Theoretical Foundations of Project Based Curricula in Higher Education

Öz

Globalization of knowledge, development in society, culture, politics, economy, technology and industry, change in quality, national and international competition, and the knowledge, skills and competences demanded from the individuals in professional life lead to radical changes in education and instruction. This worldwide change requires the reconstruction of educational systems and development of new curricula. The educational level where the need for restructuring is felt most is higher education. Within this context, higher education curricula should align with the qualifications of the 21^st century, which is also called information age. The purpose of this literature review study is to explain the key characteristics of PBL (project-based learning) curricula as follows: the historical development of PBL, key characteristics of PBL, the characteristics of PBL curriculum components and PBL curriculum strategies in higher education. As PBL curricula, which support all the roles that universities should have (education, research, knowledge production and service to the community), are appropriate for the new generation universities, they should be analyzed through more research and within different aspects. 

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Higher education,Higher education curriculum,University 4.0,Project-based learning approach,Project-based curriculum

Yükseköğretimde Proje Tabanlı Eğitim Programlarının Kuramsal Temelleri

Öz

Bilginin küreselleşmesi, toplum, kültür, siyaset, ekonomi, teknoloji, endüstri alanlarında yaşanan gelişim, kalite anlayışındaki değişim, ulusal ve uluslararası rekabet ve yeni meslek alanlarının bireylerden talep ettiği bilgi, beceri ve yetkinlikler eğitim-öğretimde köklü değişmelere neden olmaktadır. Tüm dünyada yaşanan bu değişim, eğitim sistemlerinin ve eğitim programlarının yeniden yapılandırılmasını zorunlu kılmaktadır. Yeniden yapılandırılma ihtiyacının en çok hissedildiği eğitim kademesi ise yükseköğretimdir. Bu bağlamda, yükseköğretimde eğitim programlarının bilgi çağı olarak adlandırılan 21. yy. niteliklerine uygun hale getirilmesi gerekmektedir. Yükseköğretimde proje tabanlı eğitim programlarının temel boyutlarıyla açıklanmasını amaçlayan bu derleme çalışması dört temel başlık altında yapılandırılmıştır: yükseköğretimde proje tabanlı eğitim programlarının tarihsel gelişimi, proje tabanlı eğitim programlarının temel özellikleri, proje tabanlı eğitim programlarında dört temel yapısal boyutun özellikleri, yükseköğretimde proje tabanlı eğitim programlarında tasarım stratejileri. Üniversitelerin sahip olması gereken eğitim-öğretim, araştırma, bilgi üretimi ve topluma fayda sağlama görevlerinin tümünü destekleyen proje tabanlı eğitim programlarının yeni nesil üniversitelere uygun nitelikler taşıması nedeniyle, bu programların farklı boyutlarıyla incelenmesi ve daha çok araştırmaya konu olması gerekmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Yükseköğretim,Yükseköğretimde eğitim programları,Üniversite 4.0,Proje tabanlı öğrenme yaklaşımı,Proje tabanlı eğitim programı

Kaynakça

1. Acar, S., & Güneş, B. (2017). Sihirli bir araç olarak endüstriyel kümelenmeler. Mülkiye Dergisi, 41(2), 99-122.
2. Adıgüzel, M. (2016). Üniversite iş dünyası işbirliğinde İstanbul Ticaret Odası-İstanbul Ticaret Üniversitesi Modeli. İstanbul Ticaret Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 113.
3. Alper, A. (2008). Attitudes toward problem based learning in a new Turkish medicine curriculum. World Applied Sciences Journal, 4(6), 830-836.
4. Alper, A., Öztürk, S., & Altun, C. A. (2014). Problem Based Learning Studies in Turkey. Journal of Faculty of Educational Sciences, 47(1).
5. Akçin, E. (2006). Aktif öğretim yöntemi olarak proje tabanlı öğretim: ilkeleri, yararları ve aşamaları. Çağdaş Eğitim Dergisi, 328, 40-45.
6. Alan, G. A. E. (2016). Türkiye’de Yeni Nesil Üniversiteler. Maltepe Üniversitesi İletişim Fakültesi Dergisi, 3(2), 105-118.
7. Altbach, P. G. (2004). Globalisation and the university: Myths and realities in an unequal world. Tertiary Education & Management, 10(1), 3-25.
8. Altbach, P. G., & Salmi, J. (Eds.). (2011). The road to academic excellence: The making of world-class research universities. The World Bank.

9. Andersen, A. S., & Heilesen, S. B. (2015). The Problem-Oriented Project Work (PPL) Alternative in Self-Directed Higher Education. In Inquiry-Based Learning for Multidisciplinary Programs: A Conceptual and Practical Resource for Educators (pp. 23-41). Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
10. Andersen, A. S., & Heilesen, S. B. (Eds.). (2014). The Roskilde model: Problem-oriented learning and project work (Vol. 12). Springer.
11. Andersen, A. S., & Kjeldsen, T. H. (2015). Theoretical foundations of PPL at Roskilde University. In The Roskilde model: problem-oriented learning and project work (pp. 3-16). Springer, Cham.
