Araştırma Makalesi

Silk Road Economic Belt as China’s Eurasian Dream: Common Identity or Common Fear?

Sayı: 91 22 Ekim 2019
PDF İndir
TR EN

Silk Road Economic Belt as China’s Eurasian Dream: Common Identity or Common Fear?

Öz

The Silk Road Economic Belt is the key component of China’s Eurasian Pivot strategy. In this study, China’s Eurasian Pivot is approached as a creativity strategy from the perspective of social identity theory. In order to succeed in its creativity strategy, China is trying to create a common in-group identity with the Silk Road Economic Belt countries through the Chinese Dream. However, the Chinese Dream is not perceived as a common identity by Central Asians and Uyghurs. While Central Asians respond China’s economic presence in the region positively, they are afraid of demographic changes and cultural influences that Chinese migration will cause. Therefore, the Chinese Dream has been a common fear for Turkic societies along the Silk Road Economic Belt rather than common identity. This fear could be one of the most important factors that will prevent the success of China’s Eurasian Pivot in the long run.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Kaynakça

  1. Barth, Fredrik (1969). Ethnic Groups and Boundaries: The Social Organization of Culture Difference. Little, Brown Series in Anthropology.
  2. Bellér-Hann, Ildikó (2002). “Temperamental Neighbours: Uighur-Han Relations in Xinjiang, Northwest China”. Imagined Differences: Hatred and the Construction of Identity. Ed. Günther Schlee. 5. 57-83.
  3. Burkhanov, Aziz and Chen Yu-Wen (2016). “Kazakh Perspective on China, the Chinese, and Chinese Migration”. Ethnic and Racial Studies 39 (12): 2129-2148.
  4. Callahan, William A. (2016). “China’s “Asia Dream” The Belt Road Initiative and the New Regional Order”. Asian Journal of Comparative Politics 1 (3): 226-243.
  5. Cesaro, M. Cristina (2000). “Consuming Identities: Food and Resistance among the Uyghur in Contemporary Xinjiang”. Inner Asia 2 (2): 225-238.
  6. Clinton, Hillary (2011). “America’s Pacific Century”. Foreign Policy 189: 56-63.
  7. Dillon, Michael (2004). Xinjiang: China’s Muslim Far Northwest. Routledge.
  8. Dreyer, June Teufel (1975). “Go West Young Han: The Hsia Fang Movement to China’s Minority Areas”. Pacific Affairs 48 (3): 353-369.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

İngilizce

Konular

-

Bölüm

Araştırma Makalesi

Yayımlanma Tarihi

22 Ekim 2019

Gönderilme Tarihi

20 Mart 2018

Kabul Tarihi

-

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 2019 Sayı: 91

Kaynak Göster

APA
Eliküçük Yıldırım, N. (2019). Silk Road Economic Belt as China’s Eurasian Dream: Common Identity or Common Fear? Bilig, 91, 235-254. https://doi.org/10.12995/bilig.9110
AMA
1.Eliküçük Yıldırım N. Silk Road Economic Belt as China’s Eurasian Dream: Common Identity or Common Fear? Bilig. 2019;(91):235-254. doi:10.12995/bilig.9110
Chicago
Eliküçük Yıldırım, Nilgün. 2019. “Silk Road Economic Belt as China’s Eurasian Dream: Common Identity or Common Fear?”. Bilig, sy 91: 235-54. https://doi.org/10.12995/bilig.9110.
EndNote
Eliküçük Yıldırım N (01 Ekim 2019) Silk Road Economic Belt as China’s Eurasian Dream: Common Identity or Common Fear? Bilig 91 235–254.
IEEE
[1]N. Eliküçük Yıldırım, “Silk Road Economic Belt as China’s Eurasian Dream: Common Identity or Common Fear?”, Bilig, sy 91, ss. 235–254, Eki. 2019, doi: 10.12995/bilig.9110.
ISNAD
Eliküçük Yıldırım, Nilgün. “Silk Road Economic Belt as China’s Eurasian Dream: Common Identity or Common Fear?”. Bilig. 91 (01 Ekim 2019): 235-254. https://doi.org/10.12995/bilig.9110.
JAMA
1.Eliküçük Yıldırım N. Silk Road Economic Belt as China’s Eurasian Dream: Common Identity or Common Fear? Bilig. 2019;:235–254.
MLA
Eliküçük Yıldırım, Nilgün. “Silk Road Economic Belt as China’s Eurasian Dream: Common Identity or Common Fear?”. Bilig, sy 91, Ekim 2019, ss. 235-54, doi:10.12995/bilig.9110.
Vancouver
1.Nilgün Eliküçük Yıldırım. Silk Road Economic Belt as China’s Eurasian Dream: Common Identity or Common Fear? Bilig. 01 Ekim 2019;(91):235-54. doi:10.12995/bilig.9110

Ahmet Yesevi Üniversitesi Mütevelli Heyet Başkanlığı