INSTITUTIONAL AGILITY IN EDUCATIONAL SYSTEMS: A SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE ANALYSIS ON COMPETENCE MANAGEMENT (2000–2022)

Yıl 2024, Cilt: 28 Sayı: 1, 14 - 26, 30.09.2025

Fereshteh Karimivand

Öz

Today's world is the world of organizations. Manpower, the most valuable resource of the organization, is the center of organizational approaches and activities and plays a fundamental role in the development of organizational goals and ideals. Human resources can act as an efficient and sustained force for the organization's competitive advantage. To achieve organizational goals, it is necessary to place competent people at the head of the work. On the other hand, organizational agility is the ability of the organization to survive and progress in an environment of continuous and unpredictable changes. Therefore, organizations, including universities, need people with power, knowledge, and management skills to achieve corporate agility. This study was conducted to provide a structured analysis of the impact of competence management on organizational agility in education systems. The research is in the type of compilation prepared by searching the databases of Google Scholar, ERIC, Science Direct, PubMed, Scopus, and Elsevier between 2000 and 2022. The results showed that competency management affects organizational agility. Therefore, training systems can be directed towards agility by using the competency management approach. The results suggest that authorities, administrators, and those involved in the education systems give priority to competency management for promoting organizational development.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Competency management , organizational agility , training systems

EĞİTİM SİSTEMLERİNDE KURUMSAL ÇEVİKLİK: YETKİNLİK YÖNETİMİ ÜZERİNE SİSTEMATİK BİR LİTERATÜR ANALİZİ (2000–2022)

Öz

Bugünün dünyası organizasyonlar dünyasıdır. Örgütün en değerli kaynağı olan insan gücü ise örgütsel yaklaşımların ve faaliyetlerin merkezidir ve örgütün amaç ve ideallerinin geliştirilmesinde temel bir rol oynar. İnsan kaynağı, organizasyonun rekabet avantajı için verimli ve sürekli bir güç olarak hareket edebilir. Günümüzde örgütsel amaçlara ulaşabilmek için işlerin başına yetkin kişilerin yerleştirilmesi gerekmektedir. Öte yandan örgütsel çeviklik, sürekli ve öngörülemeyen değişikliklerin olduğu bir ortamda örgütün hayatta kalma ve ilerleme yeteneğidir. Bu nedenle, üniversiteler de dahil olmak üzere kuruluşlar, kurumsal çevikliğe ulaşmak için yeteneklere, bilgiye ve yönetim becerilerine sahip insanlara ihtiyaç duyar. Bu çalışma, eğitim sistemlerinde yetkinlik yönetiminin örgütsel çeviklik üzerindeki etkisini yapılandırılmış biçimde analiz etmek amacıyla yapılmıştır. Araştırma, 2000–2022 yılları arasında Google Scholar, ERIC, Science Direct, PubMed, Scopus ve Elsevier veritabanlarında tarama yapılarak hazırlanmış bir derleme türündedir. Sonuçlar, yetkinlik yönetiminin organizasyonel çeviklik üzerinde etkili olabileceğini göstermiştir. Bu nedenle, yetkinlik yönetimi yaklaşımı kullanılarak eğitim sistemleri çevikliğe yönlendirilebilir. Bu araştırmanın sonuçları, yetkililere, yöneticilere ve eğitim sistemine dahil olanlara organizasyonel gelişmeyi teşvik edebilmeleri için tüm konularda yetkinlik yönetimine öncelik vermelerini önermektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Eğitim sistemleri , örgütsel çeviklik , yetkinlik yönetimi

