Araştırma Makalesi

Evaluation of insertion torque and implant stability using the osstell device according to connection method and practitioner variability

Cilt: 50 Sayı: 2 30 Haziran 2025
PDF İndir
EN TR

Evaluation of insertion torque and implant stability using the osstell device according to connection method and practitioner variability

Öz

Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate the effects of SmartPeg connection methods and practitioner-related variability on insertion torque and implant stability measurements using the Osstell device. Materials and Methods: Four oral and maxillofacial surgeons each placed 40 implants into bovine femur bone blocks with D1 bone quality. The study was conducted at the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Hatay Mustafa Kemal University (Hatay, Türkiye). SmartPeg insertion torque was measured using a digital torque wrench. Resonance Frequency Analysis (RFA) was performed immediately after SmartPeg placement. Data were analyzed using ANOVA and Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC). Results: The mean insertion torque values were 69.88 ± 2.11 Ncm for the group with lower applied torque, 81.66 ± 1.43 Ncm for the group with higher manual torque, and 80.88 ± 1.55 Ncm for the standardized angulated adapter group. Statistically significant differences were observed among the groups. The highest intergroup consistency was recorded between the manual high-torque group and the angulated adapter group (ICC = 0.655, 95% CI: 0.045–0.955, p = 0.026). Additionally, ISQ values showed a positive correlation with torque consistency, suggesting that uniform application methods may enhance measurement reliability. Conclusion: Practitioner-related variability affects SmartPeg insertion torque and subsequent ISQ measurements. The use of a standardized connection method, such as an angulated adapter applying fixed torque, may improve the reliability and reproducibility of RFA-based implant stability assessments.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Implant stability, insertion torque, resonance frequency analysis, practitioner variability, SmartPeg

Etik Beyan

This study was conducted using bovine femur bone specimens and did not involve human participants or live animals. Nevertheless, ethical approval was obtained from the Non-Interventional Clinical Research Ethics Committee of Hatay Mustafa Kemal University (Meeting Date: 01.04.2024, Meeting No: 03, Decision No: 25). The study was reviewed and approved unanimously by the committee, confirming compliance with ethical and scientific standards.

Kaynakça

  1. Bafijari D, Pirayesh R, Memari Y, Nezafati S, Jafari M. Influence of resonance frequency analysis (RFA) measurements for successful osseointegration of dental implants during the healing period and its impact on implant assessed by Osstell Mentor device. Open Access Maced J Med Sci. 2019;7:4110–5.
  2. Herrero-Climent M, Falcao A, Tondela J. Relevant aspects of the dental implant design on the insertion torque, resonance frequency analysis (RFA) and micromobility: an in vitro study. J Clin Med. 2023;12:1–12.
  3. Dos Santos MV, Elias CN, Cavalcanti Lima JH. The effects of superficial roughness and design on the primary stability of dental implants. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2011;13:215–23.
  4. Petersson A, Sennerby L. On standard calibration of ISQ transducer pegs: prerequisites for accurate and comparable RFA measurements. Integr Diagn Updat. 2016;1:1–3.
  5. Monje A, Ortega-Oller I, Galindo-Moreno P, Catena A, Monje F, O'Valle F et al. Sensitivity of resonance frequency analysis for detecting early implant failure: a case-control study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2014;29:456–61.
  6. Meredith N, Alleyne D, Cawley P. Quantitative determination of the stability of the implant-tissue interface using resonance frequency analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res. 1996;7:261–7.
  7. Kästel I, Hüttig F, Wegner B, Kirchner E, Heinemann F. Does the manual insertion torque of smartpegs affect the outcome of implant stability quotients (ISQ) during resonance frequency analysis (RFA)? Int J Implant Dent. 2019;5:1–7.
  8. Geckili O, Bilhan H, Cilingir A, Mumcu E, Bural C. A comparative in vitro evaluation of two different magnetic devices detecting the stability of osseointegrated implants. J Periodontal Res. 2012;47:508–13.
  9. Salatti DB, Pelegrine AA, Gehrke S, Teixeira ML, Moshaverinia A, Moy PK. Is there a need for standardization of tightening force used to connect the transducer for resonance frequency analysis in determining implant stability? Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2019. doi:10.11607/jomi.7361
  10. Al-Otaibi HN, Almutairi A, Alfarraj J, Algesadi W. The effect of torque application technique on screw preload of implant-supported prostheses. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2017;32:259–63.

Kaynak Göster

APA
Selimli, F. (2025). Evaluation of insertion torque and implant stability using the osstell device according to connection method and practitioner variability. Cukurova Medical Journal, 50(2), 443-448. https://doi.org/10.17826/cumj.1707930
AMA
1.Selimli F. Evaluation of insertion torque and implant stability using the osstell device according to connection method and practitioner variability. Cukurova Med J. 2025;50(2):443-448. doi:10.17826/cumj.1707930
Chicago
Selimli, Fariz. 2025. “Evaluation of insertion torque and implant stability using the osstell device according to connection method and practitioner variability”. Cukurova Medical Journal 50 (2): 443-48. https://doi.org/10.17826/cumj.1707930.
EndNote
Selimli F (01 Haziran 2025) Evaluation of insertion torque and implant stability using the osstell device according to connection method and practitioner variability. Cukurova Medical Journal 50 2 443–448.
IEEE
[1]F. Selimli, “Evaluation of insertion torque and implant stability using the osstell device according to connection method and practitioner variability”, Cukurova Med J, c. 50, sy 2, ss. 443–448, Haz. 2025, doi: 10.17826/cumj.1707930.
ISNAD
Selimli, Fariz. “Evaluation of insertion torque and implant stability using the osstell device according to connection method and practitioner variability”. Cukurova Medical Journal 50/2 (01 Haziran 2025): 443-448. https://doi.org/10.17826/cumj.1707930.
JAMA
1.Selimli F. Evaluation of insertion torque and implant stability using the osstell device according to connection method and practitioner variability. Cukurova Med J. 2025;50:443–448.
MLA
Selimli, Fariz. “Evaluation of insertion torque and implant stability using the osstell device according to connection method and practitioner variability”. Cukurova Medical Journal, c. 50, sy 2, Haziran 2025, ss. 443-8, doi:10.17826/cumj.1707930.
Vancouver
1.Fariz Selimli. Evaluation of insertion torque and implant stability using the osstell device according to connection method and practitioner variability. Cukurova Med J. 01 Haziran 2025;50(2):443-8. doi:10.17826/cumj.1707930