The Structuring Process of Institutional Logics in Organizational Fields: The Case of Turkish Maritime Trade Sector

Yıl 2023, , 1052 - 1081, 30.10.2023

Yasemin Şükran Uçar , Rabia Arzu Kalemci

https://doi.org/10.18074/ckuiibfd.1322916

Öz

In this article, the historical course of the Turkish maritime trade field in the Republic Era has been examined within the framework of institutional change and institutional logics, using qualitative analysis methods such as archival scanning, historical analysis, and interviews. Within this context, it has been concluded that in the years following the proclamation of the Republic, which was the stage of the establishment of state institutions, the statist and traditional practices were generally in effect. On the other hand, although the 1950s stand out as the period when the influence of the private enterprise began and the first international activities were observed in the sector, it is not yet possible to talk about a complete private sector institutional logic in the field. Nevertheless, the effects of the liberalization policies in the 1980s on the Turkish maritime trade sector were observed during the 1990s. The 2000s, on the other hand, stand out as the period in which liberalization, privatization and internationalization in the sector increased. Therefore, in the Turkish maritime trade sector in particular, it has been seen that there has been a transition from the traditional public logic towards a modern logic dominated by market relations in the Republic Era.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Turkish maritime trade sector, organizational fields, institutional theory, institutional change, institutional logics

Kurumsal Mantıkların Örgütsel Alanlarda Yapılanma Süreci: Türk Deniz Ticareti Sektörü Örneği

Öz

Bu makalede, Türk deniz ticareti örgütsel alanının Cumhuriyet Dönemindeki tarihsel seyri, kurumsal değişim ve kurumsal mantıklar çerçevesi dâhilinde, arşiv taraması, tarihsel inceleme, mülâkat gibi niteliksel analiz yöntemleri kullanılarak incelenmektedir. Bu kapsamda, devlet kurumlarının oluşum aşaması olan Cumhuriyet’in ilânının ertesindeki yıllarda genel itibarıyla devletçi ve geleneksel uygulamaların etkili olduğu görülmektedir. Diğer taraftan, 1950’li yıllar, özel teşebbüsün sektörde etkisinin hissedilmeye başlandığı ve ilk dışa açılma faaliyetlerinin gözlemlendiği dönem olarak göze çarpmakla birlikte, bu yıllarda anılan örgütsel alanda henüz tam anlamıyla bir özel sektör kurumsal mantığından bahsetmek mümkün bulunmamaktadır. Bununla birlikte, ülkemizde 1980’li yıllarda başlayan liberalleşme politikalarının Türk deniz ticareti sektörü üzerindeki etkileri, 1990’lı yıllarda görülmeye başlamaktadır. 2000’li yıllar ise, sektördeki liberalleşme, özelleştirme ve uluslararasılaşmanın artış gösterdiği dönem olarak dikkat çekmektedir. Dolayısıyla, Türk deniz ticareti sektörü özelinde, Cumhuriyet Döneminde, geleneksel kamu mantığından uzaklaşılarak piyasa ilişkilerinin hâkim olduğu modern mantığa doğru bir geçiş yaşandığı görülmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Türk deniz ticareti, örgütsel alanlar, kurumsal kuram, kurumsal mantıklar, kurumsal değişim

