Çin’in Büyük Dönüşümü Sürdürülebilir mi? Çevresel Faktörler ve İktisadi Dinamikler Arasındaki İlişkinin Analizi

Seyit Ordu; Bahar Burtan Doğan

doi:10.25229/beta.1552228

EN TR

Çin’in Büyük Dönüşümü Sürdürülebilir mi? Çevresel Faktörler ve İktisadi Dinamikler Arasındaki İlişkinin Analizi

Öz

Çin hükümetinin özellikle 1980 yılından sonra uygulamaya koyduğu reformist politikalarla birlikte, Çin’in ekonomik yapısında büyük dönüşümler yaşanmıştır. Ekonomik yapıda yaşanan bu büyük dönüşümün, günümüzde Çin’in sürdürülebilir büyümesini tehdit eden bir sorun haline geldiği düşünülmektedir. Dolayısıyla bu sorunların temelini oluşturan çevresel faktörler ve iktisadi dinamikler arasındaki ilişkinin incelenmesi önem arz etmektedir. Yapılan bu çalışmanın temel motivasyonunu, Çin’de ekonomik büyümenin, beşerî sermayenin, doğal kaynak rantının ve kentleşmenin ekolojik ayak izi üzerindeki etkisi oluşturmaktadır. Çin için 1980-2021 dönemine ait yıllık veriler kullanılarak, değişkenler arasındaki eşbütünleşme analizi için Pesaran vd. (2001) tarafından geliştirilen ARDL sınır testi kullanılırken, nedensellik analizi için Hacker ve Hatemi-J (2006)’nin geliştirdiği simetrik, asimetrik nedensellik analizi için ise Hatemi-J (2012) tarafından geliştirilen nedensellik testleri tercih edilmiştir. Elde edilen ampirik bulgulara göre, değişkenler arasında eşbütünleşme ilişkisine ulaşılırken, ekolojik ayak izi ve beşerî sermayeye ait simetrik nedensellik dışında tüm değişkenler arasında hem simetrik hem de asimetrik nedensellik ilişkisine ulaşılmıştır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Çin Ekonomisi, Çevresel Kalite, Eşbütünleşme-Nedensellik Analizi

Kaynakça

Adebayo, S. T. (2020). Revisiting the EKC hypothesis in an emerging market: An application of ARDL-based bounds and wavelet coherence approaches. SN Applied Sciences, 2, 1945. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-020-03705-y
Adeel-Farooq, R. M., Raji, J. O., & Adeleye, B. N. (2021). Economic growth and methane emission: Testing the EKC hypothesis in ASEAN economies. Management of Environmental Quality, 32(2), 277–289. https://doi.org/10.1108/MEQ-07-2020-0149
Aghajani, H., Sarkari, F., & Borhani, H. (2024). Coupling coordination analysis between urbanization and ecology in Iran. Frontiers of Urban and Rural Planning, 2(5), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44243-024-00031-4
Ahmad, F., Draz, U. M., Chandio, A. A., Ahmad, M., Su, L., Shahzad, F., & Jia, M. (2022). Natural resources and environmental quality: Exploring the regional variations among Chinese provinces with a novel approach. Resources Policy, 77, 102745. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2022.102745
Ahmed, Z., & Wang, Z. (2019). Investigating the impact of human capital on the ecological footprint in India: An empirical analysis. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 26, 26782–26796. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-05911-7
Ahmed, Z., Asghar, M. M., Malik, N. M., & Nawaz, K. (2020). Moving towards a sustainable environment: The dynamic linkage between natural resources, human capital, urbanization, economic growth, and ecological footprint in China. Resources Policy, 67, 101677. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2020.101677
Ahmed, Z., Wang, Z., & Ali, S. (2019). Investigating the non-linear relationship between urbanization and CO₂ emissions: An empirical analysis. Air Quality, Atmosphere & Health, 12, 945–953. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11869-019-00711-x
Akbostancı, E., Aşık-Türüt, S., & Tunç, İ. G. (2009). The relationship between income and environment in Turkey: Is there an environmental Kuznets curve? Energy Policy, 37(3), 861–867. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2008.09.088
Al-Mulali, U., Fereidouni, G. H., Lee, M. Y. J., & Sab, C. B. N. C. (2013). Exploring the relationship between urbanization, energy consumption, and CO₂ emission in MENA countries. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 23, 107–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2013.02.041
Amin, A., Yusoff, M. B. Y. N., Peng, S., Işık, C., Ullah, A., & Akbar, M. (2024). The influence of energy transition, and natural resources on carbon emissions in China: An augmented ARDL application. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-023-04398-0

