İş Yerinde İntikamcı Davranışlar ve Medea Sendromu: Türk Kamu Yönetimi Alanına İlişkin Bir Vaka Analizi

Öz

Çalışma, örgütlerde intikamcı davranışları, psikoloji bilimi konseptlerinden olan ‘Medea Sendromu’ çerçevesinde incelemeye dönük olarak tasarlanmıştır. Bu anlamda çalışma; kadının, çeşitli nedenlerle eşine duyduğu nefreti çocuklarına yansıtması, -doğrusu- eşinden intikam almak amacıyla çocuklarına zarar vermesi olarak tanımlanabilecek Medea Sendromu’nun, iş yerinde intikamcı davranışları açıklamada da bir model olarak kullanılabileceği varsayımı üzerine temellendirilmiştir. Vaka incelemesine dayanan çalışmada, bir devlet üniversitesindeki fakülte yöneticileri arasındaki çekişmeden kaynaklanan intikamcı eylemlerde astların neden ve nasıl bir araç olarak kullanıldıklarının belirlenmesi hedeflenmiştir. Nihai olarak, aralarındaki çekişme nedeniyle kendinden daha üst makamda bulunan bir amirinden intikam alma niyetiyle bazı üstlerin, astlarını kullanma eğiliminde oldukları belirlenmiştir. Bu eğilimin temel nedenleri; “üst makamlarda psikolojik baskı oluşturma arayışı, sahip olunan kısıt ve yetersizlikler, sosyal baskı yaratma arzusu” başlıkları altında toplanmıştır. İntikamcı davranışların uygulanmasında ise; “biçimsel yetkiye dayalı ayrıcalıklara başvurulması, daha üst yöneticiye görünür kasıtlı eylemlerin geliştirilmesi, ast(lar)ı değersizleştirme yoluyla denge arayışı” gibi bir takım yol ve yöntemler kullanılarak uygulandığı belirlenmiştir

Anahtar Kelimeler

• İntikam, İntikamcı davranış, Ast-üst ilişkileri, Medea, Medea sendromu

Revanchist Behaviours in the Workplace and Medea Syndrome: A Case Analysis in the Turkish Public Administration Field

Öz

This study is designed to analyze revanchist behaviors in the framework of Medea Syndrome which is a conception in Psychology. In this sense, the study is structured on the proposition that Medea Syndrome, that is about mother’s endamaging children for revenge on their father, can be employed to explain revanchist behaviors in work place. In the case depended study, it is aimed that how and why inferiors can be employed as an instrument in revanchist actions stemmed from a contention between faculty managers at a state university. At the end, it is determined that some superiors can be in a tendency to use their inferiors for revenge on their own superiors. The main reasons of this tendency are: “looking for a psychological pressure on superiors, inabilities and constraints, intention for social pressure”. In implementing revanchist behaviors some strategies such as “applying privileges depended on formal authority, creating visible actions to superiors, looking for equity by trivializing” can be employed

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Revenge, Revanchist behaviors, Inferior-superior relation

Kaynakça

1. Aghion P. ve Tirole J., “Formal and Real Authority in Organizations”. Journal of Political Economy. Vol. 105(1), 1997, s. 1-29.
2. Aquino, K., Tripp, T., ve Bies, R., “How Employees Respond to Personal Offense: The Effects of Blame Attribution, Victim Status, and Offender Status on Reven- ge and Reconciliation in the Workplace”, Journal of Applied Psychology, 2001, Vol. 86(1), s. 52-59.
3. Aquino K. ve Douglas S., “Identity threat and antisocial behavior in organizations: The moderating effects of individual differences, aggressive modeling, and hi- erarchical status”, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Vol.90, 2003, s. 195–208.
4. Aquino, K., Tripp, T., ve Bies, R., “Getting even or moving on? Power, procedural justice, and types of offense as predictors of revenge, forgiveness, reconciliati- on, and avoidance in organizations”, Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol.91, 2006, s. 653-658.
5. Allan W., Euripides: Medea, London: Duckworth, 2008.
6. Beugre D.C., “Reacting Aggressively To Injustice At Work: A Cognitive Stage Mo- del”, Journal of Business and Psychology, Vol. 20, No. 2, 2005, s. 291-301.
7. Bies, R.J., ve Tripp, T.M., The many faces of revenge: The good, the bad, and the ugly, R.W. Griffin, A. O’Leary-Kelly ve J. Collins (Der.), Dysfunctional beha- vior in organizations (Vol. 1): Violent behaviors in organizations içinde, Vo l. 23, Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, 1998, s. 49-68.
8. Bies, R. J., ve Tripp, T. M., Beyond distrust: Getting even and the need for revenge. R. M. Kramer ve T. Tyler (Der.), Trust and organizations içinde, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 1996, s. 246–260.

