Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

Yolsuzluğun Belirleyicileri Üzerine Ekonometrik Bir Analiz

Yıl 2024, Cilt: 9 Sayı: 2, 515 - 535

Öz

Ülkelerin gelişmişlik seviyelerinden bağımsız olarak yolsuzluk dünya genelinde sorunlu bir davranış olarak ifade edilmektedir. Yolsuzluk, toplumların geçmişten gelen demokrasi gelenekleri, iç ve dış karışıklıklardan kaçınmaları ve eğitim seviyeleri gibi birçok farklı faktör ile açıklanabilmektedir. Çalışmada, yolsuzluğun seçilen belirleyiciler aracılığıyla, yatay-kesit veri analizi ile tahmin edilmesi ve incelenmesi amaçlanmaktadır. Bu amaçla Uluslararası Şeffaflık Örgütü, Yolsuzluk Algılama Endeksi (Corruption Perception Index) verileri esas alınmış ve 151 ülkenin 2021 yılı verileri kullanılarak dört farklı model oluşturulmuştur. İlk olarak tüm ülkeler analize dâhil edilmiş ve bazı bulgular elde edilmiştir. Diğer üç model ise İnsani Gelişme Endeksi’nin gelişmişlik sınıflandırmalarına göre oluşturulmuştur. Tüm ülkelerin dâhil edildiği ilk modele göre, demokrasi, eğitim seviyesi ve ülkelerin içinde bulunduğu barış ortamı istatistiksel olarak anlamlı çıkmıştır. Benzer şekilde gelişmişlik seviyelerine göre sınıflandırılan ülkeler için ayrı modeller oluşturulmuş ve bu bağlamda yolsuzluğun belirleyicilerinin ülkelerin gelişmişlik düzeylerine bağlı olarak değişebildiği ortaya çıkmıştır. Son olarak bu çalışmada tahmin edilen eğitim ve barış faktörleri literatüre katkı sağlaması açısından önem arz etmektedir.

