LANGUAGE LEARNING STRATEGIES AND SELF-REGULATION SKILLS OF UNIVERSITY PREPARATORY SCHOOL AND PRIVATE LANGUAGE COURSE STUDENTS // ÜNİVERSİTE HAZIRLIK SINIFI VE ÖZEL DİL KURSU ÖĞRENCİLERİNİN YABANCI DİL ÖĞRENME STRATEJİLERİ VE ÖZ DÜZENLEME BECERİLERİ

Öz

This research aims to examine the use of language learning strategies and self-regulatory learning skills of university preparatory class and private English language course students according to their school type, gender, proficiency level, graduated high school type, and age. 293 learners from Adnan Menders University, School of Foreign Languages, and 129 learners from private language schools in Aydın (a total of 422 learners) composed of the research sample. Language Learning Strategies Inventory, which was developed by Oxford (1990) and adapted to Turkish by Cesur and Fer (2007), and self-regulated learning scale developed by Turan (2009) were used to identify the use of language strategies and self-regulated learning skills of learners. Confirmatory factor analysis was carried out for Language Learning Strategies Inventory and for Self-regulated Learning Scale both explanatory and confirmatory factor analysis were carried out by researchers. According to the results of the research, it was found that learners had a medium level use of language learning strategies and self-regulation skills. It was determined that the use of language learning strategies and self-regulation skills of private language course students are higher than those of preparatory class learners. It was also found that there was a positive, high-level correlation between the language learning strategies and self-regulation skills of the learners.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Language learning strategies
• Self-regulation skills
• Foreign language learning
• Private language course students
• Preparatory class students

LANGUAGE LEARNING STRATEGIES AND SELF-REGULATION SKILLS OF UNIVERSITY PREPARATORY SCHOOL AND PRIVATE LANGUAGE COURSE STUDENTS // ÜNİVERSİTE HAZIRLIK SINIFI VE ÖZEL DİL KURSU ÖĞRENCİLERİNİN YABANCI DİL ÖĞRENME STRATEJİLERİ VE ÖZ DÜZENLEME BECERİLERİ

Öz

Bu araştırmanın amacı, üniversite hazırlık sınıfı ve özel İngilizce kursu öğrencilerinin dil öğrenme stratejileri kullanımlarını ve öz düzenleyici öğrenme becerilerini okul türü, cinsiyet, kur düzeyi, mezun olunan lise türü, ortaöğretim alanı ve yaş değişkenlerine göre incelemektir. Araştırmaya Adnan Menderes Üniversitesi Yabancı Diller Yüksekokulundan 293 ve Aydında bulunan özel dil kurslarından 129 olmak üzere toplam 422 öğrenci katılmıştır. Araştırmada dil öğrenme stratejilerini belirlemek amacıyla Oxford (1990) tarafından geliştirilen ve Cesur ve Fer (2007) tarafından Türkçeye uyarlanan Dil Öğrenme Stratejileri Envanteri ve öz düzenleme becerilerini belirlemek amacıyla da Turan (2009) tarafından geliştirilen Öz Düzenleyici Öğrenme Becerileri Ölçeği kullanılmıştır. Dil Öğrenme Stratejileri Envanteri için doğrulayıcı, Öz Düzenleyici Öğrenme Becerileri Ölçeği için ise hem açımlayıcı hem de doğrulayıcı faktör analizi yapılmıştır. Araştırma sonuçlarına göre, öğrencilerin dil öğrenme stratejileri kullanımlarının ve öz düzenleme becerilerinin orta düzeyde olduğu görülmüştür. Özel kurs öğrencilerinin hem dil öğrenme stratejileri kullanımlarının hem de öz düzenleme becerilerinin hazırlık sınıfı öğrencilerine göre daha üst düzeyde olduğu belirlenmiştir. Öğrencilerin dil öğrenme stratejileri kullanımlarının yaş, İngilizce kullanma sıklığı, kur düzeyi ve ortaöğretim alanı değişkenlerine; öz düzenleme becerilerinin ise cinsiyet ve yaş değişkenine göre istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bir şekilde farklılaştığı tespit edilmiştir. Ayrıca dil öğrenme stratejileri ile öz düzenleme becerileri arasında pozitif yönde yüksek bir ilişki olduğu saptanmıştır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Dil öğrenme stratejileri
• Öz düzenleme becerileri
• Yabancı dil öğrenimi
• Yabancı dil kursu öğrencileri
• Hazırlık sınıfı öğrencileri

Kaynakça

1. Ada, S. (2011). A study on language learning strategies of students in private primary schools [Yayımlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi]. Trakya Üniversitesi Sosyal bilimler Enstitüsü.
