Ters Yüz Edilmiş Öğrenme Yaklaşımının Öğrencilerin Akademik Başarısına Etkisi: Bir Meta-Analiz Çalışması

Öz

Bu çalışmada ters yüz öğrenme yaklaşımının geleneksel öğrenme yaklaşımına kıyasla öğrencilerin akademik başarılarına etkisinin incelenmesi amaçlanmıştır. Ters yüz edilmiş öğrenme (TYÖ) yaklaşımının akademik başarı üzerindeki etki büyüklüğünü belirlemeyi amaçlayan bu çalışmada meta analiz yöntemi kullanılmıştır. Dahil edilme ölçütlerini sağlayan ve ulaşılabilen 8 lisansüstü tez ve 5 makale meta analize dahil edilmiştir. İlk olarak araştırmaya dahil edilen çalışmalara ait heterojenlik değeri hesaplanmış ve elde edilen bütün değerler (Q=6,148, p>0,05, I2=0,00) çalışmalar arasında homojenliğin olduğunu göstermiştir. Dolayısıyla bu durum etki büyüklüklerinin hesaplanmasında sabit etkiler modelinin kullanılabileceğini göstermektedir. TYÖ yaklaşımının akademik başarıya etkisine ilişkin genel etki büyüklüğü değeri, sabit etkiler modeline göre 0,080 hata ile 0,744’dür. Bu etki düzeyi örneklem grubunun öğretim seviyesi, çalışma türü ve çalışmanın yayınlanma yılı değişkenlerine göre farklılaşmamaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• ters yüz öğrenme,akademik başarı,öğrenci başarısı,meta analiz

The Effect of Flipped Learning on Students’ Academic Achievement: A Meta-Analysis Study

Öz

This study was carried out to investigate the flipped learning method on students’ academic achievements compared to the traditional method. Aiming to identify the effect size of the flipped learning method (FL) on academic achievement, meta-analysis method is used in this study used. 8 postgraduate theses and 5 articles, which met the inclusion criteria and could be accessed, are included in the meta-analysis. The heterogeneity value of the included studies was first calculated, and then all achieved values (Q=6.148, p>0.05, I2=0.00) indicated that there is homogeneity among the studies. This shows that the fixed effects model could be used in the calculation of effect sizes. General effect size of the studies investigating FL’s effect on academic achievement compared to the traditional teaching method is 0.744 with an error of 0.080 according to the fixed effects model. This effect level does not differ by the educational level of sample group, type of study and year of publication.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• flipped learning,academic achievement,student success,meta analysis

Kaynakça

1. Akgöz, S., Ercan, İ. & Kan, İ. (2004). Meta-analysis. Uludağ Medical Journal, 30 (2), 107-112.
2. Alsancak Sırakaya, D. (2015). The effect of flipped classroom model on academic achievement, self - directed learning readiness and motivation. Unpublished doctoral thesis, Gazi University, Ankara.
3. Aydın, B. (2016). The effects of flipped classroom model on academic achievement, homework/task stress level and transfer of learning. Unpublished master thesis, Süleyman Demirel University, Isparta.
4. Baker, J. (2000, April). The "classroom flip": Using web course management tools to become the guide by the side. 11. International Conference on College Teaching and Learning, Jacksonville, FL.
5. Bell, M. R. (2015). An investigation of the impact of a flipped classroom instructional approach on high school students’ content knowledge and attitudes toward the learning environment. Unpublished master thesis, Brigham Young University, Utah.
6. Bergmann, J., & Sams, A. (2012). Flip your classroom: Reach every student in every class every day. Washington: International Society for Technology in Education.
7. Betihavas, V., Bridgman, H., Kornhaber, R. & Cross, M. (2016). The evidence for ‘flipping out’: A systematic review of the flipped classroom in nursing education. Nurse Education Today, 38, 15–21.
8. Bishop, J. L. & Verleger, M. A. (2013, June). The flipped classroom: A survey of the research. 120. ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Atlanta, Georgia.