12. Anderson, T., and Shattuck, J. (2012). Design-based research: A decade of progress in education research? Educational Researcher, 41(1), 16-25.
13. Andersson, V., & Clausen, H. B. (2018). Alternative Learning Experiences: Co-creation of knowledge in new contexts. Innovative Practice in Higher Education, 3(2).
14. Antalyalı, Ö. L. (2007). Tarihsel süreç içerisinde üniversite misyonlarının oluşumu. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, (6), 25-40.
15. Arsat, D. (2014). Effectiveness of Sustainability Incorporation In Engieering Curricula: A Framework for Course Design. Institut for Planlægning, Aalborg Universitet.
16. Ateş, O., & Eryılmaz, A. (2010). Factors affecting performance of tutors during problem-based learning implementations. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), 2325-2329.
17. Audretsch, D. B. (2014). From the entrepreneurial university to the university for the entrepreneurial society. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 39(3), 313-321.
18. Aybek, H. S. Y. (2017). Üniversite 4.0’a geçiş süreci: kavramsal bir yaklaşım. Açıköğretim Uygulamaları ve Araştırmaları Dergisi, 3(2), 164-176.
19. Barnett, R., & Coate, K. (2005). Engaging the Curriculum in Higher Education. Maidenhead: Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press.
20. Barnett, R. (2010). Being a University (1st ed.). New York: Routledge.
21. Barnett, R. (2011). The idea of the university in the twenty-first century: Where’s the imagination? Yükseköğretim Dergisi, 1(2), 88-94.
22. Barrett, T. & Moore, S. (2011). New Approaches to Problem-based Learning. Revitalising Your Practice in Higher Education. Routledge.
23. Barrows, H. S. (2000). Problem-based learning applied to medical education. Springfield, IL: Southern Illinois University School of Medicine.
24. Başak, R. (2017). Türk Üniversitelerinde Statükonun Devamını Sağlayan Bir Yöntem: Akademik İç Besleme. Journal of Current Researches on Social Sciences, 7(4), 337-348.
25. Batdi, V., Aslan, A., & Zhu, C. (2018). The effect of technology supported teaching on students' academic achievement: a combined meta-analytic and thematic study. International Journal of Learning Technology, 13(1), 44-60.
26. Batovski, D. A. (2008). How to write a review article. Assumption University Journal of Technology, 11(4), 199-203.
27. Bettany-Saltikov, J. (2012). How to do a systematic literature review in nursing: a step-by-step guide. McGraw-Hill Education (UK).
28. Bilgin, A. C., Timbil, S., Guvercin, C. H., Ozan, S., & Semin, S. (2018). Preclinical Students’ Views on Medical Ethics Education: A Focus Group Study in Turkey. Acta Bioethica, 24(1), 105-115.
29. Bjarnason, S. (2007). Rhetoric or reality? Technology in borderless higher education. In International handbook of higher education (pp. 377-391). Springer, Dordrecht.
30. Bleiklie, I., & Kogan, M. (2007). Organization and governance of universities. Higher Education Policy, 20(4), 477-493.
31. Boell, S. K., & Cecez-Kecmanovic, D. (2014). A hermeneutic approach for conducting literature reviews and literature searches. CAIS, 34, 12.
32. Bohlin, H. (2008). "Bildung" and Moral Self-Cultivation in Higher Education: What Does It Mean and How Can It Be Achieved?. In Forum on Public Policy Online (Vol. 2008, No. 2, p. n2). Oxford Round Table. 406 West Florida Avenue, Urbana, IL 61801.
33. Borhan, M. T., & Sani, S. S. (2018). Collaborative Learning in a Problem and Project-Based Learning (PBL) at Aalborg University, Denmark. Advanced Science Letters, 24(6), 4565-4568.
34. Bouhuijs, P. A. (2011). Implementing problem based learning: Why is it so hard? Revista de Docencia Universitaria, 9(1), 17–24.
35. Bower, P., & Gilbody, S. (2005). Stepped care in psychological therapies: access, effectiveness and efficiency: narrative literature review. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 186(1), 11-17.
36. Brundiers, K. & Wiek, A. (2013). Do we teach what we preach? An international comparison of problem-and project-based learning courses in sustainability. Sustainability, 5(4), 1725-1746.
37. Brundiers, K., & Wiek, A. (2011). Educating students in real-world sustainability research: vision and implementation. Innovative Higher Education, 36(2), 107-124.
38. Cerit, A. G., Zobra, Y., Deveci, D. A., & Tuna, O. (2004). Problem-based learning in maritime education: How to design curriculums. Dokuz Eylul University, Izmir, Turkey.
39. Churchill, D. (2018). Transformation of Teaching through 3D Learning-Outcomes Based Curriculum Approach in Higher Education. Educational Access and Excellence, 1, 66.
40. Christie, M., & de Graaff, E. (2017). The philosophical and pedagogical underpinnings of Active Learning in Engineering Education. European Journal of Engineering Education, 42(1), 5-16.