2. Akıllılar, T. & Uslu, Z. (2011). Almanca bölümü öğrencilerinin uyguladıkları dil öğrenme stratejileri. Çukurova Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 2(40), 24-37. https://bit.ly/3sVWVT4
3. Akın, A. (2001). Improving students' active vocabulary in English through strategy awareness, recycling, and student feedback [Unpublished master’s thesis]. METU Social Sciences Institute.
4. Aktan, S. (2012). Öğrencilerin akademik başarısı, öz düzenleme becerisi, motivasyonu ve öğretmenlerinin öğretim stilleri arasındaki ilişki [Yayımlanmamış doktora tezi] Balıkesir Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü.
5. Akyol, S., & Fer, S. (2010). Sosyal yapılandırmacı öğrenme ortamı tasarımının öğrenenlerin akademik başarılarına ve öğrenmenin kalıcılığına etkisi nedir? In International Conference on New Trends in Education and Their Implications( Vol. 11, p. 13). http://www.iconte.org/FileUpload/ks59689/File/193.pdf
6. Altan, M. Z. (2004). Nationality and language learning strategies of ELT-Major University Students. Asian EFL Journal, 6(2), 1-11. https://bit.ly/3tR9X5K
7. Anderson, N. J. (1991). Individual differences in strategy use in second language reading and testing. The modern language journal, 75(4), 460-472. https://doi.org/10.2307/329495
8. Aslan, O. (2009). The role of gender and language learning strategies in learning English. [Unpublished master’s thesis] METU Social Sciences Institute.

9. Ayhan, Ü. (2016). The use of language learning strategies and its relationship with personality traits and individual differences: The case of Bosnian students at a private university [Unpublished PHD thesis]. International Burch Unıversity, Education Faculty.
10. Bacon, S. M. (1992). The relationship between gender, comprehension, processing strategies, and cognitive and affective response in foreign language listening. The modern language Journal, 76(2), 160-178. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1992.tb01096.x
11. Barnhardt, S., Chamot, A. U., El-Dinary, P. B., & Robbins, J. (1999). Learning strategies handbook. Addison-Wesley Longman.
12. Baş, G. (2014). Lise öğrencilerinin dil öğrenme stratejileri ile İngilizce dersindeki akademik başarıları arasındaki ilişki. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Buca Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, (37), 166-180. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/deubefd/issue/25112/265124
13. Batumlu, D. Z., & Erden, M. (2007). The relationship between foreign language anxiety and English achievement of Yıldız Technical University School of foreign languages preparatory students. Journal of theory and practice in education, 3(1), 24-38. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/63258
14. Bedell, D. A., & Oxford, R. L. (1996). Cross-cultural comparisons of language learning strategies in the People’s Republic of China and other countries. Language learning strategies around the world: Cross-cultural perspectives, 47-60.
15. Bekleyen, N. (2006). İngilizce öğretmen adaylarının dil öğrenme stratejileri kullanımı. TÖMER Dil Dergisi, 132, 28-37. https://bit.ly/3nnzJfp
16. Belcher, D. D. (2006). English for specific purposes: Teaching to perceived needs and imagined futures in worlds of work, study, and everyday life. TESOL quarterly, 133-156. https://doi.org/10.2307/40264514
17. Bidjenaro, T. (2005). Gender Differences in Self Regulated Learning. Paper Presented at the 36th/2005 Annual Meeting of the Northeastern Educational Research Association. Kerhonkson, NY.ED 490777
18. Bremner, S. (1999). Language learning strategies and language proficiency: Investigating the relationship in Hong Kong. Canadian Modern Language Review, 55(4), 490-514. https://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.55.4.490
19. Büyüköztürk, Ş., Çakmak, E. K., Akgün, Ö. E., & Demirel, F. (2018). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri (25.Baskı). Pegem Akademi.
