Alman Ebeveynlerin Orman Anaokullarına İlişkin Tercih Nedenleri ve Beklentileri

Öz

Bu araştırma, Alman ebeveynlerin çocuklarının eğitimi için orman anaokulunu tercih etme nedenlerini, orman anaokulundan beklentilerini ve izlenimlerini belirlemeyi amaçlamaktadır. Bununla birlikte beklentilerinin karşılanıp karşılanmadığına dair izlenimlerini ortaya çıkarmak da diğer bir amaçtır. Almanya’nın Hamburg şehrinde bulunan tipik bir orman anaokulunda altı ebeveyn ile yürütülen bu araştırma nitel bir araştırma deseni olan durum çalışmasıdır. Veriler yarı yapılandırılmış görüşme formlarıyla toplanmıştır. Araştırma sonunda tercih nedenleri, beklentiler ve izlenimler olmak üzere üç temaya ulaşılmıştır. Araştırma sonucuna göre ebeveynler çocuğun doğaya yakınlaşması, doğal materyallerle oynaması gibi doğayla ilişkili; açık havada bulunmasını sağlaması, fiziksel aktivitesini artırması gibi sağlıkla ilişkili; ebeveynin kendi çocukluğu, geleneksel eğitimden memnuniyetsizliği gibi çeşitli deneyimlerle ilişkili nedenlerden dolayı çocukları için orman anaokulunu tercih etmektedir. Ek olarak Alman ebeveynler, sağlık ve gelişimle, doğayla, öğrenme yöntemiyle ve oyunla ilgili beklentilere sahiptir. Ayrıca ebeveynlerin izlenimlerine göre, orman anaokullarına giden çocuklar daha özgür, becerikli, yorgun ama mutlu, çevreye duyarlı, oyuncu, sosyal, sağlıklı, bilgili, cesur, aktif, kendine güvenen, odaklanmış ve yaratıcı hale gelmektedirler.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Orman anaokulu
• Ebeveynler
• Tercih
• beklentiler

German Parents' Reasons for Preferring Forest Kindergartens and Their Expectations

Öz

This study aims to determine the reasons why German parents prefer forest kindergartens for their children's education, as well as their expectations and impressions of forest kindergartens. Additionally, another aim is to uncover their impressions regarding whether their expectations have been met. Conducted with six parents in a typical forest kindergarten in Hamburg, Germany, this research employs a qualitative research design known as a case study. Data collected through semi-structured interview forms. The study reveals three main themes: reasons for preference, expectations, and impressions. According to the results, parents choose forest kindergartens for reasons related to nature, such as bringing children closer to nature and playing with natural materials; health-related reasons, like ensuring outdoor activity and increasing physical activity; and various experiential reasons, such as the parents' own childhood experiences and dissatisfaction with traditional education. Furthermore, parents hold expectations related to health and development, nature, learning methods, and play. According to the parents' impressions, children who attend forest kindergartens become freer, capable, tired but happy, environmentally conscious, playful, social, healthy, knowledgeable, brave, active, self-confident, focused, and creative.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Forest kindergarten
• Parents
• Preference
• expectations

