Bibliometric and Content Analysis of Teacher Agency Research: 2006-2024

Öz

The purpose of this study is to examine the trends of studies on teacher agency through bibliometric analysis using a quantitative science mapping approach. Within the scope of the study, 504 studies on teacher agency indexed in SSCI, ESCI, AHCI, and SCI-Expanded in the Web of Science database were included in the analysis. While obtaining the data, inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied, and the process of the data gathering was shown in detail with the PRISMA flow diagram. Clustering method, co-citation method and bibliometric matching method were used to analyse the data, and keyword, author, document, and country analyses were performed. R biblioshiny library was used to analyse the data. As a result of the research, it was determined that teacher agency studies have increased in recent years. The high number of publications in the United States, the United Kingdom, Australia, China, and Finland demonstrates that educational reforms, curriculum development, and educational policies have led to an increase in teacher agency studies. Keyword and trend topic analyses reveal that teacher agency is also closely linked to teacher identity, autonomy, commitment, and beliefs, and has been explored in conjunction with key concepts such as social justice, professional learning, neoliberalism, and COVID-19 in recent years.

Öğretmen Etkenliği Araştırmalarının Bibliyometrik ve İçerik Analizi: 2006-2024

Öz

Bu çalışmanın amacı, öğretmen etkenliği üzerine yapılan çalışmaların eğilimlerini nicel bilim haritalama yaklaşımından yararlanarak bibliyometrik analiz yoluyla incelemektir. Çalışma kapsamında Web of Science veri tabanında SSCI, ESCI, A&HCI ve SCI-Expanded indeksli öğretmen etkenliği üzerine yapılan 504 araştırma analize dahil edilmiştir. Veriler elde edilirken dahil etme ve çıkarma kriterleri uygulanmış, PRISMA akış diyagramı ile verilerin elde edilme süreci detaylı bir şekilde gösterilmiştir. Verilerin analizinde kümeleme yöntemi, ortak atıf yöntemi ve bibliyometrik eşleme yönteminden yararlanılmış, kelime, yazar, doküman ve ülke analizi yapılmıştır. Veriler analiz edilirken R biblioshiny kütüphanesi kullanılmıştır. Araştırma sonucunda öğretmen etkenliği çalışmalarının son yıllarda artış gösterdiği belirlenmiştir. Özellikle Amerika Birleşik Devletleri, Birleşik Krallık, Avustralya, Çin ve Finlandiya’daki yüksek yayın sayıları, yapılan eğitim reformlarının, geliştirilen eğitim programlarının ve eğitsel politikaların öğretmen etkenliği çalışmalarını artırdığını göstermektedir. Kelime ve trend konu analizleri öğretmen etkenliğinin öğretmen kimliği, özerkliği, adanmışlığı ve inançları ile de ilişkili olduğunu ve son yıllarda sosyal adalet, mesleki öğrenme, neoliberalizm, COVID-19 anahtar kavramları ile birlikte çalışıldığını göstermektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Öğretmen etkenliği
• eğitim reformları
• öğretmen kimliği
• bibliyometrik analiz.

Kaynakça

1. Allen, L. Q. (2018). Teacher leadership and the advancement of teacher agency. Foreign Language Annals, 51(1), 240-250. https://doi.org/10.1111/flan.12311.
2. Andrés A (2009) Measuring academic research: How to undertake a bibliometric study. Amsterdam: Elsevier. Ariaa, M. and Cuccurullo, C. (2017), Bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of Informetrics, 11(4), 959-975, doi: 10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007.
3. Bandura, A. (2006). Toward a psychology of human agency. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 1(2), 164-180.
4. Bandura, A. (2009). Social cognitive theory goes global. The Psychologist, 22, 504–506. Retrieved from https://thepsychologist.bps.org.uk/getfile/1795.
5. Beijaard, D., Meijer, P. C., & Verloop, N. (2004). Reconsidering research on teachers’ professional identity. Teaching and teacher education, 20(2), 107-128.
6. Bellibaş, M. Ş., Çalışkan, Ö., & Gümüş, S. (2019). Öğretmen Failliği Ölçeği’nin (ÖFÖ) geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. Trakya Eğitim Dergisi, 9(1), 1-11. https://doi.org//10.24315/trkefd.406391.
7. Berberoğlu, A. (2023). Etken öğretmenlik ile öğretim programı okuryazarlığı arasındaki ilişkinin incelenmesi. Yayınlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi, Bolu Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi, Bolu.
8. Biesta, G., & Tedder, M. (2007). Agency and learning in the lifecourse: Towards an ecological perspective. Studies in the Education of Adults, 39(2), 132-149. https://doi.org/10.1080/02660830.2007.11661545.