9. Bolat, Y. (2016). The flipped classes and education information network (EIN). Journal of Human Sciences, 13 (2), 3373-3388.
10. Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J. P. T., & Rothstein, H. R. (2009). Introduction to meta-analysis. West Sussex, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
11. Chambers, E. (2004). An introduction to meta-analysis with articles from the journal of educational research (1992–2002). The Journal of Educational Research, 98 (1), 35–44.
12. Cohen, L., Manion, L. & Morrison, K. (2007). Research methods in education. London: Routledge.
13. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical Power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrance Earlbaum Associates.
14. Correa, M. (2015). Flipping the foreign language classroom and critical pedagogies a (new) old trend. Higher Education for the Future, 2 (2), 114-125.
15. Creswell, J. W. (2014). Educational research: Planning, conducting and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (4th Edition). Harlow Essex: Pearson.
16. Çakır, E. (2017). The effect of flipped classroom on 7th grade students’ academic achievemnt, cognitive risk taking skills and computational thinking skills in science education classroom. Unpublished master thesis, On Dokuz Mayıs University, Samsun.
17. Dinçer, S. (2014). Eğitim bilimlerinde uygulamalı meta analiz. Ankara: Pegem Academy Publishing.
18. Durlak, J.A. (1995). Reading and understanding multivariate statistics. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
19. Enfield, J. (2013). Looking at the impact of the flipped classroom model of instruction on undergraduate multimedia students at CSUN. Techtrends: Linking Research & Practice To Improve Learning, 57 (6), 14-27.
20. Erdem, M. & Akkoyunlu, B. (2002). İlköğretim sosyal bilgiler dersi kapsamında beşinci sınıf öğrencileriyle yürütülen ekiple proje tabanlı öğrenme üzerine bir çalışma. Elementary Education Online, 1 (1), 2-11.
21. Ergene, T. (1999). Effectiveness of test anxiety reduction programs: A meta-analysis review. Unpublished doctoral thesis . Ohio: Ohio University.
22. Erkuş, A. (2009). Davranış bilimleri için bilimsel araştırma süreci. Ankara: Seçkin Publishing.
23. Farah, M. (2014). The impact of using flipped classroom instruction on the writing performance of twelfth grade female Emirati students in the applied technology high school (ATHS). Unpublished master thesis, The British University, Dubai.
24. Filiz, O. & Kurt, A. A. (2015). Flipped learning: Misunderstandings and the truth. Journal of Educational Sciences Research, 5 (1), 215-229.
25. Flipped Learning Network [FLN] (2014). The Four Pillars of F-L-I-P. Retrived from http://flippedlearning.org
26. Foertsch, J., Moses, G., Strikwerda, J., & Litzkow, M. (2002). Reversing the lecture/homework paradigm using eteach web-based streaming video software. Journal of Engineering Education. 9 1(3), 267-274.
27. Gerstein, J. (2014). Moving from education 1.0 through education 2.0 towards education 3.0. Experiences in Self-Determined Learning, 83-98.
28. Gillette, C., Rudolph, M., Kimble, C., Rockich-Winston, N. Smith, L. & Broedel-Zaugg, K. (2018). A meta-analysis of outcomes comparing flipped classroom and lecture. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 82 (5), 433-440.
29. Glass, G. V. (2006). Meta-analysis: The quantitative synthesis of research findings. In J. L. Green, P. B. Elmore & G. Camilli (Eds.), Handbook of Complementary Methods in Education Research. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
30. Glass, G. V. (1976). Primary, secondary, and meta-analysis of research. Educational Researcher, 5 (10), 3- 8.
31. Göğebakan Yıldız, D., Kıyıcı, G. & Altıntaş, G. (2016). A research into the flipped classroom in terms of the academic achievement, and views of the prospective teachers. Sakarya University Journal of Education, 6 (3), 186-200.
32. Guan, S. (2013). Flipped learning driven by students: a case study of a foreign language class. ICERI2013 Proceedings, 464-468.