Kaynakça

• Aras Beger, G. (2022). Kurumsal mantıklar çerçevesinde kurumsal sosyal sorumluluk olgusunun analizi, (Yayımlanmamış Doktora Tezi), Yaşar Üniversitesi, İzmir.
• Atakan-Duman, Ş. (2017). Kurumsal Mantıklar, Örgüt Kuramları içinde Sözen, C. (Ed.), Beta Yayınevi, 4. Baskı, İstanbul.
• Beckert, J. (1999). Agency, entrepreneurs, and institutional change. The role of strategic choice and institutionalized practices in organizations. Organization Studies, 20(5), 777-799.
• Berger, P.L. & Luckman, T. (1967). The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge, Anchor.
• Besharov, M.L. & Smith, W.K. (2014). Multiple Institutional Logics in Organizations: Explaining Their Varied Nature and Implications, Academy of Management Review, 39(3), 364-381.
• Bozkurt, İ. & Halil Aytar, İ. (2015). II. Dünya Savaşı Sonrası Uluslararası Ekonomiye Eklemlenme Sürecinde Türkiye'nin Deniz Ticareti ve Liman Politikası (1945-1960). Çağdaş Türkiye Tarihi Araştırmaları Dergisi, Güz 2015, Vol. 15 Issue 31, 333-357.
• Campbell, J.L. (2004). Globalization and Institutions. Princeton University Press.
• Clemens, E. S. & Cook, J. (1999). Politics and Institutionalism: Explaining Durability and Change. Annual Review of Sociology, 25, 441-466.
• Davis, G. & Greve, H. (1997). Corporate Elite Networks and Governance Changes in the 1980s. American Journal of Sociology, 103, 1-37.
• Delbridge, R. & Edwards, T. (2007). Reflections on Developments in Institutional Theory: Toward a Relational Approach. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 23, 191-205.
• DiMaggio, P.J. & Powell, W.W. (1983). The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields. American Sociological Review, 48, 147-160.
• Quack, S. (2003). Theoretical Building Blocks for a Research Agenda Linking Globalization and Institutions. In Globalization and Institutions, edited by Marie-Laure Djelic, Marie-Laure Djelic, and Sigrid Quack, 15–34. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
• Dunn, M. B. & Jones, C. (2010). Institutional Logics and Institutional Pluralism: The Contestation of Care and Science Logics in Medical Education, 1967-2005. Administrative Science Quarterly, 55(1), 114–149.
• Fligstein, N. (1990). The Transformation of Corporate Control. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
• Friedland, R. & Alford, R. R. (1991). Bringing Society Back In: Symbols, Practices, and Institutional Contradictions W.W. Powell ve P.J. DiMaggio (Ed.), The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis içinde (232-263). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
• Giddens, A. (1984). The Constitution of Society: Outline of The Theory of Structuration. Berkeley: University of California Press.
• Glynn, M.A. & Lounsbury, M. (2005). From the Critics’ Corner: Logic Blending, Discursive Change and Authenticity in a Cultural Production System, Journal of Management Studies, 42, 1031-1055.
• Goodrick, E. & Reay, T. (2011). Constellations of Institutional Logics: Changes in the Professional Work of Pharmacists. Work and Occupations, 38, 372-416.
• Gökoğlu, M. M. (2012). Çalışanların gelecek güvencesi: Türkiye’de sosyal sigorta mantığının oluşumu, 1921-1950, (Yayımlanmamış Doktora Tezi), Başkent Üniversitesi, Ankara.
• Greenwood, R. & Hinings, C.R. (1996). Understanding Radical Organizational Change: Bringing Together The Old and The New Institutionalism. Academy of Management Review, 21, 1022–1054.
• Greenwood, R., Suddaby, R. & Hinings, C. R. (2002). Theorizing Change: The Role of Professional Associations in The Transformation of Institutionalized Fields. Academy of Management Journal, 45, 58-80.
• Greenwood, R. & Hinings, C. R. (2006). Radical Organizational Change in S. Clegg, C. Hardy, T. Lawrence ve W. Nord (Ed.), The SAGE Handbook of Organization Studies (814-842). London: SAGE.
• Greenwood, R., Oliver, C., Sahlin, K. & Suddaby, R. (2008). The Sage Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism. London: SAGE Publications.
• Greenwood, R, Díaz, A.M., Li, S.X., & Lorente, J.C (2010). The Multiplicity of Institutional Logics and the Heterogeneity of Organizational Responses, Organization Science, 21(2), 521-539.
• Greenwood, R., Raynard, M., Kodeih, F., Micelotta, E. R. & Lounsbury, M. (2011). Institutional Complexity and Organizational Responses. Academy of Management Annals, 5, 317–371.
• Greve, H. (1996). Patterns of Competition: The Diffusion of a Market Position in Radio Broadcasting. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41, 29-60.