9. Bourdieu, Pierre. (1977). Outline of a theory of practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
10. Buchanan, R. (2015). Teacher identity and agency in an era of accountability. Teachers and Teaching, 21(6), 700-719. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2015.1044329.
11. Burnard, P., & White, J. (2008). Creativity and performativity: Counterpoints in British and Australian education. British Educational Research Journal, 34(5), 667-682. https://doi.org/10.1080/01411920802224238
12. Campbell, E. (2012). Teacher agency in curriculum contexts. Curriculum Inquiry, 42(2), 183-190. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-873X.2012.00593.x
13. Castro, A. J., Kelly, J., & Shih, M. (2010). Resilience strategies for new teachers in high-needs areas. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26(3), 622-629. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2009.09.010
14. Chung, J.; (2023) Research-informed teacher education, teacher autonomy and teacher agency: the example of Finland. London Review of Education, 21(1), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.14324/LRE.21.1.13
15. Cong-Lem, N. (2021). Teacher agency: A systematic review of international literature. Issues in Educational Research, 31(3), 718-738.
16. Darling-Hammond, L. (2000). Teacher quality and student achievement. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 8(1), 1-44.
17. Datnow, A. (2012). Teacher agency in educational reform: Lessons from social networks research. American Journal of Education, 119(1), 193-201. https://doi.org/10.1086/667708
18. Davies, B. (1991). The concept of agency: A feminist poststructuralist analysis. Social Analysis: The International Journal of Social and Cultural Practice 30: 42–53.
19. Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Mukherjee, D., Pandey, N., & Lim, W. M. (2021). How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. Journal of business research, 133, 285-296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070
20. Emam, M. M., Hilal, Y. Y., Mohamed, N., & Al-Mahdy, Y. F. H. (2023). ‘Between think big and hit hard’exploring the role of teacher agency in becoming action researchers: The Egyptian context. Educational Action Research, 31(1), 135-152. https://doi.org/10.1080/09650792.2022.2159470
21. Emirbayer, M., & Mische, A. (1998). What is agency?. American journal of sociology, 103(4), 962-1023.
22. Erdem, C. (2020). Öğretmen kimliği araştırmalarında yeni bir kavram: Öğretmen etkenliği. Adıyaman Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 10(1), 32-55. https://doi.org/10.17984/adyuebd.712097
23. Erss, M., & Kalmus, V. (2018). Discourses of teacher autonomy and the role of teachers in Estonian, Finnish and Bavarian teachers' newspapers in 1991–2010. Teaching and Teacher Education, 76, 95-105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2018.08.003
24. Eteläpelto, A., Vähäsantanen, K., & Hökkä, P. (2015). How do novice teachers in Finland perceive their professional agency? Teachers and Teaching, 21(6), 660-680. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2015.1044327
25. Frostenson, M. (2015). Three forms of professional autonomy: De-professionalisation of teachers in a new light. Nordic Journal of Studies in Educational Policy, 2015(2), 28464. https://doi.org/10.3402/nstep.v1.28464
26. Fu, G., & Clarke, A. (2017). Teacher agency in the Canadian context: Linking the how and the what. Journal of Education for Teaching, 43(5), 581-593. https://doi.org/10.1080/02607476.2017.1355046
27. Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structuration. University of California Press.
28. Giroux, H. A. 2001. Theory and resistance in education: Towards a pedagogy for the opposition. Santa Barbara, CA.: Greenwood Publishing Group.
29. Guopeng Fu & Anthony Clarke (2017) Teacher agency in the Canadian context: linking the how and the what, Journal of Education for Teaching, 43:5, 581-593. https://doi.org/10.1080/02607476.2017.1355046
30. Gülmez, G. (2019). Factors behind teacher agency: A structural equational modelling study. Yayınlanmamış doktora tezi, Orta Doğu Teknik Üniversitesi, Ankara.
31. Hinostroza, Y. (2020). University teacher educators’ professional agency: A literature review. Professions and Professionalism, 10(2). https://doi.org/10.7577/pp.3544
