Kimlik İşlevleri ile Kolektif Eylem Arasında Sosyal Adaletin Düzenleyici Rolü

Öz

Bu çalışmanın temel amacı; kimlik işlevleri ile kolektif eylem tutumu arasındaki ilişkide sosyal adalet algısının rolünü incelemektir. Bu amaç doğrultusunda araştırmanın örneklemi Türkiye’nin farklı bölgelerinden kolay örneklem yöntemiyle 8 üniversiteden 263 kadın, 242 erkek toplam 505 bireyden oluşturulmuştur. Katılımcıların yaş aralığı 18-32’dir. Çalışmada kimlik işlevleri ölçeği kolektif eylem ölçeği ve sosyal adalet/sizlik ölçeği kullanılmıştır. Analizler sonucunda sosyal adalet algısının hem genel kolektif eylem eğilimini hem de kolektif eylemin her iki alt boyutunu da yordadığı saptanmıştır. Diğer taraftan sosyal adaletin; kimlik işlevleri ile kolektif eylem arasındaki ilişkide düzenleyici bir rolü olduğu görülmüştür. Bulgular, yapı kimlik işlevi alt boyutu ile genel olarak kolektif eylem arasında sosyal adaletin aracı rolü olduğunu; yine yapı işlevi ve kolektif eylem alt boyutu olan bireye yasal sorumluluk yüklemeyen eylemler arasındaki ilişkide sosyal adaletin düzenleyici rolü olduğunu göstermiştir. Ayrıca kimlik işlevi alt boyutlarından uyum ve kontrol işlev boyutları ile kolektif eylemin bireye yasal sorumluluk yüklemeyen eylemler alt boyutu arasındaki ilişkide sosyal adaletin düzenleyici role sahip olduğu bulunmuştur. Araştırma sonucunda elde edilen bulgular ilgili literatür ışığında tartışılmıştır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• kimlik
• adalet
• kolektif eylem
• sosyal adalet
• kimlik işlevleri

The Mediator Role of Social Justice Between Identity Functions and Collective Action

Öz

The aim of this study is to examine the role of social justice perception in the relationship between identity functions and collective action attitude. For this purpose, the sample of the research was formed from a total of 505 individuals, 263 women and 242 men, from 8 universities from different regions of Turkey with the easy sampling method. The age range of the participants is 18-32. In the study, identity functions scale, collective action scale and social injustice/injustice scale were used. As a result of the analyzes, it was determined that the perception of social justice predicted both general collective action tendency and both sub-dimensions of collective action. On the other hand, social justice; It has been observed that it has a mediator role in the relationship between identity functions and collective action. Findings show that social justice has a mediating role between the structure identity function sub-dimension and collective action in general; Again, it has shown that social justice has a regulatory role in the relationship between the structural function and the collective action sub-dimension, which does not impose legal responsibility on the individual.In addition, it has been found that social justice has a mediator role in the relationship between the cohesion and control function dimensions, which are among the identity function sub-dimensions, and the collective action sub-dimensions of actions that do not impose legal responsibility on the individual. The findings obtained as a result of the research were discussed in the light of the relevant literature.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• identitiy
• justice
• collective action
• social justice
• identity functions

Kaynakça

1. Adams, A. Gerald ve Marshall, K. Sheila (1996). “A Developmental Social PsychologyOf İdentity: Understanding The Person-İn-Context”. Journal of Adolescence,19 (5), 429-442
2. Braungart, M. M. ve Braungart, G. R. (1990). The life-course development of left- and right-wing youth activist leaders from the 1960. Political Psychology, 11, 243-282.
3. Chan, R. C., & Mak, W. W. (2020). Liberating and empowering effects of critical reflection on collective action in LGBT and cisgender heterosexual individuals. American Journal of Community Psychology, 65(1-2), 63-77.
4. Chayinska, M., Miranda, D., & González, R. (2021). A longitudinal study of the bidirectional causal relationships between online political participation and offline collective action. Computers in Human Behavior, 121, 106810.
5. De La Sablonnière, R., Bourgeois, L. F., & Najih, M. (2013). Dramatic social change: A social psychological perspective. Journal of Social and Political Psychology, 1(1), 253-272.
6. Demir, İ. (2011). Kimlik işlevleri ölçeği: Türkçe geçerlik ve güvenirliği. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri, 11(2), 571-586.
7. Dovidio, John F. vd. (2005). “Social identities and social context: social attitudes andpersonal well-being. In”: Social Identification in Groups. Emerald GroupPublishing Limited. p. 231-260.
8. Drury, John ve Reicher, Steve (2005). “Explaining Enduring Empowerment: AComparative Study Of Collective Action and Psychological Outcomes”.European Journal of Social Psychology, 35, 35-38

