Türkiye'de “Liderlik” Çalışmaları (1983 - 2021): Bibliyometrik Bir Analiz

Yıl 2023, , 75 - 94, 28.03.2023

Emrah Kaya , Mehmet Küçükçene

https://doi.org/10.18026/cbayarsos.1097364

Cited By: 2

Öz

Bu çalışmanın amacı, Türkiye’de liderliği konu edinen makaleleri bibliyometrik yöntem ile analiz etmek ve incelemektir. Bu amaç doğrultusunda, Web of Science (WoS) veri tabanı kullanılarak 1983 - 2021 yılları arasında yayınlanan 894 makale, VOSviewer yazılımı ile analiz edilmiştir. Araştırma sonucunda, Türkiye’de birçok disipline yayılmış olan liderlik makalelerinin en çok “eğitim” alanında gerçekleştirilmiş olması dikkat çekmektedir. Bununla birlikte, liderlik çalışmalarının 2004 yılından sonra sayısal olarak sürekli arttığı ve 2020 yılına gelindiğinde ise bir bilgi patlaması yaşandığı görülmektedir. Diğer yandan, en çok çalışılan liderlik türünün ise “dönüşümcü liderlik” olduğu tespit edilmiştir. Bu sonuçlara dayalı olarak araştırmacılara bibliyometrik yöntem kullanılarak liderliğin farklı boyutlarına odaklanabilecekleri ve benzer bir çalışmayı belirli periyotlarla yapabilecekleri önerilmiştir. Çalışmanın ayrıca liderlik konusunda çalışma yapan araştırmacılara özellikle yazar iş birliği, konu ve dergi seçiminde yol göstermesi beklenmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Bibliyometrik Analiz, Liderlik, Bilimsel Haritalama, Türkiye

Destekleyen Kurum

-

Proje Numarası

-

Teşekkür

-

“Leadership” Studies in Turkey (1983 - 2021): A Bibliometric Analysis

Öz

The aim of this study is to analyze and examine the articles on leadership in Turkey with the bibliometric method. For this purpose, 894 articles published between 1983 and 2021, obtained by using the Web of Science (WoS) database, were analyzed with the VOSviewer software. As a result of the research, it is noteworthy that the articles on leadership, which have spread to many disciplines in Turkey, are mostly carried out in the field of "education". Besides, it is seen that leadership studies have increased numerically since 2004 and a knowledge explosion has been experienced by 2020. On the other hand, it has been determined that the most studied leadership type is "transformational leadership". Based on these results, it was suggested to the researchers that they could focus on different dimensions of leadership by using the bibliometric method and do a similar study periodically. Furthermore, It is expected that the research will guide researchers working on leadership, especially regarding author collaboration, topic and journal selection.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Leadership, Science Mapping, Turkey, Bibliometric Analysis

