Analysis of Land Use Detection Between 1996 and 2024 in the Central District of Adiyaman (Southeastern Türkiye)

Öz

Land use change detection is critically important for environmental sustainability and resource management. This study investigates at the specifics of the methods used to identify changes in land use, their possible effects on ecosystems, and the causes of the decline in residential areas and rise in building on agricultural land after the February 6 earthquakes. According to the analysis results, it is seen that agricultural lands have decreased by 62.81% from 1996 to 2024. It is seen that there has been a partial increase in construction, especially after the earthquake with a magnitude of Mw 7.7 on February 6, 2023, there has been an increase in flat and bare areas and construction in these regions has increased by over 60%. According to the kappa statistics of land use maps made from satellite images of 1996, 2011 and 2024, the analysis results were calculated as 0.83, 0.82 and 0.89, respectively.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Land Use Change
• Satellite Images
• Geographic Information Systems
• Earthquakes.

Adıyaman (Merkez) 1996–2024 Yılları Arasındaki Arazi Kullanım Değişim Analizi (Güneydoğu Türkiye)

Öz

Öz: Arazi kullanımı ve arazi örtüsü değişim analizi, çevresel yönetim, afet sonrası yeniden yapılanma ve risk duyarlı kentsel planlama açısından kritik kanıtlar sunmaktadır. Bu çalışma, 1996, 2011 ve 2024 yıllarına ait Landsat uydu görüntüleri kullanılarak Türkiye’nin güneydoğusunda yer alan Adıyaman merkez ilçesindeki arazi kullanım değişimini değerlendirmektedir. Geometrik, radyometrik ve atmosferik ön işleme adımlarından sonra arazi kullanım sınıfları Spektral Açı Haritalama sınıflandırma yöntemiyle haritalanmış; sınıflandırma sonuçları doğruluk değerlendirmesi ve kappa istatistikleri kullanılarak test edilmiştir. Sonuçlar, 28 yıllık dönemde peyzajda belirgin bir dönüşüm yaşandığını göstermektedir. Tarım alanları önemli ölçüde azalırken, yerleşim ve çıplak alan sınıfları kentsel büyüme, arazi bozulumu ve deprem sonrası yeniden yapılanma baskılarına bağlı olarak genişlemiştir. En güncel harita, 6 Şubat 2023 Kahramanmaraş depremlerinden sonra düşük katlı konut gelişimine yönelik talebin arttığını da göstermektedir. Genel doğruluk değerleri 1996, 2011 ve 2024 yılları için sırasıyla %85.46, %87.52 ve %91.74 olarak hesaplanmış; kappa değerleri ise 0.83, 0.82 ve 0.89 olarak belirlenmiştir. Bu sonuçlar, sınıflandırma performansının güvenilir olduğunu ortaya koymakta ve afet riski taşıyan kentsel çevrelerde sürdürülebilir arazi kullanım politikalarının yönlendirilmesinde uydu tabanlı izlemenin önemini göstermektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Coğrafi bilgi sistemleri
• Arazi kullanım değişimi
• Uzaktan algılama
• Uydu görüntüleri
• Spektral açı haritalama.

