Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

Mine Oluşum Genlerindeki Genetik Polimorfizmler ve Çevresel Faktörler ile Çürük Deneyimi Arasındaki İlişki

Yıl 2025, Cilt: 35 Sayı: 4, 282 - 288, 21.10.2025
https://doi.org/10.17567/currresdentsci.1485658

Öz

Amaç: Çürüğün etiyolojisi hem çevresel hem de konakçı faktörleri içermektedir. Bu çalışma, mine oluşum genleri (AMELX, ENAM ve AMBN), çevresel faktörler ve bunların birlikte etkisinin yetişkinlerde çürük deneyimi üzerindeki etkisini değerlendirmeyi amaçlamaktadır.
Yöntemler: 20-65 yaş arası 114 yetişkinin dahil edildiği bir vaka kontrol çalışması yürütüldü. Ağız hijyeni alışkanlıklarına ilişkin veriler hasta bildirimi yoluyla elde edildi. Çürük, plak ve tükürük ile ilgili veriler klinik muayene yoluyla elde edildi. Tükürükten genomik DNA izole edildi. Hastalar çürük deneyimine göre iki gruba ayrıldı. Çevresel faktörler (yaş; plak miktarı; diş fırçalama süresi; şekerli içecek ve yiyecek tüketimi; florürlü diş macunu, florürlü gargara ve diş ipi kullanımı; Streptococcus mutans ve Lactobacillus sayıları) ve konakçı faktörler (tükürük akış hızı, pH, tamponlama kapasitesi ve AMELX, ENAM ve AMBN) incelendi. Genotip dağılımlarını değerlendirmek için gerçek zamanlı PCR kullanıldı. Veriler ki-kare testi ve lojistik regresyon kullanılarak SPSS ile analiz edildi.
Bulgular: Türkiye'den seçilen bireylerde AMELX, ENAM veya AMBN alel ve genotip frekansları arasında gruplar arasında istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bir fark gözlenmedi. Gruplar arasında tükürük akış hızı veya şekerli yiyecek ve içecek tüketimi açısından da anlamlı bir ilişki bulunmadı. Diğer tüm faktörlerin yüksek çürük deneyimi ile ilişkili olduğu tespit edildi.
Sonuç: Çevresel faktörler ve genotipler birlikte çok değişkenli regresyon analizi ile değerlendirildiğinde; artan yaş, yüksek plak seviyeleri ve florürlü gargara kullanımının olmamasının yüksek çürük deneyim olasılığını artırdığı belirlendi.
Anahtar Kelimeler: AMELX, ENAM, AMBN, Genetik Polimorfizm, Çürük deneyimi.

Proje Numarası

(TDH-2019-7313).