32. Hoyle, E. and John, P. D. (1995). Professional knowledge and professional practice. London: Cassell.
33. Hökkä, P., Vähäsantanen, K., & Mahlakaarto, S. (2017). Teacher educators' collective professional agency and identity–Transforming marginality to strength. Teaching and Teacher Education, 63, 36-46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2016.12.001
34. Höl, Ş. (2024). Erken yıllarda etken öğretmenlik: Okul öncesi öğretmenlerini etken yapan özelliklerin ve uygulamaların incelenmesi. Yayınlanmamış doktora tezi, Hacettepe Üniversitesi, Ankara.
35. Imants, J., & Van der Wal, M. M. (2020). A model of teacher agency in professional development and school reform. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 52(1), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2019.1604809
36. Karataş, P. (2024). English language teacher agency: A narrative inquiry in a higher education context. Yayınlanmamış doktora tezi, Orta Doğu Teknik Üniversitesi, Ankara.
37. Kaval, T. (2024). Öğretmenlerin öğretmen failliği ile okullarda sosyal adalet algıları arasındaki ilişkinin incelenmesi (Muğla ili örneği). Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Muğla Sıtkı Koçman Üniversitesi, Muğla.
38. Kaya, S. (2025). Örgütsel sinizm, öğretmen failliği ve sınıf içi etkili iletişim becerileri arasındaki ilişkiler. Yayınlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi, Zonguldak Bülent Ecevit Üniversitesi, Zonguldak.
39. Kayi-Aydar, H. (2015). Teacher agency, positioning, and English language learners: Voices of pre-service classroom teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 45, 94-103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2014.09.009
40. Ketonen, L., & Nieminen, J. H. (2025). Professional autonomy vs. assessment criteria: teacher agency in the midst of assessment reform. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2025.2460476
41. Lai, C., Li, Z., & Gong, Y. (2016). Teacher agency and professional learning in cross-cultural teaching contexts: Accounts of Chinese teachers from international schools in Hong Kong. Teaching and Teacher Education, 54, 12-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2015.11.007
42. Lasky, S. (2005). A sociocultural approach to understanding teacher identity, agency and professional vulnerability in a context of secondary school reform. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21(8), 899-916. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2005.06.003
43. Liu, S., Hallinger, P., & Feng, D. (2016). Supporting the professional learning of teachers in China: Does principal leadership make a difference? Teaching and Teacher Education, 59, 79-91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2016.05.023
44. Mausethagen, S., & Mølstad, C. E. (2015). Shifts in curriculum control: Contesting ideas of teacher autonomy. Nordic Journal of Studies in Educational Policy, 2015(2), 28520. https://doi.org/10.3402/nstep.v1.28520
45. Miller, A. L., Wilt, C. L., Allcock, H. C., Kurth, J. A., Morningstar, M. E., & Ruppar, A. L. (2022). Teacher agency for inclusive education: An international scoping review. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 26(12), 1159-1177. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2020.1789766
46. Nazari, M., De Costa, P. I., & Karimpour, S. (2023). The role of institutional policy in English language teacher autonomy, agency, and identity: A poststructural perspective. Language Teaching Research, 13621688221143476. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168822114347
47. Öğretmenlik Mesleği Kanunu, Kanun No. 7528, Resmî Gazete, Sayı: 32696, 18 Ekim 2024. https://www.resmigazete.gov.tr/
48. Pantić, N. (2015). A model for study of teacher agency for social justice. Teachers and Teaching, 21(6), 759-778. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2015.1044332
49. Parkison, P. (2008). Space for performing teacher identity: Through the lens of Kafka and Hegel. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 14(1), 51-60. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540600701837640
50. Price, D. D. S. (1976). A general theory of bibliometric and other cumulative advantage processes. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 27(5), 292-306.
