The Effect of Clinical Practice on Teacher Candidates’ Self-Efficacy Perceptions

Yıl 2016, , 265 - 286, 01.09.2016

Adnan Taşgın , Adnan Küçükoğlu

https://doi.org/10.14812/cuefd.283347

Cited By: 2

Öz

The
purpose of this research is to examine the effects of clinical practices, which
are used in teacher training and skill training, on self-efficacy perceptions
of teachers. The participants of the study, which is performed with Solomon
Four Groups Experimental Model, constitute 64 pre-school education teacher
candidates at a state university. ‘Teachers' Self Efficacy Scale" which is
developed by Tschannen-Moran and Woolfolk-Hoy (2001) is used as the data
collection tool. In analysis of data, parametric tests of independent samples
t-test and one-way analysis of covariance was used. The experimental process
lasted 14 weeks and clinical applications have been found to have positive
effects on teacher candidates’ self-efficacy perceptions. In addition, results,
it also gives hints for contributing to teacher candidates in selection of
teaching and learning strategies, ensuring the participation of students and
classroom management.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Clinic practice, Self-efficacy, Pre-service teachers

Kaynakça

• Alter, J., & Coggshall, J. G. (2009). Teaching as a clinical practice profession: Implications for teacher preparation and state policy. Washington, DC: National Professional Center for Teacher Quality.
• American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education (AACTE). (2013). The changing teacher preparation profession. Washington D.C: American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education.
• American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education (AACTE). (2010). The clinical preparation of teachers: A policy brief. Washington D.C: American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education.
• Arabzadeh, M., ShafyNadery, M., Salami, M. N., & Bayanati, M. (2012). The effects of teaching self-efficacy on student cognitive engagement. Basic Research Journal of Education Research and Review, 1 (6), 99-103.
• Arastaman, G. (2013). Eğitim ve fen edebiyat fakültesi öğrencilerinin öz-yeterlik inançları ve öğretmenlik mesleğine karşı tutumlarının incelenmesi. Ahi Evran Üniversitesi Kırşehir Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 14 (2), 205-217.
• Auwarter, A., & Aruguete, M. (2008). Counselor perceptions of students who vary in gender and socioeconomic status. Social Psychology of Education: An International Journal, 11, 389-395.
• Balkar, B. (2014). Klinik temelli yaklaşımın bilgi alanlarını kapsayan araştırma-temelli öğretmen eğitimi politikasına ilişkin öğretmen algıları. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 29 (4), 28-45.
• Ball, D. L. (2008). The work of teaching and the challenge for teacher education. Presented at the annual meeting of the American Association of Colleges of Teacher Education, New Orleans, LA. Retrieved June 10, 2013, from http://www- personal.umich.edu/~dball/presentations/020908_AACTE.pdf.
• Bandura, A. (1997). Self- efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.
• Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioural change. Pyschological Review, 84, 191-215.
• Bethune-Cookman University. (2013). Clinical practices and field experiences handbook. Retrieved October 23, 2014, from http://www.cookman.edu/documents/acad_docs/education/clinicalPracticesHandbook.pdf.
• Betoret, F. D. (2006). Stressors, self-efficacy, coping resources, and burnout among secondary school teachers in Spain. Educational Psychology: An International Journal of Experimental Educational Psychology, 26 (4), 519-539.
• Brouwers, A., & Tomic, W. (2003). A test of the factorial validity of the Teacher Efficacy Scale. Research in Education, 69, 67–80.
• Brownell, M., & Pajares, F. (1999). Classroom teachers' sense of efficacy to instruct special education students. Teacher Education and Special Education, 22, 154-164.
• Caprara, G. V., Barbaranelli, C., Steca, P., & Malone, P. S. (2006). Teachers’ self-efficacy beliefs as determinants of job satisfaction and students’ academic achievement: A study at the school level. Journal of School Psychology, 44, 473–490.
