Sahiplik Etkisinin Araç Paylaşımına Yönelik Tutum ve Niyet Üzerindeki Etkisinin Analizi

Yıl 2019, Cilt: 16 Sayı: 1, 14 - 35, 28.06.2019

Mutlu Yüksel Avcılar , Meltem Canoğlu , Akın Alkevli

Öz

Sahiplik etkisi kavramı,
kayıptan kaçınma ekseninde açıklanan bir kavram olup herhangi bir nesneden
vazgeçmenin yarattığı dezavantaj düzeyinin, o nesneye sahip olmanın yarattığı
avantaj düzeyinden yüksek olması şeklinde tanımlanmıştır. Alanyazındaki araştırmalarda
kayıptan kaçınma kavramının, bireylerin ürün sahipliğini kaybetmeleri durumunu,
ürüne erişim sağlama durumuna kıyasla daha kolay bir şekilde hatırlamaları ile
ilişkili olduğu ve bu kavramın sahiplik etkisinin tetikleyicisi olduğu
belirtilmektedir. Bu çalışmanın amacı, sahiplik etkisinin araç paylaşımına
yönelik tutum ve niyet üzerindeki etkisini tespit etmektir. Bu doğrultuda, araç
paylaşımına yönelik tutum ve niyet üzerinde sahiplik etkisi düzeyi, cinsiyet ve
sahiplik etkisi düzeyi-cinsiyet etkileşiminin etkileri incelenmiştir. Analiz
için gerekli olan veriler, kolayda örnekleme ile araştırmaya gönüllü katılan ve
araç paylaşımı uygulamalarını kullanan 400 kullanıcıdan yüz yüze anket yöntemi
kullanılarak elde edilmiştir. Verilerin analizinde cinsiyete göre bağımsız
gruplar t testi, faktör analizi ve iki yönlü varyans analizi yöntemlerinden
yararlanılmıştır.  Analiz sonuçlarına
göre, sahiplik etkisi düzeyi, cinsiyet ve etkileşim etkisi, kullanıcıların araç
paylaşımına yönelik tutumunu ve niyetini istatistiksel olarak anlamlı şekilde
etkilediği tespit edilmiştir. Sahiplik düzeyi düşük olan tüketicilerin araç
paylaşımına yönelik tutum ve davranışsal niyet düzeylerinin yüksek olduğu
tespit edilmiştir. 

Anahtar Kelimeler

Sahiplik Etkisi, Ortaklaşa/İşbirlikçi Tüketim, Araç Paylaşımı, Ödeme İstekliliği, Kabul Etme İstekliliği

Kaynakça

• Ajzen, I. (1991). The Theory of Planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 5(2), 179-211.
• Alcott, B. (2008). The Sufficiency Strategy: Would Rich-World Frugality Lower Environmental Impact?. Ecological Economics, 64(4), 770-786.
• Allwood, J. M., Laursen, S. E., Russell, S. N., de Rodríguez, C. M. ve Bocken, N. M. P. (2008). An Approach to Scenario Analysis of The Sustainability of An Industrial Sector Applied to Clothing and Textiles in the UK. Journal of Cleaner Production, 16(12), 1234-1246.
• Ariely, D., Huber, J. ve Wertenbroch, K. (2005). When Do Losses Loom Larger Than Gains?. Journal of Marketing Research, 42(2), 134-138.
• Ashby, N. J., Dickert, S. ve Glöckner, A. (2012). Focusing on What You Own: Biased Information Uptake Due To Ownership. Judgment and Decision Making, 7(3), 254.
• Bagozzi, R. P. (1975). Marketing As Exchange. The Journal of Marketing, 39(4), 32-39.
• Bailey, K. (1987). Methods of Social Research, 3th Ed., New York:The Free Pres-London: Collier McMillan Publisher.
• Balcı, Ali (2005). Sosyal Bilimlerde Araştırma. Pegema Yayıncılık, Ankara.
• Barberis, N. C. (2013). Thirty Years of Prospect Theory In Economics: A Review and Assessment. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 27(1), 173-96.
• Bardhi, F. ve Eckhardt, G. M. (2012). Access-Based Consumption: The Case of Car Sharing, Journal of Consumer Research, 39(4), 881-898.