41. Chi, M. T. H., & Glaser, R. (1985). Problem solving ability. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Human abilities: An information processing approach. New York: W. H. Freeman.
42. Cipriani, A., & Geddes, J. (2003). Comparison of systematic and narrative reviews: the example of the atypical antipsychotics. Epidemiology and psychiatric sciences, 12(3), 146-153.
43. Cobban, A. (2002). English university life in the Middle Ages. Routledge.
44. Cobban, A. B. (2017). The medieval English universities: Oxford and Cambridge to c. 1500. Routledge.
45. Conway, J., & Little, P. (2000). From practice to theory: reconceptualising curriculum development for PBL. Problem-based learning. Educational innovation across disciplines–a collection of selected papers. Singapore: Temasek Centre for Problem-based Learning, 169-79.
46. Council, J. (2018). The effects of project-based learning and motivation on students with disabilities. Doctoral dissertation, Nova Southeastern University.
47. Cowan, J., & Harding, A. G. (1986). A logical model for curriculum development. British Journal of Educational Technology, 17(2), 103-109.
48. Cowan, J. (2006). On becoming an innovative university teacher: Reflection in action: Reflection in action. McGraw-Hill Education (UK).
49. Coy, S., TeDuits, D., & Crawford, J. (2017). Using Scaffolding to Improve Learning Outcomes in a Flipped Supply Chain Management Decision Modeling Course. Journal of Supply Chain and Operations Management, 15(3), 191.
50. Crawford, K., Hagyard, A., Horsley, R., & Derricott, D. (2018). Towards a model of student partnerships in different aspects of university life. International Journal for Students as Partners.
51. Cronin, P., Ryan, F., & Coughlan, M. (2008). Undertaking a literature review: a step-by-step approach. British Journal of Nursing, 17(1), 38-43.
52. Davies, J., de Graaff, E., & Kolmos, A. (2011). PBL across the disciplines: Research into best practice. The 3rd International Research Symposium on PBL. Aalborg: Aalborg Universitetsforlag.
53. de Graaff, E., & Kolmos, A. (2003). Characteristics of problem-based learning. International Journal of Engineering Education, 19(5), 657-662.
54. de Graaff, E., & Kolmos, A. (2006). Management of change. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
55. de Graaff, E., & Kolmos, A. (2007). History of problem-based and project-based learning. Management of change: Implementation of problem-based and project-based learning in engineering, 1-8.
56. Demirören, M., Turan, S., & Öztuna, D. (2016). Medical students’ self-efficacy in problem-based learning and its relationship with self-regulated learning. Medical education online, 21(1), 30049.
57. Dijkers, M. (2015). What is a scoping review? KT Update, 4(1), 1-4.
58. Doğanay, A. (2017). Üst düzey düşünme becerilerinin öğretimi. Pegem.
59. Du, X., Massoud, W., Al-Banna, N. A., Al-Moslih, A. M., Abu-Hijleh, M. F., Hamdy, H., & Cyprian, F. S. (2016). Preparing foundation-year students for medical studies in a problem-based learning environment: Students׳ perceptions. Health Professions Education, 2(2), 130-137.
60. Edström, K., & Kolmos, A. (2012). Comparing two approaches for engineering education development: PBL and CDIO. In Proceedings of the 8th International CDIO Conference.(Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia.
61. Edström, K., & Kolmos, A. (2014). PBL and CDIO: complementary models for engineering education development. European Journal of Engineering Education, 39(5), 539-555.
62. Erdoğan, T., & Senemoğlu, N. (2017). PBL in teacher education: its effects on achievement and self-regulation. Higher Education Research & Development, 36(6), 1152-1165.
63. Etzkowitz, H. (2008). The triple helix: Industry-university-government innovation in action. New York: Routledge.
64. Ferrari, R. (2015). Writing narrative style literature reviews. Medical Writing, 24(4), 230-235.
65. Fink, F. K., Enemark, S., & Moesby, E. (2002). UICEE centre for problem-based learning (UCPBL) at Aalborg University. In 6th Baltic Region Seminar on Engineering Education, Wismar, Germany.
66. Fischer, B. A. (2018). Fact or Fiction? Designing Stories for Active Learning Exercises. Journal of Political Science Education, 1-12.
67. Fisk, P. (2017). Education 4.0… the future of learning will be dramatically different, in school and throughout life. https://www.thegeniusworks.com/2017/01/future-education-young-everyone-taught-together/ sayfasından erişilmiştir.
68. Flinterman, J. F., Teclemariam-Mesbah, R., Broerse, J.E.W., & Bunders, J.F.G. (2001). Transdisciplinarity: The new challenge for biomedical research. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 21(4), 253-266.
69. Fry, J. (2017). The Effect of a Change Facilitator on Project-Based Learning Curriculum Design. ProQuest LLC.
70. García Martín, J., & Pérez Martínez, J. E. (2017). Method to guide the design of project based learning activities based on educational theories. International Journal of Engineering Education, 33(3), 984-999.