• Charalambous, C., Philippou G., & Kyriakides L. (2008). Tracing the development of preservice teachers’ efficacy beliefs in teaching mathematics during fieldwork. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 67 (2), 125-142.
• Cohen, D. K. (1988). Teaching practice: Plus que ça change. In P Jackson (Ed.). Contributing to educational change: Perspectives on research and practice (pp. 27-84). Berkeley, CA: McCutchan. Retrieved October 28, 2014, from http://ncrtl.msu.edu/http/ipapers/html/pdf/ip883.pdf.
• Cohen, D. K. (2005). Professions of human improvement: Predicaments of teaching. In M. Nisan & O. Schremer (Eds.). Educational deliberations (pp. 278-295). Jerusalem, Israel: Keter.
• Council of Chief State School Officers (CCSSO). (2012). Our responsibility, our promise: Transforming educator preparation and entry into the profession. Washington, DC: The Council of Chief State School Officers. Retrieved October 11, 2014, from http://www.highered.nysed.gov/CCSSO.pdf.
• Creswell, J. W. (2003). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (2nd Ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Retrieved June 8, 2015, from http://isites.harvard.edu/fs/docs/icb.topic1334586.files/2003_Creswell_A%20Framework%20for%20Design.pdf.
• Czerniak, C. M., & Lumpe, A. T. (1996). Relationship between teacher beliefs and science education reform. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 7, 247-266.
• Çapa, Y., Çakıroğlu, J., & Sarıkaya, H. (2005). The development and validation of a Turkish version of the teachers’ sense of efficacy scale. Education and Science, 30 (137), 74-81.
• Darling-Hammond, L. (2005). Teaching as a profession: Lessons in teacher preparation and professional development. Phi Delta Kappan, 87 (3), 237-240.
• Darling-Hammond, L. (2006). Constructing 21st-century teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 57 (3), 300-314.
• Darling-Hammond, L., & Baratz-Snowden, J. (2007). A good teacher in every classroom: Preparing the highly qualified teachers our children deserve. Educational Horizons, 85 (2), 111-132.
• Darling-Hammond, L., & Bransford, J. (Eds). (2005). Preparing teachers for a changing World: What teachers should learn and be able to do. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. Retrieved December 10, 2014, from http://books.google.com.tr/books?id=H0uUGKrESDUC&printsec=frontcover&hl=tr&source=gbs_ge_summary_r&cad=0#v=onepage&q&f=false.
• Dawson, T. E. (1997). A primer on experimental and quasi- experimental design. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Southwest Educational Research Association, Austin, TX., January.
• Demirtaş, H., Cömert, M., & Özer, N. (2011). Öğretmen adaylarının özyeterlik inançları ve öğretmenlik mesleğine ilişkin tutumları. Eğitim ve Bilim, 36 (159), 96-111.
• Emmer, E., & Hickman, J. (1991). Teacher efficacy in classroom management and discipline. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 51,755-765.
• Field, A. (2009). Discovering statistics using SPSS (3rd ed.). London: Sage.
• Fives, H., Hamman, D., & Olivarez A. (2007). Does burnout begin with student-teaching? Analyzing efficacy, burnout and support during the student-teaching semester. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23(6), 916-934.
• Fraenkel, J. R., & Wallen, N. E. (2009). How to design and evaluate research in education (7th ed.). New York: The McGraw Hill Companies Inc.
• Fritz, J. J., Miller-Hey, J., Kreutzer, J.C., & Macphee, A. (1995). Fostering personal teaching efficacy through staff development and classroom activities. Journal of Educational Research, 88, 200-209.
• Gibson, S., & Dembo, M. H. (1984). Teacher efficacy: A construct validation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76 (4), 569-582.
• Goddard, R. D., Hoy, W. K., & Woolfolk-Hoy, A. W. (2000). Collective teacher efficacy: Its meaning, measure, and impact on student achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 37 (2), 479-507.