33. Hayırsever, F. & Orhan, A. (2018). Ters yüz edilmiş öğrenme modelinin kuramsal analizi. Mersin Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 14 (2), 572-596.
34. Hedges, L.V. & Olkin, I. (1985). Statistical methods for meta-analysis. New York: Academic Press.
35. Huedo-Medina, T. B., Sanchez-Meca, J., Marin-Martinez, F., & Botella, J. (2006). Assessing heterogeneity in meta-anlaysis: Q statistic or I2 index?. Psychological Methods, 11 (2), 193-206.
36. Hunter, J. E. & Schmidt, F. L. (1990). Methods of meta-analysis: Correcting error and bias in research findings. London: Sage Publications.
37. Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., & Stanne, M. B. (2000). Cooperative learning methods: A meta analysis. University of Minnesota. Retrieved from http://www.tablelearning.com/uploads/File/EXHIBIT-B.pdf
38. Johnson, L. W. & Renner, J. D. (2012). Effect of the flipped classroom model on a secondary computer applications course: Student and teacher perceptions, questions and student achievement. Unpublished doctoral thesis, University of Louisville, Kentucky.
39. Kara, C. O. (2016). Flipped classroom. Tıp Eğitimi Dünyası Dergisi, 45, 12-26.
40. Karabulut-Ilgu, A., Jaramillo Cherrez, N. & Jahren, C. T. (2017). A systematic review of research on the flipped learning method in engineering education. British Journal of Educational Technology, doi:10.1111/bjet.12548
41. Karasar, N. (2005). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemi. Ankara: Nobel Publishing.
42. King, A. (1993). From sage on the stage to guide on the side. College Teaching, 41 (1).
43. Kong, S. C. (2014). Developing information literacy and critical thinking skills through domain knowledge learning in digital classrooms: An experience of practicing flipped classroom strategy. Computers & Education, 78, 160-173.
44. Lipsey, M. & Wilson, D. (2001). Practical meta-analysis. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
45. Mason, G. S., Shuman T. R., & Cook, K. E. (2013). Comparing the effectiveness of an inverted classroom to a traditional classroom in an upper-division engineering course, IEEE Transactıons on Education, 56 (4).
46. McMillan, J. H. & Schumacher, S. (2001). Research in education: A conceptual introduction. 5th ed. New York: Longman.
47. Miles, M. B. & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd Ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
48. Milman, N. (2012). The flipped classroom strategy: What is it and how can it best be used. Distance Learning, 9 (3), 85-87.
49. O'Neil, K., Kelly, T., & Bone, S. (2012, June). We turned learning on its ear: flipping the developmental classroom. World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications, Chesapeake, VA.
50. Özcan, Ş. (2008). The effect of gender of education administrators and of education administrators who participated in the service training to their tasks: a meta-analysis. Unpublished doctoral thesis. Marmara University. İstanbul.
51. Petticrew, M., & Roberts, H. (2006). Systematic reviews in the social sciences: A practical guide. Malden: Blackwell Publishing.
52. Rosenthal, R. (1979). The 'file drawer' problem and tolerance for null results. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 638-641.
53. Sağlam, M. & Yüksel, İ. (2007). Meta-analysis and meta-evaluation methods in program evaluation. Journal of Social Sciences, 18, 175-188.
54. Sterne, J. A. C., & Egger, M. (2001). Funnel plots for detecting bias in meta-analysis: Guidelines on choice of axis. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 54 (10), 1046-1055.
55. Strayer, J. (2012). How learning in an inverted classroom influences cooperation, innovation and task orientation. Learning Environments Research, 15 (2), 171-193.
56. Strayer, J. (2007). The effects of the classroom flip on learning enviroment: A comparison of learning activity in a tradional classroom and a flip classroom that used an intelligent tutoring system. Unpublished doctoral thesis, The Ohio State University, Ohio.