71. GE, Xun & Land, S. M. (2004). A conceptual framework for scaffolding III-structured problem-solving processes using question prompts and peer interactions. Educational Technology Research and Development, 52(2), 5-22.
72. Gencel, I. E., & Saracaloglu, A. S. (2018). The Effect of Layered Curriculum on Reflective Thinking and on Self-Directed Learning Readiness of Prospective Teachers. International Journal of Progressive Education, 14(1), 8-20.
73. Gertz, S. K. (2017). Universities and the humanities, then and now. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 41(6), 844-856.
74. Gewurtz, R.E, Coman, L., Dhillon, S., Jung, B. & Solomon, P. (2016). Problem-based Learning and Theories of Teaching and Learning in Health Professional Education, Journal of Perspectives in Applied Academic Practice, (4)1, 59-70.
75. Goodyear, V. A., Casey, A., & Kirk, D. (2017). Practice architectures and sustainable curriculum renewal. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 49(2), 235-254.
76. Graham, R. (2018). The global state of the art in engineering education. Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) Report, Massachusetts, USA.
77. Grant, E., & Grant, E. E. (1996). The foundations of modern science in the Middle Ages: their religious, institutional and intellectual contexts. Cambridge University Press.
78. Graybill, J. K., Dooling, S., Shandas, V., Withey, J., Greve, A., & Simon, G. L. (2006). A rough guide to interdisciplinarity: Graduate student perspectives. BioScience, 56(9), 757-763.
79. Greenhalgh, T., Thorne, S., & Malterud, K. (2018). Time to challenge the spurious hierarchy of systematic over narrative reviews?. European journal of clinical investigation, 48(6), 1-6. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/eci.12931 sayfasından erişilmiştir.
80. Gregersen, B., Linde, L. T., & Rasmussen, J. G. (2009). Linking between Danish universities and society. Science and Public Policy, 36(2), 151-156.
81. Guerra, A. (2013). Evaluating potentialities and constrains of Problem Based Learning curriculum: research methodology. PBL Across Cultures, 238.
82. Guerra, A. (2014). Problem based learning and sustainable engineering education: challenges for 21st century. PhD Thesis. Department of Development and Planning, Aalborg University.
83. Guerra, A. (2017). Integration of sustainability in engineering education: Why is PBL an answer?. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 18(3), 436-454.
84. Guerra, A., & de Graaff, E. (2015). Development of a Global Network for PBL and Engineering Education. In de Graaff, A. Guerra, A. Kolmos, & N. A. Arexolaleiba (Eds.), Global Research Community: Collaboration and Developments (pp. 257-266). Aalborg Universitetsforlag.
85. Guerra, A., Rodriguez, F. J., Kolmos, A., & Reyes, I. P. (red.) (2017). PBL, Social Progress and Sustainability. (1. udg.) Aalborg: Aalborg Universitetsforlag. International Research Symposium on PBL.
86. Guerra, A., Ulseth, R., & Kolmos, A. (Eds.). (2017). PBL in Engineering Education: International Perspectives on Curriculum Change. Springer.
87. Guzmán-Valenzuela, C. (2018). Universities, knowledge and pedagogical configurations: Glimpsing the complex university. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 50(1), 5-17.
88. Gürüz, K. (2003). Dünyada ve Türkiye’de yükseköğretim: Tarihçe ve bugünkü sevk ve idare sistemleri. Ankara: ÖSYM.
89. Güzeliş, C. (2006). An experience on problem based learning in an engineering faculty. Turkish Journal of Electrical Engineering & Computer Sciences, 14(1), 67-76.
90. Hart, C. (2018). Doing a Literature Review: Releasing the Research Imagination. Sage.
91. Haskins, C. H. (2017). The rise of universities. Routledge.
92. Healey, M. (2005). Linking research and teaching exploring disciplinary spaces and the role of inquiry-based learning. Reshaping the university: New relationships between research, scholarship and teaching, 67-78.
93. Heitmann, G. (1996). Project-oriented study and project-organized curricula: A brief review of intentions and solutions. European Journal of Engineering Education, 21(2), 121-131.
94. Hernandez, C., Ravn, O., & Valero, P. (2015). The Aalborg University PO-PBL Model from a Socio-cultural Learning Perspective. Journal of Problem Based Learning in Higher Education, 3(2).
95. Hmelo-Silver, C. E., & Barrows, H. S. (2006). Goals and strategies of a problem-based learning facilitator. Interdisciplinary journal of problem-based learning, 1(1), 4.
96. Hohendahl, P. (2011). Humboldt Revisited: Liberal Education, University Reform, and the Opposition to the Neoliberal University. New German Critique, (113), 159-196. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/41288137
97. Holgaard, J. E., de Graaff, E., & Kolmos, A. (2010). Sustainability in the practice, mindset and heart of engineering. Presented at the ESRSCP-EMSU Conference. http://vbn.aau.dk/da/publications/sustainability-in-the-practise-mindset-and-heart-of-engineering(73d7bba8-f7b5-43ac-948b-49223159267a).html sayfasından erişilmiştir.
