Floristic Properties of Different Commercial Tulip Varieties under the Ecological Conditions of Bayindir

Yıl 2020, Cilt: 34 Sayı: Özel Sayı, 319 - 326, 30.09.2020

Ali Salman , Meltem Yağmur Wallace

Öz

Araştırma, Ege Üniversitesi Bayındır Meslek Yüksekokulu deneme tarlalarında 2011 – 2012 yılları arasında farklı lale çeşitlerinin, bölge koşullarındaki adaptasyon performanslarının belirlenmesi amacıyla bir vejetasyon döneminde incelenmiştir. Araştırma tesadüf blokları deneme desenine göre 3 tekerrürlü yürütülmüştür. Çalışmanın bitkisel materyalini çevre uzunluğu 10-12 cm olan Tulipa gesneriana türüne ait yirmi farklı ticari lale çeşidi (Rai, Alaaddin, Carnaval De Nice, Monte Carlo, Rem’s Favorite, White Triumphator, Pink Impression, Monesella, Oxford Elite, Cassini, Dow Jones, Van Eijk, Yokohama, Golden Apeldoorn, Ali Baba, Los Angeles, Rococco, Salmon Impression, Jan Van Nes, Wildhof) oluşturmuştur. Sürgün çıkış tarihi, çiçeklenme başlangıç tarihi, çiçeklenme bitiş tarihi, çiçekte kalma süresi, bitki boyu ve genel soğan verimi özellikleri ele alınarak çeşitler karşılaştırılmıştır.
Elde edilen verilere göre incelenen birçok karakter açısından çeşitler arasında farklılık olduğu belirlenmiştir. Buna göre; çeşitlerde ilk sürgün çıkışları Ocak ve Mart ayı başlangıcında, çiçeklenme başlangıcı Mart ve Nisan ayı başlangıcında, çiçeklenme bitimi Mart sonu ile Nisan ayı sonlarında gerçekleşmiştir. Çeşitlerin çiçekte kalma süreleri 10 ile 29 gün aralığında değişiklik göstermiş, bitki boy farklılıkları 22,4 cm ile 61,3 cm aralığında belirlenmiştir. Soğan kalitesi açısından Wildhof çeşidi hariç diğerleri orta, iyi veya çok iyi şeklinde ifade edilen soğan verimi sağlamışlardır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

tulipa gesneriana, akdeniz iklimi, adaptasyon

Farklı Ticari Lale Çeşitlerinin Bayındır Ekolojik Koşullarındaki Floristik Özellikleri

Öz

The research was carried out over a vegetation period at Ege University, Bayindir Vocational Training School’s trial fields between 2011 and 2012 to determine the adaptation performance of different commercial tulip cultivars under regional conditions. The research was carried out with three replications of randomized block design. Twenty different commercial tulip varieties of 10-12 sizes (Rai, Aladdin, Carnaval De Nice, Monte Carlo, Rem’s Favorite, White Triumphator, Pink Impression, Monesella, Oxford Elite, Cassini, Dow Jones, Van Eijk, Yokohama, Golden Apeldoorn, Ali Baba, Los Angeles, Rococco, Salmon Impression, Jan Van Nes, Wildhof) were evaluated in terms of sprouting time, flowering time, end of flowering time, flowering longevity, plant height and general bulb yield criteria.
According to the data obtained, it was determined that there was a difference between varieties in terms of the characteristics examined. According to this; varieties of the first sprout time were observed at the earliest in January and at the latest in early March, the beginning of flowering was sighted earliest in March and latest in early April, while the end of flowering occurred between late March and late April. The duration of the flowering of the varieties ranged between 10 and 29 days and plant height differences were determined between 22.4 cm and 61.3 cm. In terms of bulb yield, cultivars except for Wildhof cultivar provided medium, good or very good bulb yield.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Adaptation, Mediterranean climate, Tulipa gesneriana

Kaynakça

• Acikgoz, N., Ilker, E. and Gokcol, A. 2004. Assessment of biological research on the computer. Izmir: Ege University, TOTEM, Meta Press.
• Anonymous, 2008. Flower Bulbs. Republic of Turkey Prime Ministry under Secretariat of Foreign Trade Antalya Secretariat General for Exporters' Unions. Flower Bulbs Export Report. Antalya (in Turkish).
• Bhat, Z.A., Nazki, I. T. and Hamid, B. 2017. Evaluation of Tulip Cultivars for Growth, Flowering, Scape Yield and Corm Yield under Temperate Regions of Kashmir. Indian Horticulture Journal; 7(3/4): 196-198.
• Botschantzeva, Z.P. 1962. Tulips. Taxonomy, morphology, cytology, phytogeography and physiology, (Russian edn), English translation: Varekamp, H.Q. (1982) Balkema, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
• Eker, I., Babac, M.T. and Koyuncu, M., 2014. Revision of the genus Tulipa L. (Liliaceae) in Turkey, Phytotaxa 157, 112 pp. Magnolia Press Auckland, New Zealand.
• Hall, A.D. 1940. The genus Tulipa. The Royal Horticulture Society, London, England.
• Hessayon, D.G. 2003. The bulb expert. Transworld Puplishers, Random House Group, London, England.
• Hoog, M.H. 1973. On the origin of Tulipa. Lilies and other Liliaceae, Royal Horticulture Society, London, England, pp. 47-64.
• Le Nard, M. and De Hertogh, A.A. 2002. Research Needs for Flower Bulbs (geophytes). Acta Hort. 570: 121-127.
• Menguc, A. and Zencirkiran, M. 1991. A study on the determination of vase life of cut Gladiolus (cv. White Prosperity) flowers. Journal of Agricultural Faculty of Bursa Uludag University. 8: 123-132. (in Turkish).
• Pala, F. 2006. Cultural Possibilities of Economically Important some Bulb Plants under Ecological Conditions of Diyarbakir, Cukurova University, Institute of Science and Technology, Field Crops Department. Master Thesis (in Turkish).
• Salman, A., Zeybekoglu, E., Alp, S. and Ozzambak, M.E. 2016. Effects on Plant Growth and Bulb Growth of Different Planting Times on Tulip Varieties, Bahce Journal of Atatürk Central Horticultural Research Institute, p: 887-892 (in Turkish).
• Sayin, B. and Sayin, C. 2004. Turkey Evaluation of Ornamental Plants Production and Marketing Structure of the EU Cohesion, Turkey VI. Agricultural Economics Congress, 16-18 September, Tokat (in Turkish).
• Sonyol, C. 2012. Effects of Pre-Cooling Treatments And Different Planting Times on Growth and Flowering of Tulip Bulbs, Master Thesis, Ege University Institute of Science and Technology, Bornova, Izmir (in Turkish).
• Stork, A.L. 1984. Tulipes sauvages et cultivées. Série documentaire 13 des Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques, Genève.
• Van Raamsdonk, L.W.D. and De Vries, T. 1992. Biosystematic studies in Tulipa L. section Eriostemones Boiss., Pl. Syst. Evol. 179, 27-41.
• Van Raamsdonk, L.W.D. and De Vries, T. 1995. Species relationships and taxonomy in Tulipa subgenus Tulipa L., Pl. Syst. Evol. 195, 13-44.
• Zencirkiran, M., 2002, Geophytes, Uludag Rotary Association publications 1, ISBN: 975-93004-0-0.