Hindistan'ın Orta Doğu Politikası

Öz

In the balance sheet of general policy of this 65-year-old state, it is noticed that as a result of the colonial experience, India has given importance to its own sovereignty and emphasized the existence of the Non-Aligned Movement in the world politics (during and after the Cold War). Becoming a global and regional player is its two major foreign policy goals. The adoption of a multi-dimensional understanding of foreign policy at the end of the Cold War makes these objectives possible. In this article, it is argued that India which followed a powerful foreign policy in the last 10 years requires the Middle East region in terms of economic, geo-political, geo-strategic and cultural reasons. It is also believed that the target of knitting deeply the “Look West” policy next to the “Look East” policy is the result of its realpolitik approach.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• India, Middle East, Non-aligned Movement, Cold War

Hindistan'ın Orta Doğu Politikası

Öz

65 senelik devletin genel siyaset bilançosunda fark edilmektedir ki, kolonyal tecrübe sonucu Hindistan hem kendi egemenliğine önem vermiş hem de küresel siyasette (Soğuk Savaş dönemi ve sonrasında) Bağlantısızlar Hareketi’nin varlığını vurgulamıştır. Küresel ve bölgesel mecralarda nüfuz sahibi olmak, başlıca iki dış politika hedefidir. Soğuk Savaş bitiminde çok boyutlu bir dış politik anlayışın kabulü, bu hedefleri mümkün kılmaktadır. Bu makalede, son on yılda güçlü bir dış politika izleyen Hindistan’ın Orta Doğu bölgesine ekonomik, jeo-politik, jeo-stratejik ve kültürel nedenlerden dolayı artan bir şekilde gereksinim duyduğu iddia edilmektedir. Ayrıca, “Doğu’ya Bakış” politikasının yanında “Batı’ya Bakış” politikasını derinden örmek istemesi, reel politik yaklaşımının bir sonucu addedilmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Hindistan, Orta Doğu, Bağlantısızlık Hareketi, Soğuk Savaş

Kaynakça

1. AKRAM, Sarah, “Turkey-India Relations Redefined”, Reflections, No. 4, 2010, http://www.issi.org.pk/photos/TURKEY_INDIA_RELATIONS_REDEFINED. pdf (31.8.2012).
2. ANDERSON, Roy R., Seibert, Robert F. ve Wagner, Jon G., Politics and Change in the Middle East, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, 2006.
3. ARI, Tayyar, Geçmişten Günümüze Ortadoğu: Siyaset, Savaş ve Diplomasi, İstanbul: Alfa Yayınları, 2005.
4. ARMAOĞLU, Fahir, 20.Yüzyıl Siyasi Tarihi, İstanbul: Alkım Yayınevi, 2009.
5. ASHRAF, Fahmida, “US-Iraq War: India’s Middle East Policy”, The Institute of Strategic Studies, Islamabad, 2003, http://www.issi.org.pk/oldsite/ss_Detail.php?dataId=248 (30.8.2012).
6. BBC: Indian investment in London jumps, 27 Nisan 2007, http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/business/6599693.stm (23.8.2012)
7. BBC, “New era for Saudi-Indian ties”, 27 Ocak 2006, http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/4655268.stm (01.9.2012).
8. BBC Türkçe, Obama: Hindistan bir dünya gücü, 8 Kasım 2010, http://www.bbc.co.uk/turkce/haberler/2010/11/101108_obama_india.shtml (25.8.2012).