Awan, A., Kocoğlu, M., Tunc, A., Tiwari, K. A., & Yusoff, M. Y. N. (2024). Nuclear energy, human capital, and urbanization tackling environmental concerns in India: Evidence from QARDL and quantile co-integration. Environment, Development and Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-024-04789-x
Aytun, C., Erdogan, S., Pata, K. U., & Cengiz, O. (2024). Associating environmental quality, human capital, financial development and technological innovation in 19 middle-income countries: A disaggregated ecological footprint approach. Technology in Society, 76, 102445. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2023.102445
Azam, M., & Khan, Q. A. (2015). Urbanization and environmental degradation: Evidence from four SAARC countries—Bangladesh, India, Pakistan, and Sri Lanka. Environmental Progress & Sustainable Energy, 35(3), 823–832. https://doi.org/10.1002/ep.12282
Bakkal, H. (2022). Ekonomik büyüme, doğrudan yabancı yatırımları, finansal gelişme ve ekolojik ayak izi arasındaki ilişki: ABD ve Çin üzerine ampirik bir analiz. Anadolu Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 23(3), 366–386. https://doi.org/10.53443/anadoluibfd.1139809
Bekun, V. F., Alola, A. A., & Sarkodie, A. S. (2019). Toward a sustainable environment: Nexus between CO₂ emissions, resource rent, renewable and nonrenewable energy in 16-EU countries. Science of the Total Environment, 657, 1023–1029. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.12.104
Bilgili, F., Koçak, E., Bulut, Ü., & Kuloğlu, A. (2017). The impact of urbanization on energy intensity: Panel data evidence considering cross-sectional dependence and heterogeneity. Energy, 133, 242–256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2017.05.121
Cai, Y., Zhou, P., Zhang, Y., & Shen, Y. (2023). Natural resources extraction and sustainable environment: COP26 perspective for China. Resources Policy, 82, 103530. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2023.103530
Chen, Y., Lee, C.-C., & Chen, M. (2021). Ecological footprint, human capital, and urbanization. Energy and Environment, 33(3), 487–510. https://doi.org/10.1177/0958305X2110086
Chen, Z. M., & Chen, G. Q. (2011). An overview of energy consumption of the globalized world economy. Energy Policy, 39(10), 5920–5928. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2011.06.046
Çakar, D. N., Gedikli, A., Erdoğan, S., & Yıldırım, Ç. D. (2021). Exploring the nexus between human capital and environmental degradation: The case of EU countries. Journal of Environmental Management, 295, 113057. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113057
Çamkaya, S. (2024). Yenilenebilir enerji ve sanayileşmenin çevre üzerindeki etkisinin Stırpat-Kaya-EKC hipotezi çerçevesinde analizi: AARDL modelinden kanıtlar. Bingöl University Journal of Economics and Administrative Sciences, 8(1), 107–125. https://doi.org/10.33399/biibfad.1359874
Çamkaya, S., Karaaslan, A., & Uçan, F. (2022). Investigation of the effect of human capital on environmental pollution: Empirical evidence from Turkey. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30, 23925–23937. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-23923-8
Dada, T. J., Adeiza, A., Ismail, A. N., & Marina, A. (2022). Investigating the link between economic growth, financial development, urbanization, natural resources, human capital, trade openness and ecological footprint: Evidence from Nigeria. Journal of Bioeconomics, 24, 153–179. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10818-021-09323-x
Danish, Baloch, M. A., Mahmood, N., & Zhang, W. J. (2019). Effect of natural resources, renewable energy and economic development on CO₂ emissions in BRICS countries. Science of the Total Environment, 678, 632–638. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.05.028
Danish, Ulucak, R., & Khan, D. U. S. (2020). Relationship between energy intensity and CO₂ emissions: Does economic policy matter? Sustainable Development, 28(5), 1457–1464. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2098
Destek, A. M., & Özsoy, N. F. (2015). Relationships between economic growth, energy consumption, globalization, urbanization and environmental degradation in Turkey. International Journal of Energy and Statistics, 3(4), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1142/S2335680415500179