Kaynakça

  • 1. Pitts NB, Zero DT, Marsh PD, et al. Dental caries. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2017;3(1):1-16.
  • 2. Vieira AR, Modesto A, Marazita ML. Caries: review of human genetics research. Caries Res. 2014;48(5):491-506.
  • 3. Werneck R, Mira M, Trevilatto P. A critical review: an overview of genetic influence on dental caries. Oral Dis. 2010;16(7):613-623.
  • 4. Shaffer JR, Carlson JC, Stanley BO, et al. Effects of enamel matrix genes on dental caries are moderated by fluoride exposures. Hum Genet. 2015;134(2):159-167.
  • 5. Deeley K, Letra A, Rose E, et al. Possible association of amelogenin to high caries experience in a Guatemalan-Mayan population. Caries Res. 2008;42(1):8-13.
  • 6. Slayton R, Cooper M, Marazita M. Tuftelin, mutans streptococci, and dental caries susceptibility. J Dent Res. 2005;84(8):711-714.
  • 7. Moradian-Oldak J. Protein-mediated enamel mineralization. Front Biosci (Landmark Ed). 2012;17(6):1996-2023.
  • 8. Bartlett JD. Dental enamel development: proteinases and their enamel matrix substrates. ISRN Dent. 2013;2013(1):1-24
  • 9. Opal S, Garg S, Jain J, Walia I. Genetic factors affecting dental caries risk. Aust Dent J. 2015;60(1):2-11.
  • 10. Kilian M, Chapple I, Hannig M, et al. The oral microbiome–an update for oral healthcare professionals. Br Dent J. 2016;221(10):657-666.
  • 11. World Health Organization. The World Health Report 1998: Life in the 21st Century, A Vision for All. Geneva: WHO; 1998.
  • 12. Akbulut Ö, Çapik C. Multivariate statistical analysis and required sample size. J Nursol. 2022;25(2).
  • 13. Reza Khami M, Asgari S, Valizadeh S, Karami J, Rezaei A, Rezaei N. AMELX and ENAM polymorphisms and dental caries. Int J Dent. 2022;2022:1-6
  • 14. Telatar GY, Saydam F. Lack of association between enamel gene variants and dental caries in adults. Cumhuriyet Dent J. 2020;23(2):96-106.
  • 15. Yildiz G, Ermis R, Calapoglu N, Celik E, Türel G. Gene-environment interactions in the etiology of dental caries. J Dent Res. 2016;95(1):74-79.
  • 16. Silness J, Löe H. Periodontal disease in pregnancy II. Correlation between oral hygiene and periodontal condition. Acta Odontol Scand. 1964;22(1):121-135.
  • 17. Gudkina J, Brinkmane A. Caries experience in relation to oral hygiene, salivary cariogenic microflora, buffer capacity and secretion rate in 6-year-olds and 12-year-olds in Riga. Stomatologija. 2008;10(2):47-53.
  • 18. Sharifi R, Jahedi S, Mozaffari HR, et al. Association of LTF, ENAM, and AMELX polymorphisms with dental caries susceptibility: a meta-analysis. BMC Oral Health. 2020;20(1):1-11.
  • 19. Chisini LA, Cademartori MG, Conde MCM, Tovo-Rodrigues L, Correa MB. Genes in the pathway of tooth mineral tissues and dental caries risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Oral Investig. 2020;24(11):3723-3738.
  • 20. Gerreth K, Zaorska K, Zabel M, Nowicki M, Borysewicz-Lewicka M. Significance of genetic variations in developmental enamel defects of primary dentition in Polish children. Clin Oral Investig. 2018;22(1):321-329.
  • 21. Patir A, Seymen F, Yildirim M, et al. Enamel formation genes are associated with high caries experience in Turkish children. Caries Res. 2008;42(5):394-400.
  • 22. Sharma A, Muthu M, Vettriselvi V, Nuvvula S, Gayathri T. AMELX gene association to early childhood caries in south-Indian children: a case–control study. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2024;25(2):201-210.
  • 23. Wang X, Shaffer J, Weyant R, et al. Genes and their effects on dental caries may differ between primary and permanent dentitions. Caries Res. 2010;44(3):277-284.
  • 24. Rajpar MH, Harley K, Laing C, Davies RM, Dixon MJ. Mutation of the gene encoding the enamel-specific protein, enamelin, causes autosomal-dominant amelogenesis imperfecta. Hum Mol Genet. 2001;10(16):1673-1677
  • 25. Shimizu T, Ho B, Deeley K, Briseño-Ruiz J, Faraco IM Jr, Schupack BI, et al. Enamel formation genes influence enamel microhardness before and after cariogenic challenge. PLoS One. 2012;7(9):e45022.
  • 26. Abbasoğlu Z, Tanboğa İ, Küchler EC, et al. Early childhood caries is associated with genetic variants in enamel formation and immune response genes. Caries Res. 2015;49(1):70-77.
  • 27. Kelly AM, Bezamat M, Modesto A, Vieira AR. Biomarkers for lifetime caries-free status. J Pers Med. 2021;11(1):23.
  • 28. AlMarshad LK, AlJobair AM, Al-Anazi MR, Bohol MFF, Wyne AH, Al-Qahtani AA. Association of polymorphisms in genes involved in enamel formation, taste preference and immune response with early childhood caries in Saudi preschool children. Saudi J Biol Sci. 2021;28(4):2388-2395.
  • 29. Borilova Linhartova P, Deissova T, Musilova K, et al. Lack of association between ENAM gene polymorphism and dental caries in primary and permanent teeth in Czech children. Clin Oral Investig. 2018;22(5):1873-1877.
  • 30. Yıldız Telatar G, Saydam F, Güzel Aİ, Telatar BC. Variants in taste genes on caries risk and caries activity status. Med Mol Morphol. 2020;53(4):244-251.
  • 31. Köhler B, Andréen I. Mutans streptococci and caries prevalence in children after early maternal caries prevention: a follow-up at 19 years of age. Caries Res. 2012;46(5):474-480.
  • 32. Zakhary G, Clark R, Bidichandani S, Owen W, Slayton R, Levine M. Acidic proline-rich protein Db and caries in young children. J Dent Res. 2007;86(12):1176-1180.
  • 33. Haugejorden O, Lervik T, Birkeland JM, Jorkjend L. An 11-year follow-up study of dental caries after discontinuation of school-based fluoride programs. Acta Odontol Scand. 1990;48(4):257-263.
  • 34. Tannure PN, Küchler EC, Lips A, et al. Genetic variation in MMP20 contributes to higher caries experience. J Dent. 2012;40(5):381-386.
  • 35. Wang X, Willing MC, Marazita ML, et al. Genetic and environmental factors associated with dental caries in children: the Iowa Fluoride Study. Caries Res. 2012;46(3):177-184.

