Divorce in Turkish Society: Personal and Family of Origin Characteristics

Öz

In this study, it was aimed to examine the couple relationships of adult individuals whose marriage experience resulted in divorce, their perspectives regarding the relational interactions with divorce and the interactions with their family of origin. The study is a descriptive one, and employs the phenomenological design, one of the qualitative research methods. In this study, data was collected from the participants through the interview technique in the spring term of 2019, and the content analysis method was used to analyze the data. The study group consisted of 39 divorced (27 female; 12 male) individuals aged between 23-55, who did not have any psychiatric diagnosis and living in a city center in Central Anatolia. Semi-structured interview form was used to collect data. As a result, it was concluded that the participants had too much difficulty in couple relationships, and the relationships were affected from the family of origin relationships, premarital experiences and socio-cultural elements.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Couple relationship
• marriage
• divorce
• family of origin
• socio-cultural transfers.

Türk Toplumunda Boşanma: Kişisel ve Kök Aile Özellikleri

Öz

Bu araştırmada, evlilik deneyimi boşanma ile sonuçlanmış yetişkin bireylerin çift ilişkileri ve boşanma sürecine ilişkin kendi bireysel deneyimleri, boşanmaya ilişkin ilişkisel ve kök aileleri ile olan etkileşimlerine dair bakış açılarının incelenmesi amaçlanmıştır. Araştırma betimsel bir araştırma olup nitel araştırma desenlerinden olgubilim deseninde gerçekleştirilmiştir. Bu araştırmada veriler 2019 yılı bahar döneminde görüşme tekniği ile toplanmış ve verilerin analizi için içerik analizi yöntemi kullanılmıştır. Araştırmanın çalışma grubu, Türkiye'de İç Anadolu'da bir ilde şehir merkezinde yaşayan ve psikiyatrik tanısı olmayan 23-55 yaş arası boşanmış 39 (27 kadın, 12 erkek) kişiden oluşmaktadır. Veri toplamak için yarı yapılandırılmış görüşme formu kullanılmıştır. Sonuç olarak, katılımcıların çift ilişkilerinde çok fazla güçlük çektikleri ve evliliklerinde kök aile ilişkilerinden, evlilik öncesi deneyimlerden ve sosyo-kültürel unsurlardan etkilendikleri sonucuna varılmıştır. 

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Çift ilişkisi
• evlilik
• boşanma
• kök aile sosyo-kültürel aktarımlar.

Kaynakça

1. Akgün, R. & Polat-Uluocak, G. (2010). Effective communication and problem solving for marriage: A group work with women in a community center. Sosyal Politika Çalışmaları Dergisi, 23 (23), 9-22. Retrieved from https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/spcd/issue/21111/227377
2. Aktaş, G. (2013). Woman’s identity in the context of feminist discourse: Being a woman in a male dominated society. Journal of Faculty of Letters, 30(1), 53-72.
3. Amato, P. R., & Gilbreth, J. G. (1999). Nonresident fathers and children's well-being: A meta-analysis. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 61(3), 557-573. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/353560
4. Amato, P. R., & Keith, B. (1991). Parental divorce and the well-being of children: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 110(1), 26-46. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.110.1.26
5. Anthony, C. J., DiPerna, J. C., & Amato, P. R. (2014). Divorce, approaches to learning, and children's academic achievement: A longitudinal analysis of mediated and moderated effects. Journal of School Psychology, 52(3), 249-261. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2014.03.003
6. Arıkan, Ç. (1996). Halkın boşanmaya ilişkin tutumları araştırması (Public attitudes towards divorce research). T.C. Başbakanlık Aile ve Sosyal Araştırmalar Genel Müdürlüğü Yayınları, Bilim Serisi: 96, Öncü Ltd Şti. Ankara.
7. Belsky, J., & Kelly, J. (1994). Transition to parenthood: How a first child changes a marriage: Which couples grow closer or apart, and why? Delacorte Press.
8. Beşpınar, F., & Beşpınar, L. (2017). Household structure in Turkey and practical in double wedding picture: reflections of changes also the traditions. Nüfusbilim Dergisi, 39 (1), 109-149. Retrieved from https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/nufusbilim/issue/49169/628425