• Bar-hillel, M. ve Neter, E. (1996). Why are people reluctant to exchange lottery tickets?. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(1), 17-27.
• Barth, M., Jugert, P. ve Fritsche, I. (2016). Still Underdetected–Social Norms and Collective Efficacy Predict the Acceptance of Electric Vehicles in Germany. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 37, 64-77.
• Bauman, Z. (2000). Liquid Modernity. Polity, Cambridge.
• Becker, S. W., Ronen, J. ve Sorter, G. H. (1974). Opportunity Costs-An Experimental. Approach. Journal of Accounting Research, 12(2), 317-329.
• Beggan, J. K. (1992). On the Social Nature of Nonsocial Perception: The Mere Ownership Effect. Journal of Personality and Social psychology, 62(2), 229-237.
• Belk, R. (2014). You are What You Can Access: Sharing and Collaborative Consumption Online. Journal of Business Research, 67(8), 1595-1600.
• Bell, D. (1976). Welcome to the Post-Industrial Society. Physics Today, 29(2), 46-49.
• B’enabou, R. ve Tirole, J. (2003). Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivation. The Review of Economic Studies, 70(3), 489-520.
• Benoit, S., Baker, T. L., Bolton, R. N., Gruber, T. ve Kandampully, J. (2017). A Triadic Framework for Collaborative Consumption (CC): Motives, Activities and Resources & Capabilities of Actors. Journal of Business Research, 79, 219-227.
• Bhattacherjee, A. (2001). Understanding Information Systems Continuance: An Expectation-Confirmation Model. MIS quarterly, 351-370.
• Birnbaum, M. H. ve Stegner, S. E. (1979). Source Credibility in Social Judgment: Bias, Expertise, and the Judge's Point of View. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37(1), 48-74.
• Bischoff, I. (2008), Endowment Effect Theory, Prediction Bias and Publicly Provided Goods: An Experimental Study. Environmental and Resource Economics, 39(3), 283-296.
• Bischoff, I. ve Meckl, J. (2008). Endowment Effect Theory, Public Goods And Welfare. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 37(5), 1768-1774.
• Bock, G. W., Zmud, R. W., Kim, Y. G. ve Lee, J. N. (2005). Behavioral Intention Formation in Knowledge Sharing: Examining the Roles of Extrinsic Motivators, Social-Psychological Forces, and Organizational Climate. MIS quarterly, 29(1), 87-111.
• Botsman, R. ve Rogers, R. (2010). What’s Mine is Yours. The Rise of Collaborative Consumption. 1st rev. ed., New York: Harper Collins Publishers.
• Brown, T. C. (2005). Loss Aversion Without the Endowment Effect, and Other Explanations for the WTA–WTP Disparity. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 57(3), 367-379.
• Burkhardt, J. E. ve Millard-ball, A. (2006). Who is Attracted to Carsharing?. Transportation Research Record, 1986(1), 98-105.
• Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2018). Sosyal Bilimler İçin Veri Analizi El Kitabı. Pegem Akademi, Ankara.
• Camerer, C.F. (2000). Prospect Theory In The Wild: Evidence From The Field. In Choices, Values and Frames, ed. D Kahneman, A Tversky, pp. 288–300. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press.
• Camerer, C. (2005). Three Cheers—Psychological, Theoretical, Empirical—For Loss Aversion. Journal of Marketing Research, 42(2), 129-133.
• Can, A. (2017). SPSS ile Bilimsel Araştırma Sürecinde Nicel Veri Analizi. Pegem Akademi, Ankara.
• Carmon, Z. ve Ariely, D. (2000). Focusing On the Forgone: How Value Can Appear So Different to Buyers And Sellers. Journal of consumer research, 27(3), 360-370.
• Chen, Y. (2008). Possession and Access: Consumer Desires and Value Perceptions Regarding Contemporary Art Collection and Exhibit Visits. Journal of Consumer Research, 35(6), 925-940.
• Churchill Jr, G. A. (1979). A Paradigm For Developing Better Measures of Marketing Constructs. Journal of Marketing Research, 16(1), 64-73.