9. Duncan, E. Lauren (2012). The Psychology of Collective Action.,Oxford Handbook ofPersonality and Social Psychology. Ed. K. Deaux, & M. Snyder. s.781-803.New York: Oxford University Press.
10. Ellemers, N., Van Knippenberg, A., & Wilke, H. (1990). The influence of permeability of group boundaries and stability of group status on strategies of individual mobility and social change. British Journal of Social Psychology, 29(3), 233-246.
11. Flacks, R. (1990). Social bases of activist identity: comment on braungart article. Political Psychology, 11, 283-292.
12. Folger, R. (1986). Rethinking equity theory. In Justice in social relations (pp. 145-162). Springer, Boston, MA.
13. Gamson, W. A. (1992). The social psychology of collectiveaction. In A. D. Morris ve C. M. Mu¨ller (Eds.), Frontiers insocial movement theory (pp. 53–76). New Haven, CT: YaleUniversity Press.
14. Gezici Yalçın, M. (2007). Collective Action Of Immigrants From Turkey Living İn Germany. Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi. Philipps-Universität Marburg.
15. Hogg, M. A. ve Abrams, D. (1988). Social identifi cations: Asocial psychology of intergroup relations and group processes.London, Routledge.
16. Judge, M., Fernando, J. W., & Begeny, C. T. (2022). Dietary behaviour as a form of collective action: A social identity model of vegan activism. Appetite, 168, 105730.
17. Kaya, O. ve Mamatoğlu, N. (2017). Kolektif Eylem Ölçeği: Geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. Nesne, 5(9), 111-129.
18. Klandermans, B. (1997). The social psychology of protestOxford, England: Blackwell.
19. Knippenberg, A. V. ve Ellemers, N. (1990). Social identity andintergroup differentiation processes. European review of socialpsychology, 1(1), 137-169.
20. Lipponen, J., Helkama, K. ve Juslin M. (2003). Subgroupidentification, superordinate identification and intergroup biasbetween the subgroups. Group Processes and IntergroupRelations, 6, 239-250.
21. Livingstone, A. G. (2021). What Social Identities Can Tell Us about Violence in Social Movements, and Vice Versa: A Social-Psychological Response to “Violence, Social Movements, and Black Freedom Struggles: Ten Theses toward a Research Agenda for Scholars of Contention Today”. Contention, 9(1), 142-148.
22. Livingstone, A. G., Spears, R., Manstead, A., Makanju, D., & Sweetman, J. (2022). Dilemmas of resistance: How concerns for cultural identity shape and constrain resistance among minority groups.
23. Ljubotina, D. (2004). Young people and social justice. Croatian Journal of Social Policy, 11(2), 159-175.
24. Llones, C. A., Mankeb, P., Wongtragoon, U., & Suwanmaneepong, S. (2022). Production efficiency and the role of collective actions among irrigated rice farms in Northern Thailand. International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability, 1-11.
25. Mamatoğlu, Nihal (2008). “Öğretmenlerde Kimliklenme ve Kimliklenmenin İşeYönelik Tutum ve Algıları Yordayıcılığı”. Türk Psikoloji Yazıları, 11(22), 47-62.
26. Mamatoğlu, Nihal (2010). “Lider Davranışları Algıları ve Örgütsel KimliklenmeBoyutları Arasında Çalışanın Kişilik Özelliklerinin Düzenleyici Rolü”. TürkPsikoloji Dergisi, 25(65), 82-97.
27. McGarty, C., Bliuc, A. M., Thomas, E., & Bongiorno, R. (2009). Collective action as the material expression of opinion-based group membership.
28. Postmes, T., & Branscombe, N. R. (2002). Influence of long-term racial environmental composition on subjective well-being in African Americans. Journal of personality and social psychology, 83(3), 735.
29. Pozzi, M., Passini, S., Chayinska, M., Morselli, D., Ellena, A. M., Włodarczyk, A., & Pistoni, C. (2022). ‘Coming together to awaken our democracy’: Examining precursors of emergent social identity and collective action among activists and non‐activists in the 2019–2020 ‘Chile despertó’protests. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology.
30. Pratt, M. G. (2001). Social identity dynamics in modernorganizations: An organizational psychology/ organizationalbehavior perspective. M. A. Hogg ve D. J. Terry, (Ed.), Socialidentity processes in organizational context (13-30).Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.
31. Rathbone, J. A., Jetten, J., & Cruwys, T. (2022). Perceived legitimacy of weight-based discrimination: Consequences for group identity, collective action, body satisfaction, and self-esteem. Body Image, 41, 156-162.
32. Reade, C. (2001). Dual identification in multinationalcorporations: Local managers and their psychological attachmentto the subsidiary versusthe global organization. InternationalJournal of Human Resource Management, 12, 405-424.
33. Reicher, S. D. (1996). 'The battle of Westminster': Developing the social identity modelof crowd behavior in order to explain the initiation and development ofcollective conflict. European Journal of Social Psychology. 26: 115-134
34. Selvanathan, H. P., & Leidner, B. (2020). Modes of ingroup identification and notions of justice provide distinct pathways to normative and nonnormative collective action in the Israeli–Palestinian conflict. Journal of conflict resolution, 64(9), 1754-1788.
35. Serafini, T. E. ve Adams, G. R. (2002). Functions of identity: Scale construction and validation. Identity: An International Journal of Theory and Research, 2(4), 361-389.
