Araştırma Makalesi

Incorporating action research into in-service teacher education (INSET) programs

Cilt: 47 Sayı: 2 1 Ekim 2018
PDF İndir
EN

Incorporating action research into in-service teacher education (INSET) programs

Öz

Conducting action research (AR) is considered important for teachers’ professional development, their actual teaching practice and their theoretical knowledge . However, for many teachers, research is a new challenge and action research an unfamiliar form of classroom research. AR is a process through which practitioners address issues of importance in their practice.  The interface between AR and teacher cognition can advance our understanding of teaching practice in general. Very few, if any, however, has investigated teachers’ deliberate decision-making processes after action research processes. In an attempt to address this gap in literature, this exploratory research study investigates the influence of AR on teacher cognition.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Kaynakça

  1. Yigitoglu & Belcher, D. (2014) Baker, A. (2014). Exploring teachers' knowledge of second language pronunciation techniques: Teacher cognitions, observed classroom practices, and student perceptions. TESOL Quarterly, 48 (1), 136-163.
  2. Bartels, N. (2001). Professional preparation and action research: Only for language teachers? TESOL Quarterly, 36 (1), 71-78. Bausch, L. (2010). The power of teachers' writing stories: exploring multiple layers of reflective inquiry in writing process education. Journal of Language and Literacy Education, 6(1), 20-39.
  3. Berger, J. G., Boles, K. C., Troen, V. (2005). Teacher research and school change: paradoxes, problems, and possibilities. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21, 93–105. Borg, S. (2001). Self-perception and practice in teaching grammar. ELT Journal, 55(1), 21-29.
  4. Borg, S. (2003a). Teacher cognition in language teaching: A review of research on what teachers think, know, believe and do. Language Teaching, 36, 81-109. Borg, S. (2003b). Teacher cognition in grammar teaching: a literature review. Language Awareness, 12(3), 96-108.
  5. Borg, S. (2006). Teacher cognition and language education: Research and Practice. London: Continuum. Burns, A. (2009). Action Research in Second Language Teacher Education. In A. Burns & J. C. Richards (Eds), The Cambridge Guide to Second Language Teacher Education (pp. 289-298). New York: Cambridge.
  6. Crookes, G. (1993). Action Research for second language teachers: Going beyond teacher research. Applied Linguistics, 14 (2), 130-144. Doyle, M. (1997). Beyond life history as a student: preservice teachers' beliefs about teaching and learning. College Student Journal, 31(4), 519-532.
  7. Ebbutt, D. (1985) Educational action research: some general concerns and specific quibbles. In R. Burgess (Ed.) Issues in educational research: qualitative methods. Lewes: The Falmer Press. Edge, J. (Ed.) (2001). Action Research. Alexandria, VA: TESOL.
  8. Farrell, T. S. C., & Lim, P. C. P. (2005). Conceptions of grammar teaching: a case study of teachers' beliefs and classroom practices. TESL-EJ, 9(2), 1-13. Goetz, Z. & LeCompte, M. (1984). Ethnography and qualitative design in educational research. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

İngilizce

Konular

Eğitim Üzerine Çalışmalar

Bölüm

Araştırma Makalesi

Yazarlar

Nur Yigitoglu *
BOĞAZİÇİ ÜNİVERSİTESİ
Türkiye

Yesim Kesli Dollar Bu kişi benim
Türkiye

Yayımlanma Tarihi

1 Ekim 2018

Gönderilme Tarihi

6 Aralık 2017

Kabul Tarihi

27 Haziran 2018

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 2018 Cilt: 47 Sayı: 2

Kaynak Göster

APA
Yigitoglu, N., & Kesli Dollar, Y. (2018). Incorporating action research into in-service teacher education (INSET) programs. Çukurova Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 47(2), 694-709. https://doi.org/10.14812/cuefd.362701
AMA
1.Yigitoglu N, Kesli Dollar Y. Incorporating action research into in-service teacher education (INSET) programs. Çukurova Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi. 2018;47(2):694-709. doi:10.14812/cuefd.362701
Chicago
Yigitoglu, Nur, ve Yesim Kesli Dollar. 2018. “Incorporating action research into in-service teacher education (INSET) programs”. Çukurova Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi 47 (2): 694-709. https://doi.org/10.14812/cuefd.362701.
EndNote
Yigitoglu N, Kesli Dollar Y (01 Ekim 2018) Incorporating action research into in-service teacher education (INSET) programs. Çukurova Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi 47 2 694–709.
IEEE
[1]N. Yigitoglu ve Y. Kesli Dollar, “Incorporating action research into in-service teacher education (INSET) programs”, Çukurova Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, c. 47, sy 2, ss. 694–709, Eki. 2018, doi: 10.14812/cuefd.362701.
ISNAD
Yigitoglu, Nur - Kesli Dollar, Yesim. “Incorporating action research into in-service teacher education (INSET) programs”. Çukurova Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi 47/2 (01 Ekim 2018): 694-709. https://doi.org/10.14812/cuefd.362701.
JAMA
1.Yigitoglu N, Kesli Dollar Y. Incorporating action research into in-service teacher education (INSET) programs. Çukurova Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi. 2018;47:694–709.
MLA
Yigitoglu, Nur, ve Yesim Kesli Dollar. “Incorporating action research into in-service teacher education (INSET) programs”. Çukurova Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, c. 47, sy 2, Ekim 2018, ss. 694-09, doi:10.14812/cuefd.362701.
Vancouver
1.Nur Yigitoglu, Yesim Kesli Dollar. Incorporating action research into in-service teacher education (INSET) programs. Çukurova Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi. 01 Ekim 2018;47(2):694-709. doi:10.14812/cuefd.362701

Copyright © 2011

Cukurova University Faculty of Education

All rights reserved