Kaynakça

• Al-Omoush, K. S., Simón-Moya, V., & Sendra-García, J. (2020). The impact of social capital and collaborative knowledge creation on e-business proactiveness and organizational agility in responding to the COVID-19 crisis. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 5(4), 279-288.
• Atos Consulting. (2007). Building the Agile Enterprise. November 2007.
• Chansiri, W. (2010). Development of job competency in civil service teachers under jurisdiction of office of the basic education commission. European Journal of Social Science, 17(2).
• Chung, S., Lee, K. Y., & Kim, K. (2014). Job performance through mobile enterprise systems: The role of organizational agility, location independence, and task characteristics. Information & Management, 51(6), 605-617.
• Crocitto, M., & Youssef, M. (2003). The human side of organizational agility. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 103(6), 388-397.
• Çetinkaya, F. F., & Akkoca, Y. (2021). Stratejik liderlik ile örgütsel çeviklik arasındaki ilişkide örgütsel iletişimin aracı rolü. Mehmet Akif Ersoy Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 8(1), 66-84.
• Ellrich, F. D. (2010). The closed cohort learning model: Enabling innovation and organizational success. The University of Memphis.
• Felipe, C. M., Roldán, J. L., & Leal-Rodríguez, A. L. (2016). An explanatory and predictive model for organizational agility. Journal of Business Research, 69(10), 4624-4631.
• Gonçalves, D., Bergquist, M., Alänge, S., & Bunk, R. (2022). How digital tools align with organizational agility and strengthen digital innovation in automotive startups. Procedia Computer Science, 196, 107-116.
• Harraf, A., Wanasika, I., Tate, K., & Talbott, K. (2015). Organizational agility. Journal of Applied Business Research (JABR), 31(2), 675-686.
• İleri, Y. Y., & Soylu, Y. (2010). Bir rekabet üstünlüğü aracı olarak çeviklik kavramı ve örgüt yapısına olası etkileri. Selçuk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Meslek Yüksekokulu Dergisi, 13(1-2), 13-28.
• Jafarnejad A, & Shahabi B. (2007). An introduction to organizational agility and agile production. Mehraban Nasher Press.
• Jesse, N. (2018). Organizational evolution-How digital disruption enforces organizational agility. IFAC-PapersOnLine, 51(30), 486-491.
• Katalnikova, S., Novickis, L., Prokofyeva, N., Uskov, V., & Heinemann, C. (2017). Intelligent collaborative educational systems and knowledge representation. Procedia Computer Science, 104, 166-173.
• Lee, Y. (2010). Exploring high-performers’ required competencies. Expert Systems with Applications, 37(1), 434–439.
• Mehrabi, S., Siyadat, S. A., & Allameh, S. M. (2013). Studying the relationship between the process of knowledge sharing and organizational agility among personnel of Agriculture- Jahad Organization in Share-Kord. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 3(5), 324.
• Moradi, A., Hosseinpour, M., & Mehralizadeh, Y. (2021). Identifying the main and secondary components affecting organizational agility in the Petroleum University of Technology. Petroleum Business Review, 5(3), 1-17.
• Ngai, E. W., Chau, D. C., & Chan, T. L. A. (2011). Information technology, operational, and management competencies for supply chain agility: Findings from case studies. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 20(3), 232-249.
• Oliveira, S. B., Balloni, A. J., Oliveira, F. N. B., & Toda, F. A. (2012). Information and service-oriented architecture & web services: Enabling integration and organizational agility. Procedia Technology, 5, 141-151.
• Oromaner, M. (2001). Growing your own creating a comprehensive faculty and staff development program. AAHE BULLETIN, 54(1), 8-10.
• Petrova, E., Jansone, D., & Silkane, V. (2014). The development and assessment of competencies in Vidzeme University of Applied Sciences. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 140, 241- 245.
• Ridwandono, D., & Subriadi, A. P. (2019). IT and organizational agility: A critical literature review. Procedia Computer Science, 161, 151-159.
• Shafer, R. A. (1997). Creating organizational agility: The human resource dimension. Cornell University.
• Sharifi, H., & Zhang, Z. (2001). Agile manufacturing in practice‐Application of a methodology. International Journal of Operations & Production Management. 21(5-6), 772-794.
• Thomas, N. (2021). Towards agile knowledge management in an online organization. Procedia Computer Science, 192, 4406-4415.
• Trzcielinski, S. (2015). The influence of knowledge based economy on agility of enterprise. Procedia Manufacturing, 3, 6615-6623.
• Worley, C. G., & Lawler, E. E. (2010). Agility and organization design: A diagnostic framework. Organizational Dynamics, 39(2), 194-204.