EN
Dosimetric Comparison of The Effects of Different Treatment Plan Techniques on Reduction in Critical Organs in Whole Brain Radiotherapy Application
Öz
Different radiotherapy treatment techniques can be used in whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT). This study aims to investigate the dosimetric advantages of the anterior isocenteric (AI) technique which is produced as an alternative to the central isocentric (CI) technique. 25 whole brain patients were included in this retrospective study. Plans were made with two treatment techniques for each patient. One central isocenter (CI) was made using a conventional helmet field (HF) to center the whole brain, which is the isocenter of the target volume. An automatic margin of 5 mm was given to the planning target volume (PTV) with multileaf collimators (MLC) for both plans. For CI and AI techniques, a total dose of 30 Gy was given in 10 fractions with 6 MV photon energy. The two planning techniques were compared dosimetrically. The dose homogeneity index (DHI) had lower values in the AI plan according to CI plans significantly (p=0.049). There was a 6,57% difference between CI and AI planning techniques for the maximum dose of the right lens. For the minimum dose and mean dose AI plans significantly had lower values according to the CI plan (p=0.001 and p=0.028 respectively). In this dosimetric study, we found that the AI treatment technique for WBRT was superior to the CI technique for DHI and organs at risk. We recommended to use the AI technique, especially to better protect organs at risk in WBRT.
Anahtar Kelimeler
Kaynakça
- 1]. Yu, J., S. Shiao, and J. Knisely, 2083: A Dosimetric Evaluation of Conventional Helmet Field Irradiation Versus Two Field Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy Technique. International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics, 2006. 66(3): p. S255-S256.
- [2]. Yu, J., S. Shiao, and J. Knisely, 2083: A Dosimetric Evaluation of Conventional Helmet Field Irradiation Versus Two Field Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy Technique. International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics, 2006. 66(3): p. S255-S256.
- [3]. Fujita, H., et al., Improvement of dose homogeneity with irregular surface compensator in whole brain radiotherapy. Journal of Radiotherapy in Practice, 2016. 15(3): p. 269-275.
- [4]. Murray, K.J., et al., A randomized phase III study of accelerated hyperfractionation versus standard in patients with unresected brain metastases: a report of the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) 9104. International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics, 1997. 39(3): p. 571-574.
- [5]. Gul OV. Experimental evaluation of out-of-field dose for different high-energy electron beams and applicators used in external beam radiotherapy. Radiation Physics and Chemistry. 2024;215.
- [6]. Gul OV, Duzova M. Effect of different CTV shrinkage and skin flash margins on skin dose for left chest wall IMRT: A dosimetric study. Radiation Physics and Chemistry. 2024;216.
- [7]. Jones, D., ICRU report 50—prescribing, recording and reporting photon beam therapy. 1994, Wiley Online Library.
- [8]. Kanyilmaz, G., Baş-boyun kanserlerinde radyoterapi planlamasinda 18f-fdg pet/bt kullanimi. Mevlana Tıp Bilimleri Dergisi, 2021. 1(3): p. 85-88.
Ayrıntılar
Birincil Dil
İngilizce
Konular
Klasik Fizik (Diğer)
Bölüm
Araştırma Makalesi
Yayımlanma Tarihi
27 Mart 2024
Gönderilme Tarihi
26 Kasım 2023
Kabul Tarihi
17 Şubat 2024
Yayımlandığı Sayı
Yıl 2024 Cilt: 20 Sayı: 1
APA
Demir, H., & Kanyılmaz, G. (2024). Dosimetric Comparison of The Effects of Different Treatment Plan Techniques on Reduction in Critical Organs in Whole Brain Radiotherapy Application. Celal Bayar University Journal of Science, 20(1), 10-15. https://doi.org/10.18466/cbayarfbe.1396284
AMA
1.Demir H, Kanyılmaz G. Dosimetric Comparison of The Effects of Different Treatment Plan Techniques on Reduction in Critical Organs in Whole Brain Radiotherapy Application. Celal Bayar University Journal of Science. 2024;20(1):10-15. doi:10.18466/cbayarfbe.1396284
Chicago
Demir, Hikmettin, ve Gül Kanyılmaz. 2024. “Dosimetric Comparison of The Effects of Different Treatment Plan Techniques on Reduction in Critical Organs in Whole Brain Radiotherapy Application”. Celal Bayar University Journal of Science 20 (1): 10-15. https://doi.org/10.18466/cbayarfbe.1396284.
EndNote
Demir H, Kanyılmaz G (01 Mart 2024) Dosimetric Comparison of The Effects of Different Treatment Plan Techniques on Reduction in Critical Organs in Whole Brain Radiotherapy Application. Celal Bayar University Journal of Science 20 1 10–15.
IEEE
[1]H. Demir ve G. Kanyılmaz, “Dosimetric Comparison of The Effects of Different Treatment Plan Techniques on Reduction in Critical Organs in Whole Brain Radiotherapy Application”, Celal Bayar University Journal of Science, c. 20, sy 1, ss. 10–15, Mar. 2024, doi: 10.18466/cbayarfbe.1396284.
ISNAD
Demir, Hikmettin - Kanyılmaz, Gül. “Dosimetric Comparison of The Effects of Different Treatment Plan Techniques on Reduction in Critical Organs in Whole Brain Radiotherapy Application”. Celal Bayar University Journal of Science 20/1 (01 Mart 2024): 10-15. https://doi.org/10.18466/cbayarfbe.1396284.
JAMA
1.Demir H, Kanyılmaz G. Dosimetric Comparison of The Effects of Different Treatment Plan Techniques on Reduction in Critical Organs in Whole Brain Radiotherapy Application. Celal Bayar University Journal of Science. 2024;20:10–15.
MLA
Demir, Hikmettin, ve Gül Kanyılmaz. “Dosimetric Comparison of The Effects of Different Treatment Plan Techniques on Reduction in Critical Organs in Whole Brain Radiotherapy Application”. Celal Bayar University Journal of Science, c. 20, sy 1, Mart 2024, ss. 10-15, doi:10.18466/cbayarfbe.1396284.
Vancouver
1.Hikmettin Demir, Gül Kanyılmaz. Dosimetric Comparison of The Effects of Different Treatment Plan Techniques on Reduction in Critical Organs in Whole Brain Radiotherapy Application. Celal Bayar University Journal of Science. 01 Mart 2024;20(1):10-5. doi:10.18466/cbayarfbe.1396284