The role of the islamic finance model with its philosophy, instruments and characteristic features in mitigating the economic impacts of the covid 19

Öz

The world has been exposed to the effects of the COVID 19 pandemic since December 2019. More than 2 million died and more than 100 million were infected due to COVID 19 (John Hopkins University, 2020; WHO, 2019; Dong et al., 2020). Partial or full quarantine practices have been implemented to protect health systems against the high level of infectiousness of the virus. Quarantine measures decreased consumer and investor confidence, and the loss of workforce caused by the disease affected the world economy negatively. There was a sharp decline in the world stock markets, the supply chain was disrupted, and businesses were negatively affected by pandemic and quarantine measures. The problems experienced by the business were reflected in the households and unemployment increased (Ding et al., 2020: 1; McKibbin & Fernando, 2020: 2). According to IMF, the economic impact of the COVID 19 will be beyond the 2008 crisis (IMF, 2020a).
COVID 19 causes problems beyond public health problems for the world. The shock effect of the pandemic, uncertainty, and the measures caused great destruction in the economies. The closure of workplaces and the increase in the unemployment rate caused the global economic crisis to deepen and social problems to emerge (IMF, 2020b). During the pandemic process, the effectiveness of traditional financing instruments was discussed. The world has been facing one of the largest economic crises since the 2008 financial crisis. While the 2008 financial crisis and COVID 19 have similar effects on economies, the sources of the two crises are different. Economic risks arise from internal and external causes. Internal risks consist of risks, which arise from the economic system. Exogenous risks are the risks created by non-economic factors (Wars, pandemics, political crises, etc.) (SRC, 2013). The 2008 crisis occurred due to the internal causes of the system and affected the entire economy by starting with the financial sector. The crisis, which is caused by COVID 19, is mostly affecting the real sector and this crisis is caused by external risk factors. IMF compared the crisis, which is caused by internal and external risk factors. Although crises created by external factors have more devastating effects in the short term, recovery in these crises is quicker. Recovery is more difficult in crises that are caused by internal factors (IMF, 2009). When the impact of the pandemic disappears, economic recovery will be rapid. However, the important issue regarding the pandemic is how financing the pandemic process and economic recovery after the pandemic.
Risks on the economy increase with the classical interest debt-receivable relationship. The increase in the debt burden on the households, businesses, and governments causes the economic crises to deepen. Besides, the classical debt-receivable relationship causes stagnation in the real sector and unfairness in income distribution (Islamic Development Bank, 2020: 15 - 16). Some people have lost their jobs or part of their income due to the COVID 19 pandemic and businesses have stopped their activities. If these individuals and businesses are supported by traditional financing instruments, their existing debt burden will increase and the crisis will only be delayed. Microfinance became one of the important concepts after the pandemic. The pandemic process and the period after the pandemic one of the important concepts is microfinance. Microfinance is the provision of financing to low-income people (Emine et al., 2008: 57). During the pandemic, people who lose part or all of their income need financing. With the inability of these people to access current financing methods the microfinance mechanism should be implemented (Meagher, 2020: 1). With the pandemic process, digitalization has gained importance. Activities in education, the business world, arts, and many other fields are have been carried out on digital platforms. Therefore, there is a need for a new financing model, which digitalization is at the forefront, for in the post-pandemic economic order (Bank of England, 2020: 6).

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Islamic Economy
• Islamic Finance
• COVID 19

Covid 19’un yarattığı ekonomik etkilerle mücadelede felsefesi, araçları ve karakteristik özellikleriyle islami finansman modelinin rolü

