European Accessible Tourism Policy and Turkey

Öz

The main purpose of the study is to understand if Turkey produces coherent policies with the EU in the field of Tourism. In order to reach this purpose, two theoretical and political approaches, Europeanization and Conditionality will be applied. The hypothesis of this study is: Turkey is only merely affected by the EU’s conditionality policy. As the reason of this low level enthusiasm, it will be argued that lack of reward, which is the lack of a clear vision for future membership, decreases the enthusiasm of Turkey in fulfilling EU requirements and thus Europeanizing its tourism policy. European Accessible Tourism Policy has been chosen as the case of this study. The dependent variable of the study will be the accessible tourism policy and practices in Turkey. The independent variable will be the European Accessible Policy; the interim variable will be Turkey EU relations as it provides data for interaction between Turkey and the EU.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Tourism Policies,Accessible Tourism,EU Tourism Policy,EU – Turkey Relations,Political Conditionality

Avrupa Erişilebilir Turizm Politikası ve Türkiye

Öz

Bu çalışmanın temel amacı Türkiye’nin turizm alanında AB ile uyumlu politika üretip üretmediğinin anlaşılmasıdır. Bu amaca ulaşılabilmesi için birbirini destekler Avrupalılaşma ve Koşulluluk adlı iki kuramsal ve politik yaklaşımdan faydalanılacaktır.  Bu çalışmanın iddiası, Türkiye’nin AB’nin koşulluluk politikalarından çok etkilenmediğidir. Bunun gerekçesi olarak da koşulluluk yaklaşımının ana bileşenlerinden olan öngörülebilir, erişilebilir ve tatmin edici bir ödülün AB tarafından Türkiye’ye vaat edilememesi olduğu ileri sürülecektir. AB’nin Erişilebilir Turizm Politikası bu çerçevede bir vaka olarak incelenecektir. Çalışmanın bağımlı değişkeni Türkiye’deki erişilebilir turizm politikası ve uygulamaları olacaktır. Bağımsız değişken ise AB’nin Erişilebilir Turizm Politikası ve bunların birbirleri ile etkileşimini sağlayan ara değişken Avrupalılaşma ve koşulluluk penceresinden AB – Türkiye ilişkileri olacaktır.  

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Turizm Politikaları,Erişilebilir Turizm,Avrupa Birliği Turizm Politikası,AB – Türkiye İlişkileri,Avrupalılaşma,Siyasi Koşulluluk

Kaynakça

1. Akinci, Z. (2013). Management of accessible tourism and its market in Turkey. International Journal of Business and Management Studies, 2(2), 413–426.
2. Aydin, M., & Acikmese, S. A. (2007). Europeanization through EU conditionality: understanding the new era in Turkish foreign policy. Journal of Southern Europe and the Balkans, 9(3), 263–274.
3. Ayyıldız, T., Hakan, A., & Yazıcı, A. (2014). Konaklama İşletmelerinin Engelliler İçin Olanakları ve Yöneticilerin Görüşleri: Kuşadası Örneği. Gazi Üniversitesi Turizm Fakültesi Dergisi, 1(2), 84–100.
4. Bachtler, J., Mendez, C., & Oraže, H. (2014). From conditionality to Europeanization in Central and Eastern Europe: Administrative performance and capacity in cohesion policy. European Planning Studies, 22(4), 735–757.
5. Börzel, T. A., & Risse, T. (2000). When Europe Hits Home: Europeanization and Domestic Change. European Integration online Papers (EIoP), 4(15).
6. Börzel, T. A., & Risse, T. (2010). Governance without a state: Can it work? Regulation & Governance, 4(2), 113–134.
7. Buhalis, D., & Darcy, S. (2010). Accessible tourism: Concepts and issues. Channel View Publications.
8. Bulmer, S. (2008). Theorizing Europeanization. In: Europeanization (ss. 46–58). Springer.

