Experimental Investigation of the Effects of Process Parameters on Product Geometry and Weight in the Injection Molding Process with PE100 Material

Öz

This study investigates the influence of key process parameters on the geometric and physical properties of parts produced by injection molding using high-density polyethylene (PE100). The parameters include packing pressure, melt temperature, and cooling time which are systematically varied based on MoldFlow simulations. Samples are analyzed using an ATOS Q 3D scanning system and a high-precision digital scale. Results show that increasing packing pressure improves flatness and dimensional accuracy. While higher melt temperature enhances surface flatness, it also increases cylindrical deformations. Cooling time positively affects flatness but may lead to deformation in the upper cylinder. Regarding product weight, packing pressure has the most significant effect, followed by melt temperature, whereas cooling time shows minimal impact. The experimental findings offer practical and reliable insights for optimizing injection molding processes involving dense materials like PE100, providing meaningful contributions to both design and production strategies.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• PE100
• Injection molding
• Packing pressure
• Melt temperature
• Cooling time
• Shrinkages

Destekleyen Kurum

Samsun University and Poelsan Plastic Industry and Trade Inc.

Proje Numarası

Yok

Etik Beyan

Ethics committee approval was not required for this study because of there was no study on animals or humans.

Teşekkür

The authors gratefully acknowledge Poelsan Plastic Industry and Trade Inc. for their valuable technical support and for providing the materials used in the experimental studies presented in this paper.

Kaynakça

1. Ahmad, A. H., Leman, Z., Azmir, M. A., Muhamad, K. F., Harun, W. S. W., Juliawati, A., & Alias, A. B. S. (2009). Optimization of warpage defect in injection moulding process using ABS material. In 2009 Third Asia International Conference on Modelling & Simulation (pp. 470-474). IEEE.Altan, M. (2010). Reducing shrinkage in injection molding via the Taguchi, ANOVA and neural network methods. Materials & Design, 31, 599–604.
2. Angstadt, D. C., & Coulter, J. P. (1999). Cavity pressure and part quality in the injection molding process. In ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition (Vol. 16622, pp. 7-17). American Society of Mechanical Engineers.
3. Bushko, W. C., & Stokes, V. K. (1996). Solidification of thermoviscoelastic melts. Part 3: Effects of mold surface temperature differences on warpage and residual stresses. Polymer Engineering & Science, 36(3), 322-335.
4. Garcı́a, N., González, E., Baselga, J., & Bravo, J. (2003). Critical thickness estimation in ISO-MC cards injection using CAE tools. Journal of materials processing technology, 143, 491-494.
5. Hussin, R., Saad, R. M., Hussin, R., & Dawi, M. S. I. M. (2012). An optimization of plastic injection molding parameters using Taguchi optimization method. Asian Transactions on Engineering, 2(5), 75-80.
6. Jafarian, A. R., & Shakeri, M. (2005). Investigating the Influence of Different Process Parameters on Shrinkage of Injection-Molded Parts. American Journal of Applied Sciences, 2(3), 688-700.
7. Jansen, K. M. B., Van Dijk, D. J., & Husselman, M. H. (1998). Effect of processing conditions on shrinkage in injection molding. Polymer Engineering & Science, 38(5), 838-846.
8. Jansen, K. M. B., & Titomanlio, G. (1996). Effect of pressure history on shrinkage and residual stresses—injection molding with constrained shrinkage. Polymer Engineering & Science, 36(15), 2029-2040.

9. Kazmer, D., & Barkan, P. (1997). Multi‐cavity pressure control in the filling and packing stages of the injection molding process. Polymer Engineering & Science, 37(11), 1865-1879.
10. Mustaffa, M. T., Radhwan, H., Annuar, A. F., Azmi, H., Zakaria, M. Z., & Khalil, A. N. M. (2015). An optimization of shrinkage in injection molding parts by using Taguchi method. Journal of Advanced Research in Applied Mechanics, 10(1), 1-8.
11. Mathivanan, D., Nouby, M., & Vidhya, R. (2010). Minimization of sink mark defects in injection molding process–Taguchi approach. International Journal of Engineering, Science and Technology, 2(2), 13-22.
12. Postawa, P., & Koszkul, J. (2005). Change in injection moulded parts shrinkage and weight as a function of processing conditions. Journal of materials processing technology, 162, 109-115.
13. Tang, S. H., Kong, Y. M., Sapuan, S. M., Samin, R., & Sulaiman, S. (2006). Design and thermal analysis of plastic injection mould. Journal of materials processing technology, 171(2), 259-267.
14. Titomanlio, G., & Jansen, K. M. B. (1996). In‐mold shrinkage and stress prediction in injection molding. Polymer Engineering & Science, 36(15), 2041-2049.
15. Turng, L. S., & Peić, M. (2002). Computer aided process and design optimization for injection moulding. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part B: Journal of Engineering Manufacture, 216(12), 1523-1532.
16. Zhang, L., Theurer, C. B., Gao, R. X., & Kazmer, D. O. (2001). Design of a wireless sensor for injection molding cavity pressure measurement. In ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition (Vol. 35609, pp. 1-7). American Society of Mechanical Engineers.