Öz

COVID 19, dünya ekonomisi üzerinde yıkıcı bir etki yaratmıştır. Karantina önlemleri, tüketici ve yatırımcı güveninin azalmasıyla birlikte ülkeler küçülmüştür. İşletmeler faaliyetlerini durdurmuş ve işsizlik artmıştır. Bu dönemde geleneksel finansman araçlarının eksik yönleri ortaya çıkmıştır. Finansman faaliyetlerinde çevresel, sosyal ve ekonomik unsurlar denge içinde organize edilmelidir. Ancak geleneksel finansman faaliyetlerindeki borç alacak ilişkisi, çevresel ve sosyal unsurlara katkı sunsa da bu unsurlar arasında gerekli dengeyi kurabilecek yapıda değildir. İslami finansman modeli, sahip olduğu risk paylaşımı unsuru ve İslam dininin ilkelerinin oluşturduğu karakteristik özellikleri sebebiyle ekonomi, çevre ve sosyal dengeyi sağlayabilir. Bu çalışmada COVID 19 salgını ve sonrasındaki süreçte İslami finansman modelinin etkisi ele alınmış ve İslami finansman araçlarının kullanımına ilişkin öneriler sunulmuştur. Literatür incelemesi ve İslami finansman modelinin özellikleri göz önüne alındığında, COVID 19 süreci ve sonrası ekonomik toparlanmada İslami finansman modelinin dünya ekonomisine katkı sunabileceği yorumu yapılabilir. Salgın sebebiyle insanlar gelir kaybı yaşamış, kamu hizmetlerinde aksamalar meydana gelmiş ve ekonomide dijitalleşmenin etkisi artmıştır. İslami finansman modelinin kaynağını oluşturan İslami ahlak ekonomisi, finansman süreçlerinde toplumun çıkarlarını gözetirken sosyal ve çevresel unsurların da finansman kararlarında önemsenmesi ilkesini benimsemiştir. Ayrıca mikrofinansa uygun yapısı ve büyük potansiyele sahip İslami fintek uygulamaları ile İslami finansman modeli, COVID 19’un ekonomide yarattığı ihtiyaçlara uygun bir yapıdadır. Çalışmada İslami finansman araçları olan mudarebe, müşareke, sukuk, zekat ve tekafülün salgının etkilerine karşı uygulanması konusunda öneriler sunulmuştur

Anahtar Kelimeler

• İslam Ekonomisi
• İslami Finansman
• COVID 19

Kaynakça

1. AAOIFI. (2015). Faizsiz Finans Standartları. https://www.izu.edu.tr/docs/default-source/default-document-library/faizsiz-finans-standartlari.pdf?sfvrsn=968bc0e9_0
2. ABDUL-RAHMAN, A., & GHOLAMI, R. (2020). Islamic Finance and COVID-19 Recovery: The Role of Profit-Loss Sharing Contract. Jurnal Pengurusan (UKM Journal of Management). 59(2020), 1- 5. https://doi.org/10.17576/pengurusan-2020-59-02.
3. AFSHAR, T. A. (2013). Compare and Contrast Sukuk (Islamic Bonds) with Conventional Bonds, are They Compatible? Journal of Global Business Management, 9(1), 44 - 52.
4. AHMED, A. (2010). Global Financial Crisis: an Islamic Finance Perspective. International Journal of Islamic and Middle Eastern Finance and Management, 3(4), 306 - 320.
5. ASLAN, H. (2015). Türkiye’de Tekafül (İslami Sigorta) Uygulamaları: Problemler ve Çözüm Önerileri. Uluslararası İslam Ekonomisi ve Finansı Araştırmaları Dergisi, 1(1), 93-117.
6. ASUTAY, M. (2012). Conceptualising and Locating the Social Failure Of Islamic Finance: Aspirations of Islamic Moral Economy vs. the Realities of Islamic Finance. Asian and African area studies, 11(2), 93-113.
7. ASUTAY, M., AYSAN, A. F., & KARAHAN, C. C. (2013). Reflecting on the Trajectory of Islamic Finance: From MIT Ghamr to the Globalisation of Islamic Finance. Afro Eurasian Studies, 2(1-2), 5-14.
8. BACHA, O. (1995 ). Conventional vs. Mudharabah Financing: an Agency Cost Perspective. Journal of Islamic Economics, 4(1-2), 33- 50.