Proje Numarası

-

Kaynakça

• Akfırat, S. (2017). Kimlik liderlik ölçeğinin Türkçe formunun psikometrik özelliklerinin üniversite öğrenci örnekleminde incelenmesi. Türk Psikoloji Yazıları, 20(39), 51 - 69.
• Albort-Morant, G., Henseler, J., Leal-Millán, A., & Cepeda-Carrión, G. (2017). Mapping the field: A bibliometric analysis of green innovation. Sustainability, 9(6), 1011.
• Bush, T. (2006). Theories of educational management. International Journal of Educational Leadership Preparation, 1(2), 1-25.
• Chen, C., & Chen, C. (2003). Mapping scientific frontiers. London, England: Springer-Verlag
• De Bakker, F.G., Groenewegen, P., & Den Hond, F. (2005). A bibliometric analysis of 30 years of research and theory on corporate social responsibility and corporate social performance. Business & Society, 44(3), 283–317.
• Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Mukherjee, D., Pandey, N., & Lim, W. M. (2021). How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 133, 285-296.
• Duque Oliva, E. J., Cervera Taulet, A., & Rodríguez Romero, C. (2006). A bibliometric analysis of models measuring the concept of perceived quality in providing internet service. Innovar, 16(28), 223–243.
• Gaviria-Marin, M., Merigo, J. M., & Popa, S. (2018). Twenty years of the Journal of Knowledge
Management: A bibliometric analysis. Journal of Knowledge Management, 22(8), 1655-1687.
• Göktürk, D., & Ağın, E. (2020). Liderlik çalışmalarında takipçi (follower) merkezli yaklaşıma ilişkin bir değerlendirme. Anadolu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 20(4), 191-210.
• Gümüş, S., Gök, E., & Esen, M. (2020). A review of research on international student mobility: Science mapping the existing knowledge base. Journal of Studies in International Education, 24(5), 495–517.
• Hallinger, P., & Heck, R. H. (1996) Reassessing the principal’s role in school effectiveness: a review of empirical research, 1980–1995. Educational Administration Quarterly 32(1), 5–44.
• Hallinger, P., & Kovačević, J. (2019). A bibliometric review of research on educational administration: Science mapping the literature, 1960 to 2018. Review of Educational Research, 89(3), 335-369.
• Heck, R. H., & Hallinger, P. (2005). The study of educational leadership and management: where does the field stand today? Educational Management Administration & Leadership 33(2), 229–244.
• House, R. J., & Aditya, R. N. (1997). The social scientific study of leadership: Quo vadis?. Journal of management, 23(3), 409-473.
• Hughes, R. L., Ginett, R. C., & Curphy, G. J. (2009). Leadership: Enhancing the lessons of experience (6th ed.). Irwin: McGraw-Hill.
• Kruger, M. Witziers, B. & Sleegers, P. (2007). The impact of school leadership on school level factors: Validation of a causal model. School Effectiveness and School Improvement 18(1), 1–20.
• Leithwood, K. A., & Sun, J. P. (2012). The nature and effects of transformational school leadership: A meta-analytic review of unpublished research. Educational Administration Quarterly 48(3), 387–423.
• Leithwood, K. A., Harris, A., & Hopkins, D. (2008). Seven strong claims about successful school leadership. School Leadership and Management 28(1), 27–42.
• Liberati, A., Altman, D. G., Tetzlaff, J., Mulrow, C., Gøtzsche, P. C., Ioannidis, J. P. A., Clarke, M., Devereaux, P. J., Kleijnen, J., & Moher, D. (2009). The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: Explanation and elaboration. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 62(10), 1–34.
• Margiadi, B., & Wibowo, A. (2020). ‘’Authentic Leadership: A Bibliometric Analysis", Barnett, W.A. and Sergi, B.S. (Ed.) Advanced Issues in the Economics of Emerging Markets (International Symposia in Economic Theory and Econometrics, Vol. 27), Emerald Publishing Limited, Bingley, pp. 49-62.
• McCain, K. W. (1996). Dictionary of bibliometrics - Diodato, V. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 47, 716–717
• Najam, U., & Mustamil, N. (2020). Servant leadership: A bibliometric review. International Journal of Organizational Leadership, 9(3), 138-155.
• Rigby, J. G. (2014). Three logics of instructional leadership. Educational Administration Quarterly, 50(4), 610-644.
• Samul, J. (2020). The research topics of leadership: Bibliometric analysis from 1923 to 2019. International Journal of Educational Leadership and Management, 8(2), 116-143.
• Small, H. (1973). Co‐citation in the scientific literature: A new measure of the relationship between two documents. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 24(4), 265-269.
• Tal, D., & Gordon, A. (2016). Leadership of the present, current theories of multiple involvements: A bibliometric analysis. Scientometrics, 107(1), 259-269.
• Uslu Çetin, O., & Özdemir, M. (2021). Bir disiplin olarak eğitim yönetiminin kavram haritası üzerine boylamsal bir inceleme. İnönü Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 22(3), 1864-1897.
• Van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2014). Visualizing biblio-metric networks. In Ding, Y., Rousseau, R. and Wolfram, D. (eds), Measuring Scholarly Impact. Cham, Switzerland: Springer, pp. 285–320.
• Walker, A. D., & Ko, J. (2011). Principal leadership in an era of accountability: a perspective from the Hong Kong context. School Leadership & Management 31(4), 369–392.
• White, H. D., & McCain, K. W. (1998). Visualizing a discipline: An author co-citation analysis of information science, 1972–1995. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 49, 327–355.
• Yukl, G. (1989). Managerial leadership: A review of theory and research. Journal of Management, 15(2), 251-289.
• Yukl, G. (2013). Leadership in organizations (8th ed.), Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson
• Zupic, I., & Čater, T. (2015). Bibliometric methods in management and organization. Organizational research methods, 18(3), 429-472.