Örgütsel Öğrenme Kapasitesi, Çift Yeteneklilik, Çevre Dinamizmi ve Yenilik Performansı İlişkisi

Yıl 2022, Cilt: 5 Sayı: 2, 239 - 255, 30.12.2022

Vural Çelik Hakan Kitapçı Burçin Çetin Karabat

https://doi.org/10.33721/by.1062770

Öz

Bu çalışma bilgi teknolojileri (BT) sektöründe faaliyet gösteren işletmelerin örgütsel öğrenme kapasitelerinin, gelecek dönemlerde işletmede yapılacak yenilikleri ve çevresel dinamizmi nasıl etkileyeceğini tespit etmeyi amaçlamaktadır. Araştırmada çift yetenekliliğin örgütsel öğrenme kapasitesi üzerindeki etkisinin yanı sıra çevresel dinamizmin işletmelerin yenilik yapma performansını nasıl etkilediği incelenmektedir. Bu doğrultuda geliştirilen araştırma modelindeki ilişkileri ölçmek amacı ile BT sektöründe çalışan 311 orta ve üst düzey yöneticiden elde edilen veriler Smart PLS 2.0 ve SPSS programları aracılığı ile analiz edilmiştir. Verilerin analizinde faktör analizi ve korelasyon analizi kullanılmıştır. Yapısal eşitlik modeli kullanılarak test edilen araştırma hipotezlerinin tamamı kabul edilmiştir. Farklı sektörlerdeki işletmelerin katılımı ile elde edilecek genişletilmiş veri setine rekabet ortamı, pazar dalgalanmaları gibi faktörlerin dahil edilmesi ile araştırma sonuçlarının genellenebilirliği artıracaktır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Örgütsel Öğrenme Kapasitesi, Keşifsel Yenilik, Düzeltici Yenilik

The Relationship between Organizational Learning Capacity, Ambidexterity, Environmental Dynamism and Innovation Performance

Öz

This study aims to determine how the organizational learning capacities of businesses operating in the information technology (IT) sector will affect the innovations and environmental dynamism of an enterprise in the future. The study examines the effect of ambidexterity on organizational learning capacity, as well as the effect of environmental dynamism on the innovation performance of businesses. In order to measure the relationships in the research model developed in this direction, the data obtained from 311 middle and senior managers working in the IT sector were analyzed through Smart PLS 2.0 and SPSS programs. Factor analysis and correlation analysis were used in the analysis of the data. All of the research hypotheses tested using the structural equation model were accepted. The generalization of the research results will be increased by including factors such as competitive environment and market fluctuations in the expanded data set to be obtained with the participation of businesses in different sectors.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Organizational Learning Capacity, Exploratory İnnovation, Corrective Innovation

