The Relationship between Altruism and Life Satisfaction: Mediator Role of Cognitive Flexibility

Öz

Life satisfaction is one of the most basic goals of human beings. Covering all aspects of life satisfaction, the main dynamic and source of life motivation will be a key to human happiness. There are several factors affecting life satisfaction. This particular study probed how altruistic behaviors affect life satisfaction and how cognitive flexibility mediates the relationship between these two variables. A total of 559 undergraduate students aged between 18 and 36 (M = 21) studying at six different faculties participated in the study. The research data were collected through the scales of life satisfaction, cognitive flexibility and altruism measurement. The findings indicated that altruism is an important predictor of cognitive flexibility and life satisfaction and that cognitive flexibility is an important predictor of life satisfaction. It was also found that cognitive flexibility mediates the influence of altruism on young adult’s life satisfaction. The study concludes that students should be encouraged to exhibit altruistic behaviors to achieve life satisfaction. More importantly, it is believed that improving students’ flexible thinking skills as well as altruistic behaviors will increase their life satisfaction.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• life satisfaction,altruism,cognitive flexibility,mediator analysis

Özgecilik ve Yaşam Doyumu Arasındaki İlişki: Bilişsel Esnekliğin Aracı Rolü

Öz

Yaşam doyumu, insanın en temel amaçlarından biridir. Yaşam motivasyonunun temel kaynağı ve dinamiği olan yaşam doyumunun tüm yönlerinin ortaya çıkarılması insan mutluluğunun önemli bir kaynağı olacaktır. Yaşam doyumunu etkileyen birçok faktör bulunmaktadır. Bu çalışmada özgeci davranışların yaşam doyumunu nasıl etkilediğini ve bilişsel esnekliğin bu iki değişken arasındaki aracı rolü araştırılmaktadır. Çalışmaya yaşları 18 ve 36 (Ort = 21) arasında değişen altı farklı fakültedeki559 üniversite öğrencisi dâhil edilmiştir. Veri toplamada yaşam doyumu, bilişsel esneklik ve özgecilik ölçekleri kullanılmıştır. Bulgulara göre özgeciliğin bilişsel esneklik ve yaşam doyumunun önemli bir yordayıcısı olduğu bulunmuştur. Ayrıca bilişsel esnekliğin yaşam doyumunun önemli bir yordayıcısı olduğu bulunmuştur. Son olarak bilişsel esnekliğin, özgeciliğin genç yetişkinin yaşam doyumu üzerindeki etkisine aracılık ettiği bulunmuştur. Sonuç olarak öğrenciler yaşam doyumuna ulaşabilmeleri için özgecil davranış sergilemeye teşvik edilmelidirler. Daha da önemlisi, özgecil davranışlarla birlikte öğrencilere esnek düşünme yeteneği kazandırmak yaşam doyumlarını artıracaktır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Yaşam doyumu,Özgecilik,Bilişsel esneklik,Aracılık analizi

Kaynakça

1. Altunkol, F. (2011). The analysis of the relation between cognitive flexibility and perceived stress levels of college students (Unpublished master’s thesis). Çukurova University, Institute of Social Sciences, Turkey.
2. Altunkol, F. (2017). Bilişsel esneklik eğitim programının lise öğrencilerinin bilişsel esneklik ile algilanan stress düzeylerine ve stresle başa çıkma tarzlarına etkisi (Unpublished doctoral dissertation).Çukurova University, Institute of Social Sciences, Turkey.
3. Asıcı, E., & İkiz, F. E. (2015). Mutluluğa giden bir yol: Bilişsel esneklik. Mehmet Akif Ersoy Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 1(35), 191-211.
4. Bai, Y. (2011). Studies on the relationship among cognitive flexibility, coping styles and mental health of the teachers in the middle occupational school (Unpublished master’s thesis).Hebei University, PRC.
5. Batson, C. D. (1991). The altruism question: Toward a social-psychological answer. Hillsdale, NJ, England: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
6. Batson, C. D. (2012). A history of prosocial behavior research. In A. W. Kruglanski & W. Stroebe, Handbook of the History of Social Psychology (p. 243-264). Newyork: Psychology Press.
7. Batson, C. D., Ahmad, N., Lishner, D. A., & Tsang, J. (2016). Empathy and altruism. In K. W. Brown & M. R. Leary (Ed.), Oxford handbook of hypo-egoic phenomena: Theory and research on the quiet ego (p. 161-174). Oxford University Press.
8. Becchettibecchetti, L., Corrado, L., & Conzo, P. (2017).Sociability, altruism and well-being. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 41(2), 441-486.

