GENÇLERDE ALGILANAN SOSYAL DESTEĞİN ÖZ-YETERLİLİK İNANCINA ETKİLERİ

Yıl 2009, Cilt: 6 Sayı: 2, 1 - 11, 01.12.2009

Mustafa Fedai Çavuş

Öz

Bu çalışmanın amacı bireyde öz-yeterlilik inancının oluşumunda, algılanan sosyal desteğin etkisinin belirlenmesidir. Çalışma Osmaniye Meslek Yüksekokulunda öğrenim gören 140 öğrenci üzerinde yapılmıştır. Çalışmada anket yöntemi kullanılmıştır. Bu kapsamda, sosyal desteğin ölçülmesinde, Çok Boyutlu Algılanan Sosyal Destek Ölçeği (MSPSS), Öz-yeterlilik inancının değerlendirilmesinde ise Genel değerlendirilmiştir. Yapılan analizler kullanılan ölçeklerin güvenilir olduğunu ve genel faktör yapısının ortaya çıktığını göstermektedir. Öz-yeterlilik inancında algılanan sosyal desteğin pozitif olarak etkili olduğu tespit edilmiştir. Algılanan aile desteğinin öz-yeterlilikte en önemli etken olduğu, arkadaş desteğinin ikinci derecede ve diğer önemli kişilerin desteğinin ise üçüncü derecede etkili olduğu görülmüştür

Anahtar Kelimeler

Algılanan Sosyal Destek, Öz-yeterlilik, Gençler

The Effects of Perceived Social Support on the Self-Efficacy Among Adolescents

Öz

This study investigates relationship between perceived social support and self-efficacy believes among young persons. The study included 140 university students from Osmaniye Tecnical and Vocational High School. Survey method has been used in this study. Mean age of the participants was 20.22 years, 64 (45.7%) were female, and 76(54.3%) were male. The Turkish version of the Perceived Social Support and General Sel-efficacy Scale were used in the research. The analyses that were held at the end of the survey has shown that the scales used for this study are reliable and general factor structure has occured. It is confirmed that perceived social support has positive effect in the belief of self-efficacy. As a result, it has been viewed that the most important factor related to self-efficacy is perceived family support and the second important factor is friends support and the third one is other important people’s support