Dickey, A. D., & Fuller, A. W. (1979). Distribution of the estimators for autoregressive time series with a unit root. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 74(366a), 427–431. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1979.10482531
Dinda, S. (2004). Environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis: A survey. Ecological Economics, 49(4), 431–455. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2004.02.011
Dogan, E., & Lotz-Inglesi, R. (2020). The impact of economic structure to the environmental Kuznets curve (EKC) hypothesis: Evidence from European countries. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27, 12717–12724. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-07878-2
Ghazouani, T., & Maktouf, S. (2023). Impact of natural resources, trade openness, and economic growth on CO₂ emissions in oil-exporting countries: A panel autoregressive distributed lag analysis. A United Nations Sustainable Development Journal, 48(1), 211–231. https://doi.org/10.1111/1477-8947.12318
Gökçe, C. E., & Kızılkaya, F. (2022). Türkiye için turizm kaynaklı EKC hipotezinin test edilmesi. Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 19(1), 352–368. https://doi.org/10.33437/ksusbd.875357
Grossman, M. G., & Krueger, B. A. (1991). Environmental impacts of a North American free trade agreement. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper Series, 3914. https://doi.org/10.3386/w3914
Grossman, M. G., & Krueger, B. A. (1995). Economic growth and the environment. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110(2), 353–377. https://doi.org/10.2307/2118443
Hacker, S. R., & Hatemi-J, A. (2006). Tests for causality between integrated variables using asymptotic and bootstrap distributions: Theory and application. Applied Economics, 38(13), 1489–1500. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036840500405763
Hatemi-J, A. (2012). Asymmetric causality tests with an application. Empirical Economics, 43, 447–456. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-011-0484-x
Hondroyiannis, G., Papapetrou, E., & Tsalaporta, P. (2022). New insights on the contribution of human capital to environmental degradation: Evidence from heterogeneous and cross-correlated countries. Energy Economics, 116, 106416. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2022.106416
How the footprint works. (2019, July 18). Global Footprint Network: Advancing the Science of Sustainability. https://www.footprintnetwork.org/our-work/ecological-footprint/
Huang, Z., & Ren, X. (2024). Impact of natural resources, resilient economic growth, and energy consumption on CO₂ emissions. Resources Policy, 90, 104714. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2024.104714
Hussain, J., Khan, A., & Zhou, K. (2020). The impact of natural resource depletion on energy use and CO₂ emission in Belt & Road Initiative countries: A cross-country analysis. Energy, 199, 117409. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2020.117409
Hussain, M. M., Pal, S., & Villanthenkodath, A. M. (2023). Towards sustainable development: The impact of transport infrastructure expenditure on the ecological footprint in India. Innovation and Green Development, 2(2). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.igd.2023.100037
International Renewable Energy Agency. (n.d.). Renewable energy capacity for China. https://www.irena.org/Data I rfan, M., & Shaw, K. (2017). Modeling the effects of energy consumption and urbanization on environmental pollution in South Asian countries: A nonparametric panel approach. Quality and Quantity, 51, 65–78. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-015-0294-x
Isiksal, Z. A., Assi, F. A., Zhanakov, A., Rakhmetullina, Z. S., & Joof, F. (2022). Natural resources, human capital, and CO₂ emissions: Missing evidence from the Central Asian States. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29, 77333–77343. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-21227-5
Işık, C., Ongan, S., & Özdemir, D. (2019). Testing the EKC hypothesis for ten US states: An application of heterogeneous panel estimation method. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 26, 10846–10853. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-04514-6
Kakar, A., Khan, A., & Khan, A. (2023). Analyzing the role of governance, ICT, and urbanization on environment in South Asian countries. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 15, 2682–2703. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-023-01288-8