98. Holgaard, J. E., Hadgraft, R., Kolmos, A., & Guerra, A. (2016). Strategies for education for sustainable development–Danish and Australian perspectives. Journal of cleaner production, 112, 3479-3491.
99. Hong, N. S. (1998). The relationship between well-structured and ill-structured problem solving in multimedia simulation (Doctoral dissertation, Pennsylvania State University).
100. Nunez, H. C., Coto, M., & Jørgensen, K. M. (2018). How Does Organisational Culture Influence the Process of Change Towards PBL?. Journal of Problem Based Learning in Higher Education.
101. Jacobs, H. H. (1989). Interdisciplinary curriculum: Design and implementation. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development, 1250 N. Pitt Street, Alexandria, VA 22314.
102. Jamison, A., Kolmos, A., & Holgaard, J. E. (2014). Hybrid learning: An integrative approach to engineering education. Journal of Engineering Education, 103(2), 253–273.
103. Janíková, M., & Kowaliková, P. (2017). Technical education in the context of the Fourth Industrial Revolution. Open Online Journal for Research and Education. Special Issue, December, ISSN: 2313-1640.
104. Johnson, B., & Ulseth, R. (2016). Development of professional competency through professional identity formation in a PBL curriculum. In Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), 2016 IEEE (pp. 1-9). IEEE.
105. Jonassen, D. (2011). Supporting problem solving in PBL. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-based Learning, 5(2), 8.
106. Kahraman, S., Saatçi, A., & Baran, T. (2011). The fourth visit of John Dewey to Turkey: Problem Based Learning Experience in Turkey. Education Sciences, 6(4), 2459-2468.
107. Kalaycı, N. (2010). Yükseköğretimde proje tabanlı öğrenmeye ilişkin bir uygulama projeyi yöneten öğrenciler açısından analiz. Eğitim ve Bilim, 33(147), 85-105.
108. Kalaycı, N., & İlhan, E. (2017). Yükseköğretimde çekirdek program. Journal of Higher Education & Science/Yüksekögretim ve Bilim Dergisi, 7(1).
109. Kalkan, M., Deveci, D. A., Cerit, A. G., Zorba, Y., & Asyalı, E. (2012). A miscellaneous adoption of problem-based, task-based, and project-based learning in higher maritime education: A case study at Dokuz Eylül University Maritime Faculty. Yükseköğretim Dergisi, 2(3), 159-166.
110. Kamp, A. (2011). Delft Aerospace engineering integrated curriculum. Proceedings of the 7th International CDIO Conference, Technical University of Denmark, Copenhagen, June 20-23.
111. Kamp, A. (2016). Engineering Education in the Rapidly Changing World: Rethinking the Vision for Higher engineering Education. Delft University of Technology, Faculty of Aerospace Engineering. https://repository.tudelft.nl/islandora/object/uuid:ae3b30e3-5380-4a07-afb5-dafd30b7b433?collection=research sayfasından erişilmiştir.
112. Kinkead, J. (2003). Learning through inquiry: An overview of undergraduate research. New directions for teaching and learning, 93, 5-18.
113. Kinser, K., & Levy, D. C. (2007). For-profit higher education: US tendencies, international echoes. In International handbook of higher education (pp. 107-119). Springer, Dordrecht.
114. Klebansky, A., & Fraser, S. (2013). A strategic approach to curriculum design for information literacy in teacher education–Implementing an information literacy conceptual framework. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 38(11), 103-125.
115. Kolmos, A. (2013). Achieving Curriculum Change in Engineering Education. In D. Beanland, & R. Hadgraft (Eds.), Engineering Education: Transformation and Innovation - UNESCO Report (Chapter 15, pp. 178-186). Melbourne: RMIT University.
116. Kolmos, A. (2017). PBL Curriculum Strategies. In PBL in Engineering Education (pp. 1-12). Sense Publishers, Rotterdam.
117. Kolmos, A., Du, X., Holgaard, J. E., & Jensen, L. P. (2008). Facilitation in a PBL environment. Center for Engineering Education Research and Development, Aalborg University.
118. Kolmos, A., & Fink, F. K. (2004). The Aalborg PBL model: progress, diversity and challenges. L. Krogh (Ed.). Aalborg: Aalborg University Press.
119. Kolmos, A., Fink, F. K., & Krogh, L. (2004). The aalborg model-problem-based and project-organized learning. The Aalborg PBL model-Progress, Diversity and Challenges, 9-18.
120. Kolmos, A., Gynnild, V., & Roxå, T. (2004). The organisational aspect of faculty development. Faculty Development in Nordic Engineering Education.
121. Kolmos, A., Hadgraft, R. G., & Holgaard, J. E. (2016). Response strategies for curriculum change in engineering. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 26(3), 391-411.
122. Kolmos, A., Holgaard, J. E., & Dahl, B. (2013). Reconstructing the Aalborg Model for PBL. PBL Across Cultures, 289.
123. Kotluk, N., & Kocakaya, S. (2015). Digital storytelling for developing 21st century skills: from high school students' point of view. Journal of Research in Education and Teaching, 4(2), 354-362.