Anahtar Kelimeler

Perceived Social Support, Self-efficacy, Adolescents

Kaynakça

• Antle B. J. (2004). Factors associated with self-worth in young people with physical disabilities. Health and Social Work 29(3): 167-175.
• Aşkar, P., Umay, A.,(2002). İlköğretim matematik bölümü öğrencilerinin bilgisayarla ilgili öz-yeterlik algısı, Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, Sayı:21, 1-8.
• Baggerly, J. & Osborn, D. (2006). School counselor’s satisfaction and commitment: correlates and predictors. Professional School Counseling, 9, 3, 197-205.
• Bandura, A. (2002). Growing primacy of human agency in adaptation and change in the electronic era, European Psychologist, 7(1)2002, 2–16.
• Bandura, A. (2001). Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 1-26.
• Bandura, A. (2000). Exercise of human agency through collective efficacy. Current Directions of Psychological Science, 9, 75-78.
• Bandura, A. (1999). A social cognitive theory of personality. In L. Pervin & O. John (Ed.), Handbook of personality (2nd ed., pp. 154-196). New York: Guilford Publications.
• Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York.
• Bandura. A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
• Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84, 191-215.
• Baum, J. R. & Locke, E.A. (2004). The Relationship of entrepreneurial traits, skill and motivation to subsequent venture growth. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 4, 587–598.
• Chen, G., Webber S. S., Bliese P. D., Mathieu J. E., Payne S. C., Born D. H., & Zaccaro S. J. (2002). Simultaneous examination of the antecedents and consequences of efficacy beliefs at multiple levels of analysis. Human Performance, 15(4): 381-409.
• Cheung S.(1995). Life events, classroom environment, achievement expectation and depression among early adolescents. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal 23(1): 83-93.
• Colquitt, J. A., LePine, J.A. & Noe, R.A. (2000). Towards an integrative theory of training motivation: A meta-analytic path analysis of 20 years of research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 5, 678–707.
• Çakır, Y. ve Palabıyıkoğlu, R. (1997). Gençlerde sosyal destek-Çok boyutlu algılanan sosyal destek ölçeğinin güvenirlik ve geçerlik çalışması, Kriz Dergisi, 5(1), 15-24
• Demaray M.K. & Malecki CK (2003). Importance ratings of socially supportive behaviors by children and adolescents. School Psychology Review 32(1): 108-132.
• Duru, E., (2007). Re-examination of the psychometric characteristics of the multidimensional scale of perceived social support among Turkish University students, Social Behavior and Personality, 35(4), 443-452
• Eden, D. & Kinnar, J.(1991). Modeling Galatea: boosting self-efficacy to increase volunteering, Journal of Applied Psychology, 76 (6), 770- 780.
• Eker, D. ve Arkar, H. (1995a). Perceived social support: psychometric properties of the MSPSS in normal and pathological groups in a developing country. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatric Epidemiology, 30:121-126.
• Eker, D. ve Arkar, H. (1995b). Çok boyutlu algılanan sosyal destek ölçeği’nin faktör yapısı, geçerlik ve güvenirliği. Türk Psikoloji Dergisi, 34:45-55.
• Eker, D., Arkar, H.. ve Yaldız, H. (2000). Generality of support sources and psychometric properties of a scale of perceived social support in Turkey. Social Psychology and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 35(5), 228-233.
• Gurung, R.A. ,Sarason B.R. & Sarason,I.G.(1997). Personal characteristics, relationship quality, and social support perceptions and behavior in young adult romantic relationships, Personal Relationships, 4 (1997), 319-339.
• Heslin, P. A. & Latham, G.P. (2004). The Effect of upward feedback on managerial behavior. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 53 (1), 23–37.
• Holt M.K. & Espelage DL (2005). Social support as a moderator between dating violence victimisation and depression/anxiety among African-American and Caucasian adolescents. School Psychology Review 34(3): 309-328.
• Kazarian S.S & McCabe S.B. (1991). Dimensions of social support in the MSPSS: Factorial structure, reliability, and theoretical implications. Journal of Community Psycholgy, 19:150-60.
• Keskin, G.Ü. ve Orgun, F. (2006). Öğrencilerin öz etkililik-yeterlilik düzeyleri ile başa çıkma stratejilerinin incelenmesi, Anatolian Journal of Psychiatry ; 7:92-99.
• Kurlowicz L.H.(1993). Social factors and depression in late life, Arch Psychiatric Nurs, 7:30-36.
• Kotaman, H. (2008). Özyeterlilik İnancı ve Öğrenme Performansının Geliştirilmesine İlişkin Yazın Taraması, Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi XXI (1): 111-133
• Lee W.S. (2005). Encyclopedia of School Psychology, Sage Publication
• Leganger, A., Kraft, P., & Rİysamb, E. (2000). Perceived self-efficacy in health behavior research: Conceptualisation, measurement and correlates. Psychology and Health, 15, 51–69.
• Lu, C., Siu, O. & Cooper, C.L. (2005). Managers’ occupational stress in China: The role of self-efficacy. Personality and Individual Differences, 38, 569–578.
• Mair, J. (2002). Entrepreneurial behaviour in a large traditional firm. Research Paper No:466, University of Navarra.
• Mason W.A. (2004). General and specific predictors of behavioral and emotional problems among adolescents. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders 12(1): 49- 61.
• Paglis, L.L. & Green, S.G. (2002). Leadership self-efficacy and managers' motivation for leading change. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23, 215–235.
• Pastorelli, C. et al. (2001). The structure of children’s perceived self- efficacy: A cross-national study, European Journal of Psychological Assessment, Vol. 17, Issue 2, pp. 87–97
• Pulakos et al. (2002) E.D. Pulakos, N. Schmitt, D.W. Dorsey, S. Arad, J.W. Hedge and W.C. Borman, Predicting adaptive performance: Further tests of a model of adaptability, Human Performance 15(4), pp. 299– 323.
• Schwarzer, R. & Knoll, N.(2007). Functional roles of social support within the stress and coping process: A theoretical and empirical overview, Internatıonal Journal of Psychology, 42 (4), 243–252
• Schwarzer, R., Bäßler, J., Kwiatek, P., Schröder, K., & Zhang, J. X. (1997a). The Assessment of optimistic self-beliefs: Comparison of the German, Spanish, and Chinese versions of the general self-efficacy scale. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 46, 69–88.
• Schwarzer, R., & Born, A. (1997). Optimistic self-beliefs: Assessment of general perceived self-efficacy in thirteen cultures. World Psychology, 3, 177–190.
• Schwarzer, R., Born, A., Iwawaki, S., Lee, Y.-M., Saito, E., & Yue, X. (1997b). The Assessment of optimistic self-beliefs: Comparison of the Chinese, Indonesian, Japanese and Korean versions of the general self-efficacy scale. Psychologia: An International Journal of Psychology in the Orient, 40, 1–13.
• Schwarzer, R., Hahn, A., & Jerusalem, M. (1993). Negative affect in east German migrants: Longitudinal effects of unemployment and social support. Anxiety, Stress, and Coping, 6, 57–69.
• Schwarzer, R., Mueller, J., & Greenglass, E. (1999). Assessment of perceived general self-efficacy on the internet: Data collection in cyberspace. Anxiety, Stress, and Coping, 12, 145–161.
• Schunk, H. D. (1991). Self-efficacy and academic motivation. Educational Psychologist, 26, 207-231.
• Semadar, A., Robins, G. & Ferris, G.R. (2006). Comparing the validity of multiple social effectiveness: constructs in the prediction of managerial job performance. Journal of Organizational Behaviour, 27, 443–461.
• Siu, O., Spector, P.E., Cooper, C.L. & Lu, C. (2005). Work stress, self- efficacy, Chinese work values, and work well-being in Hong Kong and Beijing. International Journal of Stress Management, 12, 3, 274– 288.
• Stajkovic, A.D. & Luthans, F. (1998). Self-efficacy and work-related performance: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 124, 2, 240– 261.
• Stanley MA, Beck JG, Zebb BJ. (1998). Psychometric properties of the MSPSS in older adults, Aging Mental Health, 2:186-93.
• Zimet, G. D., Dahlem, N. W., Zimet, S. G., & Farley, G. K. (1988). The multidimensional scale of perceived social support. Journal of Personality Assessment, 52, 30–41.
• Zimet, G. D., Powell, S. S., Farley, G. K., Werkman, S., & Berkoff, K. A. (1990). Psychometric properties of the multidimensional scale of perceived social support. Journal of Personality Assessment, 55, 610–617.