (1915)”, Akademik Bakış, C. 4, S. 7, Ankara 2010, ss. 133-152.
33. Sakin, Serdar, “Ordu Lojistik Sisteminin Önemi Açısından Kut’ül-Amare Savaşı ve Resulayn-Musul Menzil Hattı”, Sosyal Bilimler Araştırma Dergisi, Y. VII, S. 14, Eylül 2009.
34. Türkmen, Zekeriya, “Birinci Dünya Harbi’nde Irak Cephesi’nde Türk-İngiliz Mücadelesi”, 1914’den 2014’e 100’ üncü Yılında Birinci Dünya Savaşını Anlamak 20-21 Kasım 2014, Uluslararası Sempozyum Bildirileri,, Harp Akademileri Komutanlığı Yay., İstanbul 2015, ss. 381-433.
35. Türkmen, Zekeriya, “Birinci Dünya Harbi’nde Irak Cephesi’nde Türk-İngiliz Mücadelesi ve Kutü’l Amare Zaferi”, 100’ncü Yılında Kutü’l-Amare Zaferi Kitabı, (Ed.: Zekeriya Türkmen), Askeri Müze ve Kültür Sitesi Komutanlığı, İstanbul 2016, ss. 22-60.
36. Üzen, İsmet, “Türklerin Kut’ül-Amare Kuşatması Sırasında İngiliz Ordusunda Bulunan Hintli Askerlerin Tutumu (Aralık 1915-Nisan 1916)”, Gazi Akademik Bakış, C. 2, S. 3, Kış 2008, ss. 81-102.
37. Yalçın, Edip Semih ve Keleşyılmaz, Vahdet, “Birinci Dünya Savaşı’nda İstanbul’da Kurulan Genç Hindistan ve Seyfi Hindistan Cemiyetleri”, V. Askeri Tarih Semineri Bildirileri, C. I, Ankara 1996.
38. Akkor, Mahmut, I. Dünya Savaşı’nda Anadolu’daki İngiliz Esir Kampları, (Basılmamış Doktora Tezi), Sakarya Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Sakarya 2013.
39. Saygı, Tarık, İngiliz Generali Townshend ve Türkler, (Basılmamış Doktora Tezi), İstanbul Üniversitesi, Atatürk İlkeleri ve İnkılâp Tarihi Enstitüsü, İstanbul 2011.