Araştırma Makalesi

Relationship between headache, corpus callosum, and deep white matter lesions in patients with migraine

Cilt: 47 Sayı: 1 31 Mart 2022
PDF İndir
EN TR

Relationship between headache, corpus callosum, and deep white matter lesions in patients with migraine

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of the study was to examine the relationship of white matter hyperintensities (WMHs) and measurements of corpus callosum (CC) with migraine characteristics. Materials and Methods: This study was conducted as a case-control and prospective study that included 50 migraine patients and 40 individuals in the control group. The severity and frequency of headaches and headache pain characteristics were questioned. The effects of the disease were determined using the migraine disability rating scale (MIDAS). WMH lesions were evaluated with the FAZEKAS scale. Morphometric measurements of CC were performed. The relationship between pain characteristics and measurements was examined. Results: There were 50 migraine patients (44 women, 6 men) with a mean age of 30,86±8,64 (18-51) years. The frequency of multi-point WMHs was higher in migraine patients compared to the control group. There were no differences in the measured values of CC between the two groups. WMHs were more common in patients with nausea complaints. Measured CC genu values were lower in patients with phonophobia and visual aura symptoms. Conclusion: This study has revealed that patients with migraines have a high rate of WMHs, and this rate is even higher when nausea accompanies attacks. No relationships were found between the measured values of CC and migraines.

Keywords

Migraine , magnetic resonance imagining (MRI) , corpus callosum.

Kaynakça

  1. Stewart WF, Lipton RB, Celentano DD, Reed ML. Prevalence of migraine headache in the United States: relation to age, income, race, and other sociodemographic factors. JAMA. 1992;267:64-9.
  2. Sprenger T, Borsook D. Migraine changes the brain–neuroimaging imaging makes its mark. CurrOpin Neurol. 2012;25:252.
  3. Bashir A, Lipton RB, Ashina S, Ashina M. Migraine and structural changes in the brain: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Neurology. 2013;81:1260-8.
  4. Skorobogatykh K, Van Hoogstraten WS, Degan D, Prischepa A, Savitskaya A, Ileen BM et al. Functional connectivity studies in migraine: what have we learned? J. Headache Pain. 2019;20:1-10.
  5. Chen SP, Eikermann‐Haerter K. How imaging can help us better understand the migraine‐stroke connection. Headache. 2020;60:217-28.
  6. Palm-Meinders IH, Koppen H, Terwindt GM, Launer LJ, Konishi J, Moonen JM et al. Structural brain changes in migraine. JAMA. 2012;308:1889-96.
  7. Ashina S, Bentivegna E, Martelletti P, Eikermann-Haerter K. Structural and functional brain changes in migraine. PainTher. 2021;10:211-23.
  8. Lin J, Wang D, Lan L, Fan Y. Multiple factors involved in the pathogenesis of white matter lesions. BioMed Res Int. 2017;2017:9372050.
  9. Xie H, Zhang Q, Huo K, Liu R, Jian Z-J, Bian Y-T et al. Association of white matter hyperintensities with migraine features and prognosis. BMC Neurol. 2018;18:93.
  10. van der Knaap LJ, van der Ham IJ. How does the corpus callosum mediate interhemispheric transfer? A review. Behav Brain Res. 2011;223:211-21.

Kaynak Göster

MLA
Onay, Mehmet, vd. “Relationship between headache, corpus callosum, and deep white matter lesions in patients with migraine”. Cukurova Medical Journal, c. 47, sy 1, Mart 2022, ss. 436-45, doi:10.17826/cumj.1037888.