20. Carrell, P. L. (1998). Can reading strategies be successfully taught?. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics, 21, 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1075/aral.21.1.01car
21. Cesur, M. O. (2008). Üniversite hazırlık sınıfı öğrencilerinin yabancı dil öğrenme stratejileri, öğrenme stili tercihi ve yabancı dil akademik başarısı arasındaki açıklayıcı ve yordayıcı ilişkiler örüntüsü [ Yayımlanmamış doktora tezi].YTÜ Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü.
22. Cesur, M. O., & Fer, S. (2007). What is the validity and reliability study of the strategy inventory of language learning. Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 4(2), 49-74. https://bit.ly/3gEVs11
23. Chamot, A. U. (1993). Student responses to learning strategy instruction in the foreign language classroom. Foreign Language Annals, 26(3), 308. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-9720.1993.tb02288.x
24. Chang, Y. F. (2011). Refusing in a foreign language: An investigation of problems encountered by Chinese learners of English. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/mult.2011.004
25. Chularut, P., & DeBacker, T. K. (2004). The influence of concept mapping on achievement, self-regulation, and self-efficacy in students of English as a second language. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 29(3), 248-263. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2003.09.001
26. Cohen, A. D. (2003). The learner's side of foreign language learning: Where do styles, strategies, and tasks meet?. IRAL, International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 41(4), 279-292. https://doi.org/10.1515/iral.2003.013
27. Cohen, A. D., & Dörnyei, Z. (2002). Focus on the language learner: Motivation, styles, and strategies. An introduction to applied linguistics, 170-190. Routledge.
28. Creswell, J. W. (2013). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th edition). Sage publications.
29. Çelik, N. (2012) Matematik öğretmen adaylarının ve matematik öğretmenlerinin öz düzenleme becerilerinin ve öz yeterlik algılarının incelenmesi [Yayımlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi]. Atatürk Üniversitesi, Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü.
30. Çetinel, E. (2009). 30 bin kişi 50 milyon TL verip kursa gidiyor, sadece yüzde 25'i tamamlıyor. http://www.radikal.com.tr/ekonomi/30-bin-kisi-50-milyon-tl-verip-kursa-gidiyor-sadece-yuzde-25i-tamamliyor-953195/
31. Dianyu, Z. (2005). English learning strategies and autonomous learning. Foreign Language Education, 1, 012.
32. Dickinson, L. (1995). Autonomy and motivation a literature review. System, 23(2), 165-174. https://doi.org/10.1016/0346-251X(95)00005-5
33. Ehrman, M. E., & Oxford, R. L. (1995). Cognition plus: Correlates of language learning success. The modern language journal, 79(1), 67-89. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1995.tb05417.x
34. Ehrman, M., & Oxford, R. (1990). Adult language learning styles and strategies in an intensive training setting. The modern language journal, 74(3), 311-327. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1990.tb01069.x
35. El-Dip, M.A.B. (2004). Language learning strategies in Kuwait: Links to gender, language level, and culture in a hybrid context. Foreign Language Annals. 7(1) 85-95. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-9720.2004.tb02176.x
36. Ergün, E. (2011). An investigation into the relationship between emotional intelligence skills and foreign language anxiety of students at a private university [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Middle East Technical University.
37. Erkuş, A. (2005). Bilimsel araştırma sarmalı. Seçkin Yayıncılık.
38. Ertekin, Z. S. (2006). A study on the correlation between the learning strategies of the 4th and 5th graders and those in the textbook [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Dokuz Eylül University Educational Sciences Institute.