9. BOQUERAT, Gilles ve GRARE, Frédéric, India, China, Russia; Intricacies of an Asian Triangle, New Delhi: India Research Press, 2004.
10. BRAHMAND, “Israel worried over US defence sales to India”, 19 Kasım 2010, http://www.brahmand.com/news/Israel-worried-over-US-defencesales-to-India-Report/5529/1/13.html (5.2.2012).
11. BUSINESS STANDARD,“FTA to become a gamechanger in trade with India: Israel”, 14 Eylül 2011, http://www.business-standard.com/india/news/ftato-becomegamechanger-in-tradeindia-israel/448995/ (04.9.2012).
12. BUSINESS STANDARD, “India, Saudi Arabia to better understanding”, 02 Haziran 2008, http://www.businessstandard.com/india/news/india-saudi-arabia-to-better-understanding/38855/on
13. (02.9.2012). CARTER, Ashley B., “How Washington Learned to Stop Worriying and Love India’s Bomb”, Foreign Affairs, 10 Ocak 2007. CARTER, Ashley B., “America’s New Staretegic Partner?”, Foreign Affairs, Temmuz-Ağustos 2006.
14. CHIRIYANKANDATH, James,“Realigning India: Indian Foreign Policy after the Cold War”, The Round Table, Cilt: 93, Sayı: 374, 2004.
15. CLEVELAND, William L., A History of the Modern Middle East: Sources of Conflict and Accomodation, Boulder: Westview Press, 2004.
16. COHEN, Stephen P., India: Emerging Power. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press, 2002, s. 133.
17. COVARRUBIAS, Jack ve LANSFORD, Tom Strategic Interests in the Middle East: Opposition and Support for Us Foreign Policy, Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing, Ltd
18. GALINA, Yaskina, “Russia, China, India: Prospects for Trilateral Cooperation”, Far Eastern Affairs, 2003, Cilt. 31.
19. GUPTA, Sourabh, “India’s foreign policy in the Asian Century”, East Asia Forum, 25 Mart 2012, http://www.eastasiaforum.org/2012/03/25/india-sforeign-policy-in-the-asian-century/ (6.9.2012).
20. GUPTA, Bhabani Sen. “Waiting for India: India's Role As a Regional Power.”Journal of. International Affairs. Vol. 29, No.2 (1975), ss.171-202.
21. HAGERTY, Devin T. ve HAGERTY, Herbert G., “India’s Foreign Relations”, der. Devin T. Hagerty, South Asia in World Politics, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006.
22. HİNDİSTAN DIŞİŞLERİ BAKANLIĞI, “India hopes for peaceful resolution of Egypt situation”, Basın Bültenleri, 1 Şubat 2011, http://meaindia.nic.in/mystart.php?id=530217128 (05.9.2012).
23. KAPILA, Subhash, “Turkey-India Strategic Partnership: The Indian Imperatives,” South Asia Analysis Group, Paper no. 2788, 29 Temmuz 2008, http://www.southasiaanalysis.org/%5Cpapers28%5Cpaper2788.html (30.8.2012).
24. KAPUR, Harish, Diplomacy of India: Then and Now, New Delhi: Manas Publications, 2002.
25. KENNEDY, Paul, Yirmi birinci Yüzyıla Hazırlanırken, Ankara: Türkiye İş Bankası Kültür Yayınları, 1995.
26. KISSINGER, Henry, Amerika’nın dış politikaya ihtiyacı var mı?, çev. Tayfun Evyapan, Ankara: Metu Press, 2002. KULKE, Hermann ve Rothermund, Dietmar Hindistan Tarihi, Ankara. İmge Kitabevi, 2001.
27. LANCASTER, John, “India's Foreign Minister Fired in Oil-for-Food Scandal”, Washington Post, 7 Kasım 2005, http://www.washingtonpost.com/wpdyn/content/article/2005/11/07/AR2005110700781.html (30.8.2012).
28. MOHAN, C. Raja, “India and the Balance of Power”, Foreign Affairs, Cilt: 85, Sayı: 4, 2006, ss. 17-32.
29. MOHAPATRA, Aswini K., “Bridge to Anatolia: An Overview of IndoTurkish Relations,” The Turkish Yearbook of International Relations, No. 39, 2008, ss.164-167.
30. MUDIAM, Prithvi Ram, India and the Middle East. London; New York: British Academic Press, 1994, ss.88–94. NANDA, Prakash, Rising India: Friends and Foes. Olympia Fields, IL: Lancer Publishers, 2008.
31. NAQVI, Saeed, “The Arab Spring & India Promises and Challenges”, Observer Research Foundation, 2006
32. NAYAR, Baldev Raj ve Paul, Thazha Varkey, India in the World Order; Searching for Major-Power Status, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.
33. NIZAMI, Taufiq A., Jawaharlal Nehru: The Architect of India’s Foreign Policy, New Delhi: ICON Publication, 2006.
34. OWEN, Roger, State, Power and Politics in the Making of the Modern Middle East, London: Routledge, 2004.
35. PANAGARIYA, Arvind, “Triumph of India’s Market Reforms”, Policy Analysis, Sayı: 554, Kasım 2005, iç: http://www.cato.org/pubs/pas/pa554.pdf (10.8.2012).
36. PURTAŞ, Fırat, “Avrasya'daki 'Yeni Büyük Oyun' Bağlamında Hindistan'ın Orta Asya Politikası”, Orta Asya ve Kafkasya Araştırmaları, Cilt: 1, Sayı: 2, 2006, ss. 56-77.
37. ROY, Shubhajit, “Turkey regrets not inviting India for Afghan meet”, Indian Express, 10 Şubat 2010, http://www.indianexpress.com/news/turkeyregrets-not-inviting-india-for-afghan-meet/577935/1 (31.8.2012).
38. REDIFF NEWS, India makes first contact with Egypt's Muslim Brotherhood”, 4 Mart 2012, http://www.rediff.com/news/report/india-makesfirst-contact-with-egypt-s-muslim-brotherhood/20120304.htm (05.9.2012).
39. SACHDEVA, Gulshan, “India’s Attitude towards China’s Growing Influence in Central Asia”, China and Eurasia Forum Quarterly , Cilt: 4, Sayı: 3, 2006.
40. SANDER, Oral, Siyasi Tarih 1918-1994, Ankara: İmge Kitabevi, 2003.
41. SEGAL, Gerald, “China: Arm Transfer Policies and Practices”, der. Colin Mclnnes ve Mark G. Rolls, Post-Cold War Security Issues in the AsiaPasific Region, Great Britain: Frank Cass, 1994.
42. SIDDIQUI, Humaira, “India, Egypt seek to open new chapter for bilateral relations”, India Strategic, Aralık 2008, http://www.indiastrategic.in/topstories233.htm (05.9.2012).
43. SOLOMON, Jay ve SIRCAR, Subhadib, “India Joins U.S. Effort to Stifle Iran Trade”, The Wall Street Journal, 29 Aralık 2010, http://online.wsj.com/article/- SB10001424052970203513204576046893652486616.html (03.9.2012).
44. TALBOTT, Strobe, Engaging India; Diplomacy, Democracy and the Bomb, Washington: Brookings Institution Press, 2004.
45. THE HINDU, “Saudis roll out red carpet to Manmohan”, 28 Şubat 2010. http://www.thehindu.com/news/international/article123588.ece (01.11.2012).
46. THE TIMES OF INDIA, “India to hold wide-ranging strategic talks with US, Israel”, 19 Ocak 2010, http://articles.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/2010-01- 19/india/28119010_1_largest-ever-defence-deal-second-largest-defencesupplier-sensitive-technology-control-requirements (04.9.2012).
47. WIDMALM, Sten, Kashmir in Comparative Perspective: Democracy and Violent Separatism in India, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006. ZAKARIA, Fareed, The Post-American World. And the Rise of the Rest. Penguin Boks, London, 2008.