9. Bies R. J. ve Tripp T. M., Revenge in organizations:The good, the bad, and the ugly. R. W. Griffin, A. O’Leary-Kelly and J. M. Collins, (Der.), Dysfunctional behavi- or inorganizations: Non-violent dysfunctional behavior içinde, JAI, Stamford, CT, 1998, s. 49-67.
10. Bies, R. J., ve Tripp, T. M., The study of revenge in the workplace:Conceptual, ide- ological, and empirical issues. Fox ve P. Spector (Der.), Counterproductive workplace behavior: Investigations of actors and targets içinde, Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, 2004, s.65–81 .
11. Bies, R. J., Tripp, T. M. ve Kramer, R. M., At the breaking point:Cognitive and social dynamics of revenge in organizations. (Der.) Giacalone R. ve Greenberg J., Antisocial behavior in organizations içinde, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 1997, s. 18–36.
12. Bradfield M. ve Aquino K., The Effects of Blame Attributions and Offender Likab- leness on Forgiveness and Revenge in the Workplace, Journal of Management, Vol. 25(5), 1999 s.607–631.
13. Cloke, K., “Revenge, forgiveness and the magic of mediation”, ”Mediation Quar- terly”, Vol.11, 1993, s.67–78.
14. Collins J.M. ve Griffin R.W., Dysfunctional Behavior in Organizations: Violent and Deviant Behavior. R.W. Griffin, A. O’Leary-Kelly ve J.M. Collins (Ed.) içinde. Stamford, CT: JAI Press, 1998.
15. Eisenhardt M. K., “Building theories from case study research”, Academy of Mana- gement Review, 14(4), 1989, s.532-550.
16. Eisenhardt M. K. ve Graebner E. M., “Theory Building from Cases: Opportunities and Challenges”.Academy of Management Journal, Vol: 50(1), 2007, s.25-32.
17. Fisk C., “Humiliation at Work”, William&Mary Journal of Women and Law, Vol: 8(73), 2001, s.73-95.
18. Fitness J., “Anger in the workplace: an emotion script approach to anger episodes between workers and their superiors, co-workers and subordinates”, Journal of Organizational Behavior, Vol:21, 200), s. 147-162.
19. Fuller C.L., “A Women Scorned: Medea and Betrayal, Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi, The Graduate College, Union Institute and University, 2004.
20. Gouldner A.W. “The Norm of Reciprocity: A Preliminary Statement”.American Sociological Review. Vol. 25(2), 1960, s. 161-178.
21. Hampton, J., The retributive idea. (Der.) J. G. Murphy, & J. Hampton, Forgiveness and mercy içinde, New York: Cambridge University Press, 1988, s. 111–161.
22. Hershcovis M.S., Turner N., Barling J., Arnold A.K., Dupre´ E.K., Inness M., LeB- lanc M.M. ve Sivanathan N., “Predicting Workplace Aggression: A Meta- Analysis”, Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 92(1), 2007, s. 228–238.
23. Hung T.K., Chi W.N. ve Lu L.W., “Exploring the Relationships Between Percei- ved Coworker Loafing and Counterproductive Work Behaviors: The Media- ting Role of a Revenge Motive”, Journal of Business Psychology, Vol. 24, 2009, s.257–270.
24. Jacobs J.W., “Euripides’ Medea: A Psychodynamic Model of Severe Divorce Patho- logy”, American Journal of Psychotherapy, Vol. XLII(2), 1988, s. 308-319.
25. Jones D.A. “Counterproductive Work Behavior toward Supervisors & Organizati- ons: Injustice, Revenge, & Context”, Academy Of Management Best Conferen- ce Paper, pA1, 2004.
26. Kim S.H., Smith R.H. ve Brigham N.L., “Effects of Power Imbalance and the Pre- sence of Third Parties on Reactions to Harm: Upward and Downward Reven- ge”, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 24, 1988, s.353-361.