39. Gardner, R. C. (1985). Social psychology and second language learning: The role of attitudes and motivation. Arnold.
40. Harmer, J. (1991). The practice of English language teaching. Longman.
41. Hong-Nam, K., & Leavell, A. G. (2007). A comparative study of language learning strategy use in an EFL context: Monolingual Korean and bilingual Korean-Chinese university students. Asia Pacific Education Review, 8(1), 71-88. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03025834
42. Horwitz, E. K. (1988). The beliefs about language learning of beginning university foreign language students. The Modern Language Journal, 72(3), 283-294. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1988.tb04190.x
43. Horwitz, E. K., Horwitz, M. B., & Cope, J. (1986). Foreign language classroom anxiety. The modern language journal, 70(2), 125-132. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1986.tb05256.x
44. Jenkins, J. (2009). English as a lingua franca: Interpretations and attitudes. World Englishes, 28(2), 200-207. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-971X.2009.01582.x
45. Jimenez, E., Lockheed, M. E., & Paqueo, V. (1991). The relative efficiency of private and public schools in developing countries. The World Bank Research Observer, 6(2), 205-218. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/wbro/6.2.205
46. Karasar, N. (2014). Bilimsel Araştırma Yöntemi(26. Baskı). Nobel Yayıncılık.
47. Kormos, J., & Kiddle, T. (2013). The role of socio-economic factors in motivation to learn English as a foreign language: The case of Chile. System, 41(2), 399-412. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2013.03.006
48. Kothari, C. R. (2004). Research methodology: Methods and techniques. New Age International.
49. Lestari, M., & Wahyudin, A. Y. (2020). Language Learning Strategies of Undergraduate EFL Students. Journal of English Language Teaching and Learning, 1(1), 25-30. https://doi.org/10.33365/jeltl.v1i1.242
50. Lewis, M. Paul, Gary F. Simons, and Charles D. Fennig (eds.). (2016). Ethnologue: Languages of the World, Nineteenth edition. Dallas, Texas: SIL International. Online version: http://www.ethnologue.com.
51. Lin, C. H., Zhang, Y., & Zheng, B. (2017). The roles of learning strategies and motivation in online language learning: A structural equation modeling analysis. Computers & Education, 113, 75-85. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.05.014
52. Liu, D., Ahn, G. S., Baek, K. S., & Han, N. O. (2004). South Korean high school English teachers' code switching: Questions and challenges in the drive for maximal use of English in teaching. Tesol Quarterly, 605-638. https://doi.org/10.2307/3588282
53. Liyanage, I., & Bartlett, B. (2013). Personality types and languages learning strategies: Chameleons changing colours. System, 41(3), 598-608. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2013.07.011
54. Meniado, J. C. (2016). Metacognitive Reading Strategies, Motivation, and Reading Comprehension Performance of Saudi EFL Students. English Language Teaching, 9(3), 117-129. http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/elt.v9n3p117
55. Naiman, N., Frohlich, M., Stern, H., & Todesco, A. (1978). The good language learner. Research in Education Series. Ontario Institute for Studies in Education.
56. Nakata, Y. (2010). Toward a framework for self-regulated language-learning. TESL Canada journal, 1-1. https://doi.org/10.18806/tesl.v27i2.1047
57. Nyikos, M. (1990). Sex‐related differences in adult language learning: Socialization and memory factors. The Modern Language Journal, 74(3), 273-287. https://doi.org/10.2307/327624
58. O'malley, J. M., & Chamot, A. U. (1990). Learning strategies in second language acquisition. Cambridge university press.
59. O'Malley, J. M., Chamot, A. U., Stewner‐Manzanares, G., Kupper, L., & Russo, R. P. (1985). Learning strategies used by beginning and intermediate ESL students. Language learning, 35(1), 21-46. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1985.tb01013.x
60. Oxford, R. (1990). Language learning strategies: What every teacher should know. Newbury House Publishers.
61. Oxford, R., & Nyikos, M. (1989). Variables affecting choice of language learning strategies by university students. The modern language journal, 73(3), 291-300. https://doi.org/10.2307/327003
62. Özdemir, A., Aydın, N. ve Akar-Vural, R. (2009). Çevre eğitimi öz-yeterlik algısı üzerine bir ölçek geliştirme çalışması. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Buca Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 26, 1-8. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/deubefd/issue/25438/268408
63. Padem, S. (2012). Üniversite hazırlık sınıfı öğrencilerinin dil öğrenme stratejileri kullanımlarının çeşitli değişkenlere göre incelenmesi [Yayımlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi] Düzce Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü.