• Grazino, A. M., & Raulin, M.L. (2004). Research methods: A Process of inquiry (5th ed.). USA: Pearson Education Group, Inc.
• Grossman, P. (2010, May). Learning to practice: The design of clinical experience in teacher preparation. Washington, DC: American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education & National Education Association.
• Grossman, P., Hammerness, K. M., McDonald, M., & Ronfeld, M. (2008). Constructing coherence: Structural predictors of perceptions of coherence in NYC teacher education programs. Journal of Teacher Education, 59 (4), 273-287.
• Grossman, P., & McDonald, M. (2008). Back to the future: Directions for research in teaching and teacher education. American Educational Research Journal, 45(1), 184-205.
• Gürsoy, E., Bulunuz, N., Baltacı-Göktalay, Ş., Bulunuz, M., Kesner, J., & Salihoğlu, U. (2013). Clinical supervision model to improve supervisory skills of cooperating teachers and university supervisors during teaching practice. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, Özel Sayı (1), 191-203.
• Güvenç, H. (2011). Öğretmen adayı öğrencilerin mesleki özyeterlilik algıları ile öğrenci başarısı sorumluluk algıları. E-Journal of New World Sciences Academy, 6 (2), 1410-1421.
• Hammerness, K. (2006). From coherence in theory to coherence in practice. Teachers College Record, 108 (7), 124–65.
• Henson, R. K. (2001). Teacher self-efficacy: Substantive ımplications and measurement dilemmas. Keynote address given at the annual meeting of the Educational Research Exchange. College Station, Texas: Texas A&M University.
• Heritage, M., Kim, J., Vendlinski, T. P., & Herman, J. L. (2009). From evidence to action: A seamless process in formative assessment? Educational Measurement, 28 (3): 24–31.
• Hoy, W. K., & Woolfolk, A. E. (1990). Socialization of student teachers. American Educational Research Journal, 27 (2), 279-300.
• Irving, O., & Martin, J. (1982). Withitness: The confusing variable. American Educational Research Journal, 19 (2), 313-319.
• Jungert, T., & Rosander, M. (2010). Self-efficacy and strategies to influence the study environment. Teaching in Higher Education, 6 (15), 647-659.
• Kirk, R. E. (1995). Experimental design: Procedures for the behavioral sciences (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
• Knoell, C. M. (2012). The role of the student-teacher relationship in the lives of fifth graders: A mixed methods analysis. Unpublished doctorate dissertation, The Graduate College at the University of Nebraska, Lincoln, Nebraska.
• Knoblauch, D., & Woolfolk Hoy, A. (2008). ‘‘Maybe I can teach those kids.’’ The influence of contextual factors on student teachers' efficacy beliefs. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24, 166-179.
• Korthagen, F. A. J. (2011). Making teacher education relevant for practice: The pedagogy of realistic teacher education. Orbis Scholae, 5 (2), 31-50.
• Kounin, J. S., & Sherman, L. W. (1979). School environments as behavior settings. American Educational Research Journal, 18 (3), 145-151.
• Kriewaldt, J., & Turnidge, D. (2013). Conceptualising an approach to clinical reasoning in the education profession. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 38 (6), 103-115.
• LaMaster, K. J. (2001). Enhancing preservice teachers field experiences through the addition of a service-learning component. The Journal of Experiential Education, 24 (1), 27-33.
• Levine, M. (2010). Developing principles for clinically based teacher education. Commissioned by the National Council for the Accreditation of Teacher Education for the Blue Ribbon Panel on Clinical Preparation and Partnerships for Improved Student Learning.
• Liberante, L. (2012). The importance of teacher-student relationships, as explored through the lens of the NSW Quality Teaching Model. Journal of Student Engagement: Education matters, 2(1), 2-9.
• Moalosi, S. W. T. (2013). Teachers’ self-efficacy: Is reporting non-significant results essential? Journal of International Education Research, 9 (4), 397-406.
• Moore, W. P., & Esselman, M. E. (1992, April). Teacher efficacy, empowerment, and a focused instructional climate: Does student achievement benefit? Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA.
