FACULTY PERSPECTIVES OF COMMUNITY SERVICE LEARNING IN TEACHER EDUCATION

Yıl 2013, Cilt: 42 Sayı: 2, 18 - 35, 09.03.2014

Demet Seban

Öz

Community service learning aims to develop students’ commitment to civic participation as an active, responsible and democratic citizen through providing service responding to a need that originates in the community as well as strengthen their academic learning. In this study it is aimed to examine Community Service Practices course defined as a compulsory course in teacher education program through the lenses of faculty. Specifically, the purpose of this study is to understand how faculty explains service learning and what kind of issues they addresses with regard to advisors, participants, characteristic of the service learning experience and assessing the outcomes. Data collected from 10 education faculty members with semi-structured interviews and analyzed using qualitative content analysis.  The emerging themes – objectives, process and service learning in the teacher education program- framed the examination of the faculty perceptions.  As a result, the faculty aimed to provide pre-service teachers to be sensitive to the community needs as well as developing their problem solving and project development and management skills. They emphasized the importance of advisor’s competence and proficiency, the selection of the community partner. They also stressed the difficulty of evaluation, the inadequate time for the course and the importance of applying the course as voluntary-based instead of compulsory. The need for further research examining community service practices that includes all participants- students, faculty, and community partners- and its’ long-term effects on students using longitudinal studies appeared as new research suggestions.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Community service practice, teacher education, advisor perspectives

Kaynakça

• Arkün, S. & Seferoğlu, S. S. (2010, Nisan). Topluma hizmet uygulamaları dersinin işlenişine yönelik bir örnek uygulama ve sürece ilişkin öğrenci görüşlerinin değerlendirilmesi. 7. Eğitimde İyi Örnekler Konferansı’nda sunulmuştur, Sabancı Üniversitesi, İstanbul.
• Banerjee, M. & Hausafus, C. O. (2007). Faculty use of service-learning: Perceptions, motivations, and impediments for the human sciences. Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning 14(1), 32-45.
• Birge, J. (2005). The aesthetical basis for service learning practice. In D. W. Butin (Ed.), Service-learning in higher education: Critical issues and directions (pp. 195-203). Gordonsville, VA: Palgrave Macmillan.
• Bloomgarden, A. H. & O’Meara, K. (2007). Faculty role integration and community engagement: Harmony or cacophony? Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning, 13(2), 5-18.
• Bringle , R. G.& Hatcher, J. A. (1996). Implementing service learning in higher education. Journal of Higher Education, 67(2), 221-239.
• Bringle, R. G., & Hatcher, J. A. (1995). A service-learning curriculum for faculty. Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning, 2(1), 112-122.
• Butin, D. (2005b). Service-learning as postmodern pedagogy. In D. Butin (Ed.), Service-learning in higher education: Critical issues and directions (pp. 89–104). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
• Cipolle, S. (2004) Service-learning as a counter-hegemonic practice: evidence pro and con. Multicultural Education, 11(3), 12-23.
• Dinçer, Ç. Ergül, A. Şen, M. & Çabuk, B. (2011). Bir topluma hizmet uygulaması örneği: “Haydi kavram oyuncaklarıyla oynayalım”. Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi, 19(1), 19-38.
• Ekiz, D. (2009). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri. Ankara: Anı Yayıncılık.
• Elma, C., Kesten, A., Kıroglu, K., Uzun, E. M., Dicle, A. N., & Palavan, Ö. (2011). Kurum yöneticilerinin bakış açısıyla topluma hizmet. Elektronik Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 10(35), 45-63.
• Elma, C., Kesten, A., Kıroglu, K., Uzun, E. M., Dicle, A. N., & Palavan, Ö. (2010). Öğretmen adaylarının topluma hizmet uygulamaları dersine ilişkin algıları. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Yönetimi, 16(2), 231-252.
• Howard, J. (2003). Service-learning research: Foundational issues. In S. H. Billig & A. S. Waterman (Eds.), Studying service-learning: Innovations in education research methodology (pp. 1-12). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
• O'Grady, C. (2000). Integrating service learning and multicultural education : An overview. In C. O'Grady (Ed.), Integrating service learning and multicultural education in colleges and universities (pp. 1-19). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc., Publishers.
• O’Meara, K. & Niehaus, E. (2009). Service-learning is…How faculty explain their practice Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning 16(1), 17-32.
• Özdemir, S. M. & Tokcan, H (2010). Topluma hizmet uygulamaları dersinin öğretmen adaylarının görüşlerine göre değerlendirilmesi. Selçuk Üniversitesi Ahmet Keleşoğlu Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 30, 41-61.
• Schnaubelt, T & Statham, A. (2007) Faculty perceptions of service as a mode of scholarship. Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning, 14(1), 18-31.
• Sönmez, Ö. F. (2010). Sosyal bilgiler öğretmen adaylarının topluma hizmet uygulamaları dersine yönelik görüşlerinin kazanım boyutunda değerlendirilmesi. Karadeniz Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 2(2), 53-71.
• Tuncel, G. Kop, Y & Katılmış, A. (2011). Sosyal bilgiler dersi öğretmen adaylarının “Topluma Hizmet Uygulamaları” dersine yönelik görüşleri. In Z. Kaya & U. Demiray (Eds.), 2nd International Conference on New Trends in Education and Their Implications (pp. 435-447). Ankara: Siyasal Kitapevi.
• Uğurlu, Z. & Kral, E. (2011). Öğretmen adaylarının topluma hizmet uygulamaları dersinin işleyiş süreci ve kazanımlarına ilişkin görüşleri. In Z. Kaya & U. Demiray (Eds.), 2nd International Conference on New Trends in Education and Their Implications (pp. 720-734). Ankara: Siyasal Kitapevi.
• Wade, A & Demb, A. (2009). A conceptual model to explore faculty community engagement. Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning, 15(2), 5-16.
• Ward, K. (1998). Addressing academic culture: Service learning, organizations, and faculty work. In R. A. Rhodes & J. P. F. Howard (Eds.), Academic service learning: A pedagogy ofaAction and reflection (pp. 73-80). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.