Comparative Analysis of The Relationships among Economic Growth, Globalization and R & D: The Case of Turkey & South Korea

Yıl 2019, Cilt: 1 Sayı: 4, 271 - 296, 14.10.2019

Özer Özçelik Serkan Göksu

Öz

The reason for selecting the scope of the study
Turkey and South Korea; the development efforts of these countries of basic
macro-economic indicators, from the outset despite being close to each other in
terms of development in recent years, South Korea is the clear future of
Turkey. In this study, it is aimed to determine and compare the effect of
research and investment investments and globalization index and the
relationship between real GDP per capita and these variables by ARDL approach.
According to the results obtained from the ARDL method, the models created
using the annual data for the period 1991-2016 for each 2 (two) countries were
cointegrated between the variables in the long run, ie the linear compositions
converged to the equilibrium point. All coefficients are statistically the
created models for the prediction of long-term coefficients South Korea is
pointless to more significantly in Turkey. For South Korea, it can be said that
there is a positive relationship between real GDP per capita, research and
development investments and globalization index. 1% increase in research and
development investments and globalization index will lead to a 0.27% and 1.53%
increase in real GDP per capita in the long run, respectively. The fact that
the coefficients of error correction models are negative and the probability
value is less than 0.05 indicates that the error correction coefficients are
significant. According to the results of a deviation from the equilibrium occur
in the future can be said South Korea could improve faster than in Turkey.

Anahtar Kelimeler

South Korea, ARDL, R&D, Globalization

Comparative Analysis of The Relationships among Economic Growth, Globalization and R & D: The Case of Turkey & South Korea

Öz

The reason for selecting the scope of the study Turkey and South Korea; the development efforts of these countries of basic macro-economic indicators, from the outset despite being close to each other in terms of development in recent years, South Korea is the clear future of Turkey. In this study, it is aimed to determine and compare the effect of research and investment investments and globalization index and the relationship between real GDP per capita and these variables by ARDL approach. According to the results obtained from the ARDL method, the models created using the annual data for the period 1991-2016 for each 2 (two) countries were cointegrated between the variables in the long run, ie the linear compositions converged to the equilibrium point. All coefficients are statistically the created models for the prediction of long-term coefficients South Korea is pointless to more significantly in Turkey. For South Korea, it can be said that there is a positive relationship between real GDP per capita, research and development investments and globalization index. 1% increase in research and development investments and globalization index will lead to a 0.27% and 1.53% increase in real GDP per capita in the long run, respectively. The fact that the coefficients of error correction models are negative and the probability value is less than 0.05 indicates that the error correction coefficients are significant. According to the results of a deviation from the equilibrium occur in the future can be said South Korea could improve faster than in Turkey.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Güney Kore, ARDL, AR&GE, Küreselleşme