Kaynakça

1. Absoud, M., Cummins, C., Lim, M. J., Wassmer, E., & Shaw, N. (2011). Prevalence and predictors of vitamin D insufficiency in children: A Great Britain population based study. PloS One, 6(7), 1–6.
2. Adamu-Issah, M. (2020). Parental motivation and the enrolment of their children into kindergarten [Doktora tezi, University of Cape Coast]. DSpace. https://ir.ucc.edu.gh/xmlui/handle/123456789/4267
3. Ahi, B., Kaya, G., & Kahriman-Pamuk, D. (2023). Forest schools as a family choice: a narrative study. Early Child Development and Care, 193(5), 647–660. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004430.2022.2131779
4. Akıncı Coşgun, A., Özer, Z., & Aydın Bölükbaş, F. (2021). Bir waldorf anaokulu hakkında ebeveyn ve öğretmen görüşlerinin incelenmesi. E-Kafkas Journal of Educational Research, 8(2), 320–337.
5. Aksoy, P. (2020). Koronavirüs salgını ile ortaya çıkan sürecin okul öncesi dönem çocukları üzerindeki etkilerine ilişkin ebeveyn algıları. The Journal of Academic Social Science Studies, 81(13), 115–138. https://doi.org/10.29228/JASSS.46326
6. Ashmann, S. (2018). Developing a nature-based four-year-old kindergarten program: Oak Learning Center at Bay Beach Wildlife Sanctuary in Green Bay. International Journal of Early Childhood Environmental Education, 6(1), 35–43.
7. Bakken, L., Brown, N., & Downing, B. (2017). Early childhood education: The long-term benefits. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 31(2), 255–269. https://doi.org/10.1080/02568543.2016.1273285
8. Bal, E., & Ceylan, R. (2019). Ebeveynlerin okul öncesi eğitim kurumları ile ilgili görüşleri: Seçme nedenleri ve kurumdan beklentileri. D. K. Dimitrov, D. Nikoloski, & R. Yılmaz (Haz.), Proceedings of XI. International Balkan and Near Eastern Social Sciences Congress Series içinde (s. 277–288).