Kim, D., & Go, S. (2020). Human capital and environmental sustainability. Sustainability, 12(11), 4736. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12114736
Kirikkaleli, D., & Kalmaz, B. T. (2020). Testing the moderating role of urbanization on the environmental Kuznets curve: Empirical evidence from an emerging market. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27, 38169–38180. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-09870-2
Kocoğlu, M., Jahanger, A., Awan, A., Barak, D., & Lorente-Balsalobre, D. (2023). Examining the nonlinear impact of human capital on environmental degradation in N-11 countries:An application of the PSTR approach. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30, 74265–74279. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-27426-y
Kwakwa, A. P., Alhassan, H., & Adu, G. (2019). Effect of natural resources extraction on energy consumption and carbon dioxide emission in Ghana. International Journal of Energy Sector Management, 14(1), 20–39. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJESM-09-2018-0003
Li, Y., & Huang, Y. (2023). Enhancing resources efficiency: Studying economic development in resource-rich regions for long-term sustainability of China. Resources Policy, 86(A), 104234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2023.104234
Liang, W., & Yang, M. (2019). Urbanization, economic growth and environmental pollution: Evidence from China. Sustainable Computing: Informatics and Systems, 21, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.suscom.2018.11.007
List, J. A., & Gallet, C. A. (1999). The Kuznets curve: What happens after the inverted-U? Review of Development Economics, 3, 200–206. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9361.00061
Liu, H., Wong, W. K., Cong, P. T., Nassani, A. A., Haffar, M., & Rumman-Abu, A. (2023). Linkage among urbanization, energy consumption, economic growth and carbon emissions: Panel data analysis for China using ARDL model. Fuel, 332(2), 126122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2022.126122
Liu, J., & Diamond, J. (2005). China's environment in a globalizing world. Nature, 435, 1179–1186. https://doi.org/10.1038/4351179a
Liu, X., & Bae, J. (2018). Urbanization and industrialization impact of CO₂ emissions in China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 172, 178–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.10.156
Liu, X., Sun, T., Feng, Q., & Zhang, D. (2020). Dynamic nonlinear influence of urbanization on China’s electricity consumption: Evidence from dynamic economic growth threshold effect. Energy, 196, 117187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2020.117187
Longoni, A., Luzzini, D., & Guerci, M. (2018). Deploying environmental management across functions: The relationship between green human resource management and green supply chain management. Journal of Business Ethics, 151, 1081–1095. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3228-1
Luzzati, T., & Orsini, M. (2009). Investigating the energy-environmental Kuznets curve. Energy, 34(3), 291–300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2008.07.006
Mahmood, H., Furqan, M., Hassan, M. S., & Rej, S. (2023). The environmental Kuznets curve (EKC) hypothesis in China: A review. Sustainability, 15(7), 6110. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15076110
Mahmood, N., Wang, Z., & Hassan, T. S. (2019). Renewable energy, economic growth, human capital, and CO₂ emission: An empirical analysis. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 26, 20619–20630. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-05387-5
Menendez-Lopez, C. A., Perez, R., & Moreno, B. (2014). Environmental costs and renewable energy: Re-visiting the Environmental Kuznets Curve. Journal of Environmental Management, 145, 368–373. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.07.017
Muhammad, B., & Khan, K. M. (2021). Foreign direct investment inflow, economic growth, energy consumption, globalization, and carbon dioxide emission around the world. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28, 55643–55654. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-14857-8