• Ciarrochi, J. ve Forgas, J. P. (2000). The Pleasure of Possessions: Affective Influences and Personality in the Evaluation of Consumer Items. European Journal of Social Psychology, 30(5), 631-649.
• Cohen, B. ve Munoz, P. (2016). Sharing Cities and Sustainable Consumption and Production: Towards An Integrated Framework. Journal of Cleaner Production, 134, 87-97.
• Corrigan, J. R. ve Rousu, M. C. (2006). The Effect of Initial Endowments in Experimental Auctions. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 88(2), 448-457.
• Cronin Jr, J. J. ve Taylor, S. A. (1992). Measuring Service Quality: A Reexamination and Extension. The Journal of Marketing, 56, 55-68.
• Çabuk, S., Südaş, H. D., ve Zeren, D. (2015). Sahip Olmak Yerine Paylaşmak: Tüketicilerin Paylaşma Davranışlarının Unsurlarını Belirlemeye Yönelik Bir Çalışma. Çankırı Karatekin Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 6(1), 151-168.
• Dall Pizzol, H., Ordovás De Almeida, S. ve do Couto Soares, M. (2017). Collaborative Consumption: A Proposed Scale For Measuring The Construct Applied to A Carsharing Setting. Sustainability, 9(5), 703-718.
• DellaVigna, S. (2009), Psychology and Economics: Evidence From the Field. Journal of Economic Literature, 47(2), 315-72.
• Dommer, S. L. ve Swaminathan, V. (2012). Explaining The Endowment Effect Through Ownership: The Role Of Identity, Gender, and Self-Threat. Journal of Consumer Research, 39(5), 1034-1050.
• Dowling, R. ve Simpson, C. (2013). Shift–The Way You Move: Reconstituting Automobility. Continuum, 27(3), 421-433.
• Dueker, K. J., Bair, B. O. ve Levin, I. P. (1977). Ride-sharing: Psychological Factors. Transportation Engineering Journal of the American Society of Civil Engineers, 103(6), 685-692.
• Duncan, M. (2011), The Cost Saving Potential of Carsharing in a US Context. Transportation, 38(2), 363-382.
• Edbring, E. G., Lehner, M. ve Mont, O. (2016). Exploring Consumer Attitudes to Alternative Models of Consumption: Motivations and Barriers. Journal of Cleaner Production, 123, 5-15.
• Efthymiou, D., Antoniou, C. ve Waddell, P. (2013), Factors Affecting the Adoption of Vehicle Sharing Systems By Young Drivers. Transport Policy, 29, 64-73.
• Ericson, K. M. ve Fuster, A. (2014). The Endowment Effect. Annu. Rev. Econ. 6, 555–579.
• Ertz, M., Durif, F. ve Arcand, M. (2016). Collaborative Consumption: Conceptual Snapshot at A Buzzword. J. Entrep. Educ. 19 (2), 1–23.
• Fehr-Duda, H., De Gennaro, M. ve Schubert, R. (2006). Gender, Financial Risk, and Probability Weights. Theory and decision, 60(2-3), 283-313.
• Fellows, N. T. ve Pitfield, D. E. (2000). An Economic and Operational Evaluation of Urban Car-Sharing. Transportation Research Part D”, Transport and Environment, 5(1), 1-10.
• Ferguson, E. T. (1990), Evaluation of Employer-Sponsored Ridesharing Programs In Southern California (No. 1280), 59-72.
• Firnkorn, J. ve Müller, M. (2011). What Will Be the Environmental Effects of New Free-Floating Car-Sharing Systems? The case of car2go in Ulm. Ecological Economics, 70(8), 1519-1528.
• Fornell, C., Johnson, M. D., Anderson, E. W., Cha, J. ve Bryant, B. E. (1996). The American Customer Satisfaction Index: Nature, Purpose, and Findings. The Journal of Marketing, 60(4), 7-18.
• Franciosi, R., Kujal, P., Michelitsch, R., Smith, V. ve Deng, G. (1996). Experimental Tests of the Endowment Effect. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 30(2), 213-226.
• Frost, S. (2010), Sustainable and Innovative Personal Transport Solutions—Strategic Analysis of Carsharing Market in Europe. United Kingdom. Frost & Sullivan. http://www.frost.com/prod/servlet/svcg.pag/AT00, 12.02.2018.