9. BAKER, S. R., FARROKHNIA, R. A., MEYER, S., PAGEL, M., & YANNELIS, C. (2020). How Does Household Spending Respond to an Epidemic? Consumption During the 2020 Covid-19 Pandemic. NBER Working Paper No. 26949 https://www.nber.org/system/files/working_papers/w26949/w26949.pdf.
10. Bank of England. (2017). Quarterly Bulletin Q3. https://www.bankofengland.co.uk/-/media/boe/files/quarterly-bulletin/2017/islamic-banks-and-central banking.pdf?la=en&hash=15D94BD65C2EFA6962989D10E21543B7B7013C1C
11. Bank of England. (2020). Why Islamic Finance Has an Important Role to Play in Supporting the Recovery from Covid – and How the Bank of England’s New Alternative Liquidity Facility Can Help. https://www.bankofengland.co.uk/-/media/boe/files/speech/2020/why-islamic-finance-has-an-important-role-to-play-in-supporting-the-recovery-from-covid.pdf?la=en&hash=58B28008CE026D33B0590F7DB5CDA84DAE723CAD
12. BARTIK, A. W., BERTRAND, M., CULLEN, Z. B., GLAESER, E. L., LUCA, M., & STANTON, C. T. (2020). How are Small Businesses Adjusting to Covid-19? Early Evidence From a Survey. NBER Working Paper No. 26989 http://tjyute.com/papers/w26989.pdf
13. BDDK. (2020). Resmi Gazete’de Yayımlanan Kurul Kararları. https://www.bddk.org.tr/Mevzuat-Kategori/Resmi-Gazetede-Yayimlanan-Kurul-Kararlari/8
14. BELL, D. N., & BLANCHFLOWER, D. G. (2020). US and UK Labour Markets Before and During the Covid-19 Crash. National Institute Economic Review, 252, 52-69. https://doi.org/10.1017/nie.2020.14.
15. BİLEN, M. & GÜNEY, T. (2019). Türkiye’de Yoksulluk Sorunu İle Mücadelede Zekat Kurumunun Rolü Ve Gerekliliği Hakkinda Camii Cemaati Üzerine Bir Araştirma. İslam Ekonomisi ve Finansı Dergisi, 5(2), 133-167.
16. Bureau of Economic Analysis China. (2020). Çin 2020 Yılı GSYH Verileri. http://www.stats.gov.cn/english/PressRelease/202010/t20201021_1795384.html
17. Bureau of EconomicAnalysis USA. (2020). ABD 2020 Yılı GSYH Verileri. https://www.bea.gov/news/2020/gross-domestic-product-third-quarter-2020-advance-estimate
18. BÜYÜKAKIN, F. & BİLAL, E. (2016). Finansal Krizlere Karşi Sukukun Uygulanabilirliği Üzerine Bir Değerlendirme. Finansal Araştırmalar ve Çalışmalar Dergisi, 8(14), 33-55.
19. CATTELAN, V. (2009). From the Concept of Haqq to the Prohibitions of Riba, Gharar and Maysir in Islamic Finance. International Journal of Monetary Economics and Finance, 2(3-4), 384-397.
20. ÇAKAR, R. (2018). Dünyadaki İslami Bankacılığın Gelişimi ile İslam İşbirliği Teşkilatına Üye Ülkelerin Makroekonomik Göstergeleri; Granger Nedensellik Analizi. Electronic Turkish Studies, 13(15), 81 - 99. http://dx.doi.org/10.7827/TurkishStudies.13512 .
21. ÇAKAR, R., GÜNGÖR, S., & KARAKAŞ, G. (2018). Türkiye’de Geleneksel ve Katılım Bankalarının Toplam Kredi Hacimleriyle Ekonomik Büyüme Arasındaki Ilişkisi. İslam Ekonomisi ve Finansı Dergisi, 4(1), 69- 95.
22. DEMIRDÖĞEN, Y. (2020). İslami Fintek Ekosistemi Üzerine Bİr Değerlendirme. Gaziantep Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 2(1), 63-99.