Nathaniel, P. S., Yalçiner, K., & Bekun, V. F. (2021). Assessing the environmental sustainability corridor: Linking natural resources, renewable energy, human capital, and ecological footprint in BRICS. Resources Policy, 70, 101924. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2020.101924
Ogboola, O. M., Bekun, V. F., & Joshua, U. (2021). Pathway to environmental sustainability: Nexus between economic growth, energy consumption, CO₂ emission, oil rent and total natural resources rent in Saudi Arabia. Resources Policy, 74, 102380. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2021.102380
Pata, K. U., Naimoğlu, M., Karlılar, S., & Kartal, T. M. (2024). Analyzing the EKC hypothesis for the top 10 energy-importing countries: A perspective for the COP27 targets. Air Quality, Atmosphere and Health, 17, 953–966. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11869-023-01490-2
Perman, R., & Stern, D. I. (2003). Evidence from panel unit root and cointegration tests that the Environmental Kuznets Curve does not exist. Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 47, 325–347. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8489.00216
Pesaran, M. H., Shin, Y., & Smith, R. J. (2001). Bounds testing approaches to the analysis of level relationship. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 16(3), 289–326. https://doi.org/10.1002/jae.616
Phillips, B. C. P., & Perron, P. (1988). Testing for a unit root in time series regression. Biometrika, 75(2), 335–346. https://doi.org/10.2307/2336182
Pradhan, P. R., Arvin, B. M., & Nair, M. (2021). Urbanization, transportation infrastructure, ICT, and economic growth: A temporal causal analysis. Cities, 115, 103213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2021.103213
Rahman, M. M., & Alam, K. (2021). Clean energy, population density, urbanization and environmental pollution nexus: Evidence from Bangladesh. Renewable Energy, 172, 1063–1072. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2021.03.103
Romer, M. P. (1986). Increasing returns and long-run growth. Journal of Political Economy, 94(5), 3–22. https://doi.org/10.1086/261420
Salari, M., Javid, J. R., & Noghanibehambari, H. (2021). The nexus between CO₂ emissions, energy consumption, and economic growth in the U.S. Economic Analysis and Policy, 69, 182–194.
Saleem, N., Rahman, S.-u., & Jun, Z. (2019). The impact of human capital and biocapacity on environment: Environmental quality measure through ecological footprint and greenhouse gases. Journal of Pollution Effects and Control, 7(2), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.35248/2375-4397.19.7.23
Sapci, O., & Shogren, J. F. (2017). Environmental quality, human capital and growth. Journal of Environmental Economics and Policy, 7(2), 184–203. https://doi.org/10.1080/21606544.2017.1384403
Sarkodie, A. S. (2020). Causal effect of environmental factors, economic indicators and domestic material consumption using frequency domain causality test. Science of the Total Environment, 736, 139602. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139602
Selden, M. T., & Song, D. (1994). Environmental quality and development: Is there a Kuznets curve for air pollution emissions? Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 27(2), 147–162. https://doi.org/10.1006/jeem.1994.1031
Seyhan, B., Zuhal, M., & Akyol, M. (2022). The validity of the environmental Kuznets curve for South Africa: Engle-Granger cointegration test. The Journal of Kesit Academy, 8(33), 537–556.
Shafik, N., & Banyopadhyay, S. (1992). Economic growth and environmental quality: Time-series and cross-country evidence. World Development Report, 904.
Sharif, A., & Raza, A. S. (2016). Dynamic relationship between urbanization, energy consumption and environmental degradation in Pakistan: Evidence from structure break testing. Journal of Management Sciences, 3(1), 3–23. https://doi.org/10.20547/jms.2014.1603101
Statista Database. (n.d.). Consumption of renewable energy in China. https://www.statista.com/statistics/274058/renewable-energy-consumption-in-china
Stern, I. D. (2004). The rise and fall of the environmental Kuznets curve. World Development, 32(8), 1419–1439. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2004.03.004
Subramaniam, Y. (2024). Investigating the impact of a green economy on the EKC hypothesis: Evidence from European countries. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 26, 21689–21708. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-023-04349-9