• González-Ortega, I., Echeburúa, E., Corral, P., Polo-López, R. ve Alberich, S. (2013). Predictors of Pathological Gambling Severity Taking Gender Differences Into Account. European Addiction Research, 19(3), 146-154.
• Grant, J. E., Chamberlain, S. R., Schreiber, L. R. ve Odlaug, B. L. (2012). Gender-Related Clinical and Neurocognitive Differences in Individuals Seeking Treatment For Pathological Gambling. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 46(9), 1206-1211.
• Gwilliam, K. M. ve Geerlings, H. (1992). Research and Technology Strategy to Help Overcome the Environmental Problems In Relation to Transport, (No. EUR--14710). Commission of the European Communities, Brussels.
• Haase, M. ve Kleinaltenkamp, M. (2011). Property Rights Design and Market Process: Implications for Market Theory, Marketing Theory, and SD Logic. Journal of Macromarketing, 31(2), 148-159.
• Haefelİ, U., Matti, D., Maibach, M. ve Schreyer, C. (2006). Evaluation Car-Sharing. Federal Department of the Environment, Transport, Energy and Communications, Bern.
• Hamari, J., Sjöklint, M. ve Ukkonen, A. (2016). The Sharing Economy: Why People Participate in Collaborative Consumption. Journal of the Association For Information Science and Technology, 67(9), 2047-2059.
• Hartgen, D. T. (1977). Ridesharing Behavior: A Review of Recent Findings”, (No. Prelim. Res Rpt. 130). New York State Department of Transportation.
• Hartgen, D. T. ve Bullard, K. C. (1993). What Has Happened to Carpooling: Trends in North Carolina, 1980 to 1990.Transportation Research Record, 1390, 50-59.
• Ibáñez, A., Blanco, C., Moreryra, P. ve Saiz-Ruiz, J. (2003). Gender Differences In Pathological Gambling. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 64(3), 295–301.
• IBI Group ve IBI Group. (2009). On-street Parking Carshare Demonstration Project. San Diego Association of Governments, San Diego.
• IBI (2017). What to Do About Uber: Ride-Sharing and The Rules. https://www.ibigroup.com/ibi-ideas/uber-ride-sharing-rules/, 01.03.2018.
• Johnson, E. J., Häubl, G. ve Keinan, A. (2007). Aspects of Endowment: A Query Theory of Value Construction. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 33(3), 461-474.
• Johnson, K. K., Mun, J. M. ve Chae, Y. (2016). Antecedents to Internet Use to Collaboratively Consume Apparel. Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management: An International Journal, 20(4), 370-382.
• Joo, J. (2007). An Empirical Study on the Relationship Between Customer Value and Repurchase Intention in Korean İnternet Shopping Malls. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 48(1), 53-62.
• Joo, j. (2015). Motives For Participating in Sharing Economy: Intentions to Use Car Sharing Services. Journal of Distribution Science, 15(2), 21-26.
• Kahneman, D. (1992). Reference Points, Anchors, Norms, and Mixed Feelings. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 51(2), 296-312.
• Kahneman, D. ve Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision Under Risk, Econometrica, 47 (2), 263–91.
• Kahneman, D., Knetsch, J. L. ve Thaler, R. H. (1990). Experimental Tests of the Endowment Effect and The Coase Theorem. Journal of Political Economy, 98 (6), 1325–1348.
• Kahneman, D., Knetsch, J. L. ve Thaler, R. H. (1991). Anomalies: The Endowment Effect, Loss Aversion, and Status Quo Bias. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 5(1), 193-206.
• Kahneman, D. ve Tversky, A. (2013). Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision Under Risk. In Handbook of the Fundamentals of Financial Decision Making: Part I (pp. 99-127).
• Kang, J., Hwang, K. ve Park, S. (2016). Finding Factors That Influence Carsharing Usage: Case Study in Seoul. Sustainability, 8(8), 709-721.
• Katzev, R. (2003). Car Sharing: A New Approach to Urban Transportation Problems. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 3(1), 65-86.