23. DING, W., LEVINE, R., LIN, C., & XIE, W. (2020). Corporate Immunity to the COVID-19 Pandemic. NBER Working Paper No. 27055 https://retirementincomejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/NBER-stock-sensitivity-to-C19-4-20.pdf
24. DONG, E., DU, H, GARDNER L.(2020). An interactive web-based dashboard to track COVID-19 in real time. Lancet Infecious Diseases. 20(5), 533-534. 10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30120-1
25. EĞRİ, T. & SAĞLAM, M. S. (2020) Mudarebe Finansmanının Katılım Bankalarında Uygulanmasının Ahlaki Risk Yönünden Değerlendirilmesi: Türkiye Örneği. International Journal of Islamic Economics and Finance Studies, 2020/2, 197-226.
26. ELLEBY, C., DOMÍNGUEZ, I. P., ADENAUER, M., & GENOVESE, G. (2020). Impacts of the COVID-19 Pandemic on the Global Agricultural Markets. Environmental and Resource Economics, 76(4), 1067-1079. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-020-00473-6.
27. EMİNE, Ö., PINAR, O., GÖKTEN, S., & AYPEK, N. (2008). Mikrofinans Sistemi ve Ticari Bankaların Mikrofinans Sistemindeki Yeri. Sosyoekonomi, 8(8), 55 - 74.
28. EROKHIN, V., & GAO, T. (2020). Impacts Of COVID-19 on Trade and Economic Aspects of Food Security: Evidence From 45 Developing Countries. International journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(16), 1- 28. 10.3390/ijerph17165775.
29. EROL, S. I. (2012). İktisadi Kalkınmada Değerlerin Rolü (İbn Haldun’un Perspektifinden). Çalışma İlişkileri Dergisi, 3(2), 49-65.
30. Eurostat. (2020). AB 2020 Yılı GSYH Verileri. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/documents/2995521/10662173/2-13112020-AP-EN.pdf/0ac3f053-f601-091d-ea21-db1ecaca7e8c
31. EVDS. (2020). İmalat Sanayi Kapasite Kullanım Oranı. https://evds2.tcmb.gov.tr/
32. FATUROHMAN, T., RASYID, M. F. A., RAHADI, R. A., DARMANSYAH, A., & AFGANI, K. F. (2020). The Potential Role of Islamic Social Finance in the Time of COVID-19 Pandemic. Review of Integrative Business and Economics Research, 10, 95 - 105.
33. FRANZONI, S., & AIT ALLALI, A. (2018). Principles of Islamic Finance and Principles of Corporate Social Responsibility: What Convergence? Sustainability, 10(3), 1- 11. 10.3390/su10030637.
34. HAMMAD, N. (1996). İktisâdî Fıkıh Terimleri Sözlüğü. R. Ulusoy, (Çev.) İstanbul: İz Yayıncılık.
35. HMB. (2020). Merkezi Yönetim Bütçe İstatistikleri. https://muhasebat.hmb.gov.tr/merkezi-yonetim-butce-istatistikleri
36. HERS, A. F., SAMAR, M. & YILMAZ, M. (2020). İslam İktisadinda Bölüşüm Sisteminin Bir Araci Olarak Zekâtin Rolü. İslam Hukuku Araştırmaları Dergisi, 35, 273-304.
37. HUO, X., & QIU, Z. (2020). How Does China’s Stock Market React to the Announcement of the COVID-19 Pandemic Lockdown? Economic and Political Studies, 8(4), 436-461. 10.1080/20954816.2020.1780695 .
38. IMF. (2009). World Economic Outlook https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/weo/2009/02/pdf/text.pdf
39. IMF. (2020a). World Economic Outlook. https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/WEO/Issues/2020/06/24/WEOUpdateJune2020
40. IMF. (2020b). World Economic Outlook. https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/WEO