Kaynakça

• Abdallah, A. B., Dahiyat, S. E. ve Matsui, Y. (2019). Lean Management and Innovation Performance: Evidence from International Manufacturing Companies. Management Research Review, 42 (2), 239-262.
• Ahmad, F. ve Karim, M. (2019). Impacts of Knowledge Sharing: A Review and Directions for Future Research. Journal of Workplace Learning, 31, 207–230.
• Alsabbagh, M. ve Khalil, A. H. A. (2016). The Impact of Leadership Styles on Organizational Learning: An Empirical Study on the Education Sector in Damascus City. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 6 (5), 197-216.
• Argote, L. (1999). Organizational Learning: Creating, Retaining, and Transferring Knowledge. Kluwer Academic.
• Argote, L. ve Ophir, R. (2002). Intraorganizational Learning. In J. A. C. Baum (Eds.), Companion to Organizations, (193–234). Blackwell
• Argyris, C. ve Schon, D. (1978). Organizational Learning: A Theory of Action Perspective. Reading. Addison Wesley Publishing Co.
• Auh. S. ve Menguc, B. (2004). Balancing Exploration and Exploitation: the Moderating Role of Competitive Intensity. Journal of Business Research. 58 (12), 1652-1661. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2004.11.007
• Barney, J. (1991). Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage. Journal of Management, 17 (1), 99-120. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700108
• Berberoglu, A. (2018). Impact of Organizational Climate on Organizational Commitment and Perceived Organizational Performance: Empirical Evidence from Public Hospitals. BMC Health Services Reseach, 18 (1), 399-408.
• Bocanet, A. ve Ponsiglione, C. (2012). Balancing Exploration and Exploitation Complex Environments. The Journal of Information Knowledge Management Systems, 42 (1), 15-35. https://doi.org/10.1108/03055721211207743
• Cao, Q., Gedajlovic, E. ve Zhang, H. (2009). Unpacking Organizational Ambidexterity: Dimensions, Contingencies, and Synergistic Effects. Organization Science, 20 (4), 781–796.
• Chege, S. M., Wang, D. ve Suntu, S. L. (2020) Impact of Information Technology Innovation on Firm Performance in Kenya, Information Technology for Development, 26 (2), 316-345. https://doi.org/10.1080/02681102.2019.1573717
• Cheryl, A. V. D. (1997). Organizational Learning in Acquisitions Wtihin The Hospitality Industry: Developing The Constructs of Exploration and Exploitation. University of South Carolina.
• Collins, C. J., ve Smith, K. G. (2006). Knowledge Exchange and Combination: The Role of Human Resource Practices in the Performance of High-technology Firms, Academy of Management Journal,. 49 (3), 544-560.
• Costello, A. B. ve Osborne, J. W. (2005). Best Practices in Exploratory Factor Analysis: Four Recommendations for Getting the Most from your Analysis. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 10 (7), 1-9.
• Crossan, M. M. ve Bedrow, I. (2003). Organizational Learning and Strategic Renewal, Strategic Management Journal, 24 (11), 1087-1105.
• Crossan, M., Lane, H. W. ve White, R. E. (1999). An Organizational Learning Framework: From Intuition to Institution. The Academy of Management Review, 24 (3), 522–537.
• Davis, J. P., Eisenhardt, K. M. ve Bingham, C. B. (2009). Optimal Structure, Market Dynamism, and the Strategy of Simple Rules, Administrative Science Quarterly, 54 (3), 413-452. https://doi.org/10.2189/asqu.2009.54.3.413
• Dekoulou, P. ve Trivellas, P. (2014). Learning Organization in Greek Advertising and Media Industry: A Way to Face Crisis and Gain Sustainable Competitive Advantage. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 148, 338–347
• Dess G. G. ve Beard D. W. (1984). Dimensions of Organizational Task Environment. Administrative Science Quarterly, 29 (1), 52-73. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393080
• Djamaludin, A.; Madhakomala, R. ve Tunas, B. (2022). Generating Employee Competitive Advantage in the Port and Maritime Industry: Knowledge Management and Learning Organization Role. International Journal of Social Science Reseach and Review, 5, 188–199
• Duncan R.B. (1972). Characteristics of Organizational Environments and Perceived Environmental Uncertainty, Administrative Science Quarterly. 17 (3), 313-327. https://doi.org/10.2307/2392145
• Duncan, B. L. (1976). Differential Social Perception and Attribution of Intergroup Violence: Testing the Lower Limits of Stereotyping of Blacks. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34 (4), 590-598