27. Little M. L., Simmons B. L. Ve Nelson L.D., “Health Among Leaders: Positive and Negative Affect, Engagement and Burnout, Forgiveness and Revenge”, Jour- nal of Management Studies, Vol:44(2), 2007, s. 243-260.
28. McCloskey M.A., “The “Medea Complex” Among Men: The Instrumental Abuse of Children to Injure Wives”, Violence and Victims, Vol. 16(1), 2001, s. 19-37.
29. Mikula, G., Petri, B., & Tanzer, N., “What people regard as unjust: Types and struc- tures of everyday experiences of injustice”, European Journal of Social Psycho- logy, Vol. 30, 1990, s.13–149.
30. Mitchell, M. S., ve Ambrose, M. L., “Abusive supervision and workplace deviance and the moderating effects of negative reciprocity beliefs” Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 92, 2007, s. 1159–1168.
31. Neuman J.H. ve Baron A.R., Aggression in the Workplace: A Social-Psychological Perspective, Suzy F. ve Spector E.P. (Der.), Counterproductive work behavi- or: Investigations of actors and targets içinde, Washington, DC, US: American Psychological Association, 2004, s. 13-40.
32. Naylor C. J., Pritchard D. R. ve Ilgen R. D., A Theory of Behavior in Organizations. London: Academic Press, 1980.
33. Restubog S.L.D., Zagenczyk J.T., Bordia P., Bordia S. ve Georgia J.C., “If You Wrong Us, Shall We Not Revenge? Moderating Roles of Self-Control and Perceived Aggressive Work Culture in Predicting Responses to Psychological Contract Breach”, Journal of Management, DOI: 10.1177/0149206312443557, 2012.
34. Richmond P.V. ve McCroskey C.J., “The Impact of Supervisor and Subordinate Immediacy on Relational and Organizational Outcomes”. Communication Monographs, Vol. 67 (1), 2000, s.85-95.
35. Robinson S., “Dysfunctional Workplace Behavior”. The Sage Handbook of Organi- zational Behavior. Barling J. Cooper L. C. (Ed.). London: Sage, 2008.
36. Schumann K. ve Ross M., “The Benefits, Costs, and Paradox of Revenge”, Social and Personality Psychology Compass, Vol. 4(12), 2010, s. 1193–1205.
37. Spector E.P. ve Fox F., Concluding Thoughts: Where Do We Go From Here?, Suzy F. ve Spector E.P. (Der.), Counterproductive work behavior: Investigations of actors and targets içinde, Washington, DC, US: American Psychological Asso- ciation, 2004, s. 297-305.
38. Stern E.S., “The Medea Complex: the Mother’s Homicidal Wishes to her Child”, British Journal of Psychology, Vol. 94, 1948, s.321-331.
39. Stuckless, N., ve Goranson, R., “The Vengeance Scale: Development of a measu- re of attitudes toward revenge”, Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, Vol.7, 1992, s.25–42.
40. Tripp, T. M.,ve Bies, R. J., What’s good about revenge: The avenger’s perspective, (Der.) R. J. Lewicki, R. J. Bies, ve B. H. Sheppard, Research on Negotiation in Organizations (Vol. 6) içinde, Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, 1997, s. 145–160.
41. Tripp T.M. ve Bies R.J., “Righteous” Anger and Revenge in the Workplace: The Fantasies, the Feuds, the Forgiveness”, M. Potegal vd. (Der..), International Handbook of Anger içinde, USA: Springer, 2010, s.413-431.
42. Walsham G., “Interpretive case studies in IS research: nature and method”, Euro- pean Journal of Information Systems, Vol: 4, 1995, s. 74-81.
43. Yin K. R., Case study research: Design and methods, Thousand Oaks: Sage, 2003.