Association between Genetic Polymorphisms in Enamel Formation Genes and Environmental Factors with Caries Experience

Yıl 2025, Cilt: 35 Sayı: 4, 282 - 288, 21.10.2025
https://doi.org/10.17567/currresdentsci.1485658

Öz

Objective: The etiology of dental caries involves both environmental and host-related factors. This study aims to evaluate the effect of enamel formation genes (AMELX, ENAM, and AMBN), environmental factors, and their combined influence on caries experience in adults..
Methods: A Case-Control Study was conducted including 114 adults aged 20-65 years. Data regarding oral hygiene habits were obtained through patient declaration. Data regarding caries, plaque and saliva were obtained through clinical examination. Genomic DNA was isolated from saliva. Patients were divided into two groups according to caries experience. Environmental factors (age; amount of plaque; tooth brushing duration; consumption of sugary drinks and foods; use of fluoride toothpaste, fluoride mouthwash and dental floss; Streptococcus mutans and Lactobacillus counts) and host factors (saliva flow rat, pH, buffering capacity and AMELX, ENAM and AMBN) were examined. Real-time PCR was used to evaluate genotype distributions. Data were analyzed using chi-square test and logistic regression with SPSS.
Results: No statistically significant differences were observed in AMELX, ENAM or AMBN Allele and genotype frequencies between groups in selected subjects in Turkey. There was no significant association between the groups with regard to salivary flow rate or consumption of sugary drinks and food. All other factors were found to be associated with high caries experience.
Conclusion: When environmental factors and genotypes were evaluated together using multivariate regression analysis, It was determined that increased age, high plaque levels, and the absence of fluoride mouthwash use increased the likelihood of high caries experience.
Keywords: AMELX, ENAM, AMBN, Genetic Polymorphism, Caries experience

Etik Beyan

The study protocol was approved by the decision of the Ataturk University Faculty of Medicine Clinical Research Ethics Committee (Number B.30.2.ATA.0.01.00/38). Informed consent forms were obtained in writing from each participant participating in the study.

Destekleyen Kurum

The study was supported by the Ataturk University Scientific Research Projects Foundation (TDH-2019-7313).

Proje Numarası

(TDH-2019-7313).