• Fang C., Chang S. ve Chen G. (2010). Organizational Learning Capability and Organizational Innovation: The Moderating Role of Knowledge Inertia. African Journal of Business Management, 5 (5), 1864-1870. Farzaneh, M., Ghasemzadeh, P., Nazari, J. A. ve Mehralian, G. (2021). Contributory Role of Dynamic Capabilities in the Relationship Between Organizational Learning and Innovation Performance. European Journal of Innovation Management. 24 (3), 655-676
• Garvin, D. A. (1993). Building A Learning Organization. Harvard Business Review, 71 (4), 78-91.
• Gibson, C.B., ve J. Birkinshaw. (2004). The Antecedents, Consequences, and Mediating Role of Organizational Ambidexterity. Academy of Management Journal. 47 (2), 209-226. https://doi.org/10.5465/20159573
• Goh, S. ve Richards, G. (1997). Benchmarking the Learning Capability of Organizations. European Management Journal, 15 (5), 575-583. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-2373(97)00036-4
• Guinot, J., Chiva, R. ve Mallén, F. (2013). Organizational Trust and Performance: Is Organizational Learning Capability a Missing Link? Journal of Management and Organization, 19 (5), 559–582. https://doi.org/10.1017/jmo.2014.3
• Jansen J. J. P., Bosch V. D., Frans, A. J. ve Volberda H. W. (2006). Exploratory Innovation, Exploitative Innovation, and Performnace: Effects of Organizational Antecedents and Environmental Moderators. Management Science. 52 (11), 1661-1674
• He, Z. L. ve P. K. Wong (2004), Exploration vs. Exploitation: an Empirical Test of the Ambidexterity Hypothesis, Organization Science, 15 (4), 481-494. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1040.0078
• Henrich, R. G. (2007). Exploration and Exploitation in Product Innovation. Advance Access Published, 6 (5), 945-975. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dtm013
• Holmqvist, M. (2004), Experimental Learning Processes of Exploitation and Exploration: An Empirical Study of Product Development. Organization Science, 15 (1), 70-81. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1030.0056
• Hsu, M. L. A. ve Chen, F. H. (2017). The Cross-level Mediating Effect of Psychological Capital on the Organizational Innovation Climate - Employee Innovative Behavior Relationship. Journal of Creative Behavior, 51 (2),128-139.
• Huber, G. P. (1991). Organizational Learning: The Contributing Processes and the Literatures. Organization Science, 2 (1), 88-115. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2.1.88
• Hult, G., Tomas M. ve Ferrel, O. C. (1997). Global Organizational Learning Capacity in Purchasing: Construct and Measurement. Journal of Business Research. 40 (2), 97-111. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0148-2963(96)00232-9
• Jansen, J. J. P., Van Den B., Frans A. J. ve Volberda, H. W. (2006). Exploratory Innovation, Exploitative Innovation, and Performance: Effects of Organizational Antecedents and Environmental Moderators. Management Science, 52 (11), 1661-1674. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1060.0576
• Kim, E. J. ve Park, S. (2020). Transformational Leadership, Knowledge Sharing, Organizational Climate and Learning: An Empirical Study. Leadership & Organization Development Journal. 41 (6), 761-775.
• Lawrence, P. ve Lorch, J. W. (1967). Organization and Environment: Managing Differentiation and Integration. Harvard Business School.
• Levinthal, D. A. ve March, J. G. (1993). The Myopia of Learning. Strategic Management Journal, 14 (52), 95-112. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250141009
• Liu, Y. ve Zhong, R. (2011). Research on Transactive Memory System, Knowledge Reuse and Team Efficacy in Professional Service Teams. International Conference on Management and Service Science, 1-4.
• March, J. G. (1991). Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning. Organization Science, 2 (1), 71-87. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2.1.71
• Marquardt, M. J. (1996). Building the Learning Organization: A Systems Approach to Quantum Improvement and Global Success. McGraw-Hill.
• Masa’deh, R.E., Obeidat, B.Y. ve Tarhini, A. (2016). A Jordanian Empirical Study of the Associations Among Transformational Leadership, Transactional Leadership, Knowledge Sharing, Job Performance, and Firm Performance: A Structural Equation Modelling Approach. Journal of Management Development, 35 (5), 681-705.
• Mohammad, H. I. (2019). Mediating Effect of Organizational Learning and Moderating Role of Environmental Dynamism on the Relationship Between Strategic Change and Firm Performance. Journal of Strategy and Management,12 (2), 275-297.
• Mullins L. (2010). Management and Organizational Behavior. 9th Edition. Pearson Education
• Nevis, E.C., DiBella, A.J. ve Gould, J.M. (1995). Understanding Organizations as Learning Systems. Sloan Management Review. 36 (2), 73-80