9. Binay, M . (2018). Analysis of the Causes for Divorce in Turkey and Alternative Dispute Methods. Ombudsman Akademik , 5 (9) , 237-267.
10. Bohannon, P. (1970). Divorce and after. NY: Doubleday.
11. Booth, A., & Amato, P. R. (2001). Parental predivorce relations and offspring postdivorce well-being. Journal of Marriage and Family, 63(1), 197-212. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2001.00197.x
12. Bowen, M. (1976). Theory in the practice of psychotherapy. In P. J. Guerin. (Ed.), Family Therapy (pp. 42-90) NY: Gardner.
13. Bumpass, L. L. & Sweet, J. A. (1972). Differentails in marital instability: 1970, American Sociological Review, 37(6), ss. 754-766.
14. Booth, A., & Edwards, J. N. (1985). Age at marriage and marital instability, Journal of Marriage and Family, 47(1), 67-75.
15. Burns, A., & Dunlop, R. (2002). Parental marital quality and family conflict: Longitudinal effects on adolescents from divorcing and non-divorcing families. Journal of Divorce & Remarriage, 37(1-2), 57-74. http://dx.doi.org/10.1300/J087v37n01_04
16. Can, Y, Aksu, N . (2016). Boşanma sürecinde ve sonrasinda kadin. Elektronik Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 15 (58) 888-902. Doi: https://doi.org/10.17755/esosder.258824
17. Cherlin, A. J. ( 2010 ). Demographic trends in the United States: a review of research in the 2000s. Journal of Marriage and Family, 72, 403 – 419.
18. Clarke-Stewart, A., & Brentano, C. (2006). A review of “divorce: causes and consequences. Yale University Press.
19. Das, C. (2011). British-Indian adult children of divorce: Context, impact and coping. United Kingdom: Ashgate.
20. Demircioğlu, N., S. (2000). Effects on the women's status and sex role of divorce. (Unpublished doctorate thesis). Ege University, Institute of Social Sciences. İzmir.
21. Duman, N, (2018). Boşanmanın psiko-sosyal sebepleri üzerine bir değerlendirme araştırma makalesi, International Journal of Human Studies, 2 (2018), 246-255. Doi: https://doi.org/10.35235/uicd.464622
22. Dwairy, M. (2006). Counseling and psychotherapy with arabs and muslims: a culturally sensitive approach. Columbia University New York and London: Teachers College Press.
23. Erdur-Baker, Ö. (2007). Psikolojik danışma ve kültürel faktörler. Türk Psikolojik Danışma ve Rehberlik Dergisi, 3, 27, 109-122.
24. Günindi, A. E. (2010). Türk atasözleri ve deyimlerinde kadına yönelik toplumsal cinsiyet rolleri. Gazi Türkiyat Türkoloji Araştırmaları Dergisi, 0(6), 167-182.
25. Furman, R., Langer, C. L., & Taylor, D. B. (2010). Analyzing narratives through poetic forms and structures in gerontology: Applying new tools in qualitative research. Journal of Poetry Therapy, 23 (2), 61-71.
26. Georgas, J. (2006). Families and family change. In Families across Cultures A 30-Nation Psychological Study (Eds. J. Georgas, J. W. Berry, F. J. R. van de Vijver, Ç. Kağıtçıbaşı, Poortinga, Y. H., pp. 3-51). Cambridge University Press.
27. Goldenberg, H., & Goldenberg, I. (2012). Family therapy: An overview (8th ed.). Belmont: Thomson Brooks/Cole publishers.
28. Gostečnik, C. (2010). Sistemske teorije in praksa. [System theory and practice], Ljubljana,
29. Brat Frančišek in Frančiškanski družinski inštitut; N. Rijavec Klobučar, Transformativno učenje v partnerskih odnosih na prehodu v starševstvo [Transformative learning in the transition to parenthood], “Andragoška spoznanja” 17 (2011) 3, 31–39.
30. Gülerce, A. (1996). Psychological patterns of family in Turkey. Boğaziçi Matbaası.
31. Gülerce, A. (2007). Transformational model of family and psychological patterns of family in Turkey. Boğaziçi Matbaası.
32. Havermans, N., Botterman, S., & Matthijs, K. (2014). Family resources as mediators in the relation between divorce and children's school engagement. The Social Science Journal, 51(4), 564-579. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.soscij.2014.04.001
33. Hope, S., Power, C., & Rodgers, B. (1999). Does financial hardship account for elevated psychological distress in lone mothers? Social Science & Medicine, 49(12),1637-49.
34. Huston, T. L., Caughlin, J. P., Houts, R. M., Smith, S. E., & George, L. J. (2001). The connubial crucible: Newlywed years as predictors of marital delight, distress, and divorce. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 237-252.
35. Kağıtçıbaşı, Ç. ve Cemalcılar, Z. (2014). Dünden bugüne insan ve insanlar sosyal psikolojiye giriş. Evrim yayınevi.
36. Karakaya, Ş. (2018). The effect of divorce on children’s self-esteem and social problem solving skills: a comparative study of Denizli in the sample. (Unpublished Master Thesis). Hacettepe University/Institute of Social Sciences. Ankara.