9. Bedel, A. & Ulubey, E. (2015). Ergenlerde başa çıkma stratejilerini açıklamada bilişsel esnekliğin rolü. Elektronik Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 14(55), 291-300.
10. Bentler, P. M. & Bonett, D. G. (1980).Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88, 588-606.
11. Bettencourt, L. A. & Brown, S. W. (1997). Contact employees: relationships among workplace fairness, job satisfaction and prosocial service behaviors. Journal of Retailing, 73(1), 39–61. doi:10.1016/S0022-4359(97)90014-2.
12. Bollen, K. A. (1989). A new incremental fit index for general structural equation models. Sociological Methods & Research, 17(3), 303-316. doi: 10.1177/0049124189017003004
13. Bonanno, G. A., Papa, A., Lalande, K., Westphal, M., & Coifman, K. (2004). The importance of being flexible: The ability to both enhance and suppress emotional expression predicts long-term adjustment. Psychological Science, 15(7), 482-487.
14. Browne, M.W. & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136-162). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
15. Caprara, G. V. & Steca, P. (2005).Self-efficacy beliefs as determinants of prosocial behavior conducive to life satisfaction across ages. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 24(2), 191-217. doi:10.1521/jscp.24.2.191.62271.
16. Caprara, G. V., Barbaranelli, C., Pastorelli, C., Bandura, A., & Zimbardo, P. G. (2000). Prosocial foundations of children’s academic achievement. Psychological Science, 11(4), 302-306. doi:10.1111/1467-9280.00260.
17. Certel, Z., Bahadır, Z., Kabaca, H. E., & Seraki, A. S. (2018). Professional experience, tolerance, empathy and reading interests as variables predicting cognitive flexibilities of physical education teachers. International Journal On New Trends In Education & Their Implications, 9(3).
18. Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. Boston: Pearson.
19. Dennis, J. P. & Vander Wal, J. S. (2009). The cognitive flexibility inventory: instrument development and estimates of reliability and validity. Cognitive Therapy Research, 34, 241–253.
20. Diener, E. D., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of personality assessment, 49(1), 71-75. doi:10.1207/s15327752jpa4901_13
21. Dovidio, J. F., Piliavin, J. A., Schroeder, D. A., & Penner, L. A. (2006). The social psychology of prosocial behavior. Mahwah, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
22. Dulin, P., Hill, R. D., Anderson, J., & Rasmussen, D. (2001). Altruism as a predictor of life satisfaction in a sample of low-income older adult service providers. Journal of Mental Health and Aging,7(3), 349-360.
23. Dunleavy, K. N. & Martin, M. (2006). A convergent validity study of the decision-making collaboration scale. American Journal of Psychology, 8(2), 339-344.
24. Durak, M., Senol-Durak, E., & Gençöz, T. (2010). Psychometric properties of the satisfaction with life scale among Turkish university students, correctional officers, and elderly adults. Social Indicators Research, 99(3), 413-429.
25. Dusselier, L., Dunn, B., Wang, Y., Shelley II, M. C. & Whalen, D. F. (2005). Personal, health, academic, and environmental predictors of stress for residence hall students. Journal of American College Health, 54(1), 15–24.
26. Gülaçtı, F., Gür, R., & Çiftçi, Z. (2017). Öğretmen adaylarının özgecilik ve yaşam doyumu düzeylerinin incelenmesi. Pegem Atif İndeksi, 473-484. doi:10.14527/9786053188407.31
27. Hooper, D., Coughlan, J., & Mullen, M. (2008). Structural equation modelling: Guidelines for determining model fit. Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 6(1), 53–60.
28. Hossain, M. A., Dwivedi, Y. K., Chan, C., Standing, C., & Olanrewaju, A. S. (2018). Sharing political content in online social media: A planned and unplanned behaviour approach. Information Systems Frontiers,20(3), 485-501. doi:10.1007/s10796-017-9820-9