124. Krogh Hansen, K., Otrel-Cass, K., Guerra, A., & Dahms, M-L. (2014). Good Examples Catalogue: “Problem Based Learning and Sustainability in Engineering and Science Education – Practice and Potential” . Faculty of Engineering and Science, Aalborg University.
125. Kyrö, P., & Mattila, J. (2012, May). Towards future university by integrating Entrepreneurial and the 3rd Generation University concepts. In 17th Nordic Conference on Small Business Research. Helsinki, Finland.
126. Lapteva, A. V, & Efimov, V. S. (2016). New Generation of Universities. University 4.0.
127. Journal of Siberian Federal University. Humanities & Social Sciences, 11(9), 2681– 2696.
128. Lattuca, L. R. (2007). Curricula in international perspective. In International handbook of higher education (pp. 39-64). Springer, Dordrecht.
129. Leavy, P. (2012). Transdisciplinarity and training the next generation of researchers: Problem-centered approaches to research and problem-based learning. International Review of Qualitative Research, 5(2), 205-223.
130. LeCompte, M. D., & Goetz, J. P. (1982). Ethnographic data collection in evaluation research. Educational evaluation and policy analysis, 4(3), 387-400.
131. Lehmann, M., Christensen, P., Du, X., & Thrane, M. (2008). Problem-oriented and project-based learning (POPBL) as an innovative learning strategy for sustainable development in engineering education. European journal of engineering education, 33(3), 283-295.
132. Lewis, P. (2018). Globalizing the Liberal Arts: Twenty-First-Century Education. In Higher Education in the Era of the Fourth Industrial Revolution (pp. 15-38). Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore.
133. Lotti, A. (2015). Problem based learning in Italian universities. Medical Education and Practice, 15(1), 5-12.
134. Lozano, R., Lukman, R., Lozano, F. J., Huisingh, D., & Lambrechts, W. (2013). Declarations for sustainability in higher education: becoming better leaders, through addressing the university system. Journal of Cleaner Production, 48, 10-19.
135. Lozano, F. J., & Lozano, R. (2014). Developing the curriculum for a new Bachelor's degree in Engineering for Sustainable Development. Journal of Cleaner Production, 64, 136-146.
136. Lukovics, M., & Zuti, B. (2013). Successful Universities towards the Improvement of Regional Competitiveness: ‘Fourth Generation Universities’ (September 4, 2017). https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3022717 sayfasından erişilmiştir.
137. Macdonald, R.F., & Savin-Baden, M. (2004). A briefing on assessment in problem-based learning, LTSN Generic Centre Assessment Series. http://www.heacademy.ac.uk/assets/York/documents/resources/resourcedatabase/id349_A_Briefing_on_Assessment_in_Problembased_Learning.pdf sayfasından erişilmiştir.
138. Mills, J. E., & Treagust, D. F. (2003). Engineering education—Is problem-based or project-based learning the answer. Australasian journal of engineering education, 3(2), 2-16.
139. Moesby, E. (2005). Curriculum development for project-oriented and problem-based learning (POPBL) with emphasis on personal skills and abilities. Global J. of Engng. Educ, 9(2), 121-128.
140. Møller, S., & Søndergaard, P. (2016). A danish library impact-report: Results from Roskilde University Library. English summary. Skriftserie fra Roskilde Universitetsbibliotek, (63), 1-20.
141. Musal, B., Abacioglu, H., Dicle, O., Akalin, E., Sarioglu, S., & Esen, A. (2002). Faculty Development Program in Dokuz Eylül School of Medicine: In the process of curriculum change from traditional to PBL. Medical Education Online, 7(1), 4533.
142. Musal, B., Akalın, E., Kılıç, O., Esen, A., & Alıcı, E. (2002). Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Probleme dayalı öğretim programı, süreçleri ve eğitim yönlendiricilerinin rolü. TED, 9(9).
143. Musal, B., Keskin, O., & Tuncel, P. (2016). Application of an Electronic Problem-Based Learning System in Undergraduate Medical Education Program. J Health Med Informat, 7(246), 2.
144. Musal, B., Taskiran, C., & Kelson, A. (2003). Opinions of tutors and students about effectiveness of PBL in Dokuz Eylul University School of Medicine. Medical Education Online, 8(1), 4345.
145. Müller, T., & Henning, T. (2017). Getting Started With PBL—A Reflection. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 11(2), 8.
146. Neville, A. J. (2009). Problem-based learning and medical education forty years on. Medical Principles and Practice, 18(1), 1-9.
147. Nielsen, J. D., Du, X. Y., & Kolmos, A. (2010). Innovative application of a new PBL model to interdisciplinary and intercultural projects. International Journal of Electrical Engineering Education, 47(2), 174-188.
148. Nordahl, R., & Kofoed, L. B. (2008). Medialogy-design of a transdisciplinary education using a problem based learning approach. Proceedings of 36th European Society for Engineering Education (SEFI) on Quality Assessment, Employability & Innovation, 2-5.