Kaynakça

  • Akçay, S. (2000). Yolsuzluk, ekonomik özgürlükler ve demokrasi. Muğla Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 1(1), 1-15.
  • Beck, P. J., & Maher, M. W. (1986). A comparison of bribery and bidding in thin markets. Economics Letters, 20(1), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-1765(86)90068-6.
  • Beşel, F. & Yardımcıoğlu, F. (2013). Demokrasi ve yolsuzluk ilişkisi: seçilmiş Ortadoğu ülkelerinin analizi. In K. İnat and M. Ataman (Eds.). Ortadoğu Yıllığı: 2013, (ss. 445-461). Açılım Kitabevi.
  • Campbell, N. & Saha, S. (2013). Corruption, democracy and Asia-Pacific countries, Journal of the Asia Pacific Economy, 18(2), 290-303. https://doi.org/10.1080/13547860.2013.778156.
  • Drury, A. C., Krieckhaus, J. & Lusztig, M. (2006). Corruption, democracy and economic growth. International Political Science Review, 27(2), 121–136. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192512106061.
  • Economist Intelligence Unit - EIU. (2022). https://pages.eiu.com/rs/753-RIQ-438/images/eiu-democracy-index-2021.pdf. (Erişim Tarihi 15.12.2023.)
  • Haass, F. & Ottmann, M. (2017). Profits from peace: the political economy of power-sharing and corruption. World Development, 99, 60-74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2017.07.006.
  • Human Development Index - HDI. (2022). Human Development Report: 2021-2022. https://hdr.undp.org/system/files/documents/global-report-document/hdr2021-22reportenglish_0.pdf.
  • Institute for Economics & Peace - IEP. (2021). Global Peace Index Report: 2021. https://www.economicsandpeace.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/GPI-2021-web.pdf. (Erişim Tarihi 15.12.2023).
  • Johnston, M. (2012). Corruption control in the United States: law, values, and the political foundations of reform. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 78(2), 329–345. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852312438782.
  • Kolstad, I & Wiig, A. (2016). Does democracy reduce corruption?, Democratization, 23(7), 1198-1215. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2015.1071797.
  • Lambsdorff, J.G. (2007). The institutional economics of corruption and reform: theory, evidence, and policy. Cambridge University Press.
  • Le Billon, P. (2008). Corrupting peace? Peacebuilding and post-conflict corruption, International Peacekeeping, 15(3), 344-361, https://doi.org/10.1080/13533310802058851.
  • Leff, N. H. (1964). Economic development through bureaucratic corruption. American Behavioral Scientist, 8(3), 8-14. https://doi.org/10.1177/000276426400800303.
  • Mauro, P. (1995). Corruption and growth. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110(3), 681–712. https://doi.org/10.2307/2946696.
  • Mauro, P. (1997). The effects of corruption on growth, investment, and government expenditure: a cross-country analysis. In Kimberly Ann Elliott (Eds.). Corruption and the Global Economy, (ss. 83-107). Institute for International Economics.
  • Mohtadi, H, & Roe, T. L. (2003). Democracy, rent seeking, public spending and growth. Journal of Public Economics. 87(3-4), 445-466. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0047-2727(01)00135-9.
  • Montinola, G. R., & Jackman, R. W. (2001). Sources of corruption: a cross-country study. British Journal of Political Science, 32(01), 147-170. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123402000066.
  • Nye, J. S. (1967). Corruption and political development: a cost-benefit analysis. The American Political Science Review, 61(2), 417–427. https://doi.org/10.2307/1953254.
  • Peyton, K. & Belasen, A. R. (2012). Corruption in emerging and developing economies: evidence from a pooled cross-section. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 48(2), 29-43. https://doi.org/10.2753/REE1540-496X480202.
  • Rock, M. T. (2007.) Corruption and democracy. UN/DESA Working paper, 55, 1-18.
  • Rock, M. T. (2009). Corruption and democracy, The Journal of Development Studies, 45(1), 55-75. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220380802468579.
  • Rose-Ackerman, S. (1978). Corruption: A Study in Political Economy, Academic Press.
  • Rose-Ackerman, S. (2008). Corruption and post-conflict peace-building. Ohio Northern University Law Review, 34(2), 405-444.
  • Saha, S. & Su, J.J. (2012). Investigating the interaction effect of democracy and economic freedom on corruption: a cross-country quantile regression analysis. Economic Analysis & Policy, 42(3), 389-396. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0313-5926(12)50036-6.
  • Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1993). Corruption. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 108(3), 599–617. https://doi.org/10.2307/2118402.
  • Sung, HE. (2004). Democracy and political corruption: a cross-national comparison. Crime, Law and Social Change, 41, 179–193. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:CRIS.0000016225.75792.02.
  • Tanzi, V. (1998). Corruption around the world: causes,consequences, scope and cures. IMF Staff Papers, 45(4), 559-594. https://doi.org/10.2307/3867585.
  • Transparency International. (10. 12. 2023). What is corruption https://www.transparency.org/what-is-corruption/#define. (Erişim Tarihi 15.12.2023).
  • Transparency International. (2022). Corruption Perception Index Report 2021. https://images.transparencycdn.org/images/CPI2021_Report_EN-web.pdf. (Erişim Tarihi 21.12.2023).
  • Treisman, D. (2007). What have we learned about the causes of corruption from ten years of cross-national empirical research?. Annual Review of Political Science, 10(1), 211–244. https://doi.org/10.1146/ annurev.polisci.10.081205.095418.
  • United Nations-UN. (12.12.2023). Global Cost of Corruption at Least 5 Per Cent of World Gross Domestic Product, Secretary-General Tells Security Council, Citing World Economic Forum Data. https://press.un.org/en/2018/sc13493.doc.htm. (Erişim Tarihi 20.12. 2023).
  • Yakışık, H., & Çetin, A. K. (2014). Yolsuzlukların sosyoekonomik belirleyicileri: yatay kesit veri analizi. Atatürk Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 28(3), 205-224. https://doi.org/10.16951/iibd.27756