51. Priestley, M., Edwards, R., Priestley, A., & Miller, K. (2012). Teacher agency in curriculum making: Agents of change and spaces for manoeuvre. Curriculum Inquiry, 42(2), 191-214. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-873X.2012.00588.x
52. Priestley, M., Biesta, G. J. J., Philippou, S., & Robinson, S. (2015). The teacher and the curriculum: Exploring teacher agency. In D. Wyse, L. Hayward, & J. Pandya (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of curriculum, pedagogy and assessment (pp. 187– 201). SAGE.
53. Pyhältö, K., Pietarinen, J., & Soini, T. (2015). Teachers’ professional agency and learning–from adaption to active modification in the teacher community. Teachers and Teaching, 21(7), 811-830. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2014.995483
54. Robinson, S. (2012). Constructing teacher agency in response to the constraints of education policy: Adoption and adaptation. Curriculum Journal, 23(2), 231-245. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585176.2012.678702
55. Severance, S., Penuel, W. R., Sumner, T., & Leary, H. (2018). Organizing for teacher agency in curricular co-design. In Cultural-historical activity theory approaches to design-based research (pp. 45-78). Routledge.
56. Sloan, K. (2006). Teacher identity and agency in school worlds: beyond the all‐good/all‐bad discourse on accountability‐explicit curriculum policies. Curriculum Inquiry, 36(2), 119-152. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-873X.2006.00350.x
57. Tao, J., & Gao, X. (2017). Teacher agency and identity commitment in curricular reform. Teaching and Teacher Education, 63, 346-355. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.01.010
58. Toom, A., Pyhältö, K., Pietarinen, J., & Soini, T. (2021). Professional agency for learning as a key for developing teachers’ competencies? Education sciences, 11(7), 324. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11070324
59. Toom, A., Pyhältö, K., & Rust, F. O. C. (2015). Teachers’ professional agency in contradictory times. Teachers and Teaching, 21(6), 615-623. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2015.1044334
60. Tran, H. (2018). Teacher agency in times of educational change: the case of transitioned teachers in Vietnam. Current Issues in Language Planning, 20(5), 544–559. https://doi.org/10.1080/14664208.2018.1553912. https://doi.org/10.1080/14664208.2018.1553912
61. Trust, T., & Whalen, J. (2020). Should teachers be trained in emergency remote teaching? Lessons learned from the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 28(2), 189–199. https://doi.org/10.70725/307718pkpjuu
62. Vähäsantanen, K. (2015). Professional agency in the stream of change: Understanding educational change and teachers' professional identities. Teaching and Teacher Education, 47, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2014.11.006
63. Van der Heijden, H. R. M. A., Geldens, J. J., Beijaard, D., & Popeijus, H. L. (2015). Characteristics of teachers as change agents. Teachers and Teaching, 21(6), 681-699. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2015.1044328
64. Vural, N. (2022). Okul iklimi ile öğretmen failliği arasındaki ilişkinin incelenmesi. Yayınlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi, Yozgat Bozok Üniversitesi, Yozgat.
65. Wermke, W., & Höstfält, G. (2014). Contextualizing teacher autonomy in time and space: A model for comparing various forms of governing the teaching profession. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 46(1), 58-80. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2013.812681
66. Wermke, W., & Forsberg, E. (2017). The changing nature of autonomy: Transformations of the late Swedish teaching profession. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 61(2), 155-168. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2015.1119727
67. Yaylı, D. (2017). Coping strategies of pre-service teachers of Turkish with tensions in achieving agency. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 17(68), 187-202. http://dx.doi.org/10.14689/ejer.2017.68.10
68. Zipf, G.K. (1949). Human behavior and the principle of least effort. Cambridge, MA: Addison-Wesley