64. Park, G. P., & Lee, H. W. (2006). The characteristics of effective English teachers as perceived by high school teachers and students in Korea. Asia Pacific Education Review, 7(2), 236-248. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03031547
65. Pawlak, M. (2019). Investigating language learning strategies: Prospects, pitfalls and challenges. Language Teaching Research. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168819876156
66. Phakiti, A. (2003). A closer look at gender and strategy use in L2 reading. Language learning, 53(4), 649-702. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1467-9922.2003.00239.x
67. Pintrich, R. R. (2000). The role of goal orientation in self-regulated learning. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, M. Zeidner (Eds), Handbook of Self- Regulation (pp, 451-501). Academic Press.
68. Punch, K. F. (2013). Introduction to social research: Quantitative and qualitative approaches. Sage.
69. Rao, Z. (2016). Language learning strategies and English proficiency: interpretations from information-processing theory. The Language Learning Journal, 44(1), 90-106. https://doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2012.733886
70. Razak, N. Z. A., Ismail, F., Aziz, A. A., & Babikkoi, M. A. (2012). Assessing the use of English language learning strategies among secondary school students in Malaysia. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 66, 240-246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.11.266
71. Reid, J. M. (1987). The learning style preferences of ESL students. TESOL quarterly, 21(1), 87-111. https://doi.org/10.2307/3586356
72. Rubin, J. (1975). What the "good language learner" can teach us. TESOL quarterly, 41-51.
73. Seidlhofer, B. (2009). Common ground and different realities: World Englishes and English as a lingua franca. World Englishes, 28(2), 236-245. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-971X.2009.01592.x
74. Senemoğlu, N. (2010). Gelişim öğrenme ve öğretim kuramdan uygulamaya (18. Baskı). Pegem Akademi.
75. Stern, H. H. (1975). What can we learn from the good language learner? Canadian Modern language review, 31(4), 304-318. https://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.31.4.304
76. Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2013). Using multivariate statistics (Sixth edition).Pearson Education.
77. Tang, M., & Tian, J. (2015). Associations between Chinese EFL graduate students' beliefs and language learning strategies. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 18(2), 131-152. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2014.882882
78. Taylor, S. K., & Cutler, C. (2016). Introduction: Les classes d’accueil et d’immersion: stratégies, pratiques et croyances. Canadian Modern Language Review, 72(4), 405-422. https://utpjournals.press/doi/10.3138/cmlr.72.4.405
79. Turan, S. (2009). Probleme dayalı öğrenmeye ilişkin tutumlar, öğrenme becerileri ve başarı arasındaki ilişkiler [Yayımlanmamış doktora tezi] Hacettepe Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü.
80. Vrugt, A. and Oort, F. J. (2010). Effective self-regulated learning of university students. In Jesús de la Fuente Arias Mourad Ali Eissa (Ed.). International Handbook on Applying Self-Regulated Learning in Different Settings, 319-340. Almeria, Spain.
81. Wenden, A. (1991). Learner strategies for learner autonomy: Planning and implementing learner training for language learners. Prentice-Hall.
82. Wharton, G. (2000). Language learning strategy use of bilingual foreign language learners in Singapore. Language learning, 50(2), 203-243. https://doi.org/10.1111/0023-8333.00117
83. Wong, M. S. L. (2011). Language Learning Strategy Use: A Study of Pre-Service Teachers in Malaysia. Online Submission. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED521415
84. Xiaodong, H. (2004). Problems in autonomous English learning research in China [J]. Foreign Language World, 4(1), 68-81.
85. Zhang, F., & Yin, P. (2009). A Study of pronunciation problems of English learners in China. Asian social science, 5(6), 141. https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v5n6p141
86. Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Becoming a self-regulated learner: An overview.Theory into practice, 41(2), 64-70. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4102_2
87. Zimmerman, B. J., & Martinez-Pons, M. (1988). Construct validation of a strategy model of student self-regulated learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80(3), 284-290. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0022-0663.80.3.284
88. Zoubir-Shaw, S., & Oxford, R. L. (1995). Gender differences in language learning strategy use in university-level introductory French classes: A pilot study employing a strategy questionnaire. Faces in a crowd: Individual learners in multisection programs, 181-213.