An Econometric Analysis on the Determinants of Corruption

Yıl 2024, Cilt: 9 Sayı: 2, 515 - 535

Öz

Regardless of the development levels of countries, corruption is expressed as a problematic behavior around the world. Corruption can be explained by many different factors such as societies democratic traditions from the past, their avoidance of internal and external conflicts, and their education levels. The study aims to estimate and examine corruption through selected determinants using cross-sectional data analysis. For this purpose, Transparency International Corruption Perception Index (CPI) data was taken as basis. Four different models were created using 2021 data from 151 countries. First, all countries were included in the analysis and some findings were obtained. The other three models were created according to the development classifications of the Human Development Index. According to the first model in which all countries were included, democracy, education level and an atmosphere of peace of the countries were statistically significant. Similarly, separate models were created for countries classified according to their development levels. In this context, it has been revealed that the determinants of corruption may changeable depending on the development levels of countries. Finally, the education and peace factors estimated in this study are important in terms of contributing to the literature.

Kaynakça

  • Akçay, S. (2000). Yolsuzluk, ekonomik özgürlükler ve demokrasi. Muğla Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 1(1), 1-15.
  • Beck, P. J., & Maher, M. W. (1986). A comparison of bribery and bidding in thin markets. Economics Letters, 20(1), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-1765(86)90068-6.
  • Beşel, F. & Yardımcıoğlu, F. (2013). Demokrasi ve yolsuzluk ilişkisi: seçilmiş Ortadoğu ülkelerinin analizi. In K. İnat and M. Ataman (Eds.). Ortadoğu Yıllığı: 2013, (ss. 445-461). Açılım Kitabevi.
  • Campbell, N. & Saha, S. (2013). Corruption, democracy and Asia-Pacific countries, Journal of the Asia Pacific Economy, 18(2), 290-303. https://doi.org/10.1080/13547860.2013.778156.
  • Drury, A. C., Krieckhaus, J. & Lusztig, M. (2006). Corruption, democracy and economic growth. International Political Science Review, 27(2), 121–136. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192512106061.
  • Economist Intelligence Unit - EIU. (2022). https://pages.eiu.com/rs/753-RIQ-438/images/eiu-democracy-index-2021.pdf. (Erişim Tarihi 15.12.2023.)
  • Haass, F. & Ottmann, M. (2017). Profits from peace: the political economy of power-sharing and corruption. World Development, 99, 60-74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2017.07.006.
  • Human Development Index - HDI. (2022). Human Development Report: 2021-2022. https://hdr.undp.org/system/files/documents/global-report-document/hdr2021-22reportenglish_0.pdf.
  • Institute for Economics & Peace - IEP. (2021). Global Peace Index Report: 2021. https://www.economicsandpeace.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/GPI-2021-web.pdf. (Erişim Tarihi 15.12.2023).
  • Johnston, M. (2012). Corruption control in the United States: law, values, and the political foundations of reform. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 78(2), 329–345. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852312438782.
  • Kolstad, I & Wiig, A. (2016). Does democracy reduce corruption?, Democratization, 23(7), 1198-1215. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2015.1071797.
  • Lambsdorff, J.G. (2007). The institutional economics of corruption and reform: theory, evidence, and policy. Cambridge University Press.
  • Le Billon, P. (2008). Corrupting peace? Peacebuilding and post-conflict corruption, International Peacekeeping, 15(3), 344-361, https://doi.org/10.1080/13533310802058851.
  • Leff, N. H. (1964). Economic development through bureaucratic corruption. American Behavioral Scientist, 8(3), 8-14. https://doi.org/10.1177/000276426400800303.