Kaynakça

1. Agapiou, A., Alexakis, D. D., Sarris, A., Hadjimitsis, D. G. (2014). Evaluating the potentials of Sentinel-2 for archaeological perspective. Remote Sensing, 6(3), 2176-2194. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs6032176
2. Awad, M. (2018). Current and future trends in segmenting satellite images using hybrid and dynamic genetic algorithms. In S. Bhattacharyya (Ed.), Hybrid Metaheuristics for Image Analysis (pp. 1-20). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77625-5_1
3. Babitha, M. S., Andrushia, A. D., Anand, N., Naser, M. Z., Pari, Y. (2025). Land use and land cover change detection from multisource satellite imagery - A hybrid convolutional neural network approach. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 161, 112187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2025.112187
4. Benzougagh, B., Meshram, S. G., Fellah, B. E., Mastere, M., El Basri, M., Ouchen, I. (2024). Mapping of land degradation using spectral angle mapper approach (SAM): The case of Inaouene watershed (Northeast Morocco). Modeling Earth Systems and Environment, 10(1), 221-231. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40808-023-01711-8
5. Bharath, N., Swathi, K. K., Dwarakish, G. S., Shivanna, Jagadeesha, P. B. (2025). Shoreline change detection using DSAS and land use/land cover change analysis of Mangalore coast, southwest coast of India. Environmental and Sustainability Indicators, 100906. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indic.2025.100906
6. Ebodé, V. B. (2023). Impact of climate and anthropogenic changes on current and future variability in flows in the Nyong River Basin (equatorial Central Africa). Journal of Hydroinformatics, 25(2), 369-384. https://doi.org/10.2166/hydro.2023.116
7. Elmahdy, S. I., Mohamed, M. M. (2016). Mapping of tecto-lineaments and investigating their association with earthquakes in Egypt: A hybrid approach using remote sensing data. Geomatics, Natural Hazards and Risk, 7(2), 600-619. https://doi.org/10.1080/19475705.2014.996612
8. Kruse, F. A., Boardman, J. W., Lefkoff, A. B., Heidebrecht, K. B., Shapiro, A. T., Barloon, P. J., Goetz, A. F. H. (1993). The Spectral Image Processing System (SIPS): Interactive visualization and analysis of imaging spectrometer data. Remote Sensing of Environment, 44(2-3), 145-163. https://doi.org/10.1016/0034-4257(93)90013-N

9. Kumari, N., Ayare, B. L., Bhange, H. N., Ingle, P. M., Kasture, M. C. (2024). Land use and land cover change detection using remote sensing in the Kal River Basin, Raigad District, Maharashtra, India. International Journal of Environment and Climate Change, 14(10), 58-69. https://doi.org/10.9734/ijecc/2024/v14i104467
10. Liang, C., Cheng, B., Xiao, B., Dong, Y. (2023). Unsupervised domain adaptation for remote sensing image segmentation based on adversarial learning and self-training. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, 20, 1-5.
11. Mather, P., Tso, B. (2016). Classification Methods for Remotely Sensed Data. CRC Press. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781420090741 Moghaddam, S. N. M., Cao, H. (2024). Land use and land cover change detection. In Artificial Intelligence-Driven Geographies: City Development: Issues and Best Practices. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-5116-7_5 Mudaliar, A. (2022). Potential use of Sentinel-2 data for discrimination of Tectona grandis L. healthy and non-healthy tree species using spectral angle mapper. Environmental Sciences Proceedings, 22(1), 13. https://doi.org/10.3390/IECF2022-13130
12. Pal, M., Mather, P. M. (2006). Support vector machines for classification in remote sensing. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 26(5), 1007-1011. https://doi.org/10.1080/01431160512331314083
13. Shi, S., Liu, Y., Li, D., Zhong, Y. (2025). Multi-temporal high-resolution urban land-use mapping and change analysis based on a deep geospatial-temporal adaptation network. Remote Sensing of Environment, 114912. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2025.114912
14. Yuan, Q., Shen, H., Li, T., Li, Z., Li, S., Jiang, Y., Xu, H., Tan, W., Yang, Q., Wang, J. (2020). Deep learning in environmental remote sensing: Achievements and challenges. Remote Sensing of Environment, 241, 111716.
15. Zare Naghadehi, S., Asadi, M., Maleki, M., Tavakkoli-Sabour, S. M., Van Genderen, J. L., Saleh, S. S. (2021). Prediction of urban area expansion with implementation of MLC, SAM and SVMs' classifiers incorporating artificial neural network using Landsat data. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 10(8), 513. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi10080513
16. Zhang, Y., Chen, G., Myint, S. W., Zhou, Y., Hay, G. J., Vukomanovic, J., Meentemeyer, R. K. (2022). UrbanWatch: A 1-meter resolution land cover and land use database for 22 major cities in the United States. Remote Sensing of Environment, 278, 113106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2022.113106
17. Zhao, X., Xia, N., Li, M. (2023). Dynamic monitoring of urban renewal based on multisource remote sensing and POI data: A case study of Shenzhen from 2012 to 2020. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 125, 103586.