Production Factors and Pricing System within İslamic Economics

Yıl 2018, Cilt: 7 Sayı: 13, 199 - 218, 28.01.2018

Dr. Ahmet Efe

Öz

Production factors and pricing mechanism are shaped according to the
modern theory of economics and requirements of capitalism. In this study, with
an approach of Islamic point of view, the underpinning basis of production
factors and pricing mechanisms are being searched with a comparative analysis
of western economic theory. With the reference to our assumption that in every
society economic policies and administrative regulations cannot be
differentiated from philosophical basis, a multidisciplinary analysis is
conducted over economics, philosophy and related Islamic jurisprudence. Our
argument is that in comparing modern approach that centralizes worldly life in
primer focus by subjugating everything that can serve material progress and
capital accumulation as means of production or productive relations, with
İslamic economics that takes world only as a temporary place but worthwhile to
the extent that it preserves life of the hereafter by subjugating whatever
exist as creature means relation of which should be based on Divine consent. The
production relations and methods are not exalted and sanctified in İslamic
economics but rather respected due to their functionalities of easing human
needs and temporary worldly life which are a transient to hereafter. The price
of capital as mean of production is not interest but profit while pricing mechanism
is close to liberal system but requires market intervention in case of
disruption or failures.

Anahtar Kelimeler

İslamic Economics, management of production factors, pricing mechanism

İslam Ekonomisinde Üretim Faktörleri ve Fiyatlandırma Sistemi

Öz

Üretim faktörleri ve fiyatlandırma sistemi modern iktisat teorisi ve kapitalist uygulamalar çerçevesinde şekillenmektedir. Bu çalışmamızda İslam ekonomisi kapsamında üretim faktörleri ve fiyatlandırma sisteminin temelleri irdelenmektedir. İddiamız, İslam’a uygun üretim faktörleri ve fiyatlandırma sisteminin kapitalist uygulamalara göre insanın huzurunu sağlama ve hayatını kolaylaştırma noktasında daha tutarlı, mantıklı ve yararlı sonuçlar doğurduğudur. Dünya hayatını merkeze alarak diğer her şeyi dünyadaki maddi kazanımlar açısından araçsallaştıran batılı yaklaşımlara nazaran geçici dünya hayatını ve bütün gereklerini ebedi olan ahiret hayatını kazanmak için bir araç olarak görerek her iki hayatı da değerleri kadar önem veren İslami yaklaşımın üstünlüğü ortaya konulmaktadır. İslam ekonomisinde üretim araçları kutsanmamakta, bir imtihan olan dünya hayatını kolaylaştıran ve insan ihtiyaçlarını gideren fonksiyonları itibariyle bir nimet ve araç olarak görülmektedir. Buna göre, üretim faktörlerinden sermayenin fiyatı faiz değil kar olarak kabul edilmekte ve fiyatlandırma mekanizmasında da liberal sisteme yakın ancak düzensizliklere ve bozgunculuğa karşı tedbir ve düzenleme mekanizmasının mevcut olduğu tespit edilmektedir. 