• Kiracı, H. (2017). Ortak Tüketim Ekseninde Paylaşılan/Paylaşılamayan Varlıklar ve Bireylerin Paylaşım Davranışlarını Etkileyen Faktörler Üzerine Bir Araştırma. Uluslararası İktisadi ve İdari İncelemeler Dergisi, 51-70.
• Knetsch, J. L. (1989). The Endowment Effect and Evidence of Nonreversible Indifference Curves. American Economic Review, 79 (5), 1277–1284.
• Knetsch, J. L. (1995). Asymmetric Valuation of Gains and Losses and Preference Order Assumptions, Economic Inquiry, 33, 134–141.
• Knetsch, J. L. (2001). Environmental Valuations and Standard Theory: Behavioral Findings, Context Dependence and Implications. Yearbook of Environmental and Resource Economics, 2000(2001), 267–299.
• Knetsch, J. L. ve Sinden, J. A. (1984). Willingness to Pay and Compensation Demanded: Experimental Evidence of an Unexpected Disparity in Measures of Value. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 99 (3), 507–21.
• Knetsch, J. L. ve Wong, W. K. (2009). The Endowment Effect and the Reference State: Evidence and Manipulations. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 71(2), 407-413.
• Kopp, J., Gerike, R. ve Axhausen, K. W. (2015). Do Sharing People Behave Differently? An Empirical Evaluation of the Distinctive Mobility Patterns of Free-Floating Car-Sharing Members. Transportation, 42(3), 449-469.
• KRC Research (2010), Millennials Driving Less and Worried About Cost of Car Ownership. Zipcar, Inc. http://ir.zipcar.com/releasedetail.cfm?ReleaseID=553203, 09.06.2018.
• Krech, D., Crutchfield, R. S. ve Ballachey, E. L. (1962). Individual in Society: A Textbook of Social Psychology. New York, NY, US: McGraw-Hill.
• Kuhnimhof, T., Buehler, R. ve Dargay, J. (2011). A New Generation: Travel Trends For Young Germans and Britons. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, (2230), 58-67.
• Kurt, S. ve Ünlüönen, K. (2017). Paylaşım Ekonomisi Kapsamında Turizm Sisteminin Değerlendirilmesi. Gazi Üniversitesi Turizm Fakültesi Dergisi, 1, 1-21.
• Leismann, K., Schmitt, M., Rohn, H. ve Baedeker, C. (2013). Collaborative Consumption: Towards A Resource-Saving Consumption Culture. Resources, 2(3), 184-203.
• Lerner, J. S., Small, D. A. ve Loewenstein, G. (2004). Heart Strings and Purse Strings: Carryover Effects of Emotions On Economic Decisions. Psychological Science, 15(5), 337-341.
• Levine, Mark (2009). Share My Ride”, New York Times Magazine, March 5. https://www.nytimes.com/2009/03/08/magazine/08Zipcar-t.html, 02.06.2018.
• Liberman, N., Idson, L. C., Camacho, C. J. ve Higgins, E. T. (1999). Promotion and Prevention Choices Between Stability and Change. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77(6), 1135-1145.
• Lin, C. H., Chuang, S. C. ve Kung, C. Y. (2006). The Presence of Reference Price: How Value Can Appear Convergent to Buyers and Sellers. Advances in Consumer Research, 33, 1-5.
• List, J. A. (2003), Does Market Experience Eliminate Market Anomalies?. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118(1), 41-71.
• Litman, T. (2000) Evaluating Carsharing Benefits. Transportation Research Record. Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1702(1), 31-35.
• Liu, A., Wuest, T., Wei, W., ve Lu, S. (2014). Application Of Prospect Theory On Car Sharing Product Service System. Procedia CIRP, 16, 350-355.
• Loewenstein, G. ve Issacharoff, S. (1994). Source Dependence in the Valuation of Objects. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 7(3), 157-168.
• Loewenstein, G. ve Adler, D. (1995). A Bias in the Prediction of Tastes. The Economic Journal, 105, 929-937.
• Loose, W. (2010). The State of European Car-Sharing. Project Momo Final Report D, 2. Work Package, 1-119. 05.06.2018
• Maddux, W. W., Yang, H., Falk, C., Adam, H., Adair, W., Endo, Y. ve Heine, S. J. (2010). For Whom is Parting With Possessions More Painful? Cultural Differences in the Endowment Effect. Psychological Science, 21(12), 1910-1917.