9. Bulmer, S., & Burch, M. (1998). Organizing for Europe: Whitehall, the British State and European Union. Public Administration, 76(4), 601–628.
10. Bulmer, S. J., & Radaelli, C. M. (2004). The Europeanisation of national policy? Queens University Belfast.
11. Cowles, M. G., Caporaso, J. A., & Risse-Kappen, T. (2001). Transforming Europe: Europeanization and domestic change. Cornell University Press.
12. Darcy, S., & Dickson, T. J. (2009). A whole-of-life approach to tourism: The case for accessible tourism experiences. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management, 16(1), 32–44.
13. Darcy, S., Cameron, B., & Pegg, S. (2010). Accessible tourism and sustainability: a discussion and case study. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 18(4), 515–537.
14. Darcy, S., Cameron, B., Pegg, S., & Packer, T. (2008). Developing business case studies for accessible tourism. Gold Coast, Australia: Sustainable Tourism for Cooperative Research Centre.
15. Exadaktylos, T., & Radaelli, C. M. (2009). Research design in European studies: the case of Europeanization. Journal of Common Market Studies, 47(3), 507–530.
16. Featherstone, K., & Radaelli, C. M. (2003). The politics of Europeanization. Oxford University Press.
17. Grabbe, H. (2001). How does Europeanization affect CEE governance? Conditionality, diffusion and diversity. Journal of European public policy, 8(6), 1013–1031.
18. Greer, S. L. (2006). Uninvited Europeanization: neofunctionalism and the EU in health policy. Journal of European Public Policy, 13(1), 134–152.
19. Grigoriadis, I. N. (2008). On the Europeanization of minority rights protection: Comparing the cases of Greece and Turkey. Mediterranean Politics, 13(1), 23–41.
20. Grigoriadis, I. N. (2009a). Islam and democratization in Turkey: Secularism and trust in a divided society. Democratization, 16(6), 1194–1213.
21. Grigoriadis, I. N. (2009b). Trials of Europeanization: Turkish political culture and the European Union. Palgrave Macmillan New York.
22. Haughton, T. (2007). When does the EU make a difference? Conditionality and the accession process in Central and Eastern Europe. Political studies review, 5(2), 233–246.
23. Haverland, M., Alpan, B., Diez, T., Ágh, A., Yılmaz, G., Raagmaa, G., … Radaelli, C. M. (2008). The politics of Europeanization. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 4(2), 69–88.
24. Kastenholz, E., Eusébio, C., Figueiredo, E., & Lima, J. (2012). Accessibility as competitive advantage of a tourism destination: The case of Lousã. In: Field Guide to Case Study Research in Tourism, Hospitality and Leisure (ss. 369–385). Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
25. Kelley, J. (2004). International actors on the domestic scene: Membership conditionality and socialization by international institutions. International organization, 58(3), 425–457.
26. Keyman, E. F., & Önis, Z. (2004). Helsinki, Copenhagen and beyond. Turkey and European integration: accession prospects and issues, 173.
27. Keyman, E. F., & Öniş, Z. (2007b). Turkish politics in a changing world: Global dynamics and domestic transformations (C. 184). Bilgi University Press Istanbul.
28. Keyman, E.F., & Öniş, Z. (2007a). Globalization and social democracy in the European periphery: Paradoxes of the Turkish experience. Globalizations, 4(2), 211–228.
29. Knill, C., & Lehmkuhl, D. (2002). The national impact of European Union regulatory policy: Three Europeanization mechanisms. European Journal of Political Research, 41(2), 255–280.
30. Kubicek, H., & Cimander, R. (2005). Interoperability in eGovernment-A Survey on Information Needs of Different EU Stakeholders. European review of political technologies, 3, 1–17.
31. Ladrech, R. (1994). Europeanization of domestic politics and institutions: The case of France. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 32(1), 69–88.
32. Leontitsis, V., & Ladi, S. (2018). The changing nature of European governance and the dynamics of Europeanization. In: The Palgrave handbook of public administration and management in Europe (ss. 765–781). Springer.
33. Luiza, S. M. (2010). Accessible tourism–the ignored opportunity. Annals of Faculty of Economics, 1(2), 1154–1157.