29. Hullman, G. A. (2007). Communicative adaptability scale: Evaluating its use as an ‘other-report’ measure. Communication Reports, 20(2), 51-74. doi:10.1080/08934210701643693
30. Ionescu, T. (2011). Exploring the nature of cognitive flexibility. New Ideas in Psychology, 30(2), 190-200.
31. Johnco, C., Wuthrich V. M., & Rapee, R. M. (2014). The influence of cognitive flexibility on treatment outcome and cognitive restructuring skill acquisition during cognitive behavioural treatment for anxiety and depression in older adults: Results of a pilot study. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 57, 55- 64.
32. Kahana, E., Bhatta, T., Lovegreen, L. D., Kahana, B., & Midlarsky, E. (2013). Altruism, helping, and volunteering: pathways to well-being in late life. Journal of Aging and Health, 25(1), 159-187. doi: 10.1177/0898264312469665.
33. Kahana, E., Kahana, B., Lovegreen, L., Kahana, J., Brown, J., & Kulle, D. (2011). Health-care consumerism and access to health care: Educating elders to improve both preventive and end-of-life care. Research in the Sociology of Health Care, 29, 173-193. doi:10.1108/S0275-4959(2011)0000029010
34. Kaya, Ş., Arslan, A., Özgen, D., Cesaretli, E., Bal, H.K., & Şen, Ş., (2015). 14-18 yaş arası bireylerin özgecilik ile yaşam doyumu arasındaki ilişki. Retrieved from https://prezi.com/tg7f9eytksib/ondokuz-mayis-universitesi-egitim-fakultesi-rehberlik-vepsi/
35. Keith, J., Velezmoro, R., & O’brien, C. (2015). Correlates of cognitive flexibility in veterans seeking treatment for posttraumatic stress disorder. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 203(4), 287-293. doi: 10.1097/NMD.0000000000000280
36. Kline, R. B. (2015). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York: Guilford publications.
37. Koesten , J., Schrodt, P., & Ford, D. J. (2009). Cognitive flexibility as a mediator of family communication environments and young adults' well-being. Health Communication, 24(1), 82-94. doi: 10.1080/10410230802607024
38. Layous, K., Nelson, S.K., Oberle, E., Schonert-Reichl, K.A., & Lyubomirsky, S. (2012). Kindness counts: prompting prosocial behavior in preadolescents boosts peer acceptance and well-being. PLoS ONE 7(12): e51380. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0051380
39. Little, T. D., Cunningham, W. A., Shahar, G., & Widaman, K. F. (2002). To parcel or not to parcel: Exploring the question, weighing the merits. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 151–173.
40. Martin, M. M., & Anderson, C. M. (1998). The cognitive flexibility scale: Three validity studies. Communication Reports, 11(1), 1-9. doi:10.1080/08934219809367680
41. Martin, M. M., & Anderson, C. M. (2001).The relationship between cognitive flexibility and affinity-seeking strategies. Advances in Psychological Research, 4, 69-76.
42. Martin, M. M., & Rubin, R. B. (1995).A new measure of cognitive flexibility. Psychological reports, 76(2), 623-626. doi:10.2466/pr0.1995.76.2.623
43. Martin, M. M., Anderson, C. M., & Thweatt, K. S. (1998). Individuals’ perceptions of their communication behaviors: A validity study of the relationship between the cognitive flexibility scale and the communication flexibility scale with aggressive communication traits. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 13(3), 531-540.
44. Martin, M. M.,Staggers, S. M., & Anderson, C. M. (2011). The relationships between cognitive flexibility with dogmatism, intellectual flexibility, preference for consistency, and self-compassion. Communication Research Reports, 28(3), 275-280.
45. Meadows, S. O., Brown, J. S., & Elder, G. H. (2006). Depressive symptoms, stress, and support: Gendered trajectories from adolescence to young adulthood. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 35(1), 89-99.