57. Talbert, R. (2017). Flipped learning: A guide for higher education faculty. Virginia: Stylus Publishing.
58. Tan, C., Yue, W.G. & Fu, Y. (2017). Effectiveness of flipped classrooms in nursing education: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Chinese Nursing Research, 4, 192-200.
59. Touchton, M. (2015). Flipping the classroom and student performance in advanced statistics: Evidence from a quasi-experiment. Journal of Political Science Education, 11 (1), 28-44.
60. Torun, F. & Dargut, T. (2015). A proposal for the applicability of flipped classroom model in mobile learning environments. Journal of Educational Sciences, 6 (2), 20-29.
61. Üstün, U. & Eryılmaz, A. (2014). A research methodology to conduct effective research syntheses: Meta-analysis. Education and Science, 39 (174), 1-32.
62. Wells, K., & Littell, J. H. (2009). Study quality assessment in systematic reviews of research on intervention effects. Research on Social Work Practice, 19 (1), 52-62.
63. Yestrebsky, C. L. (2015). Flipping the classroom in a large chemistry class research university environment. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 191, 1113–1118.
64. Yıldırım, A. & Şimşek, H. (2011). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri. Ankara: Seçkin Publishing.
65. Zainuddin, Z. & Halili, S. H. (2016). Flipped classroom research and trends from different fields of study. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 17 (3), 313-340.
66. Akgün, M. & Atıcı, B. (2017). The effect of flipped classroom on learners’ academic achievements and views. Kastamonu Education Journal, 25 (1), 329-344.
67. Aydın, B. (2016). The effects of flipped classroom model on academic achievement, homework/task stress level and transfer of learning. Unpublished master thesis, Süleyman Demirel University, Isparta.
68. Aydın, G. (2016). The investigation of the effect of flipped classroom model on undergraduate students’ attitude, self-efficacy and academic achievement towards programming. Unpublished master thesis, Dokuz Eylül University, İzmir.
69. Boyraz, S. & Ocak, G. (2017). Implementation of flipped education into Turkish EFL teaching context. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 13 (2), 426-439.
70. Çakır, E. (2017). The effect of flipped classroom on 7th grade students’ academic achievemnt, cognitive risk taking skills and computational thinking skills in science education classroom. Unpublished master thesis, On dokuz Mayıs University, Samsun.
71. Göğebakan Yıldız, D., Kıyıcı, G. & Altıntaş, G. (2016). A research into the flipped classroom in terms of the academic achievement, and views of the prospective teachers. Sakarya University Journal of Education, 6 (3), 186-200.
72. Güç, F. (2017). The effect of the flipped classroom practice on the rational numbers and operations with rational numbers. Unpublished master thesis, Amasya University, Amasya.
73. Kurt, G. (2017). Implementing the flipped classroom in teacher education: evidence from Turkey. Educational Technology & Society, 20 (1), 211–221.
74. Özpınar, İ. Aydoğan Yenmez, A. & Gökçe, S. (2016). An application of flipped classroom method in the instructional technologies and material development course. Journal of Education and training Studies, 4 (12), 213-226.
75. Sağlam, D. (2016). The effect of flipped classroom model on the academic achievements and attitudes of students in English language teaching. Unpublished master thesis, Bülent Ecevit University, Zonguldak.
76. Topalak, Ş. (2016). The effect of flipped classroom model on the beginner level piano teaching. Unpublished doctoral thesis, İnönü University, Malatya.
77. Turan, Z. (2015). The evaluation of flipped classroom method and examination of its effects on academic achievement, cognitive load and motivation. Unpublished doctoral thesis, Atatürk University, Erzurum.
78. Yavuz, M. (2016). An investigation into the effects of flipped classroom applications on the academic success and experiences of the students at secondary school. Unpublished master thesis, Atatürk University, Erzurum.