34. Mihaela, B. C., Andrea, N., & Viorel, F. A. (2011). The tourism barriers of the disabled in Romania. European Integratıon–New Challenges, 638.
35. Olsen, J. P. (2002). The many faces of Europeanization. Journal of Common Market Studies, 40(5), 921–952.
36. Öniş, Z. (2000). Luxembourg, Helsinki and Beyond: Towards an Interpretation of Recent Turkey‐EU Relations. Government and Opposition, 35(4), 463–483.
37. Özogul, G., & Baran, G. G. (2016). Accessible tourism: The golden key in the future for the specialized travel agencies. Journal of Tourism Futures, 2(1), 79–87.
38. Papadimitriou, D., & Phinnemore, D. (2004). Europeanization, conditionality and domestic change: The twinning exercise and administrative reform in Romania. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 42(3), 619–639.
39. Parker, O. (2009). Cosmopolitan Europe’ and the EU–Turkey question: the politics of a ‘common destiny. Journal of European Public Policy, 16(7), 1085–1101.
40. Pridham, G. (2005). Designing democracy. Springer.
41. Radaelli, C. M. (2000). Whither Europeanization? Concept stretching and substantive change. European Integration online Papers, 4(8).
42. Radaelli, C. M. (2006). Europeanization: solution or problem? In: Palgrave advances in European Union studies (ss. 56–76). Springer.
43. Radaelli, C. M. (2008). Europeanization, policy learning, and new modes of governance. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis, 10(3), 239–254.
44. Schimmelfennig, F. (2015). Europeanization beyond Europe. Living Reviews in European Governance, 10(1).
45. Schimmelfennig, F., Engert, S., & Knobel, H. (2003). Costs, commitment and compliance: The impact of EU democratic conditionality on Latvia, Slovakia and Turkey. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 41(3), 495–518.
46. Schimmelfennig, F., & Sedelmeier, U. (2004). Governance by conditionality: EU rule transfer to the candidate countries of Central and Eastern Europe. Journal of European public policy, 11(4), 661–679.
47. Schimmelfennig, F., & Sedelmeier, U. (2005). The Europeanization of central and eastern Europe. Cornell University Press.
48. Schimmelfennig, F., Sedelmeier, U., Kelley, J., Anastasakis, O., Bechev, D., Schimmelfennig, F., … Yilmaz, G. (2003). Governance by conditionality: EU rule transfer to the candidate countries of Central and Eastern Europe. Journal of Common Market Studies, 9(2), 233–246.
49. Sedelmeier, U. (2008). After conditionality: post-accession compliance with EU law in East Central Europe. Journal of European public policy, 15(6), 806–825.
50. Steinert, C., Steinert, T., Flammer, E., & Jaeger, S. (2016). Impact of the UN convention on the rights of persons with disabilities (UN-CRPD) on mental health care research-a systematic review. BMC psychiatry, 16(1), 166.
51. Şen, N., Yetim, A. Ç., & Bilici, N. (2014). Kültür Varlıkları ve Müzelerin Engelli Turist Ziyaretine Uygunluğunu Belirlemeye Yönelik Bir Araştırma. Erzincan Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 7(1), 1–16.
52. Tocci, N. (2005). Europeanization in Turkey: trigger or anchor for reform? South European Society and Politics, 10(1), 73-83.
53. Tozlu, E., Mercan, Ş. O. & Lütfi, A. (2012). Çanakkale’nin Engelli Turizmine İlişkin Durumunun Belirlenmesine ve Planlanmasına Yönelik Bir Çalışma. Aksaray Üniversitesi İİBF Dergisi, 4(1), 1–16.
54. Ulusoy, K. (2007). Turkey’s reform effort reconsidered, 1987–2004. Democratisation, 14(3), 472–490.
55. Üstün, T. B. (2010). Measuring health and disability: Manual for WHO disability assessment schedule WHODAS 2.0. World Health Organization.
56. Westcott, J. (2004). Improving information on accessible tourism for disabled people. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
57. Yilmaz, G. (2014). EU conditionality is not the only game in town! Domestic drivers of Turkey’s Europeanization. Turkish Studies, 15(2), 303–321.
58. Yılmaz, B. (2008). Relations of Turkey with the European Union a candidate forever?
59. Yılmaz, G. (2012). From EU conditionality to domestic choice for change: Exploring Europeanisation of minority rights in Turkey. Turkey and the European Union: Processes of Europeanisation, 119–140.
60. Yılmaz, G. (2015). Türkiye, Avrupalılaşma ve Yerel Değişim. Avrupa Araştırmaları Dergisi, 22(2), 63–84.