41. Institute of International Finance. (2020). Global Debt Monitor. https://www.iif.com/Research/Capital-Flows-and-Debt/Global-Debt-Monitor
42. İslam Ansiklopedisi. (2013). Zekat. https://islamansiklopedisi.org.tr/zekat#1
43. Islamic Development Bank. (2020). The COVID-19 Crisis And Islamic Finance,https://www.isdb.org/sites/default/files/media/documents/202010/1.%20IsDB%20Group%20Report%20on%20Covid-19%20and%20Islamic%20Finance__FINAL.pdf
44. JAMARUDDIN, W. N., & MARKOM, R. (2020). The Application of Fintech in the Operation of Islamic Banking Focussing on Islamic Documentation: Post-COVID-19. INSLA E-Proceedings, 3(1), 31-43.
45. John Hopkins University. (2020). Coronavirus COVID-19 Global Cases. https://coronavirus.jhu.edu/map.html
46. KALIM, R., MUSHTAQ, A., & ARSHED, N. (2016). Islamic Banking and Economic Growth: Case of Pakistan. Islamic Banking and Finance Review, 3(1), 14-28.
47. KUTVAL, Y. (2017). İslam İktisadi Düşünce, Ticaret ve Finansman Yöntemlerinin Tarihsel Gelişimi. Medeniyet ve Toplum Dergisi, 1(2), 149-162.
48. LEE, D. K. C., & TEO, G. S. Z. J. (2015). Emergence of FinTech and the LASIC Principles. Journal of Financial Perspectives.3(3), 1- 26.
49. LIU, H., MANZOOR, A., WANG, C., ZHANG, L., & MANZOOR, Z. (2020). The COVID-19 Outbreak and Affected Countries Stock Markets Response. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(8), 1 - 19. 10.3390/ijerph17082800 .
50. MB. (2020). Koronavirüsün Ekonomik ve Finansal Etkilerine Karşı Alınan Tedbirler https://www.tcmb.gov.tr/wps/wcm/connect/TR/TCMB+TR/Main+Menu/Duyurular/Koronavirus
51. MCKIBBIN, W. J., & FERNANDO, R. (2020). The Global Macroeconomic Impacts of COVID-19: Seven Scenarios. CAMA Working Paper 19/2020.http://www.sensiblepolicy.com/download/2020/2020WorkingPapers/2020_19_CAMA_COVID19_mcKibbin_fernando_0.pdf
52. MEAGHER, P. (2020). Microfinance in the COVID-19 Crisis: A Framework for Regulatory Responses. https://www.cgap.org/sites/default/files/publications/2020_06_COVID_Briefing_Framework_Regulatory_Response_4.pdf
53. MIAN, A. R., STRAUB, L., & SUFI, A. (2020). Indebted Demand. NBER Working Paper No. 26940. https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/216606/1/cesifo1_wp8210.pdf
54. OECD. (2020a). OECD Unemployment Rates News Release: April 2020. http://www.oecd.org/sdd/labour-stats/unemployment-rates-oecd-06-2020.pdf
55. OECD. (2020b). G20 GDP Growth - Third Quarter of 2020. https://www.oecd.org/newsroom/g20-gdp-growth-third-quarter-2019-oecd.htm
56. OECD. (2020c). Unemployment Rate Data https://data.oecd.org/unemp/unemployment-rate.htm
57. Oxford Business Group. (2020). After Covid-19, What is Next for Islamic Banking? https://oxfordbusinessgroup.com/news/after-covid-19-what-next-islamic-banking
58. ÖZDEMIR, M. (2019). Katılım Bankaları ve İslami Mikrofinans: Türkiye'deki Mevcut Durum ve Öneriler. Journal of BRSA Banking & Financial Markets, 13(2), 120- 160.
59. PARLAKKAYA, R., & ÇÜRÜK, S. A. (2016). Bir Yoksullukla Mücadele Aracı Olarak Islami Mikrofinans ve Türkiye’de Uygulanabilirliği. International Journal of Islamic Economics and Finance Studies, 1(2), 81 - 86.