Anahtar Kelimeler

İslam ekonomisi, üretim faktörleri yönetimi, fiyatlandırma mekanizması

Kaynakça

• Al-Jarhi, M. A. (2013). Gaps in the Theory and Practice of Islamic Economics. Islamic Economics, 237-248.
• Ansari, M. (1994). İslamic Perspectives on Sustainable Development. The American Journal of Islamic Studies, 394–402.
• Aström, Z. H. (2011). Paradigm Shift for Sustainable Development: The Contribution of Islamic Economics. Journal of Economic and Social Studies, 73-84.
• Bilmen, Ö. (1985). Hukukı İslamiyye ve İstilahatı Fıkhıyye Kamusu, 1-10 Cilt. İstanbul: Bilmen Yayınevi.
• Boettke, P. J., Coyne, C. J., Davis, J., Guala, F., Marciano, A., Runde, J., et al. (2006). Where Economics and Philosophy Meet: Review of the Elgar Companion to Economics and Philosophy with Responses from the Authors. The Economic Journal, 306-F325.
• Branco, M. C. (2007). Family, Religion and Economic Performance: A Critique of Cultural Determinism. Review of Social Economy, Vol. Lxv, No. 4, December, 407-424.
• Bruce J. Perlman, G. G. (2007). Cultural Determinism versus Administrative Logic: Asian Values and Administrative Reform in Kazakhstan and Uzbekistan. International Journal of Public Administration, Volume 30, Issue 12-14, 1327-1342.
• Campbell, W. F. (1971). Economics And The Machiavellian Tradition. Journal of Economic Issues, 20-31.
• Çayıroğlu, Y. (2014). İslâm İktisadının karakteristik özellİkleri. İslam Hukuku Araştırmaları Dergisi, 149-183.
• Dialogue, A. A. (2015). Philosophy and Economics in the Capabilities . Journal of Human Development and Capabilities: A Multi-Disciplinary Journal for People-Centered Development, 1-14.
• Eltis, W. (1997). Rationalism and Anti-Rationalism in the History of Economics (Book Review). European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 337-342.
• Erdem, E. (2010). The Functions of State in Determining Economic Policies in Islamic Tradition. Erciyes Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 19-36.
• Es-Sadr, M. (1993). İslam Ekonomi Sistemi. Ankara: Rehber Yayıncılık, No :30, I-III.cilt, 1.Baskı.
• Gundolf, K., & Filser, M. ( 2013). Management Research and Religion: A Citation Analysis. Journal of Business Ethics, January 1,, 177–185.
• Hill, L. E. (1989). Cultural Determinism or Emergent Evolotion: An Analysis of the Controversy Between Clarenve Ayres and David Miller. Journal of Economik Issues, Vol. XXIII, No. 2, 465-471.
• Jha, Y. (2013). Examining the Meta-Principles of Modern Economics and their Implications for Islamic Banking and Finance. Islamic Sciences, Vol. 11, 169-181.
• Khan, M. F. (2013). Theorizing Islamic Economics: Search for a Framework for Islamic Economic Analysis. Islamic Econ., Vol. 26 No. 1, 203-236.
• Koehler, B. (2011). The Economist Mohammed Ibn Abdullah (570 – 632). Economic Affairs, 109-114.
• Marsuki, M. Z. (2009). Religious Agendas Towards Sustainable Development: An Islamic Perspective. Malaysian Journal of Science and Technology Studies, 22-39.
• Martin, J. (2010). At the intersection of Behavioural Economics and Philosophy: Mutually informed disciplines. South African Journal of Philosophy, 95-103.
• Mennan, M. (1984). İslam ve Çağdaş Ekonomik Konular. İstanbul: Fikir Yayınları, Terc:Ali Zengin, .
• Minkenberg, M. (2007). Democracy and Religion: Theoretical and Empirical Observations on the Relationship between Christianity, Islam and Liberal Democracy. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies,Vol. 33, No. 6, August, 887-909.
• Mirakhor, A. (2014). The Starry Heavens Above and the Moral Law Within: On the Flatness of Economics. Econ Journal Watch, 186-193.
• Mutahhari, M. (1995). İslami İktisadın Felsefesi. İstanbul: İnsan Yayınları, No :172.
• Nakvi, N. H. (1985). Ekonomi ve Ahlak. İstanbul: İnsan Yayınları.
• Nienhaus, V. (2013). Method and Substance of Islamic Economics: Moving Where? Islamic Economics, 169-202.
• Nursi, B. S. (1960). Sözler. İstanbul: Envar Neşraiyat.
• Nursi, B. S. (1970). Lemalar. İstanbul: Envar Neşriyat.
• Nursi, B. S. (1993). Münazarat. İstanbul: Envar Neşriyat.
• Reda, A. (2013). Islam and Markets. Review of Social Economy, 20-43.
• Riis, O. (1989). The Role of Religion in Legitimating the Modern Structuration of Society. Acta Sociologia, 137153.
• Salman, A. (2013). The Libertarian Character of the Islamic Economy. economic affairs, volume 33, number 1, 108-120.
• Shittu, A. B. (2014). The Qur'anic worldview: A springboard for cultural reform. Intellectual Discourse, 239-242.
• Sidani, Y., & Ariss, A. A. (2015). New Conceptual Foundations for Islamic Business Ethics:The Contributions of Abu-Hamid Al-Ghazali. Journal of Business Ethics, 847–857.
• Steigerwald, D. (2005). Our New Cultural Determinizm. Society, January 1, 71-75.
• Tabakoğlu, A. (1988). İslam ve Ekonomik Hayat. Ankara: Diyanet Yayınları.
• Talegani, M. (1989). İsmal ve Mülkiyet. İstanbul: Yöneliş Yayınları.
• Teymiyye, İ. (1967). El- Hisbe fi El- İslam. Kahire.
• Wible, J. (2000). Complexity In Peirce’S Economics And Philosophy. C. S. PEIRCE içinde, Complexity & the History of Economic Thought (s. 74-103). Research and Development.
• Wight, J. B. (2014). Economics within a Pluralist Ethical Tradition. Review of Social Economy, Volume 72, Issue 4, 417-435.
• Wilber, C. K. (1974). The 'New' Economic History Re-examined: R. H. Tawney on the Origins of Capitalism. American Journal of Economics & Sociology, July 1,, 249-258.
• Wishloff, J. (2009). The Land of Realism and the Shipwreck of Idea-ism: Thomas Aquinas and Milton Friedman on the Social Responsibilities of Business. Journal of Business Ethics , 137–155.
• Yusuf, E. (1970). Kitap El- Haraç, . İstanbul: Çev: Ali Özbek.
• Zaim, S. (1992). İslam-İnsan-Ekonomsi. İstanbul: Yeni Asya Yayınları.
• Zaman, A. (2012). Crisis in Islamic Economics: Diagnosis and Prescriptions. Islamic Econ, n., Vol. 25 No. 1, 143-166.