37. Karney, B. R., & Bradbury, T. N. (1995). The longitudinal course of marital quality and stability: A review of theory, methods, and research. Psychological Bulletin, 118(1), 3-34. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033- 2909.118.1.3
38. Karney, B. R., & Bradbury, T. N. (1997). Neuroticism, marital interaction, and the trajectory of marital satisfaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72(5), 1075-1092. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.72.5.1075
39. Karney , B.R. , Bradbury , T.N. , & Johnson , M.D. ( 1999 ). Deconstructing stability: The distinction between the course of a close relationship and its endpoint . In J.M. Adams & W.H. Jones (Eds.), Handbook of interpersonal commitment and relationship stability (pp. 481 – 499 ). New York : Plenum Press .
40. Kerr, M. (1981). Family systems theory and therapy. In A. S. Gurman ve D. P. Kniskern (Eds.), Handbook of family therapy (pp. 226-264). New York: Brunner/Mazel.
41. Klobučar, N.R. (2016). Transition to Parenthood and Susceptibility to Divorce: qualitative research of divorced young parents in Slovenia. Wydawnictwo Naukowe Uniwersytetu Papieskiego Jana Pawła II w Krakowie. 6(1), 157-177.
42. Kurter, M. F., Jencius, M., & Duba, J. D. (2004). A Turkish perspective on family therapy: An interview with Hürol Fisiloğlu. The Family Journal: Counseling and Therapy for Couples and Families, 12(3), 319-323.
43. Laver R. H., & Laver, J. C. (1991). Marriage and Family The Quest For Intimacy. Wm.C. Brown Publishers.
44. Markman, H. J., Rhoades, G. K., Stanley, S. M., Ragan, E. P., & Whitton, S. W. (2010). The premarital communication roots of marital distress and divorce: The first five years of marriage. Journal of Family Psychology, 24(3), 289-298. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0019481
45. McGoldrick, M., Gerson, R., & Petry, S. (2008). Genograms: Assessment and intervention. New York, NY: W.W. Norton.
46. Mocan-Aydın, G. (2000). Western models of counseling and psychotherapy within Turkey: Crossing cultural boundaries. The Counseling Psychologist, 28(2), 281-298.
47. Orbuch, T. L., Veroff, J., Hassan, H., & Horrocks, J. (2002). Who will divorce: A 14-year longitudinal study of Black couples and White couples. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 19(2), 179-202. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0265407502192002
48. Quah, S. R. (2008). Families in Asia Home and Kin. NY: Routledge.
49. Öngider, N . (2013). Boşanmanın çocuk üzerindeki etkileri. Psikiyatride Güncel Yaklaşımlar, 5 (2), 140-161 . DOI: 10.5455/cap.20130510.
50. Özuğurlu, K. (2006). Eşlerde Problem Çözme. Ana – Baba Okulu (12. Baskı). İçinde (201-219). Remzi Kitabevi.
51. Robinson, M. (1991). Family transformation through divorce and remarriage: A systemic approach. Routledge Publication.
52. Sanizah, A., Hasfariza, F., Norin Rahayu, S., Nur Niswah Naslina, A.: Determinants of marital dissolution: a survival analysis approach. Int. J. Econ. Stat. 2, 348–354 (2014)
53. Segrin, C., & Flora, J. (2011). Family Communication. NY: Routledge.
54. Sucu, İ. (2007). Boşanmış Kadınların Boşanma Nedenleri ve Boşanma Sonrası Toplumsal
55. Kabulleri (Sakarya İli Örneği). (Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi), Sakarya Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü. Sakarya.
56. Tavşancıl, E. ve Aslan, E. (2001). Sözel, yazılı ve diğer materyaller için içerik analizi ve uygulama örnekleri. Epsilon Yayınevi.
57. Tedeschi, R. G., & Calhoun, L. G. (2004). Posttraumatic growth: Conceptual foundations and empirical evidence. Psychological Inquiry, 15(1), 1-18.
58. Tezcan, M. (2000). Türk Ailesi Antropolojisi, İmge Kitabevi Yayınları.
59. Türkiye İstatistik Kurumu (TÜİK) (2014). Evlenme ve boşanma istatistikleri. http://www.tuik.gov.tr/PreHaberBultenleri.do?id=16051.
60. Türkiye Boşanma Nedenleri Araştırması (TBNA), (2014). T.C. Aile ve Sosyal Politikalar Bakanlığı Aile ve Toplum Hizmetleri Genel Müdürlüğü. Türkiye Boşanma Nedenleri Araştırması. Araştırma ve Sosyal Politika Serisi 23. Birinci Basım.
61. Watzlawick, P., Bavelas, J. B., Jackson, D. D., & O'Hanlon, B. (2011). Pragmatics of human communication: A study of interactional patterns, pathologies and paradoxes. WW Norton ve Company
62. Weinberger, M. I., Hofstein, Y., & Whitbourne,S. K. (2008). Intimacy in young adulthood as a predictor of divorce in midlife. Personal Relationships, 15(4), .551-557.
63. Yıldırım, İ. (2007). Partner selection among college students. Turkish Psychological Counseling and Guidance Journal, 3 (27) , 15-30.
64. Yıldırım, A. & Şimşek, H. (2006). Sosyal Bilimlerde Nitel Araştırma Yöntemleri. 6. Baskı. Seçkin Yayıncılık
65. Yıldız, D. 2018. Early marriages in the context of socio-cultural factors, (Unpublished master’s thesis). Hacettepe University/Institute of Social Sciences. Ankara.