60. PEHLİVAN, P. (2016). Türkiye’de Katılım Bankacılığı ve Bankacılık Sektöründeki Önemi. Sosyal Ekonomik Araştırmalar Dergisi, 16(31), 296-324.
61. PIÇAK, M. (2012). Faiz Olgusunun Iktisadi Düşünce Tarihindeki Gelişimi. Manas Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 1(4), 61-92.
62. S&P. (2020). Islamic Finance 2020-2021: COVID-19 Offers an Opportunity for Transformative Developments. https://www.spglobal.com/ratings/en/research/articles/200615-islamic-finance-2020-2021-covid-19-offers-an-opportunity-for-transformative-developments-11533355
63. SHAFIAI, M. H. M., & MOI, M. R. (2015). Fitting Islamic Financial Contracts in Developing Agricultural Land. Global Journal Al-Thaqafah, 5(1), 43-49.
64. SOELEMAN, S., & LESTARI, S. D. (2014). The Role of Sukuk Financing for Sustainable Development of Smallholder Farmers. Australasian Accounting, Business and Finance Journal, 8(5), 79-92. 10.14453/aabfj.v8i5.5.
65. SRC. (2013). Endogenous Risk. www.systemicrisk.ac.uk/endogenous-risk
66. SUGÖZÜ, İ. H., ERDOĞAN, S., & ULAŞAN, E. (2017). The Impacts of Interest Expenditure on Income Distribution and an Application on the Factors Distorting Income Istrıbutıon: an Empırıcal Analysıs for Turkey. Electronic Turkish Studies, 12(12), 231- 250.
67. SWARTZ, N. P., & COETZER, P. (2010). Takaful: an Islamic Insurance Instrument. Journal of Development and Agricultural Economics, 2(10), 333-339.
68. TAJGARDOON, G., NOORMOHAMADI, K., & BEHNAME, M. (2012). Foreign Direct Investment and Islamic Banking: A Granger Causality Test. Economics and Finance Review, 2(5), 8-13.
69. TCCB. (2020). Koronavirüsle Mücadele Eşgüdüm Toplantısı Sonrası Yaptıkları Konuşma. https://www.tccb.gov.tr/konusmalar/353/118038/koronavirusle-mucadele-esgudum-toplantisi-sonrasi-yaptiklari-konusma
70. TÜİK. (2020). İstatistikler. https://www.tuik.gov.tr/
71. WHO. (2019). Coronavirus Disease. https://www.who.int/emergencies/diseases/novel-coronavirus-2019/question-andanswers-hub/q-a-detail/q-a-coronaviruses
72. WIDIARTO, I., & EMROUZNEJAD, A. (2015). Social and Financial Efficiency of Islamic Microfinance Institutions: a Data Envelopment Analysis Application. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 50, 1-17. 10.1016/j.seps.2014.12.001.
73. WTO. (2020a). Uluslararası Dış Ticaret Verileri. https://www.wto.org/english/res_e/statis_e/statis_e.htm
74. WTO. (2020b). Trade Shows Signs Of Rebound From COVID-19, Recovery Still Uncertain. https://www.wto.org/english/news_e/pres20_e/pr862_e.htm
75. YAZICI, M. (1995). Tek Vergi Düzeni Artık Varlık Vergisi. İstanbul: Yaylım Matbaası.
76. YUSOFF, M. B. (2011). Zakat Expenditure, School Enrollment, and Economic Growth in Malaysia. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 2(6), 175-181.
77. YÜCEL, A. G., & KÖSEOĞLU, A. (2020). Do Participation Banks Contribute to Economic Growth? Time-Series Evidence from Turkey. Bilimname, 2020(42), 155-180. https://doi.org/10.28949/bilimname.811760