149. OECD. (2007). Four future scenarios for higher education. Paris: OECD.
150. O’Neill, G. (2010). Programme design: Overview of curriculum models. UCD Teaching and Learning/Resources: www. ucd. ie/teaching.
151. Ornstein, A. & Hunkins, F. (2012). Curriculum: Foundations, principles, and issues. (6th ed.). Pearson.
152. Önder, İ. (2015). Üniversite Üzerine Biraz Eğilelim. Toplum ve Demokrasi Dergisi, 8(17-18).
153. Özcan, D., & Çakır, H. (2016). Üniversite-Toplum, Devlet, Piyasa/Sermaye İlişkileri Bağlamında Üniversite Özerkliği. Journal of Higher Education & Science/Yüksekögretim ve Bilim Dergisi, 6(1).
154. Özdemir, P. (2016). Üçüncü kuşak üniversiteler. Maltepe Üniversitesi İktisadi Ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Ekonomik, Toplumsal Ve Siyasal Analiz Dergisi, 15(8), 15-33.
155. Pautasso, M. (2013). Ten simple rules for writing a literature review. PLoS computational biology, 9(7), e1003149.
156. Pawlowski, K. (2009). The ‘fourth generation university’as a creator of the local and regional development. Higher Education in Europe, 34(1), 51-64.
157. Perrault, E. K., & Albert, C. A. (2018). Utilizing project-based learning to increase sustainability attitudes among students. Applied Environmental Education & Communication, 17(2), 96-105.
158. Perkin, H. (2007). History of universities. In International handbook of higher education (pp. 159-205). Springer, Dordrecht.
159. Ponnusami, V. (2015). Curriculum Development Using Problem Based Learning Techniques. Management Studies and Economic Systems, 2(1), 51-58.
160. Prinz, C., Morlock, F., Freith, S., Kreggenfeld, N., Kreimeier, D., & Kuhlenkötter, B. (2016). Learning factory modules for smart factories in industrie 4.0. Procedia CIRP, 54, 113-118.
161. Randolph, J. J. (2009). A guide to writing the dissertation literature review. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 14(13), 1-13.
162. Reed, D. (2004). Universities and the promotion of corporate responsibility: Reinterpreting the liberal arts tradition. Journal of Academic Ethics, 2(1), 3-41.
163. Requies, J. M., Agirre, I., Barrio, V. L., & Graells, M. (2018). Evolution of Project-Based Learning in Small Groups in Environmental Engineering Courses. Journal of Technology and Science Education, 8(1), 45-62.
164. Rhoads, R. A. (2018). A critical analysis of the development of the US research university and emergence of the neoliberal entrepreneurial model. Entrepreneurship Education, 1-15.
165. Roffe, I. (2010). Sustainability of curriculum development for enterprise education: Observations on cases from Wales. Education+ Training, 52(2), 140-164.
166. Rukancı, F., & Anameriç, H. (2004). Ortaçağda ilk üniversiteler: Studium generale. Felesefe Dünyası, 1(39), 170-186.
167. Salmi, J. (2018). Dünya Çapında Üniversite Kurmanın Zorluğu. Eflatun.
168. Saunders- Smits, G.N., (2011), Research Based Learning in a Project Based Learning Environment- A Case Study Proceedings of the 39th SEFI conference, SEFI & ISEL, Lisbon.
169. Saunders-Smits, G. N., Roling, P., Brügemann, V., Timmer, N., & Melkert, J. (2012). Using the engineering design cycle to develop integrated project based learning in aerospace engineering. In EE2012: International Conference on Innovation, Practice and Research in Engineering Education, Coventry University, UK, 18-20 September 2012. Loughborough University.
170. Savin-Baden, M. (2000). Problem-based learning in higher education: Untold stories. Buckingham: SRHE and Open University Press.
171. Schwab, Klaus. (2018). The Urgency of Shaping the Fourth Industrial Revolution. World Economic Forum. https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2018/01/the-urgency-of-shaping-the-fourthindustrialrevolution sayfasından erişilmiştir.
172. Schwab, K. (2016). The fourth industrial revolution: what it means, how to respond. World Economic Forum, Davos, January, 14.
173. Scott, J. C. (2006). The mission of the university: Medieval to postmodern transformations. The journal of higher education, 77(1), 1-39.
174. Servant-Miklos, V. F. (2018). Problem solving skills versus knowledge acquisition: the historical dispute that split problem-based learning into two camps. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 1-17.
175. Servant-Miklos, V. F. & Spliid, C. M. (2017). The construction of teaching roles at Aalborg university centre, 1970–1980. History of Education, 1-22.
176. Shinde, V. (2014). Design of course level project based learning models for an Indian engineering institute: An assessment of students’ learning experiences and learning outcomes. Aalborg: Aalborg University. http://vbn.aau.dk/en/publications/designofcourse-level-project-basedlearning-models-for-an-indianengineeringinstitute(e3d036d7-0fed-4460-867d-a6785c27285d).html sayfasından erişilmiştir.