  • Mauro, P. (1995). Corruption and growth. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110(3), 681–712. https://doi.org/10.2307/2946696.
  • Mauro, P. (1997). The effects of corruption on growth, investment, and government expenditure: a cross-country analysis. In Kimberly Ann Elliott (Eds.). Corruption and the Global Economy, (ss. 83-107). Institute for International Economics.
  • Mohtadi, H, & Roe, T. L. (2003). Democracy, rent seeking, public spending and growth. Journal of Public Economics. 87(3-4), 445-466. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0047-2727(01)00135-9.
  • Montinola, G. R., & Jackman, R. W. (2001). Sources of corruption: a cross-country study. British Journal of Political Science, 32(01), 147-170. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123402000066.
  • Nye, J. S. (1967). Corruption and political development: a cost-benefit analysis. The American Political Science Review, 61(2), 417–427. https://doi.org/10.2307/1953254.
  • Peyton, K. & Belasen, A. R. (2012). Corruption in emerging and developing economies: evidence from a pooled cross-section. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 48(2), 29-43. https://doi.org/10.2753/REE1540-496X480202.
  • Rock, M. T. (2007.) Corruption and democracy. UN/DESA Working paper, 55, 1-18.
  • Rock, M. T. (2009). Corruption and democracy, The Journal of Development Studies, 45(1), 55-75. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220380802468579.
  • Rose-Ackerman, S. (1978). Corruption: A Study in Political Economy, Academic Press.
  • Rose-Ackerman, S. (2008). Corruption and post-conflict peace-building. Ohio Northern University Law Review, 34(2), 405-444.
  • Saha, S. & Su, J.J. (2012). Investigating the interaction effect of democracy and economic freedom on corruption: a cross-country quantile regression analysis. Economic Analysis & Policy, 42(3), 389-396. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0313-5926(12)50036-6.
  • Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1993). Corruption. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 108(3), 599–617. https://doi.org/10.2307/2118402.
  • Sung, HE. (2004). Democracy and political corruption: a cross-national comparison. Crime, Law and Social Change, 41, 179–193. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:CRIS.0000016225.75792.02.
  • Tanzi, V. (1998). Corruption around the world: causes,consequences, scope and cures. IMF Staff Papers, 45(4), 559-594. https://doi.org/10.2307/3867585.
  • Transparency International. (10. 12. 2023). What is corruption https://www.transparency.org/what-is-corruption/#define. (Erişim Tarihi 15.12.2023).
  • Transparency International. (2022). Corruption Perception Index Report 2021. https://images.transparencycdn.org/images/CPI2021_Report_EN-web.pdf. (Erişim Tarihi 21.12.2023).
  • Treisman, D. (2007). What have we learned about the causes of corruption from ten years of cross-national empirical research?. Annual Review of Political Science, 10(1), 211–244. https://doi.org/10.1146/ annurev.polisci.10.081205.095418.
  • United Nations-UN. (12.12.2023). Global Cost of Corruption at Least 5 Per Cent of World Gross Domestic Product, Secretary-General Tells Security Council, Citing World Economic Forum Data. https://press.un.org/en/2018/sc13493.doc.htm. (Erişim Tarihi 20.12. 2023).
  • Yakışık, H., & Çetin, A. K. (2014). Yolsuzlukların sosyoekonomik belirleyicileri: yatay kesit veri analizi. Atatürk Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 28(3), 205-224. https://doi.org/10.16951/iibd.27756
Toplam 33 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil Türkçe
Konular Yatay Kesit Analizi, Kamu Ekonomisi
Bölüm Makaleler
Yazarlar

Hikmet Dersim Yıldız 0000-0002-2866-3936

Erken Görünüm Tarihi 29 Haziran 2024
Yayımlanma Tarihi
Gönderilme Tarihi 19 Mart 2024
Kabul Tarihi 27 Mayıs 2024
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2024 Cilt: 9 Sayı: 2

Kaynak Göster

APA Yıldız, H. D. (2024). Yolsuzluğun Belirleyicileri Üzerine Ekonometrik Bir Analiz. Bulletin of Economic Theory and Analysis, 9(2), 515-535.