Üniversite Öğrencilerinin İş Etiği Algısı: Bir Vakıf Üniversitesi Örneği

Öz

Bu çalışmanın amacı üniversite öğrencilerinin iş etiği ve etik konusundaki görüşlerini belirlemektir. Bir vakıf üniversitenin öğrencilerinden eksiksiz ve geçerli olarak toplanan 275 adet anket formu ile ilgili analizler yapılmıştır. Faktör analizi ile 20 ifadelik ölçek üç boyutlu bir yapıda 13 ifadeye indirgenmiştir. Belirlenen üç faktör iş etiği, kişisel etik ve materyalist etik olarak önceki çalışmalara dayalı olarak isimlendirilmiştir. Genel olarak sonuçlar incelendiğinde, öğrencilerin öğrenim gördükleri bölümler ile iş etiği faktörü, öğrenim gördükleri yıl ile kişisel etik ve materyalistik etik ile anlamlı farklılıklar olduğu ortaya çıkmıştır. Ayrıca toplanan veriler ile öğrencilerin bazı demografik özellikleri (yaş, cinsiyet) ile tanımlayıcı özellikleri (kaçıncı sınıf öğrencisi oldukları, tütün kullanımı, sosyal medya kullanımı, etik ile ilgili aldıkları dersler v.b) arasındaki ilişkiler de incelenmiş olup, bunlar arasında anlamlı ilişkilerin çıkmadığı görülmüştür.  

Anahtar Kelimeler

• iş etiği,etik algı,Universite öğrencileri,Türkiye

Analyzing College Students’ Ethics Perceptions: A Pilot Study at A Foundation University in Turkey

Öz

The purpose of this study is to analyze the perspectives of students towards business ethics. A survey focusing on business ethics and the ethical perceptions has been conducted at a foundation university in Turkey. Turkish students and their perceptions on 20 specific ethical behaviors and the relationships with demographic and basic variables were detailed. Ethical crisis usually occurs directly related to disciplines such as law, finance and management etc. Therefore, this study is surveyed to summer school students across 6 departments in Mersin region (n=275 & N=796). The relationship between students’ demographics and other related factors (such as age, gender, year in school, tobacco use, social media account usage, taking any business ethics course or lectures, time spent studying and being employed or trained before or current) were examined but no differences were found. After implementing a factor analysis on the retrieved data, 20 items were reduced to 13 items and classified under three factors entitled with business ethics, personal ethics and materiality ethics. The results show that students’ departments with business ethics factor and the study period of students with personal and materiality ethics factor have significant differences.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Business Ethics,Students,Ethical perceptions,Demographics,Turkey