36. Shankar-Brown, R. (2015). Urbanization and persistent educational inequalities: The need for collective action towards equity and social justice. National Youth Advocacy and Resilience Journal, 1(1), 31.
37. Simon, B., Loewy, M., Stürmer, S., Weber, U., Freytag, P., Habig, C., Kampmeier, C. ve Spahlinger, P. (1998). Collective identification and social movement participation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74 (3), 646z.
38. Simon, Bernd ve Klandermans, Bert (2001). “Politicized Collective İdentity: A SocialPsychological Analysis”. American Psychologist, 56, 319-331
39. Singleton, S. (1999). Commons problems, collective action and efficiency: past and present institutions of governance in Pacific Northwest salmon fisheries. Journal of Theoretical Politics, 11(3), 367-391.
40. Smith, E. M., González, R., & Frigolett, C. (2021). Understanding Change in Social‐Movement Participation: The Roles of Social Norms and Group Efficacy. Political Psychology, 42(6), 1037-1051.
41. Stets, Jan E.; Burke, Peter J. (2005). “New directions in identity control theory.In”: Social identification in groups. Emerald Group Publishing Limited. p. 43-64.
42. Sturmer, Stefan ve Simon, Bernd (2004). “Collective Action: Towards A Dual-PathwayModel”. European Review of Social Psychology, 15 (1), 59-99
43. Sturmer, Stefan ve Simon, Bernd (2009). “Pathways To Collective Protest: Calculation,Identification, Or Emotion? A Critical Analysis Of The Role Of Group‐ BasedAnger İn Social Movement Participation”. Journal of Social Issues, 65 (4), 681-705.
44. Tajfel, H. (1974). Social identity and intergroup behaviour. Social Science Information, 13(2), 65–93. doi:10.1177/053901847401300204
45. Tajfel, H. (Ed.) (1978). Social Categorization, Social İdentity, and Social Comparison: Differentiation Between Social Groups. . New York: Academic Press.
46. Tajfel, H. ve Turner, C. J. (1979). An integrati ve theory of inter-group conflict. G. Austin ve S. Worchel (Ed.),The social psychology of inter-group relations. (pp. 33-47). Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
47. Thomas, E. F., Zubielevitch, E., Sibley, C. G., & Osborne, D. (2020). Testing the social identity model of collective action longitudinally and across structurally disadvantaged and advantaged groups. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 46(6), 823-838.
48. Ufkes, G. E., Dovidio F. J. ve Tel, G. (2014). Identity and collective action among european kurds. British Journal of Social Psychology.
49. Uluğ, Ö. M., & Acar, Y. G. (2019). ‘Names will never hurt us’: A qualitative exploration of çapulcu identity through the eyes of Gezi Park protesters. British Journal of Social Psychology, 58(3), 714-729.
50. Uluğ, Ö. M., & Tropp, L. R. (2021). Witnessing racial discrimination shapes collective action for racial justice: Enhancing awareness of privilege among advantaged groups. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 51(3), 248-261.
51. Van Dick, R. (2004). My job is my castle: Identification inorganizational contexts. C. L. Cooper ve I. T. Robertson, (Ed.),International review of industrial and organizational psychologyiçinde (171-203). Wiley: Chichester
52. Van Knippenberg, D. ve van Schie, E. C. M. (2000). Foci and correlates of organizational identification. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 73, 137- 147.
53. Van Zomeren, M., & Iyer, A. (2009). Introduction to the Social and Psychological Dynamics of Collective Action. Journal of Social Issues, 65(4), 645–660. doi:10.1111/j.1540- 4560.2009.01618.x
54. Van Zomeren, M., Kutlaca, M., & Turner-Zwinkels, F. (2018). Integrating who “we” are with what “we”(will not) stand for: A further extension of the Social Identity Model of Collective Action. European Review of Social Psychology, 29(1), 122-160.
55. Van Zomeren, M., Postmes, T. ve Spears, R. (2008). Toward an integrative social identity model of collective action: a quantitative research synthesis of three socio-psychological perspectives. Psychological Bulletin, 134 (4), 504-535.
56. Van Zomeren, M., Spears, R., Fischer, A. H., & Leach, C. W. (2004). Put your money where your mouth is! Explaining collective action tendencies through group-based anger and group efficacy. Journal of personality and social psychology, 87(5), 649.
57. Wright, C. S. Taylor, M. D. ve Moghaddam, M. F. (1990). Responding to membership in a disadvantaged group: from acceptance to collective protest. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58 (6), 994.
58. Wright, C. Stephen (2001) “Strategic Collective Action: Social Psychology and SocialChange”. Blackwell Handbook Of Social Psychology: Intergroup Processes2001, 409-430.
59. Yıldırım, F. (2011). Üniversite Gençliği Sosyal Adalet’ten Ne Anlıyor? Sosyal Adalet İlkelerinin Sosyal Adalet Algısı Üzerindeki Etkisi. Aile Ve Toplum: Eğitim, Kültür Ve Araştırma Dergisi, 25 (7), 113-124
60. Yzerbyt, V., & Demoulin, S. (2010). Intergroup relations. In S. T. Fiske, D. T. Gilbert, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (pp. 1024–1083). John Wiley & Sons, Inc.. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470561119.socpsy002028