• Gürboğa, N. & Koraltürk, M. (2016). 1930’larda İktisadi Devletçilik, Şilepçiliğin Gelişmesi ve Sosyete Şilep T.A.Ş.’nin Kuruluşu. Yakın Dönem Türkiye Araştırmaları, 13 (25-26), 27-49.
• Hensmans, M. (2003). Social Movement Organizations: A Metaphor for Strategic Actors in Institutional Fields. Organization Studies, 24(3), 355-381.
• Hoffman, A.J. (1999). Institutional Evolution and Change: Environmentalism and the U.S. Chemical Industry. Academy of Management Journal, 42, 351-371.
• Johansen, C. B. & Waldorff, S. B. (2017). What are institutional logics and where is the perspective taking us?. G. Kruecken, C. Mazza, R.E. Meyer, P. Walgenbach (Eds.), New themes in institutional analysis: Topics and issues from European Research içinde. Cheltenham, Edward Elgar Publishing Inc.
• Kalemci, R. A., Gökoğlu, M. M. & Tüzün, İ. K. (2015). Örgütsel Alanda Kurumsal Mantıklar Arası Oluşan Çelişki: Türk Askerlik Hizmeti Alanı Örneği. Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi İİBF Dergisi, 10(2), 153-175.
• Kitchener, M. (2002). Mobilising the Logic of Managerialism in Professional Fields: The Case of AHC Mergers. Organization Studies, 23, 391-420.
• Kondra, A. & Hinings, C.R. (1998). Organizational Diversity and Change in Institutional Theory. Organization Studies, 19, 743–767.
• Kraatz, M. & Zajac, E. (1996). Exploring The Limits of The New Institutionalism: The Causes and Consequences of Illegitimate Organizational Change. American Sociological Review, 61, 812–836.
• Lawrence, T. B., Winn, M. I. & Jennings, P. D. (2001). The temporal dynamics of institutionalization. Academy of Management Review, 26(4), 624-644.
• Leblebici, H., Salancik, G. R., Copay, A. & King, T. (1991). Institutional Change and The Transformation of Interorganizational Fields: Organizational History of The U.S. Radio Broadcasting Industry. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36 (3), 333-363.
• Levy, D. (2006). How Private Higher Education’s Growth Challenges The New Institutionalism. H-D. Meyer ve B. Rowan (Ed.), The New Institutionalism in Education içinde, (143–162). Albany: SUNY.
• Lounsbury, M. (2007). A Tale of Two Cities: Competing Logics and Practice Variation in The Professionalizing of Mutual Funds. Academy of Management Journal, 50 (2), 289-307.
• Lounsbury, M. & Crumley, E. T. (2007). New Practice Creation: An Institutional Perspective on Innovation. Organization Studies, 28 (7), 993-1012.
• Lune, H., & Martinez, M. (1999). Old Structures, New Relations: How Community Development Credit Unions Define Organizational Boundaries. Sociological Forum, 14, 609-634.
• Marquis, C. & Lounsbury, M. (2007). Vive La Résistance: Competing Logics and the Consolidation of U.S. Community Banking. Academy of Management Journal, 50, 799-820.
• McPherson, C. M. & Sauder, M. (2013). Logics in Action: Managing Institutional Complexity in a Drug Court. Administrative Science Quarterly, 58, 165–196.
• Meyer, J. W. & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83(2), 340-363.
• Meyer, A. D., Brooks, G. R. & Goes, J. B. (1990). Environmental jolts and industry revolutions: Organizational responses to discontinuous change. Strategic Management Journal, 93-110.
• Meyer, J.W. & Scott, W.R. (1992). Organizational Environments: Ritual and Rationality. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE Publications.
• Oliver, C. (1992). The Antecedents of Deinstitutionalization. Organization Studies, 13(4), 563-588.
• Outila, V. & Fey, C. F. (2021). “We have performance appraisal every day and every hour”: Transferring performance management to Russia. Journal of International Management, 100901.
• Özen. Ş. (2007). Yeni Kurumsal Kuram: Örgütleri Çözümlemede Yeni Ufuklar ve Yeni Sorunlar. Özen, Ş. ve Sargut, A. S. (Der.). Örgüt Kuramları içinde, İmge Kitapevi. İstanbul.
• Öztürk, A. (2018). Geleneksellik-Modernlik ve Profesyonellik Düzeyi İlişkisinde Kurumsal Mantıkların, Sosyal Becerilerin ve Sosyal Öğrenmenin Yönlendirici Rolü, (Yayımlanmamış Doktora Tezi), Başkent Üniversitesi, Ankara.
• Öztürk, A. & Sargut, S. (2017). Kurumsal mantıklar, sosyal beceriler ve sosyal öğrenme ilişkisi. VIII. Örgüt Kuramı Sempozyumu: Çankaya Üniversitesi: 02/02/2017-03/02/2017.
• Pamuk, Ş. (2012). Türkiye’nin 200 Yıllık İktisadi Tarihi. Türkiye İş Bankası Kültür Yayınları, İstanbul.
• Pache, A. & Santos, F. (2013). Inside the hybrid organization: Selective coupling as a response to competing institutional logics. Academy of Management Journal, 56, 972-1001.
• Purdy, J. M. & Gray, B. (2009). Conflicting Logics, Mechanisms of Diffusion, and Multilevel Dynamics in Emerging Institutional Fields. Academy of Management Journal, 52 (2), 355-380.