Kaynakça

  • 1. Pitts NB, Zero DT, Marsh PD, et al. Dental caries. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2017;3(1):1-16.
  • 2. Vieira AR, Modesto A, Marazita ML. Caries: review of human genetics research. Caries Res. 2014;48(5):491-506.
  • 3. Werneck R, Mira M, Trevilatto P. A critical review: an overview of genetic influence on dental caries. Oral Dis. 2010;16(7):613-623.
  • 4. Shaffer JR, Carlson JC, Stanley BO, et al. Effects of enamel matrix genes on dental caries are moderated by fluoride exposures. Hum Genet. 2015;134(2):159-167.
  • 5. Deeley K, Letra A, Rose E, et al. Possible association of amelogenin to high caries experience in a Guatemalan-Mayan population. Caries Res. 2008;42(1):8-13.
  • 6. Slayton R, Cooper M, Marazita M. Tuftelin, mutans streptococci, and dental caries susceptibility. J Dent Res. 2005;84(8):711-714.
  • 7. Moradian-Oldak J. Protein-mediated enamel mineralization. Front Biosci (Landmark Ed). 2012;17(6):1996-2023.
  • 8. Bartlett JD. Dental enamel development: proteinases and their enamel matrix substrates. ISRN Dent. 2013;2013(1):1-24
  • 9. Opal S, Garg S, Jain J, Walia I. Genetic factors affecting dental caries risk. Aust Dent J. 2015;60(1):2-11.
  • 10. Kilian M, Chapple I, Hannig M, et al. The oral microbiome–an update for oral healthcare professionals. Br Dent J. 2016;221(10):657-666.
  • 11. World Health Organization. The World Health Report 1998: Life in the 21st Century, A Vision for All. Geneva: WHO; 1998.
  • 12. Akbulut Ö, Çapik C. Multivariate statistical analysis and required sample size. J Nursol. 2022;25(2).
  • 13. Reza Khami M, Asgari S, Valizadeh S, Karami J, Rezaei A, Rezaei N. AMELX and ENAM polymorphisms and dental caries. Int J Dent. 2022;2022:1-6
  • 14. Telatar GY, Saydam F. Lack of association between enamel gene variants and dental caries in adults. Cumhuriyet Dent J. 2020;23(2):96-106.
  • 15. Yildiz G, Ermis R, Calapoglu N, Celik E, Türel G. Gene-environment interactions in the etiology of dental caries. J Dent Res. 2016;95(1):74-79.
  • 16. Silness J, Löe H. Periodontal disease in pregnancy II. Correlation between oral hygiene and periodontal condition. Acta Odontol Scand. 1964;22(1):121-135.
  • 17. Gudkina J, Brinkmane A. Caries experience in relation to oral hygiene, salivary cariogenic microflora, buffer capacity and secretion rate in 6-year-olds and 12-year-olds in Riga. Stomatologija. 2008;10(2):47-53.
  • 18. Sharifi R, Jahedi S, Mozaffari HR, et al. Association of LTF, ENAM, and AMELX polymorphisms with dental caries susceptibility: a meta-analysis. BMC Oral Health. 2020;20(1):1-11.
  • 19. Chisini LA, Cademartori MG, Conde MCM, Tovo-Rodrigues L, Correa MB. Genes in the pathway of tooth mineral tissues and dental caries risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Oral Investig. 2020;24(11):3723-3738.
  • 20. Gerreth K, Zaorska K, Zabel M, Nowicki M, Borysewicz-Lewicka M. Significance of genetic variations in developmental enamel defects of primary dentition in Polish children. Clin Oral Investig. 2018;22(1):321-329.
  • 21. Patir A, Seymen F, Yildirim M, et al. Enamel formation genes are associated with high caries experience in Turkish children. Caries Res. 2008;42(5):394-400.
  • 22. Sharma A, Muthu M, Vettriselvi V, Nuvvula S, Gayathri T. AMELX gene association to early childhood caries in south-Indian children: a case–control study. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2024;25(2):201-210.