• Margolin, J. B., Misch, M. R. ve Dobson, R. D. (1976). Incentives and Disincentives to Ride-Sharing Behavior: A Progress Report. Transportation Research Record, 592, 41-44.
• Martin, E., Shaheen, S. ve Lidicker, J. (2010). Impact of Carsharing On Household Vehicle Holdings: Results from North American Shared-use Vehicle Survey. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, (2143), 150-158.
• Martinez, L. F., Zeelenberg, M. ve Rijsman, J. B. (2011). Regret, Disappointment and the Endowment Effect. Journal of Economic Psychology, 32(6), 962-968.
• Marx, P. (2011). “The Borrowers”, New Yorker, January 31, 34–38. https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2011/01/31/the-borrowers. 15.10.2018.
• Matthews, R. (1993). Carpooling Trends in Georgia: 1980 to 1990. In Unpublished Seminar Paper, CP (Vol. 6830). Urban Transportation Planning and Policy Analysis Graduate City Planning Program, Georgia Institute of Technology, June.
• Meijkamp, R. (1998), Changing Consumer Behaviour Through Eco‐Efficient Services: An Empirical Study of Car Sharing in the Netherlands. Business Strategy and the Environment, 7(4), 234-244.
• Meijkamp, R. ve Aarts, H. (1997). Breaking Through Habitual Behaviour: Is Car Sharing An İnstrument for Reducing Car Use?. In Policy, Planning and Sustainability. Proceedings of Seminars c and d held at ptrc European Transport Forum, Brunel Unıversıty, 1-5 September 1997. (Vol. 413). 309-321.
• Millard-Ball, A., Murray, G. ve ter Schure, J. (2006). Carsharing As Parking Management Strategy. Proceedings of the 85th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, USA.
• Morency, C., Trépanier, M., Agard, B., Martin, B. ve Quashie, J. (2007). Car Sharing System: What Transaction Datasets Reveal on Users' Behaviors. In Intelligent Transportation Systems Conference, 2007. ITSC 2007. IEEE (pp. 284-289). IEEE.
• Morency, C., Habib, K. M. N., Grasset, V. ve Islam, M. T. (2012), Understanding Members' Carsharing (Activity) Persistency By Using Econometric Model. Journal of Advanced Transportation, 46(1), 26-38.
• Morewedge, C. K., Shu, L. L., Gilbert, D. T. ve Wilson, T. D. (2009), Bad Riddance or Good Rubbish? Ownership and Not Loss Aversion Causes the Endowment Effect. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45(4), 947-951.
• Muniz, A. M. ve O'Guinn, T. C. (2001), Brand Community. Journal of Consumer Research, 27(4), 412-432.
• Nakip, M. (2013). Pazarlamada Araştırma Teknikleri ve SPSS Uygulamalari, 3. Baskı, Ankara: Seçkin Yayıncılık.
• Naughton, K. (2008). Can You Give Your Car Up?. Newsweek, August, 4, https://www.newsweek.com/driving-forces-can-you-give-your-car-8758, 15.05.2018.
• Navigant Research (2015). https://www.navigantresearch.com/newsroom/global-carsharing-services-revenue-is-expected-to-reach-6-5-billion-in-2024, 26.02.2018.
• Novemsky, N. ve Kahneman, D. (2005a). How Do Intentions Affect Loss Aversion?. Journal of Marketing Research, 42(2), 139-140.
• Novemsky, N. ve Kahneman, D. (2005b). The Boundaries of Loss Aversion. Journal of Marketing Research, 42(2), 119-128.
• Ornetzeder, M., Hertwich, E. G., Hubacek, K., Korytarova, K. ve Haas, W. (2008). The Environmental Effect of Car-Free Housing: A Case in Vienna. Ecological Economics, 65(3), 516-530.
• Pedersen, E. R. G. ve Netter, S. (2015). Collaborative Consumption: Business Model Opportunities and Barriers For Fashion Libraries. Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management, 19(3), 258-273.
