Translation and Adaptation of the Behavior Change Techniques Taxonomy v1 into Turkish

Öz

Behavior Change Techniques Taxonomy v1 (BCTTv1) is an internationally recognized framework that systematically classifies techniques used in behavior change interventions. The absence of a Turkish adaptation creates an important gap in conceptual consistency and implementation standardization within the Turkish context. This study aims to translate and culturally adapt BCTTv1 into Turkish through a three-stage methodology combining forward–backward translation, expert evaluation, and cognitive interviews based on the think-aloud method. The 93-technique taxonomy was translated by two independent translators and assessed for conceptual and linguistic equivalence, with issues identified in 36 techniques. During expert evaluation, 124 feedback items were consolidated through content analysis into 53 revision proposals, which were then assessed for clarity, interpretability, and cultural appropriateness in cognitive interviews with seven participants. Modifications were made to 51 techniques at the levels of definitions, examples, terminology, and explanations; as multiple types of improvements applied to some techniques, expert (53) and participant (36) contributions together brought the total number of revisions to 89. Based on these findings, a final Turkish version with clearer definitions, culturally appropriate examples, and standardized terminology was developed. The results demonstrate that taxonomy adaptation, unlike traditional scale adaptation, requires a more multi-layered and iterative process, offering a systematic approach for adapting similar taxonomies to different cultural contexts.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Behavior change techniques
• Taxonomy adaptation
• Cultural translation
• Cognitive interview
• User-centered method

Davranış Değiştirme Teknikleri Taksonomisi v1’in Türkçeye Çevrilmesi ve Kültürel Uyarlaması

Öz

Davranış Değiştirme Teknikleri Taksonomisi v1 davranış değişikliği müdahalelerinde kullanılan teknikleri sistematik ve kapsamlı biçimde sınıflandıran uluslararası kabul görmüş bir çerçevedir. DDTTv1’in Türkçe literatürde uyarlanmış bir versiyonunun bulunmaması, Türkçe bağlamında yürütülen müdahalelerde kavramsal tutarlılık ve uygulama standardizasyonu açısından önemli bir boşluk oluşturmaktadır. Mevcut çalışma DDTTv1’in Türkçe çevrilmesini ve kültürel uyarlamasını amaçlamaktadır.  Çalışma üç aşamalı bir süreç olarak tasarlanmıştır. İleri–geri çeviri, uzman değerlendirmesi ve sesli düşünme (think-aloud) yöntemine dayalı bilişsel görüşmeler ile yenilikçi bir uyarlama metodolojisi sunmaktadır. Toplam 93 teknikten oluşan taksonomi, iki bağımsız çevirmen tarafından Türkçeye çevrilmiş ve kavramsal ile dilsel eşdeğerlik açısından değerlendirilmiştir. İleri–geri çeviri sürecinde 36 teknikte sorun tespit edilmiştir. Uzman değerlendirmesi aşamasında toplam 124 geri bildirim elde edilmiş, bu geri bildirimler içerik analizi ile birleştirilerek 53 düzenleme önerisi altında toplanmıştır. Yapılan düzenlemeler, yedi katılımcı ile gerçekleştirilen bilişsel görüşmeler aracılığıyla anlaşılırlık, yorumlanabilirlik ve kültürel uygunluk açısından değerlendirilmiştir. Bulgular tanım, örnek, terminoloji ve açıklama düzeyinde toplam 51 teknikte düzenleme yapıldığını göstermektedir. Bazı tekniklerde birden fazla türde geliştirme yapılması nedeniyle, uzman (53) ve katılımcı (36) katkıları birlikte toplam düzenleme sayısını 89’a ulaştırmıştır. Yapılan düzenlemeler özellikle kavramsal netlik, zamansal yorumlama, terminolojik tutarlılık ve kültürel uygunluk alanlarında yoğunlaşmıştır. Elde edilen bulgular doğrultusunda, daha açık tanımlar, kültürel bağlama uygun örnekler ve standardize edilmiş terminoloji içeren nihai Türkçe sürüm oluşturulmuştur. Bulgular, taksonomi uyarlamasının klasik ölçek uyarlamalarından farklı olarak daha çok katmanlı ve yinelemeli bir süreç gerektirdiğini göstermektedir. Önerilen metodoloji, benzer taksonomilerin farklı kültürel bağlamlara uyarlanmasında kullanılabilecek sistematik bir yaklaşım sunmaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Davranış değiştirme teknikleri
• Taksonomi uyarlaması
• Kültürel çeviri
• Bilişsel görüşme
• Kullanıcı merkezli yöntem

Kaynakça

1. Beatty, P. C., & Willis, G. B. (2007). Research synthesis: The practice of cognitive interviewing. Public Opinion Quarterly, 71(2), 287-311. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfm006
2. Bowers, V. A., & Snyder, H. L. (1990). Concurrent versus retrospective verbal protocol for comparing window usability. Proceedings of the Human Factors Society Annual Meeting, 34(17), 1270–1274. https://doi.org/10.1177/154193129003401720
3. Cane, J., O’Connor, D., & Michie, S. (2012). Validation of the theoretical domains framework for use in behaviour change and implementation research. Implementation Science, 7, 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-7-37
4. Castro, O., Fajardo, G., Johnston, M., Laroze, D., Leiva-Pinto, E., Figueroa, O., Corker, E., Chacón-Candia, J. A., & Duarte, G. (2024). Translating the behaviour change technique taxonomy version 1 into Spanish: Methodology and validation. Wellcome Open Research, 9(298), 298. https://doi.org/10.12688/wellcomeopenres.21388.1
5. Collins, D. (2003). Pretesting survey instruments: An overview of cognitive methods. Quality of Life Research, 12, 229-238. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023254226592
6. Dombrowski, S. U., Sniehotta, F. F., Avenell, A., Johnston, M., MacLennan, G., & Araújo-Soares, V. (2012). Identifying active ingredients in complex behavioural interventions for obese adults with obesity-related co-morbidities or additional risk factors for co-morbidities: A systematic review. Health Psychology Review, 6(1), 7-32. https://doi.org/10.1080/17437199.2010.513298
7. Epstein, J., Santo, R. M., & Guillemin, F. (2015). A review of guidelines for cross-cultural adaptation of questionnaires could not bring out a consensus. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 68(4), 435-441. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.11.021
8. Ericsson, K.A, & Simon, H.A. (1993). Protocol analysis: Verbal reports as data (Rev. ed.) MIT Press.