46. Midlarsky, E., & Kahana, E. (1994). Altruism in later life (vol. 196). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
47. Miranda, R. & Nolen-Hoeksema, S. (2007). Brooding and reflection: Rumination predicts suicidal ideation at 1-year follow-up in a community sample. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 45(12), 3088-3095.
48. Nazarzadeh, R. S., Fazeli, M., Aval, M. M. & Shourch, R. M. (2015). Effectiveness of cognitive-behavior therapy on cognitive flexibility in perfectionist. Psychology, 6(14), 1780.
49. Neugarten, B., Havighurst, R., & Tobin, S. (1961). The measure of life satisfaction. Journal of Gerontology, 16, 134-143.
50. Newman, B. M. & Newman, P. R. (2018). Development through life: A psychosocial approach. Boston: Cengage Learning
51. Pallant, J. (2001). SPSS survival manual. Maidenhead, PA: Open University Press.
52. Palm, K. M. & Follette, V. M. (2011).The roles of cognitive flexibility and experiential avoidance in explaining psychological distress in survivors of interpersonal victimization. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 33(1), 79-86.
53. Park, N. (2004). The role of subjective well-being in positive youth development. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 591(1), 25-39. doi:10.1177/0002716203260078
54. Pavot W. & Diener, E. (2009) Review of the satisfaction with life scale. In E. Diener (ed), Assessing well-being. Social Indicators Research Series, 39. Dordrecht: Springer
55. Post, S. G. (2005). Altruism, happiness, and health: It’s good to be good. International Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 12(2), 66-77. doi:10.1207/s15327558ijbm1202_4
56. Recepoğlu, E. (2013). Öğretmen adaylarının yaşam doyumları ile öğretmenlik mesleğine ilişkin tutumları arasındaki ilişkinin incelenmesi. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, Special Issue (1), 311-326.
57. Schreiber, J. B., Nora, A., Stage, F. K., Barlow, E. A., & King, J. (2006). Reporting structural equation modeling and confirmatory factor analysis results: A review. The Journal of Educational Research, 99(6), 323-338. doi:10.3200/JOER.99.6.323-338.
58. Scott, W. A. (1962), Cognitive complexity and cognitive flexibility. American Sociological Association Sociometry, 25(4), 405-414.
59. Segrin, C. (2006). Family interactions and well-being: Integrative perspectives. Journal of Family Communication, 6, 3-21.
60. Tian, L., Chu, S., & Huebner, E. S. (2016). The chain of relationships among gratitude, prosocial behavior and elementary school students’ school satisfaction: The role of school affect. Child Indicators Research, 9(2), 515-532.
61. Timarová, S., & Salaets, H. (2011). Learning styles, motivation and cognitive flexibility in interpreter training: Self-selection and aptitude. Interpreting, 13(1), 31-52. doi: 10.1075/intp.13.1.03tim
62. Topuz, C. (2013). The relationship of altruism with subjective and psychological well-being among university students (Unpublished master’s thesis). Fatih University, Institute of Social Sciences, Turkey.
63. Ummet, D., Eksi, H., & Otrar, M. (2015). Altruism among university students: A study of transactional analysis ego states and life satisfaction. The Anthropologist, 20(3), 625-635. doi: 10.1080/09720073.2015.11891766
64. Ümmet, D. (2012). The investigation of altruism behavior of college students in the context of transactional analysis ego states and life satisfaction (Unpublished doctoral dissertation).Marmara University, Institute of Educational Sciences, Turkey.
65. Yavuzer, N. (2017). Bir prososyal davranış kaynağı olarak özgeci motivasyonun ilgili alan yazını ışığında değerlendirilmesi. Hasan Ali Yücel Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 14(27), 105-126.
66. Zhang, J. H. (2011). Relationship between cognitive flexibility and coping strategies of high school students (Unpublished master’s thesis). Hebei University, PRC.