Şerifoğlu, M. M., & Güney, Ö. P. (2024). Is the environmental Kuznets curve (EKC) hypothesis still valid for OECD countries? A comprehensive analysis across multiple sources. Quality and Quantity. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-024-01945-3
Şimşek, T., & Bursal, M. (2019). Türkiye’de ekolojik ayak izi ve biyokapasite arasındaki ilişki: Bootstrap rolling window nedensellik testi. IBAD Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 452–465. https://doi.org/10.21733/ibad.613865
Tiwari, K. A., Kocoğlu, M., Banday, J. U., & Awan, A. (2022). Hydropower, human capital, urbanization and ecological footprints nexus in China and Brazil: Evidence from quantile ARDL. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29, 68923–68940. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-20320-z
U.S. Energy Information Administration. (n.d.). Total energy data for China. https://www.eia.gov/opendata/browser/total-energy
Ur-Rahman, S., Chen, S., Saud, S., Saleem, N., & Bari, W. M. (2019). Nexus between financial development, energy consumption, income level, and ecological footprint in CEE countries: Do human capital and biocapacity matter? Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 26, 31856–31872. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-06343-z
Wang, J., & Wang, R. (2024). The impact of urbanization on environmental quality in ecologically fragile areas: Evidence from Hengduan Mountain, Southwest China. Land, 13(4), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.3390/land13040503
Wang, Q., Wu, D.-S., Zeng, E.-Y., & Wu, W.-B. (2017). Exploring the relationship between urbanization, energy consumption, and CO₂ emissions in different provinces of China. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 54, 1563–1579. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.10.090
World Bank. (2009). Industrial development report 2009. https://www.unido.org/sites/default/files/2009-02/IDR_2009_print_0.PDF World Bank. (n.d.). Carbon emissions for China. https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/EN.ATM.CO2E.KT?locations=CN
Wu, H., Gai, Z., Guo, Y., Li, Y., Hao, Y., & Lu, Z. N. (2020). Does environmental pollution inhibit urbanization in China? A new perspective through residents’ medical and health costs. Environmental Research, 182, 109128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2020.109128
Xie, L., Mu, X., Lu, K., Hu, D., & Hu, G. (2022). The time-varying relationship between CO₂ emissions, heterogeneous energy consumption, and economic growth in China. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 25, 7769–7793. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-022-02371-x
Xu, C.-S., He, X.-Z., Long, R.-Y., Shen, W.-X., Ji, S.-B., & Chen, Q.-B. (2015). Impacts of economic growth and urbanization on CO₂ emissions: Regional differences in China based on panel estimation. Regional Environmental Change, 16, 777–787. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-015-0795-0
Yılancı, V., Gorus, S. M., & Andreoni, V. (2023). Reinvestigation of the validity of the EKC hypothesis extended with energy: A time-varying analysis for the United Kingdom. Journal of Cleaner Production, 428, 139284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.139284
Zhang, Y., Alharti, M., Ali, A. S., Abbas, Q., & Hesary-Teghizadeh, F. (2022). The eco-innovative technologies, human capital, and energy pricing: Evidence of sustainable energy transition in developed economies. Applied Energy, 325, 119729. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2022.119729
Zhang, Y.-J., Zhang, H., & Tan, D.-T. (2014). The impact of economic growth, industrial structure and urbanization on carbon emission intensity in China. Natural Hazards, 73, 579–595. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-014-1091-x
Zhu, J., Lin, N., Zhu, H., & Liu, X. (2023). Role of sharing economy in energy transition and sustainable economic development in China. Journal of Innovation and Knowledge, 8(2), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2023.100314
Zi, C., Jie, W., & Bo-Hong, C. (2016). CO₂ emissions and urbanization correlation in China based on threshold analysis. Ecological Indicators, 61(2), 193–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.09.013