• Piscicelli, L., Cooper, T. ve Fisher, T. (2015). The Role of Values in Collaborative Consumption: Insights From A Product-Service System For Lending and Borrowing in the UK. Journal of Cleaner Production, 97, 21-29.
• Plott, C. R. ve Zeiler, K. (2005). The Willingness to Pay–Willingness to Accept Gap,The “Endowment Effect. The American Economic Review, 95(3), 530-545.
• Plott, C. R. ve Zeiler, K. (2007). Exchange Asymmetries Incorrectly Interpreted as Evidence of Endowment Effect Theory and Prospect Theory?. American Economic Review, 97(4), 1449-1466.
• Plunkett, H. R. ve Buehner, M. J. (2007), The Relation of General and Specific Locus of Control to Intertemporal Monetary Choice. Personality and Individual Differences, 42(7), 1233-1242.
• Prettenthaler, F. E. ve Steininger, K. W. (1999). From Ownership to Service Use Lifestyle: The Potential of Car Sharing. Ecological Economics, 28(3), 443-453.
• Prieto, M., Baltas, G. ve Stan, V. (2017). Car Sharing Adoption Intention in Urban Areas: What Are the Key Sociodemographic Drivers?. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 101, 218-227.
• Prothero, A., Dobscha, S., Freund, J., Kilbourne, W. E., Luchs, M. G., Ozanne, L. K., ve Thøgersen, J. (2011). Sustainable Consumption: Opportunities for Consumer Research and Public Policy. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 30(1), 31-38.
• Purohit, D. (1995). Playing the Role of Buyer And Seller: The Mental Accounting of Trade-ins. Marketing Letters, 6(2), 101-110.
• PWC. (2015). The Sharing Economy Consumer Intelligence Series. Price Waterhouse Coopers Report http://www.pwc.com/us/en/industry/entertainment-media/publications/consumer-intelligence-series/assets/pwc-cis-sharing-economy.pdf, 08.05.2018.
• Reb, J. ve Connolly, T. (2007). Possession, Feelings of Ownership, and the Endowment Effect. Judgment and Decision Making, 2(2), 107-114.
• Reuters Brazil (2014). Zazcar Aproveita geração da Internet e Caos no Trânsito para Crescer. http://br.reuters.com/article/internetNews/idBRSPE92H00920130318?sp=true, 26.12.2017.
• Rickenberg, T. A., Gebhardt, A. ve Breitner, M. H. (2013). A Decision Support System For The Optimization Of Car Sharing Stations. In ECIS. p. 207-218.
• Rifkin, J. (2000). L’âge de l’accès: la vérité sur la nouvelle économie. Paris, La Découverte.
• Rifkin, J. (2001). The Age of Access: The New Culture of Hypercapitalism. Penguin.
• Saqib, N. U., Frohlich, N. ve Bruning, E. (2010). The Influence of Involvement on the Endowment Effect: The Moveable Value Function. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 20(3), 355-368.
• Schouten, J. W. ve McAlexander, J. H. (1995). Subcultures of Consumption: An Ethnography of the New Bikers. Journal of Consumer Research, 22(1), 43-61.
• Seik, F. T. (2000) Vehicle Ownership Restraints and Car Sharing in Singapore. Habitat International, 24(1), 75-90.
• Shaheen, S.A., (1999). Dynamics in Behavioral Adaptation to a Transportation Innovation: A Case Study of Carlink–A Smart Carsharing System. UCB-ITS-PRR-99-41.
• Simonson, I. ve Drolet, A. (2004). Anchoring Effects on Consumers' Willingness-to-Pay and Willingness-to-Accept. Journal of Consumer Research, 31(3), 681-690.
• Steininger, K., Vogl, C. ve Zettl, R. (1996). Car-Sharing Organizations: The Size of the Market Segment and Revealed Change in Mobility Behavior. Transport Policy, 3(4), 177-185.
• Strahilevitz, M. A. ve Loewenstein, G. (1998), The Effect of Ownership History on the Valuation of Objects. Journal of Consumer Research, 25(3), 276-289.