9. Bilgi, O. ve Stenger, U. (2021). Phenomena. B. Bloch, M. Kuhn, M. Schulz, W. Smidt, & U. Stenger (Haz.), Early Childhood Education in Germany: Exploring Historical Developments and Theoretical Issues içinde (s. 73–89). Taylor and Francis.
10. Borge, A. I., Nordhagen, R., & Lie, K. K. (2003). Children in the environment: Forest day-care centers. The History of the Family, 8(4), 605–618.
11. Boyer, R. (2020). Forest kindergarten and the perception of parents [Bitirme tezi, University of Tennessee]. UTC Scholar. https://scholar.utc.edu/honors-theses/233
12. Brady, E., & Gilligan, R. (2018). The life course perspective: An integrative research paradigm for examining the educational experiences of adult care leavers? Children and Youth Services Review, 87, 69–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2018.02.019
13. Bundesverband der Natur- und Waldkindergärten. (2023). Natur- und Waldkindergärten in Deutschland. https://www.bvnw.de/
14. Burke, R. S. (2014). Taming the wild: Approaches to nature in Japanese early childhood education. International Journal of Early Childhood Environmental Education, 2(1), 76–96.
15. Byron, M. (2016). Adapting the european forest kindergarten model to urban areas [Yüksek lisans tezi, University of Wisconsin-Stevens Point]. Minds. http://digital.library.wisc.edu/1793/81898
16. Cleland, V., Crawford, D., Baur, L.A., Hume, C., Timperio, A., & Salmon, J. (2008). A prospective examination of children’s time spent outdoors, objectively measured physical activity and overweight. International Journal of Obesity, 32, 1685–1693.
17. Cordiano, T. S., Lee, A., Wilt, J., Elszasz, A., Damour, L. K., & Russ, S. W. (2019). Nature-based education and kindergarten readiness: Nature-based and traditional preschoolers are equally prepared for kindergarten. International Journal of Early Childhood Environmental Education, 6(3), 18–36.
18. Cornell Card, B. E. (2014). Forest kindergarten: A qualitative case study comparing the emergent and play-based curriculum at cedarsong nature school to the newfoundland and labrador kindergarten [Yüksek lisans tezi, Memorial University of Newfoundland]. Memorial University Research Repository. https://research.library.mun.ca/8324/
19. Fjørtoft, I., & Sageie, J. (2000). The natural environment as a playground for children: Landscape description and analyses of a natural playscape. Landscape and Urban Planning, 48(1-2), 83–97.
20. Flores, U. (2014). Bildung für nachhaltige Entwicklung im Waldkindergarten – umgesetzt durch die Methoden der NaturSpielpädagogik [Bitirme tezi, University of Applied Sciences Koblenz]. Fachhochschule Kiel. https://www.fh-kiel.de/fileadmin/data/weiterbildung/Programm/Bildung-fu__776_r-nachhaltige-Entwicklung-im-Waldkindergarten-_-umgesetzt-durch-die-Methoden-der-NaturSpielpa__776_dagogik.pdf
21. Foun, A., Vengat, S., & Young, S. (2022). Parental expectations and deciding factors for kindergartens in China [Bitirme tezi, Worcester Polytechnic Institute]. Digital WPI. https://digital.wpi.edu/concern/student_works/6682x7323?locale=zh
22. Gall, H. (2018). Developing a business model for an all-day nature-based preschool in the twin cities metro area of Minnesota [Yüksek lisans tezi, Hamline University]. DigitalCommons. https://digitalcommons.hamline.edu/hse_cp/177
23. Harwood, D., Reichheld, S., McElhone, S., & McKinlay, B. (2017). "I can climb the tree!" Exploring young children's play and physical activity in a forest school program. The International Journal of Holistic Early Learning and Development, 4, 45–62.
24. Howlett, K., & Turner, E. C. (2022). Effects of COVID‐19 lockdown restrictions on parents' attitudes towards green space and time spent outside by children in Cambridgeshire and North London, United Kingdom. People and Nature, 4(2), 400–414.
25. Hunter, J., Syversen, K., Graves, C., & Bodensteiner, A. (2019). Balancing outdoor learning and play: Adult perspectives of teacher roles and practice in an outdoor classroom. International Journal of Early Childhood Environmental Education, 7(2), 34–50.
26. Hutchison, E. (2011). A life course perspective. E. Hutchinson (Haz.) Dimensions of human behaviour: The changing life course içinde (s. 1–38). SAGE Publications.
27. Kampichler, M., Dvořáčková, J., & Jarkovská, L. (2018). Choosing the right kindergarten: Parents’ reasoning about their ECEC choices in the context of the diversification of ECEC programs. Journal of Pedagogy, 9(2), 9–32.
28. Kandemir, M. (2020). Outdoor time practices in early childhood education: Parent and teacher views [Yüksek lisans tezi, Middle East Technical University]. OpenMETU. https://hdl.handle.net/11511/69269
29. Kane, A. & Kane, J. (2011). Waldkindergarten in Germany. Green Teacher, 94, 16–19.
30. Kim, J. & Fram, M. S. (2009). Profiles of choices: Parents’ patters of priority in child care decision-making. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 24, 77–91.
31. Klinkhammer, N. & Scholz, A. (2021). The German ECEC system governance structure, policies and constitutive norms. B. Bloch, M. Kuhn, M. Schulz, W. Smidt, & U. Stenger (Haz.), Early Childhood Education in Germany: Exploring Historical Developments and Theoretical Issues içinde (s. 125–141). Taylor and Francis.