  • 23. Wang X, Shaffer J, Weyant R, et al. Genes and their effects on dental caries may differ between primary and permanent dentitions. Caries Res. 2010;44(3):277-284.
  • 24. Rajpar MH, Harley K, Laing C, Davies RM, Dixon MJ. Mutation of the gene encoding the enamel-specific protein, enamelin, causes autosomal-dominant amelogenesis imperfecta. Hum Mol Genet. 2001;10(16):1673-1677
  • 25. Shimizu T, Ho B, Deeley K, Briseño-Ruiz J, Faraco IM Jr, Schupack BI, et al. Enamel formation genes influence enamel microhardness before and after cariogenic challenge. PLoS One. 2012;7(9):e45022.
  • 26. Abbasoğlu Z, Tanboğa İ, Küchler EC, et al. Early childhood caries is associated with genetic variants in enamel formation and immune response genes. Caries Res. 2015;49(1):70-77.
  • 27. Kelly AM, Bezamat M, Modesto A, Vieira AR. Biomarkers for lifetime caries-free status. J Pers Med. 2021;11(1):23.
  • 28. AlMarshad LK, AlJobair AM, Al-Anazi MR, Bohol MFF, Wyne AH, Al-Qahtani AA. Association of polymorphisms in genes involved in enamel formation, taste preference and immune response with early childhood caries in Saudi preschool children. Saudi J Biol Sci. 2021;28(4):2388-2395.
  • 29. Borilova Linhartova P, Deissova T, Musilova K, et al. Lack of association between ENAM gene polymorphism and dental caries in primary and permanent teeth in Czech children. Clin Oral Investig. 2018;22(5):1873-1877.
  • 30. Yıldız Telatar G, Saydam F, Güzel Aİ, Telatar BC. Variants in taste genes on caries risk and caries activity status. Med Mol Morphol. 2020;53(4):244-251.
  • 31. Köhler B, Andréen I. Mutans streptococci and caries prevalence in children after early maternal caries prevention: a follow-up at 19 years of age. Caries Res. 2012;46(5):474-480.
  • 32. Zakhary G, Clark R, Bidichandani S, Owen W, Slayton R, Levine M. Acidic proline-rich protein Db and caries in young children. J Dent Res. 2007;86(12):1176-1180.
  • 33. Haugejorden O, Lervik T, Birkeland JM, Jorkjend L. An 11-year follow-up study of dental caries after discontinuation of school-based fluoride programs. Acta Odontol Scand. 1990;48(4):257-263.
  • 34. Tannure PN, Küchler EC, Lips A, et al. Genetic variation in MMP20 contributes to higher caries experience. J Dent. 2012;40(5):381-386.
  • 35. Wang X, Willing MC, Marazita ML, et al. Genetic and environmental factors associated with dental caries in children: the Iowa Fluoride Study. Caries Res. 2012;46(3):177-184.
Toplam 35 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil İngilizce
Konular Restoratif Diş Tedavisi
Bölüm Araştırma Makalesi
Yazarlar

Büşra Özdemir 0000-0002-7035-3341

Nurcan Özakar 0000-0003-4023-6723

Hasan Dogan 0000-0002-5232-4336

Proje Numarası (TDH-2019-7313).
Yayımlanma Tarihi 21 Ekim 2025
Gönderilme Tarihi 17 Mayıs 2024
Kabul Tarihi 24 Nisan 2025
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2025 Cilt: 35 Sayı: 4

Kaynak Göster

AMA Özdemir B, Özakar N, Dogan H. Association between Genetic Polymorphisms in Enamel Formation Genes and Environmental Factors with Caries Experience. Curr Res Dent Sci. Ekim 2025;35(4):282-288. doi:10.17567/currresdentsci.1485658

Current Research in Dental Sciences is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

29936                                    34333