ÖĞRETMEN ADAYLARININ TEKNOLOJİ KULLANIMINA YATKINLIK DÜZEYLERİNİN İNCELENMESİ

Öz

The rapid development of science and technology is manifested in the scientific area both in the social field. As a result of this development, technology and education have been expressed together. This study was done to evaluate the competence of the faculty of education students using technology. Prepaired Likert-type questionnaire is investigated statistically and then  it is transformed a questionnaire that contains 18 questions. The reliability coefficient of the questionnaire was found to be 0.723.

This Likert type questionnaire has been applied to 65 students in the Faculty of Education in Kafkas University. The differences that contains sex, department and income rate are investigated and evaluations were done using SPSS 18.0 software. Differences between groups were determined by t test and variance analysis.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Teacher candidates,technology using,education,t test,variance analysis

Kaynakça

1. Akkoyunlu, B., Orhan,F., (2003), www.tojet.sakarya.edu.tr/archive/ v2i3/akkoyunlu.htm (2003, Nisan 20).
2. Altun, A., (2003), The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, January, 2 (1).
3. Aral, N. ve Aktaş, Y. (1997), Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 13, 99-105.
4. Atıcı, M., (2000), www.yok.gov.tr/egfak/meral.htm (2002, Mart ll).
5. Aydın, K. (2004), C:9, S:1, s.149-164.
6. Büyüköztürk, Ş., (2004), Pegem Yayıncılık, 4. Baskı, Ankara, s.119. Çağıltay, K., Askar, P., ve Ozgit, A. (1995), INET-95, Hawaii.
7. Deniz, L., (2000), M.Ü. Atatürk Eğitim Fakültesi EğitimBilimleri Dergisi, 12, 135-166. Hardy, J. V. (1998), Computers in the Schools, 14(3-4), 119-136.
8. Henry, M. J. (1993), Annual Convention of the Eastem Educational Research Association, Clearwater, FL. Hunt, N. P. and Bahlin, R. M. (1993), Journal of Research on Computing in Education. 25(4), 487-497.

9. Gerçek, C., Köseoğlu, P., Yılmaz, M., Soran, H. (2006), H.U. Journal of Education. 30: s. 130- 139
10. Güler, H., Sağlam, N., (2002), H. Ü. Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 23, 117-123.
11. Gürün, O. A. (1984), Çocuğumuzu Tanıyalım, İnkılap Yayınevi, İstanbul.
12. Jordan, W. R. and Follman, J. M. (1992), Palatka, FL: South Eastem Regional Vision for Education. Lyons, V. J. and CarIson, R. D. (1995), Knowledge and use.
13. Marcinkiewicz, H. R., (1993), Journal of Research on Computing in Education. 26(2), 220-237. Namlu, A.G. (1999), Anadolu Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Yayınlan, 57.
14. Office of Technology Assessment. (1988), Washington, DC: OTA. Office of Technology Assessment. (1995), Washington, DC: OTA.
15. Okinaka, R. (1992), (ED346039): ERIC Document Production Service.
16. Özcan, Y. ve Koçak A. (2003), European Journal of Communication 18(2): 241–254.
17. Özkul, E., Girginer, N. (2001). I. Uluslar arası Eğitim Teknolojileri Sempozyum Bildirisi. Rıza, E. T., (2003), ISBN: 975-96446-1-4, 448s.
18. Sayın, Ö. (1999), İletişim Ortamlarında Çocuk Birey Sempozyumu bildiriler kitabı. Eskişehir:Anadolu Üniversitesi.
19. Yenice, N., (2003), The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, October, 2(4).