32. Kruse, I. (2013). Der Waldkindergarten als Therapeutische Landschaft [Yüksek lisans tezi, Berlin School of Public Health]. Das Bundesforschungszentrum für Wald. https://bfw.ac.at/cms_stamm/050/images/green_care_wald/MASTERARBEIT-Ines-Walden-Kruse.pdf
33. Larimore, R. (2016). Defining nature-based preschools. International Journal of Early Childhood Environmental Education, 4(1), 32–36.
34. Lee, S. (2019). Early childhood teachers' perspectives of outdoor and nature play in Seoul, South Korea and Montreal, Canada [Doktora tezi, Concordia University]. Spectrum Research Repository. https://spectrum.library.concordia.ca/id/eprint/985593/
35. MacEachren, Z. (2013). The Canadian Forest School movement. Learning Landscapes, 17(1), 219–233. https://doi.org/10.36510/LEARNLAND.V7I1.639
36. Malovic, M., & Malovic, S. (2017). Parents' perspective on the quality of kindergarten. Research in Pedagogy, 7(2), 200–220.
37. McCurdy, L. E., Winterbottom, K. E., Mehta, S. S., & Roberts, J. R. (2010). Using nature and outdoor activity to improve children’s health. Current Problems in Pediatric and Adolescent Health Care, 40(5), 102–17.
38. Menteş, H. S. & Sarıbaş, Ş. (2022). COVID-19 pandemi sürecinde ebeveyn görüşlerine göre okul öncesi dönem çocuklarının açık hava oyun deneyimlerindeki değişimler. Yaşadıkça Eğitim, 36(3), 656–672.
39. Moss, S. (2012). Natural childhood. National Trust.
40. Mtahabwa, L. (2011). Parental demand, choice and access to early childhood education in Tanzania. Early Child Development and Care, 181(1), 89–102. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004430903271012
41. Nadasdy, R. (2018). Working with students with special needs in forest pedagogy: Pedagogues’ practices in i Ur och Skur Preschools in Sweden [Bitirme tezi, Jönköping University]. DivaPortal. https://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:1219390/FULLTEXT01.pdf
42. Nah, K. O., & Waller, T. (2015). Outdoor play in preschools in England and South Korea: Learning from polyvocal methods. Early Child Development and Care, 185(11–12), 2010–2025. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004430.2015.1028397
43. Ordon, U. (2019). Forest nursery schools and the need for health and ecological education among the youngest. Edukacja Elementarna w Teorii i Praktyce, 14(3), 111–120. https://doi.org/10.35765/eetp.2019.1453.07
44. Öztürk, Y., & Özer, Z. (2022). Outdoor play activities and outdoor environment of early childhood education in Turkey: A qualitative meta-synthesis. Early Child Development and Care, 192(11), 1752–1767. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004430.2021.1932865
45. Saldana, J. (2022). Nitel araştırmacılar için kodlama el kitabı. Pegem Akademi Yayıncılık
46. Sampson, S. D. (2022). Doğa dostu çocuk nasıl yetiştirilir? Doğayı sevme sanatı ve bilimi. Alfa Yayıncılık
47. Schaller, R. (2023). Exploring perspectives on nature-based early childhood education: A comparative analysis of educators and families. comparative analysis of educators and families [Yüksek lisans tezi, Hamline Unıversıty]. Digital Commons.https://digitalcommons.hamline.edu/hse_all/4602
48. Schulz, M., Kuhn, M., Bloch, B., Smidt, W. & Stenger, U. (2021). Historical development and current frameworks. B. Bloch, M. Kuhn, M. Schulz, W. Smidt, & U. Stenger (Haz.), Early Childhood Education in Germany: Exploring Historical Developments and Theoretical Issues içinde (s. 23–34). Taylor and Francis.
49. Sop, A., & Dalkıran Turgut, M. (2021). Ebeveynlerin çocukları için Montessori yöntemi uygulayan anaokulu seçme nedenleri. Erken Çocukluk Çalışmaları Dergisi, 5(1), 66–91. https://doi.org/10.24130/eccd-jecs.1967202151229
50. Specht, I. O., Larsen, S. C., Nielsen, A. K., Rohde, J. F., Heitmann, B. L., & Jørgensen, T. S. (2023). Types of kindergarten and their relationship with parental and children’s socio-demographic characteristics in Denmark. PloS One, 18(7), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0288846
51. Statistisches Bundesamt. (2023). Betreuungsquote von Kindern unter 6 Jahren nach Bundesländern. https://www.destatis.de/DE/Themen/Gesellschaft-Umwelt/Soziales/Kindertagesbetreuung/Tabellen/betreuungsquote.html
52. Suchert, V., Hanewinkel, R., & Isensee, B. (2015). Sedentary behavior and indicators of mental health in school-aged children and adolescents: A systematic review. Preventive Medicine: An International Journal Devoted to Practice and Theory, 76, 48–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2015.03.026
53. Truong, M. V., Nakabayashi, M., & Hosaka, T. (2022). How to encourage parents to let children play in nature: Factors affecting parental perception of children's nature play. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 69, 1–8.
54. Wang, Y. (2020). Reflections on China Triggered by the Forest Kindergarten in Kassel, Germany. Proceedings of the 2020 5th International Conference on Modern Management and Education Technology (MMET 2020) içinde (s. 47–50). Atlantis Press.
55. Wells, N. M., & Evans, G. W. (2003). Nearby nature: A buffer of life stress among rural children. Environment and Behavior, 35(3), 311–330.
56. White, R. (2006). Young children’s relationship with nature. Taproot, 16(2), 1–10.
57. Yıldırım, A. & Şimşek, H. (2018). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri. Seçkin.
58. Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods. Sage.