9. Félix, I. B., Silva, C. C., Guerreiro, M. P., Henriques, H. R., Michie, S., Henriques, M. A., & Marques, M. M. (2024). Translating the Behaviour Change Technique Taxonomy v. 1 to other languages: The approach used in European Portuguese (BCTTv1-PT). Wellcome Open Research, 9, 114. https://doi.org/10.12688/wellcomeopenres.20609.1
10. French, D. P., Olander, E. K., Chisholm, A., & Mc Sharry, J. (2014). Which behaviour change techniques are most effective at increasing older adults’ self-efficacy and physical activity behaviour? A systematic review. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 48(2), 225-234. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12160-014-9593-z
11. Garnett, C., Crane, D., West, R., Brown, J., & Michie, S. (2015). Identification of behavior change techniques and engagement strategies to design a smartphone app to reduce alcohol consumption using a formal consensus method. JMIR mHealth and uHealth, 3(2), e3895. https://doi.org/10.2196/mhealth.3895
12. Garnett, C. V., Crane, D., Brown, J., Kaner, E. F., Beyer, F. R., Muirhead, C. R., Hickman, M., Beard, E., Redmore, J., & De Vocht, F. (2018). Behavior change techniques used in digital behavior change interventions to reduce excessive alcohol consumption: A meta-regression. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 52(6), 530-543. https://doi.org/10.1093/abm/kax029
13. Gjersing, L., Caplehorn, J. R., & Clausen, T. (2010). Cross-cultural adaptation of research instruments: Language, setting, time and statistical considerations. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 10, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-10-13
14. Hambleton, R. K., & Patsula, L. (1998). Adapting tests for use in multiple languages and cultures. Social Indicators Research, 45, 153-171. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006941729637
15. Krippendorff, K. (2018). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology (4th ed.). SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781071878781
16. Meyer, R., Drewniak, D., Hovorka, T., & Schenk, L. (2019). Questioning the questionnaire: Methodological challenges in measuring subjective quality of life in nursing homes using cognitive interviewing techniques. Qualitative Health Research, 29(7), 972-986. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732318812042
17. Michie, S., Ashford, S., Sniehotta, F. F., Dombrowski, S. U., Bishop, A., & French, D. P. (2011). A refined taxonomy of behaviour change techniques to help people change their physical activity and healthy eating behaviours: The CALO-RE taxonomy. Psychology & Health, 26(11),1479-1498. https://doi.org/10.1080/08870446.2010.540664
18. Michie, S., Johnston, M., & Carey, R. (2020). Behavior change techniques. In M. D. Gellman (Ed.), Encyclopedia of behavioral medicine (2nd ed., pp. 206-213). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-39903-0_1661
19. Michie, S., Richardson, M., Johnston, M., Abraham, C., Francis, J., Hardeman, W., Eccles, M. P., Cane, J., & Wood, C. E. (2013). The behavior change technique taxonomy (v1) of 93 hierarchically clustered techniques: Building an international consensus for the reporting of behavior change interventions. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 46(1), 81-95. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12160-013-9486-6
20. Miller, K., Chepp, V., Willson, S., & Padilla, J.-L. (2014). Cognitive Interviewing Methodology. Wiley.
21. Sousa, V. D., & Rojjanasrirat, W. (2011). Translation, adaptation and validation of instruments or scales for use in cross‐cultural health care research: A clear and user‐friendly guideline. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 17(2), 268-274. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2753.2010.01434.x
22. Squires, A., Aiken, L. H., Van den Heede, K., Sermeus, W., Bruyneel, L., Lindqvist, R., Schoonhoven, L., Stromseng, I., Busse, R., & Brzostek, T. (2013). A systematic survey instrument translation process for multi-country, comparative health workforce studies. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 50(2), 264-273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2012.02.015
23. Van de Vijver, F., & Leung, K. (2001). Personality in cultural context: Methodological issues. Journal of Personality, 69(6), 1007-1031. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6494.696173
24. Webb, T., Joseph, J., Yardley, L., & Michie, S. (2010). Using the internet to promote health behavior change: A systematic review and meta-analysis of the impact of theoretical basis, use of behavior change techniques, and mode of delivery on efficacy. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 12(1), e1376. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.1376
25. Wild, D., Grove, A., Martin, M., Eremenco, S., McElroy, S., Verjee-Lorenz, A., & Erikson, P. (2005). Principles of good practice for the translation and cultural adaptation process for patient-reported outcomes (PRO) measures: Report of the ISPOR task force for translation and cultural adaptation. Value in Health, 8(2), 94-104. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1524-4733.2005.04054.x
26. Willis, G. B. (2004). Cognitive interviewing: A tool for improving questionnaire design. Sage Publications.
27. Willis, G. B. (2015). Analysis of the cognitive interview in questionnaire design. Oxford University Press.
28. Willis, G. B., & Artino, A. R. Jr. (2013). What do our respondents think we’re asking? Using cognitive interviewing to improve medical education surveys. Journal of Graduate Medical Education, 5(3), 353-356. https://doi.org/10.4300/JGME-D-13-00154.1