• Nonaka, I. ve Takeuchi, H. (1995). The Knowledge-Creating Company: How Japanese Companies Create The Dynamics of Innovation? University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign's Academy for Entrepreneurial Leadership Historical Research Reference in Entrepreneurship.
• Nonaka, I.ve Takeuchi, H. (1995a). The Knowledge Creating Company: How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation. Oxford University Press
• Nunally, J. C. (1967). Psychometic Theory. McGraw Hill.
• Ojha, D., Struckell, E., Acharya, C. ve Patel, P. C. (2018). Supply Chain Organizational Learning, Exploration, Exploitation, and Firm Performance: A Creation-dispersion Perspective. International Journal of Production Economics, 204, 70-82
• O’Reilly, C. A. ve Tushman, M. (2008) Ambidexterity as a Dynamic Capability: Resolving the Innovator’s Dilemma. Research in Organizational Behavior, 28, 185-206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.riob.2008.06.002
• Pan, X., Song, M. L., Zhang, J.ve Zhou, G. (2019). Innovation Network, Technological Learning and Innovation Performance of High-Tech Cluster Enterprises. Journal of Knowledge Management, 23 (9), 1729-1746.
• Peralta, C. F. ve Saldanha, M. F. (2014). Knowledge-centered Culture and Knowledge Sharing: the Moderator Role of Trust Propensity. Journal of Knowledge Management, 18 (3), 538-550.
• Porter, M. E. (1980). Competitive Strategy. Free Press.
• Porter, M. E. (1996). What is a Strategy?. Harvard Business Review, 74 (6): 61-78
• Rahmi, D.Y. ve Indarti, N. (2019). Examining the Relationships Among Cognitive Diversity, Knowledge Sharing and Team Climate in Team Innovation, Team Performance Management: An International Journal, 25 (5/6), 299-317. https://doi.org/10.1108/TPM-11-2018-0070
• Rao, Y., Yang, M. ve Yang, Y. (2018). Knowledge Sharing, Organizational Learning and Service Innovation in Tourism, Journal of Service Science and Management, 11 (5), 510-526
• Reagans, R. ve McEvily, B. (2003). Network Structure and Knowledge Transfer: The Effects of Cohesion and Range. Administrative Sciences, 48, 240-267
• Roberts, N. ve Stockport, G. J. (2009). Defining Strategic Flexibility. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 10 (1), 27-32. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03396553
• Robbins, S. P. ve Judge, T.A. (2016). Organizational Behavior. 17th Edition, Pearson Education Limited.
• Sanz-Valle, R., Naranjo-Valencia, J. ve Jiménez-Jiménez, D. P. C. L. (2011). Linking Organizational Learning with Technical Innovation and Organizational Culture. Journal of Knowledge Management, 15 (6), 997-1015. https://doi.org/10.1108/13673271111179334
• Schein, E. H. (1992). Organizational Culture and Leadership. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
• Senge, P. M. (1990). The Fifth Discipline: The Art and Practice of the Learning Organization. Doubleday.
• Shaher, A.ve Ali, K., (2020). The Effect of Entrepreneurial Orientation and Knowledge Management on Innovation Performance: The Mediation Role of Market Orientation. Management Science Letters. 10 (15), 3723–3734.
• Sheng, M. L. (2017). A Dynamic Capabilities-based Framework of Organizational Sensemaking through Combinative Capabilities Towards Exploratory and Exploitative Product Innovation in Turbulent Environments. Industrial Marketing Management, 65 (2), 28-38.
• Sinkula, J. M. (1994). Market Information Processing and Organizational Learning. Journal of Marketing, 58 (1), 35-45. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224299405800103
• Teo, H. H. ve Wang X. (2006). Organizational Learning Capacity and Attitude toward Complex Technological Innovations: An Empirical Study. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 57 (2), 264-279. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20275
• Tushman, M. L. ve O’Reilly, C.A. (1996). The Ambidextrous Organization: Managing Evolutionary and Revolutionary Change. California Management Review, 38 (4), 1-23. https://doi.org/10.2307/41165852
• Van Deusen. C. A. (1997). Organizational Learning in Acquisitions within The Hospitality Industry: Developing The Constructs of Exploration and Exploitation. (Master of Science Appalachian State University).
• Zhang, W., Sun, S. L., Jiang, Y. ve Zhang, W. (2019). Openness to Experience and Team Creativity: Effects of Knowledge Sharing and Transformational Leadership, Creativity Research Journal, 31:1, 62-73. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2019.1577649
• Zhu, Y.Q. (2016). Why and How Knowledge Sharing Matters for R&D Engineers. R&D Management, 47 (2), 212-222