• Süel, E. (2013). Türkiye’de Kentsel Nüfus Artışı ve Ulaşım Politikaları, http://thecityfixturkiye.com/turkiyede-kentsel-nufus-artisi-ve-ulasim-politikalari/, 12.01.2019
• Süel, E. (2014). Mobicar-İstanbul’un Araç Paylaşım Sistemi, http://thecityfixturkiye.com/mobicar-istanbulun-arac-paylasim-sistemi/, 11.01.2019
• Teal, R. F. (1987). Carpooling: Who, How and Why. Transportation Research Part A: General, 21(3), 203-214.
• Thaler, R. H. (1980). Towards a Positive Theory of Consumer Choice. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 1(1), 39–60.
• Thaler, R. H. ve Johnson, E. J. (1990). Gambling With the House Money and Trying to Break Even: The Effects of Prior Outcomes on Risky Choice. Management Science, 36(6), 643-660.
• Thomas, V. L., Yeh, M. ve Jewell, R. D. (2015). Enhancing Valuation: The Impact of Self-Congruence With a Brand on the Endowment Effect. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics, 58, 178-185.
• Thompson, D. ve Weissmann, J. (2012). The Cheapest Generation. The Atlantic, 22. September 2012 issue, Available Online: http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2012/09/thecheapest-generation/309060/, 20.11.2018.
• Tversky, A. ve Kahneman, D. (1991). Loss Aversion in Riskless Choice: A Reference-Dependent Model, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 106(4), 1039−1061.
• United Nations. (2014). World Urbanization Prospects. https://esa.un.org/unpd/wup/, 25.02.2018.
• Ural, A. ve Kılıç, İ. (2013). Bilimsel Araştırma Süreci ve SPSS ile Veri Analizi. Detay Yayıncılık, Ankara.
• Van Boven, L., Loewenstein, G. ve Dunning, D. (2003). Mispredicting the Endowment Effect: Underestimation of Owners’ Selling Prices by Buyer’s Agents. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 51(3), 351-365.
• Van Dijk, E. ve Van Knippenberg, D. (1996). Buying and Selling Exchange Goods: Loss Aversion and the Endowment Effect. Journal of Economic Psychology, 17(4), 517-524.
• Voorhees, A. (1974). Transportation Pooling. Final Report to the US Department of Transportation, Office of the Secretary, Washington DC.
• Voss, K. E., Spangenberg, E. R. ve Grohmann, B. (2003), Measuring the Hedonic and Utilitarian Dimensions of Consumer Attitude. Journal of Marketing Research, 40(3), 310-320.
• Wachs, M. ve Taylor, B. D. (1998). Can Transportation Strategies Help Meet the Welfare Challenge?. Journal of the American Planning Association, 64(1), 15-19.
• Wieland, A., Sundali, J., Kemmelmeier, M. ve Sarin, R. (2014), Gender Differences in the Endowment Effect: Women Pay Less, But Won't Accept Less. Judgment & Decision Making, 9(6). 558-571.
• Winer, R. S. (1986). A Reference Price Model of Brand Choice For Frequently Purchased Products. Journal of Consumer Research, 13(2), 250-256.
• Wittkowski, K., Moeller, S. ve Wirtz, J. (2013), Firms’ Intentions to Use Nonownership Services. Journal of Service Research, 16(2), 171-185.
• Wong, G., Zane, N., Saw, A. ve Chan, A. K. K. (2013). Examining Gender Differences for Gambling Engagement and Gambling Problems Among Emerging Adults. Journal of Gambling Studies, 29(2), 171-189.
• Yang, H. C., Cho, H. Y. ve Lee, W. D. (2015). Multi-Dimensional Emotional Intelligence Effects on Intrinsic/Extrinsic Motivation and Job Satisfaction: Analysis Using Laborer Perceived Organizational Support, The East Asian Journal of Business Management, 5(4), 13-18.
• Yazıcıoğlu, Y. ve Erdoğan, S. (2004). SPSS Uygulamalı Bilimsel Araştırma Yöntemleri. Detay Yayıncılık, Ankara.
• Zhao, D. (2010, January 28). Car Sharing: A Sustainable and Innovative Personal Transport Solution with Great Potential and Huge Opportunities. Frost & Sullivan. http://www.frost.com/prod/servlet/market-insight-top.pag?docid=190795176, 05.03.2018.