Hububat tarlalarında kullanılan Mesosulfuron+Iodosulfuron'un etkili minimum dozlarının saptanması

Yıl 2011, Cilt: 51 Sayı: 4, 359 - 371, 26.12.2011

Mustafa Selçuk Başaran , M. Başaran , Y. Katırcıoğlu

Öz

Mesosulfuron+ iodosulfuron'un, Zadoks skalasına göre 20–22 ve 30–32 iki farklı döneminde uygulandığında yabancı ot kuru ağırlığında %90 (ED90) azalmaya neden olan etkili minimum dozları Ankara ve Konya illerinde 2008 ve 2009 yıllarında yürütülen çalışmalarla araştırılmıştır. Mesosulfuron + iodosulfuron'un 3 farklı alandaki 15 yabancı ot türü için minimum etkili dozları doğrusal-olmayan regresyon analizi ile hesaplanmıştır. ED90 değerlerinin Altınova Tarım İşletmesi Müdürlüğü (TİM)'nde erken dönemde 13.11–23.54, geç dönemde 15.06–23.60; Konuklar TİM'nde 10.82–15.07, geç dönemde 12.70–15.78; Polatlı TİM'nde ise erken dönemde 12.47–19.63 ve geç dönemde 14.06–23.77g da-1 olduğu hesaplanmıştır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Mesosulfuron + iodosulfuron, minimum doz, yabancı ot gelişme dönemi

Determination of the effective minimum doses of Mesosulfuron+Iodosulfuron in cereal fields

Öz

Minimum lethal herbicide doses (MLHD), the herbicide doses reduced the dry weight of the weeds at 90% (ED90), of mesosulfuron + iodosulfuron used in two different periods, Zadoks scale 20-22 and Zadoks scale 30-32 growth stages, were investigated in Ankara and Konya provinces from 2008 to 2009. MLHD of mesosulfuron + iodosulfuron for 15 weeds in the three experimental areas was calculated to be used with non-linear regression analysis. ED90 values in Altınova State Farm (SF), Konuklar SF and Polatlı SF, respectively, were estimated 13.11-23.54, 10.82-15.07 and 12.47-19.63 when used the herbicide at early stage, while 15.06-23.60, 12.70-15.78 and 14.06-23.77 g da-1 when used the herbicide at late stage.