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

Türkçe

Konular

Zaman Serileri Analizi, Makro İktisat (Diğer), Çevre Ekonomisi

Bölüm

Araştırma Makalesi

Yazarlar

Seyit Ordu ^*
0000-0002-3203-9378
Türkiye

Bahar Burtan Doğan
0000-0001-9835-2423
Türkiye

Erken Görünüm Tarihi

30 Haziran 2025

Yayımlanma Tarihi

30 Haziran 2025

Gönderilme Tarihi

18 Eylül 2024

Kabul Tarihi

27 Şubat 2025

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 2025 Cilt: 10 Sayı: 2

DOI

https://doi.org/10.25229/beta.1552228

IZ

https://izlik.org/JA35YE42GC

APA

Ordu, S., & Burtan Doğan, B. (2025). Çin’in Büyük Dönüşümü Sürdürülebilir mi? Çevresel Faktörler ve İktisadi Dinamikler Arasındaki İlişkinin Analizi. Bulletin of Economic Theory and Analysis, 10(2), 483-528. https://doi.org/10.25229/beta.1552228

AMA

1.Ordu S, Burtan Doğan B. Çin’in Büyük Dönüşümü Sürdürülebilir mi? Çevresel Faktörler ve İktisadi Dinamikler Arasındaki İlişkinin Analizi. beta. 2025;10(2):483-528. doi:10.25229/beta.1552228

Chicago

Ordu, Seyit, ve Bahar Burtan Doğan. 2025. “Çin’in Büyük Dönüşümü Sürdürülebilir mi? Çevresel Faktörler ve İktisadi Dinamikler Arasındaki İlişkinin Analizi”. Bulletin of Economic Theory and Analysis 10 (2): 483-528. https://doi.org/10.25229/beta.1552228.

EndNote

Ordu S, Burtan Doğan B (01 Haziran 2025) Çin’in Büyük Dönüşümü Sürdürülebilir mi? Çevresel Faktörler ve İktisadi Dinamikler Arasındaki İlişkinin Analizi. Bulletin of Economic Theory and Analysis 10 2 483–528.

IEEE

[1]S. Ordu ve B. Burtan Doğan, “Çin’in Büyük Dönüşümü Sürdürülebilir mi? Çevresel Faktörler ve İktisadi Dinamikler Arasındaki İlişkinin Analizi”, beta, c. 10, sy 2, ss. 483–528, Haz. 2025, doi: 10.25229/beta.1552228.

ISNAD

Ordu, Seyit - Burtan Doğan, Bahar. “Çin’in Büyük Dönüşümü Sürdürülebilir mi? Çevresel Faktörler ve İktisadi Dinamikler Arasındaki İlişkinin Analizi”. Bulletin of Economic Theory and Analysis 10/2 (01 Haziran 2025): 483-528. https://doi.org/10.25229/beta.1552228.

JAMA

1.Ordu S, Burtan Doğan B. Çin’in Büyük Dönüşümü Sürdürülebilir mi? Çevresel Faktörler ve İktisadi Dinamikler Arasındaki İlişkinin Analizi. beta. 2025;10:483–528.

MLA

Ordu, Seyit, ve Bahar Burtan Doğan. “Çin’in Büyük Dönüşümü Sürdürülebilir mi? Çevresel Faktörler ve İktisadi Dinamikler Arasındaki İlişkinin Analizi”. Bulletin of Economic Theory and Analysis, c. 10, sy 2, Haziran 2025, ss. 483-28, doi:10.25229/beta.1552228.

Vancouver

1.Seyit Ordu, Bahar Burtan Doğan. Çin’in Büyük Dönüşümü Sürdürülebilir mi? Çevresel Faktörler ve İktisadi Dinamikler Arasındaki İlişkinin Analizi. beta. 01 Haziran 2025;10(2):483-528. doi:10.25229/beta.1552228

Bu dergide yayımlanan eserler Creative Commons Atıf 4.0 Uluslararası Lisansı ile lisanslanmaktadır.

Çin’in Büyük Dönüşümü Sürdürülebilir mi? Çevresel Faktörler ve İktisadi Dinamikler Arasındaki İlişkinin Analizi

Is China’s Great Transformation Sustainable? Analysing the Relationship Between Environmental Factors and Economic Dynamics

Öz

Anahtar Kelimeler

Çin’in Büyük Dönüşümü Sürdürülebilir mi? Çevresel Faktörler ve İktisadi Dinamikler Arasındaki İlişkinin Analizi

Öz

Anahtar Kelimeler

Kaynakça

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

Konular

Bölüm

Yazarlar

Erken Görünüm Tarihi

Yayımlanma Tarihi

Gönderilme Tarihi

Kabul Tarihi

Yayımlandığı Sayı

DOI

IZ

Kaynak Göster