• Morgan, G. A., Leech, N. L., Gloeckner, G. W., & Barrett, K. C. (2004). SPSS for introductory Statistics: Use and interpretation (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
• Nespor, J. (1987). The role of beliefs in the practice of teaching. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 19 (4), 317-328.
• Öksüz, Y., & Coşkun, K. (2012). Öğretmenlik uygulaması I-II derslerinin zihin engelliler öğretmen adaylarının öz-yeterlilik algılamaları üzerindeki etkisi. Ahi Evran Üniversitesi Kırşehir Eğitim Fakültesi (KEFAD), 13 (2), 131-155.
• Pajares, F. (2002). Overview of social cognitive theory and of self-efficacy. Retrieved November 3, 2014, from http://www.uky.edu/~eushe2/Pajares/eff.html.
• Pajares, F., & Schunk, D. H. (2001). Self-beliefs and school success: Self-efficacy, self-concept and school achievement. In R. Riding ve S. Rayner (Eds.), Self-perception (pp. 239-266). London: Ablex Publishing. Retrieved November 3, 2014, from http://www.uky.edu/~eushe2/Pajares/PajaresSchunk2001.html.
• Plourde, L.A. (2001). The genesis of science teaching in the elementary school: The ınfluence of student teaching. Retrieved August 7, 2006, from http://www.ed.psu.edu/cı/2001 aets/s-1-08-plourde.rtf.
• Ross, J. A. (1992). Teacher efficacy and the effect of coaching on student achievement. Canadian Journal of Education, 17 (1), 51-65.
• Sağır, M., Bilen, K., & Ercan, O. (2014). Öğretmenlik uygulaması dersinin öğretmen adaylarının öz yeterlik ve ders anlatımlarına ilişkin algılarına etkisi. KSÜ Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 11 (2), 97-114.
• Saracaloğlu, A. S., Yenice, N., & Özden, B. (2013). Fen bilgisi, sosyal bilgiler ve sınıf öğretmeni adaylarının öğretmen öz-yeterlik algılarının akademik kontrol odaklarının incelenmesi. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 34, 227-250.
• Sawilowsky, S., Kelley, D. L., Blair, R. C., & Markman, B. S. (1994). Meta-analysis and the Solomon four group design. Journal of Experimental Education, 62 (4), 361-376.
• Teachers for a New Era. (TNE). (2006). Transforming teacher education. New York: Carnegie Corporation. Retrieved September 10, 2014, from http://carnegie.org/fileadmin/Media/Publications/PDF/Carnegie.pdf
• The National Council for Accreditation of Teacher Education (NCATE). (2010). Transforming teacher education through clinical practice: A national strategy to prepare effective teachers. Retrieved June 12, 2013, from http://www.ncate.org/LinkClick.aspx?fileticket=zzeiB1OoqPk%3D&tabid=715.
• Tschannen-Moran, M., & Woolfolk-Hoy, A. (2001). Teacher Efficacy: Capturing and elusive construct. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17, 783-805.
• Tschannen-Moran, M, Woolfolk-Hoy A., & Hoy K.W. (1998). Teacher efficacy: its meaning and measurement. Review of Educational Research, 68 (2), 202-248.
• Wagler, R. R. (2007). Assessing the impact of vicarious experiences on preservice elementary science teacher efficacy and preservice elementary teacher efficacy. Unpublished doctorate dissertation, Oklahoma State University, Oklahoma.
• Wilson, S. M., Floden, R. E., & Ferrini-Mundy, J. (2001). Teacher preparation research: Current knowledge, gaps and recommendations. Washington, DC: Center for the Study of Teaching Policy. Retrieved May 10, 2014, from https://depts.washington.edu/ctpmail/PDFs/TeacherPrep-WFFM-02-2001.pdf.
• Woolfolk, A. E., & Hoy, W. K. (1990). Prospective teachers’ sense of efficacy and beliefs about control. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 81-91.
• Zeichner, K. M. (2012). The importance of strong clinical preparation for teachers. Retrieved June 12, 2014, from http://ccte.org/wp-content/pdfs-conferences/ccte-conf-2012-fall-zeichner-clinical-preparation.pdf.
• Zeichner, K. M. (2003). The adequacies and inadequacies of three current strategies to recruit, prepare, and retain the best teachers for all students. Teachers College Record, 105 (3), 490–519.
• Zimmerman, B. J. (Eds.) (1995). Self-efficacy and educational development. Self-efficacy in changing societies. New York: Cambridge University Press.