Anahtar Kelimeler

-

Kaynakça

• Auskalnis A. and Kadzys A. 2006. Effect of Timing and Dosage in Herbicide Application on Weed Biomass in Spring Wheat. Agronomy Research 4 (special issue), 133–136.
• Bolton E. E. and Hepworth H. M. 1972. Tillage research in Turkey. Proc. of Regional Wheat Workshop Beirut, Lebanon.
• Davis P. H. 1965–1985. Flora of Turkey and the East Aegean Islands. Vol. 1–9. Edinburgh: University Press.
• Davis P. H. 1988. Flora of Turkey and the East Aegean Islands (Supple.). Vol. 10. Edinburgh: University Press.
• Doğan M. N. and Boz Ö. 2003. Differences in the Tensitivity of Weed Species Against Tribenuron-methyl in Wheat. 7th EWRS Mediterranean Symposium, Adana, Turkey.
• Doğan M. N., Boz Ö. ve Albay F. 2004. Tarım Alanlarında Sorun Olan Yabancı Otların Kimyasal Mücadelesinde Azaltılmış Herbisit Dozlarının Etkinliğinin Araştırılması, TÜBİTAK, 2688.
• Doğan M. N. and Boz Ö. 2005. The concept of reduced herbicide rates for the control of johnsongrass (S. halepense L.) in cotton during the critical period for weed control, Zeitschrift für Pflanzenkrankheiten und Pflanzenschutz, 112 (1), 71–79.
• Doğan M. N. ve Boz Ö. 2009. Buğdayda Kullanılan Bazı Herbisitlerin Etkili Minimum Dozlarının Belirlenmesi, Türkiye III. Bitki Koruma Kong, 15–18 Temmuz Van.
• Donald C. M. 1963. Competition Among Crop and Pasture Plants, Advances in Agronomy 15, 1–118 pp.
• Kahramanoğlu İ. ve Uygur F. N. 2010. Trifluralin‟in azaltılmış dozlarının Kırmızı köklü tilki kuyruğu [Amaranthus retroflexus L. (Amaranthaceae)]‟nun gelişimine etkisi. Bitki Koruma Bülteni, 50 (4), 213–221.
• Kır K. and Doğan M. N. 2009. Weed Control in Maize (Zea mays L.) with Effective Minimum Rates of Foramsulfuron. Turk. J. Agric. For., 33, 601-610.
• Knezevic S. Z., Streibig J. C. and Ritz J. 2007. Utilizing R software package for dose– response studies: The concept and data analysis. Weed Tech. 21 (3), 840–848.
• Medd R.W., Van De Ven R., Pickering D.I. and Nordblom T.L. 2001. Determination of environment-specific dose response relationships for clodinafop-propargyl on Avena spp. Weed Research 41: 351–368.
• Mohammad A. B., Eskandar Z., Saeid S., Mohammad J. and Fariba M. 2007. Evaluation of Sulfosulfuron for Broadleaved and Grass Weed Control in Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) in Iran. Crop Protection, 26 (9), 1385–1389.
• Nielsen O. K., Ritz C. and Streibig J. C. 2004. Nonlinear Mixed–model Regression to Analyze Herbicide Dose–response Relationships. Weed Technology, 18 (1), 30–37.
• Olsen J. D. and Manners G. D. 1989. Toxicology of Diterpenoid Alkaloids in Rangeland Larkspur (Delphinium spp.). 291-326 in Cheeke, P. R., ed. Toxicants of plant origin. Vol. I. Alkaloids. CRC Press, Inc., Boca Raton, Fla., USA. 335pp.
• Perkins J. H. and Patterson B. R. 1997. Pests, Pesticides and the Environment: A Historical Rerspective of Prospects for Pesticide Reduction. In: Techniques for Reducing Pesticide Use. (Ed.): D. Pimental. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester. pp. 13–33.
• Ritz C and Streibig J. C. 2007. Statistical assessment of dose-response curves with free software: collection of examples. Course Notes of “Dose-Response Curves in Pesticide Science”, Samsun, Turkey, 33p.
• Rubin B. 1996. Herbicide-resistant Weeds the Inevitable Phenomenon: Mechanisms, Distribution and Significance. Journal of Plant Diseases and Protection, Sp. Issue (XV), 17–32.
• Seefeldt S. S., Jensen J. E. and Fuerst E. P. 1995. Log-logistic Analysis of Herbicide Dose- response Relationships. Weed Technology, 9 (2), 218–227.
• Sözeri S. and Solmaz A. 1996. Effects of Root, Leaf and Flower Extracts of Oriental Lakspur (Consolida orientalis (Gay) Schröd.) on Germination and Seedling Growth of Wheat. The Journal of Turkish Phytopathology, 25 (3), 89–92.
• Talgre L., Lauringson E., Koppel M., Nurmekivi H. and Uusna S. 2004. Weed Control in Spring Barley by Lower Doses of Herbicide in Estonia. Latvian Journal of Agronomy, 7, 171–175.
• Uluğ E., Kadıoğlu İ. ve Üremiş İ. 1993. Türkiye‟nin Yabancı Otları ve Bazı Özellikleri, T.C. Tarım ve Köyişleri Bakanlığı Zirai Mücadele Araştırma Enstitüsü Müdürlüğü, Adana, Yayın No: 78.
• Waller G. R. 1989. Allelochemical Action of Some Natural Products, in Phytochemical Ecology: Allelochemicals, Mycotoxins and Insect Pheromones and Allomones. Institute of Botany, Acedemia Sinica Monogroph Series No: 9, Taipei, 129-153s.
• Williams M. C. 1984. Poisonous Plants Part 3, Poisonous Alkoloids in Plants. Weeds Today. 15: 2, 1–2 p. (Weed abstracts, 33 (6):1755).
• Zadoks J. C., Chang T. T. and Konzak C. F. 1974. A Decimal Code for the Growth Stages of Cereals. Weed Research, 14: 415–421.
• Zoschke A. 1994. Toward Reduced Herbicide Rates and Adapted Weed Management. Weed Technology, 8, 376–386.