177. Shumar, W., & Robinson, S. (2018). Universities as Societal Drivers: Entrepreneurial Interventions for a Better Future. The Thinking University: A Philosophical Examination of Thought and Higher Education, 31-45.
178. Sipes, S. M. (2017). Development of a problem-based learning matrix for data collection. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-based Learning, 11(1), 2.
179. Smith, C. (2017). Utilizing the FPSPI framework for creative problem solving across the curriculum: An exploration of methods utilized by successful teachers. Doctoral dissertation, Capella University.
180. Sørensen, M. J. (2017). Teaching consumer law based on PBL principles within a workshop frame. Journal of Problem Based Learning in Higher Education, 5(2).
181. Sterling, S. (Ed.). (2010). Sustainability education: Perspectives and practice across higher education. Taylor & Francis.
182. Sterling, S. (2001). Sustainable education: re-visioning learning and change. Bristol, UK: Green Books-The Schumacher Society.
183. Şahin, M. (2010). The impact of problem-based learning on engineering students’ beliefs about physics and conceptual understanding of energy and momentum. European Journal of Engineering Education, 35(5), 519-537.
184. Tantillo, A. O. (2018). Organizing Enlightenment: Information Overload and the Invention of the Modern Research university. German Quarterly, 91(2), 251-253.
185. Torres, C. A., & Schugurensky, D. (2002). The political economy of higher education in the era of neoliberal globalization: Latin America in comparative perspective. Higher Education, 43(4), 429-455.
186. Tress, B., Tress, G., & Fry, G. (2003). Potential limitations of interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary landscape studies. In Interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary landscape studies: Potential and limitations (No. 2, pp. 182-192). WUR, Alterra.
187. Tuncer, M., & Taşpınar, M. (2010). Sanal ortamda proje tabanlı öğrenme yönteminin öğrenci başarısına etkisi. Akdeniz Eğitim Araştırmaları Dergisi Mediterranean Journal of Educational Research, 123, 104.
188. Uysal, H. T., & Çatı, K. (2016). Yükseköğretim kurumlarındaki yöneticilerin girişimci üniversite algılamalarında iş ve örgüt psikolojisinin etkisi. Journal of Higher Education & Science/Yüksekögretim ve Bilim Dergisi, 6(1).
189. Vaira, M. (2004). Globalization and higher education organizational change: A framework for analysis. Higher education, 48(4), 483-510.
190. van Belkom, P. (2018). Bildung and the Limits of the State in the Life and Works of Wilhelm von Humboldt: A Historical and Critical Assessment (Master's thesis), Leiden University.
191. Van den Akker, J. (2004). Curriculum perspectives: An introduction. In Curriculum landscapes and trends (pp. 1-10). Springer, Dordrecht.
192. Vaz, R. F., & Pedersen, P. C. (2002, November). Experiential learning with a global perspective: Overseas senior design projects. In Frontiers in Education, 2002. FIE 2002. 32nd Annual(Vol. 3, pp. S3B-S3B). IEEE.
193. Vauchez, A., & Pedersen, O. (1997). The first universities: Studium generale and the origins of university education in Europe. Cambridge University Press.
194. Veldman, F.J., de Wet, M.A., Mokhele, N.E., & Bouwer, W.A.J. (2008). Can engineering education in South Africa afford to avoid problem-based-learning as a didactic approach? European Journal of Engineering Education, 33(5–6), 551–559.
195. Visser, J. (2006). Universities, wisdom, transdisciplinarity, and the challenges and opportunities of technology. Perspectives on of higher education in the digital age, 187-206.
196. Wiek, A., Xiong, A., Brundiers, K., & van der Leeuw, S. (2014). Integrating problem-and project-based learning into sustainability programs: A case study on the School of Sustainability at Arizona State University. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 15(4), 431-449.
197. Wiers, R. W., van de Wiel, M. W., Sá, H. L., Mamede, S., Tomaz, J. B., & Schmidt, H. G. (2002). Design of a problem-based curriculum: a general approach and a case study in the domain of public health. Medical teacher, 24(1), 45-51.
198. Wijnia, L., Loyens, S. M., Derous, E., & Schmidt, H. G. (2015). How important are student-selected versus instructor-selected literature resources for students’ learning and motivation in problem-based learning?. Instructional Science, 43(1), 39-58.
199. Wissema, J. G. (2009). Towards the third generation university: Managing the university in transition. Edward Elgar Publishing.
200. Woods, D. R. (2003). Preparing for PBL (pp. 1-14). Hamilton, ON: McMaster University.
201. Yalçın, B. M., Karahan, T. F., Karadenizli, D., & Şahin, E. M. (2006). Short-term effects of problem-based learning curriculum on students’ self-directed skills development, Croatian Medical Journal, 47(3), 491-498.
202. Yıldırım, A., & Şimşek, H. (2013). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri. (9. Genişletilmiş Baskı) Ankara: Seçkin.