Kaynakça

1. 1. Akram, M., & Azad, M. K. K. (2011). Attitude towards business ethics: Comparison of public and private organizations in Pakistan. International Journal of Economics and Management Sciences, 13, 73-77.2. Alayoğlu, N., Öztűrk, A. O., Babacan, M. (2012). Perceptions of college students and attitudes of private and public employees towards business ethics. Turkish Journal of Business Ethics, 5(9), (2012, May). 27-35. 3. Ashforth, B. E., Gioia, D. A., Robinson, S. L., & Trevino, L. K. I. (2008). Re-viewing organizational corruption. Academy of Management Review, 33, 670–684ç4. Brown T.A. , Sautter,J.A , Littvay, L , Sautter A.C., Bearnes, B. (2010). Ethics and Personality: Empathy and Narcissism as Moderators of Ethical Decision Making in Business Students, Journal of Education for Business, 85:4, 203-208, DOI: 10.1080/088323209034495015. Cagle J.A.B., Glasgo,P.W., Holmes,V.M. (2008). Using Ethics Vignettes in Introductory Finance Classes: Impact on Ethical Perceptions of Undergraduate Business Students, Journal of Education for Business, 84:2, 76-83, DOI: 10.3200/JOEB.84.2.76-836. Deniz, R, İpbüker,C, Göksel,Ç (2005). Mühendislik Etiği Dersleri Neden Zorunlu Olarak Okutulmalıdır?, TMMOB Harita ve Kadastro Mühendisleri Odası 10. Türkiye Harita Bilimsel ve Teknik Kurultayı 28 Mart - 1 Nisan 2005, Ankara.7. Deshpande, S.P., Joseph, J., Prasad, R., (2006). Factors Impacting Ethical Behavior in Hospitals Journal of Business Ethics 69:207–216 Springer 2006 DOI 10.1007/ s10551-006- 9086-58. Freeman, R.E.(2009). Teaching business ethics in the age of Madoff‟, Change 41.6, 37-42.9. Laczniak, G. R., & Murphy, P. E. (1993). Ethical marketing decisions: The higher road. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall Inc. 10. Lampe, M., Engleman-Lampe, C. (2012). Mındfulness-Based Busıness Ethıcs Educatıon Academy of Educational Leadership Journal, Volume 16, Number 3, 201211. Lau, L. K., Caracciolo, B., Roddenberry, S., & Scroggins, A. (2012). College students' perception of ethics. Journal of Academic and Business Ethics, 5, 1-13.12. Ludlum, M.P. and S. Moskaloinov (2004). Right and Wrong and Cultural Diversity: Replication of the 2002 NAS/Zogby Poll on Business Ethics, Journal of Education for Business, 79(5), 294-298. 13. Ludlum ,L., Moskalionov,S., Ramachandran, V. (2013). Examining Ethical Behaviors by Business Students, American International Journal of Contemporary Research Vol. 3 No. 3; March 2013 14. Malloy, D.C., (2003). Understanding the Nature of Ethics, Values, and Purposes of Business, Health Care and Law: Implications and Applications for Community Sport, the Sport We Want, 59-79 http://www.cces.ca/files/pdfs/CCES-PAPER-Malloy-E.pdf, Accessed date: 01,09,2015.15. Murphy P.E., (2009). Ethical Marketing in American and European Companies Patrick E. Murphy, International Marketing Trends Congress, URL: http://www.marketing-trends congress. com/archives/ 2009/ Materiali/ Paper/Fr /Murphy. Pdf. Accessed date: 01 September, 2015.16. Nagpal, S. &Das, S.G. (2013). Understanding Ethics: A Study on Perception of Management Students. Biz & Bytes - A Quarterly Journal of Management & Technology. 4(2),1-8.17. Pardini, D.J., Silva Costa,Y.,R. Ferri, I.V.M., (2014). Corrupt Behaviors in the Finance Sector: Theory, Typology and Control Mechanisms at Brazilian Banks,38. Enanpad 13-17 September, 2014, Rio De Janeiro, http://www.anpad.org.br/admin/pdf/2014_EnANPAD_FIN1512.pdf. Accessed date: 03,09,201518. Pittela,R., Totstein,P., (2015). Creating an ethical classroom, www. teaching.monster. com/ benefits/ articles / 3522 -creating-an-ethical-classroom, Accessed date: 3,09,2015.19. Reiss, M.C., and K. Mitra (1998). The effects of individual difference factors on the acceptability of ethical and unethical workplace behaviors, Journal of Business Ethics 17, 1581-1593.20. Roberts, C., & Roper, C. D. (2015). Ethics for Students Means Knowing and Experiencing: Multiple Theories, Multiple Frameworks, Multiple Methods in Multiple Courses. In D. Palmer (Ed.), Handbook of Research on Business Ethics and Corporate Responsibilities (pp. 153-178). Hershey, PA: Business Science Reference. doi:10.4018/978-1-4666-7476-9.ch008.21. Ruegger,D., King, E.W., (1992). A Study of the Effect of Age and Gender upon Student Business Ethics, Journal of Business Ethics ,Vol. 11, No. 3 (Mar., 1992), pp. 179-186 22. Scherer, R. F. (1988). Dimensionality of Coping: Factor Stability Using the Ways Of Coping Questionnaire”, Psychological Report, 62, 66-77