Kaynakça

• Acaravcı, A. Akalin, G. ve Erdoğan, S. (2019). Araştırma Geliştirme Harcamalarının Türkiye İhracatına Etkileri. Hacettepe Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi. 37(1). s. 1-16.
• Akbey, F. (2014). Ar&Ge, İnovasyon ve Kalkınma İlişkisine Yönelik Bir Literatür Taraması: Kuramsal Özet Maliye Dergisi Sayı 166.
• Akın, B. (2001). Yeni Ekonomi. (1. Basım). Çizgi Kitapevi Yayınları, Konya.
• Altın.O & Kaya, A. A. (2009). Türkiye’de Ar&Ge Harcamaları ve Ekonomik Büyüme Arasındaki Nedensel İlişkinin Analizi. Ege Academic Review. 9 (1) 2009: 251-259
• Bayraktutan, Y. Arslan İ. ve Alancıoğlu E. (2018). Orta Gelir Tuzağını Aşmada Araştırma-Geliştirme: Türkiye Ve Güney Kore Karşılaştırması. International Journal of Social Humanities Sciences Research (JSHSR). 5. 1232-1240. 10.26450/jshsr.473.
• Bozkurt, C. (2015). R&D Expenditures and Economic Growth Relationship in Turkey. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, 5(1), 188-198
• Choi, C.&Hoon Yi, M. (2018) The Internet, R&D expenditure and economic growth, Applied Economics Letters, 25:4, 264-267, DOI: 10.1080/13504851.2017.1316819
• Demir, İ. C.&Balkı, A. (2019).Türkiye’de Wagner Kanunu’nun Sınanması: 1960 – 2016 Dönemi Analizi. Vergi Raporu, Mart 2019, Sayı: 234, s.20-21
• Dickey, D.A.&Fuller, W. (1981). Likelihood Ratio Statistics for Autoregressive Time Series with a Unit Root, Econometrica, 49, pp.1057-1072,
• https://www.jstor.org/stable/1912517?origin=crossref&seq-=1#metadata_info_tab_contents
• Doruk, Ö. T. & Söylemezoğlu, E. (2014), Gelişmekte Olan Ülkelerde Ar-Ge’ye Dayalı Büyümenin Varlığının Sınanması. 1. Ulusal Üretim Ekonomisi Kongresi, https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2541083.
• Duman, K & Aydın, K. (2018). Türkiye’de Ar&Ge Harcamaları ile Gsyih İlişkisi. Gazi İktisat ve İşletme Dergisi, 2018; 4(1): 49-66
• Engle, R.F.&Granger C.W.J. (1987). Cointegration and Error Correction: Representation, Estimation and Testing, Econometrica, 55, pp. 251-276, https://www.jstor.org/stable/1913236?origin=crossref&seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents
• Freimane, R. & Balina, S. (2016). Research and De¬velopment Expenditures and Economic Growth in the EU: A Panel Data Analysis, Economics and Business, 29 (1), 5 - 11.
• Gittleman, M.&Wolff, E. (1995), R&D Activity and Cross-Country Growth Comparisons, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 19, issue 1, p. 189-207, https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oup:cambje:v:19:y:1995:i:1:p:189-207.
• Johansen, S.&Juselius, K. (1990). Maximum Likelihood Estimation and Inference on Cointegration – with Applications to the Demand for Money, Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 52, pp.169-210 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1468-0084.1990.mp52002003.x
• KOF İsviçre Ekonomi Enstitüsü (2018). 01.09.2018, https://kof.ethz.ch/en/forecastsandindicators/indicators/kof-globalisation-index.html
• Kwiatkowski, D. , Phillips, P.C. B. , Schmidt, P. ve Shin, Y. (1992). Testing The Null Hypothesis of Stationarity Against the Alternative of a Unit Root: How Sure Are We That The Economic Time Series Have a Unit Root? Journal of Econometrics, 54, ss.159 178.
• Lichtenberg. F., (1992). R&D Investment and International Productivity Differences, No 4161, NBER Working Papers, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc, https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:nbr:nberwo:4161.
• OECD. Ekonomik İşbirliği ve Kalkınma Örgütü (2018). 01.09.2018, https://data.oecd.org/rd/grossdomesticspending-on-r-d.htm
• OECD. Ekonomik İşbirliği ve Kalkınma Örgütü (2018). 01.09.2018, http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno-/researchanddevelopmentstatisticsrds.htm
• Özcan, S.E. & Özer, P. (2017), Ar-Ge Harcamaları ve Patent Başvuru Sayısının Ekonomik Büyüme Üzerindeki Etkileri: OECD Ülkeleri Üzerine Bir Uygulama. Anadolu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi. 18 (1), s. 15-28.
• Ustabaşı, A. ve Esin, Ö. Ö. (2016).” The Effects of R&D and High Technology Exports on EconomicGrowth: A Comparative Cointegration Analysis for Turkey andSouth Korea” International Conference On Eurasian Economies
• Utku.H.(2004). R&D, Innovation, and Economic Growth: An Empirical Analysis. IMF Working Paper. Research Department. WP/04/185
• PARK, W. G. (1995), Internatıonal R&D Spıllovers And Oecd Economıc Growth. Economic Inquiry, 33: 571-591.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1465-7295.1995.tb01882.x
• Pata, U. K., Yurtkuran, S., ve Kalça, A. (1995). Türkiye’de Enerji Tüketimi ve Ekonomik Büyüme: ARDL Sınır Testi Yaklaşımı. Marmara Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 38(2), 255-271
• Pesaran, M. H., Shin, Y., Smith, R. (2001). Bounds Testing Approaches to the Analysis of Level Relationships, Journal of Applied Econometrics, 16-3, s.289-326. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/jae.616
• Peter C. B. P. & Pierre P. (1988). Testing for a Unit Root in Time Series Regression, Biometrika,75-2, s.335-346
• Tiryakioğlu, M.(2006).Araştırma Geliştirme-Ekonomik Büyüme İlişkisi: Seçilmiş Oecd Ülkeleri Üzerine Uygulama. Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, İktisat Anabilim Dalı. Yüksek Lisans Tezi.
• T.M.M.O. Makina Mühendisleri Odası. (2018). Dünyada ve Türkiye’de Ar&Ge Faaliyetleri, Oda Raporu. Yayın No: MMO/696, Ankara.
• Varol, H.(2017).Türkiye'de Bilgi Ekonomisi Ve Türkiye-Güney Kore Karşılaştırması. Bartın Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, İktisat Anabilim Dalı. Yüksek Lisans Tezi.
• WB. Dünya Bankası. (2018). 01.09.2018, https://databank.worldbank.org/reports.aspx?source=2&series=NY.GDP.MKTP.KD&country=#