Araştırma Makalesi

Vergi Tarifelerinin Matematiksel ve Grafiksel Yorumu

Cilt: 2 Sayı: 1 24 Mart 2017
PDF İndir
EN TR

Mathematical and Graphical Interpretation of Tax Tables

Öz

The average tax rate and the marginal tax rate are the most important tools used to distinguish tax table types and perceive structure of tax table. The relationship between these two variables and progress within themselves gives us many clues about the tax tables. In this study, after describing the theoretical background of tax tables, the mathematical background has been put forward by proving some proposals related to tax tables. The tax amount, the average tax rate and the marginal tax rate are formulated separately for each tax table type and the relationships among them are shown mathematically. Then the progress of the average tax rate curve under certain conditions is interpreted geometrically.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Tax Tables,Progression,Average Tax Rate,Marginal Tax Rate

Kaynakça

  1. Barro, R. J., & Sahasakul, C. (1983). Measuring the Average Marginal Tax Rate from the Individual Income Tax. Journal of Business, 56(4), 419-452.
  2. De Bartolome, C. A. M. (1995). Which Tax Rate Do People Use: Average or Marginal?. Journal of Public Economics, 56(1), 79-96.
  3. Edizdoğan, N., Çetinkaya, Ö., & Gümüş, E. (2015). Kamu Maliyesi. Bursa: Ekin Yayınları.
  4. Friedman, M. (2002). Capitalism and Freedom. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. (Özgün çalışma, 1962).
  5. Gwartney, J., & Long, J. (1985). Is the Flat Tax a Radical Idea. Cato Journal, 5(2), 407-432.
  6. Hall, R. E., & Rabushka, A. (1995). The Flat Tax. California: Hoover Institution Press.
  7. Hayes, K. J., Lambert, P. J., & Slottje, D. J. (1995). Evaluating Effective Income Tax Progression. Journal of Public Economics, 56, 461-474.
  8. Karayılmazlar, E., & Kargı, N. (2008). Artan Oranlı Gelir Vergisi Tarifesi: Küresel Ekonomide Rekabet Gücü. TİSK Akademi, 2008/II, 200-222.
  9. Lambert, P. (2001). The Distribution and Redistribution of Income. New York: Manchester University Press.
  10. Musgrave, R. A. (2002). Equity and the Case for Progressive Taxation. In J. J. Thorndike & D. J. Ventry Jr. (Eds.), Tax Justice: The Ongoing Debate (ss. 9-24). Washington, D.C.: The Urban Institute Pess.

Kaynak Göster

APA
Yüksel, C. (2017). Mathematical and Graphical Interpretation of Tax Tables. Bulletin of Economic Theory and Analysis, 2(1), 31-62. https://doi.org/10.25229/beta.284883
AMA
1.Yüksel C. Mathematical and Graphical Interpretation of Tax Tables. beta. 2017;2(1):31-62. doi:10.25229/beta.284883
Chicago
Yüksel, Cihan. 2017. “Mathematical and Graphical Interpretation of Tax Tables”. Bulletin of Economic Theory and Analysis 2 (1): 31-62. https://doi.org/10.25229/beta.284883.
EndNote
Yüksel C (01 Mart 2017) Mathematical and Graphical Interpretation of Tax Tables. Bulletin of Economic Theory and Analysis 2 1 31–62.
IEEE
[1]C. Yüksel, “Mathematical and Graphical Interpretation of Tax Tables”, beta, c. 2, sy 1, ss. 31–62, Mar. 2017, doi: 10.25229/beta.284883.
ISNAD
Yüksel, Cihan. “Mathematical and Graphical Interpretation of Tax Tables”. Bulletin of Economic Theory and Analysis 2/1 (01 Mart 2017): 31-62. https://doi.org/10.25229/beta.284883.
JAMA
1.Yüksel C. Mathematical and Graphical Interpretation of Tax Tables. beta. 2017;2:31–62.
MLA
Yüksel, Cihan. “Mathematical and Graphical Interpretation of Tax Tables”. Bulletin of Economic Theory and Analysis, c. 2, sy 1, Mart 2017, ss. 31-62, doi:10.25229/beta.284883.
Vancouver
1.Cihan Yüksel. Mathematical and Graphical Interpretation of Tax Tables. beta. 01 Mart 2017;2(1):31-62. doi:10.25229/beta.284883