Hamlet'i Yeniden Yazma Yoluyla Yıkmak: Howard Barker'ın Gertrude-The Cry Oyununda Annenin Cinsel ve Toplumsal Cinsiyet Politikası

Yıl 2022, Cilt: 16 Sayı: 1, 83 - 98, 06.06.2022

Özlem Özmen Akdoğan

https://doi.org/10.47777/cankujhss.1010395

Öz

Howard Barker’ın Gertrude-The Cry (2002) adlı oyunu Shakespeare'in en popüler oyunu Hamlet hakkında bilinen her şeyi altüst eder ve büyük ölçüde dönüştürür. Bu uyarlamada, kaynak metnin ana karakteri Hamlet yerine, kocasının katline olası katkısı ve Claudius ile evlenmesiyle Shakespeare’in Hamlet'inde kötü bir kadın olarak sunulan Gertrude'dur. Barker, Hamlet'in trajik kahraman statüsünü değiştirir ve annesini Shakespeare'in metninde kendisi için belirlenen normların hiçbirine uymayan oyunun yeni kahramanı yapar. Bu uyarlamadaki Gertrude, oyunun birkaç erkek karakterine karşı aşırı derecede erotik arzuyla dolu bir kadındır. Bu makale, Barker'ın yeniden yazımını geleneksel edebî eserlerde temsil edilen kadınlık normlarına meydan okuma girişimi olarak analiz etmektedir. Barker'ın versiyonundaki dönüşümler, oyunun yazıldığı dönemde kadının toplumdaki rolü ve statüsüyle de ilişkilendirilmektedir. 21. yy.’ın ilk yıllarında İngiltere'de hâkim olan Yeni İşçi Hükümeti’nin düzenlemeleri ışığında, bireysel irade ve cinsel özgürlük gibi konuları ele alması bakımından Barker'ın eseri politik güdümlü bir uyarlama olarak da tartışılmaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Howard Barker, Gertrude-The Cry, Shakespeare, Hamlet, New Labour

Destekleyen Kurum

Yok

Proje Numarası

Yok

Teşekkür

Yok

Subverting Hamlet through Re-writing: Sexual and Gender Politics of the Mother in Howard Barker’s Gertrude-The Cry

Öz

In Howard Barker’s Gertrude-The Cry (2002), all the things most popularly known about Shakespeare’s play Hamlet are subverted and transformed to a great extent. In this adaptation, the title character of the source text is changed from Hamlet to Gertrude, who is presented as a villainous woman in Hamlet with her potential involvement in her husband’s murder and subsequent marriage to Claudius. Barker alters the status of Hamlet as the tragic hero and makes his mother the new heroine of the play who does not conform to any of the norms set for her in Shakespeare’s text. Instead, Gertrude behaves as a woman extremely driven by erotic desire towards several male characters in the play. This paper analyses Barker’s rewriting as an attempt to challenge the norms of womanhood represented in conventional literary works. The transformations in Barker’s version are also related to women’s role and status in society at the time the play was written. Regarding the dominant ideas of the play such as personal will and sexual liberation in light of the relevant legislations of the New Labour as the ruling party in Britain in the early years of the twenty-first century, Barker’s play is also discussed as a politically driven adaptation.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Howard Barker, Gertrude-The Cry, Shakespeare, Hamlet, New Labour

Proje Numarası

Yok

Kaynakça

• Barker, Howard. Gertrude-The Cry. Calder, 2002.
• Barker, Howard. “Gertrude-The Cry.” The Wrestling School, 2002, http://www.thewrestlingschool.co.uk /Gertrude.htm
• Barker, Howard. “Interview with Chris Megson.” Modern British Playwriting in the 1970s, edited by Chris Megson, Bloomsbury, 2012, pp. 207-211.
• Barker, Howard. “On Shakespeare.” Interview with Vanasay Khamphommala. Howard Barker Interviews 1980-2010: Conversations in Catastrophe, edited by Mark Brown, Intellect, 2011, pp. 161-175.
• Barker, Howard. “Death as a Theatrical Experience.” Interview with Aleks Sierz. Howard Barker Interviews 1980-2010: Conversations in Catastrophe, edited by Mark Brown, Intellect, 2011, pp. 111-123.
• Blair, Tony. 2005. “Our Citizens Should Not Live in Fear.” The Guardian, 11 Dec. 2005, https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2005/dec/11/labour.prisons andprobation
• Bradley, Lynne. Adapting King Lear for the Stage. Ashgate, 2010.
• Carney, Sean. The Politics and Poetics of Contemporary English Tragedy. Toronto University Press, 2013.
• Coote, Anna. “Feminism and the Third Way: A Call for Dialogue.” New Labour: The Progressive Future, edited by Stuart White, Palgrave Macmillan, 2001, pp. 126-133.
• Foakes, Reginald A. “Introduction.” King Lear. William Shakespeare, edited by Reginald A. Foakes, Arden Shakespeare, 2001, pp. 1-151.
• Hutcheon, Linda. A Theory of Adaptation. Routledge, 2006.
• Kilpatrick, David. “Gertrude-The Cry (review).” Theatre Journal, vol. 55, no. 4, 2003, pp. 704-706.
• MacKinnon, Catherine A. Foreword. Sexual Politics. Kate Millett, Columbia University Press, 2016, pp. ix-xix.
• Millett, Kate. Sexual Politics. Columbia University Press, 1969.
• Newman, Janet. Modernizing Governance: New Labour, Policy and Society. Sage, 2001.
• Obis, Eleonore. “‘Not Nude but Naked:’ Nakedness and Nudity in Barker’s Drama.” Howard Barker’s Art of Theatre, edited by David Ian Rabey and Sarah Goldingay, Manchester University Press, 2013, pp. 73-82.
• Rabey, David Ian. Howard Barker: Ecstasy and Death. Palgrave Macmillan, 2009.
• Saunders, Graham. “Howard Barker’s ‘Monstrous Assaults.’ Eroticism, Death and the Antique Text.” Eroticism and Death in Theatre and Performance, edited by Karoline Gritzner, Hertfordshire University Press, 2010, pp. 144-159.
• Shade, Ruth. “All Passion is a Risk.” Gambit: Howard Barker Special Issue, vol. 11, no. 41, 1984, pp. 101-109.
• Shakespeare, William. Hamlet, William Shakespeare, edited by Ann Thompson and Neil Taylor. Arden Shakespeare, 2006.
• Smith, Bruce R. “Making a Difference: Male/Male ‘Desire’ in Tragedy, Comedy, and Tragicomedy.” Erotic Politics: Desire on the Renaissance Stage, edited by Susan Zimmerman, Routledge, 1992, pp. 99-117.
• Smith, Hilda L. “Gender, the False Universal and Shakespeare’s Comedies.” Women Making Shakespeare: Text, Reception and Performance, edited by Gordon McMullan et al., Bloomsbury, 2014, pp. 35-46.
• Smith, Rebecca. “A Heart Cleft in Twain: The Dilemma of Shakespeare’s Gertrude.” The Woman’s Part: Feminist Criticism of Shakespeare, edited by Carolyn Ruth Swift Lenz et al., Illinois University Press, 1983, pp. 194-211.