• Ramirez, F. O., Soysal, Y. & Shanahan, S. (1997). The Changing Logic of Political Citizenship: Cross-National Acquisition of Women's Suffrage Rights: 1890 to 1990. American Sociological Review, 735-745.
• Rao, H., Monin, P. & Durand, R. (2003). Institutional Change in Toque Ville: Nouvelle Cuisine As An Identity Movement in French Gastronomy. American Journal of Sociology, 108 (4), 795-843.
• Reay, T. & Hinings, C. R. (2005). The Recomposition of an Organizational Field: Health Care in Alberta. Organization Studies, 26 (3), 351-384.
• Reay, T. & Hinings, C. R. (2009). Managing The Rivalry of Competing Institutional Logics. Organization Studies, 30 (6), 629–652.
• Rowan, B. (2006). The New Institutionalism and The Study of Educational Organizations: Changing Ideas for Changing Times. H-D. Meyer ve B. Rowan (Ed.), The New Institutionalism in Education içinde, (15-32). Albany: SUNY.
• Schneiberg, M. (2002). Organizational Heterogeneity and The Production of New Forms: Politics, Social Movements and Mutual Companies in American Fire Insurance, 1900-1930. M. Lounsbury ve M. Ventresca (Ed.), Research in the Sociology of Organizations içinde, (39-89).
• Schneiberg, M. (2007). What’s on The Path? Path Dependence, Organizational Diversity and The Problem of Institutional Change in The US Economy, 1900-1950, Socio-Economic Review, 5, 47-80.
• Scott, W. R., Ruef, M., Mendel, P. J. & Caronna, C. A. (2000). Institutional Change and Healthcare Organizations: From Professional Dominance to Managed Care. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
• Scott, W. R. (1987). The adolescence of institutional theory. Administrative science quarterly, 493-511.
• Seo, M-G. & Creed, W. E. D. (2002). Institutional Contradictions, Praxis, and Institutional Change: A Dialectical Perspective. Academy of Management Review, 27 (2), 222-247.
• Sezgin, G. (2007). İnönü Dönemi (1938-1950) Türk Denizciliği. (Yüksek Lisans Tezi). Ankara Üniversitesi Türk İnkilâp Tarihi Enstitüsü, Ankara.
• Suddaby, R. & Greenwood, R. (2005). Rhetorical Strategies of Legitimacy. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50(1), 35-67.
• Thornton, P.H. & Ocasio, W. (1999). Institutional Logics and the Historical Contingency of Power in Organizations: Executive Succession in the Higher Education Publishing Industry, 1958-1990. American Journal of Sociology, 105 (3), 801-843.
• Thornton, P. H. (2004). Markets from Culture: Institutional Logics and Organizational Decisions in Higher Education Publishing. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
• Thornton, P., Jones, C. & Kury, K. (2005). Institutional Logics and Institutional Change: Transformation in Accounting, Architecture, and Publishing. C. Jones ve P. H. Thornton (Ed.), Research in The Sociology of Organizations içinde (125-170). London: JAI.
• Thornton, P.H. & Ocasio, W. (2008). Institutional Logics. R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, K. Sahlin ve R. Suddaby (Ed.), The Sage Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism içinde (s.99-129). Los Angeles: Sage.
• Thornton, P., Ocasio, W. & Lounsbury, M. (2012). The Institutional Logics Perspective. New York: Oxford University Press.
• Waldorff, S. B., Reay, T. & Goodrick, E. (2013). A Tale of Two Countries: How Different Constellations of Logics Impact Action. M. Lounsbury & E. Boxenbaum (Eds.), Institutional Logics in Action, Research in the Sociology of Organizations içinde, Vol. 39(A) (99-129). New York: Emerald Press.
• Whitley, R.D. (1991). The Social Construction of Business Systems in East Asia. Organization Studies, 12(1), 1-28.
• Whitley, R.D. (1994). Dominant Forms of Economic Organization in Market Economies. Organization Studies, 15(2), 153-182.
• Whitley, R. (2000). Divergent Capitalisms: The Social Structuring and Change of Business Systems. Oxford: Oxford University Press: 3-116.
• Wooten, M. & Hoffman, A. (2008). Organizational Fields: Past, Present and Future. R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, K. Sahlin ve R. Suddaby (Ed.), The Sage Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism içinde, London: SAGE Publications.
• Yalçınkaya, A. & Taşcı, D. (2017). Bir kurumsal girişimci olarak devlet: yeni kurumsal kuram bağlamında bir değerlendirme. Yönetim ve Organizasyon Araştırmaları Dergisi, 2(1), 71-90.
• Yurtoğlu, N. (2019), İnönü Dönemi’nde Türkiye’de Deniz Ulaşımı (1938-1950), Belgi Dergisi, C.2, S.18, Pamukkale Üniversitesi Atatürk İlkeleri ve İnkılâp Tarihi Araştırma ve Uygulama Merkezi Yayını, Yaz 2019/II, 1449-1474.