YEREL YÖNETİMLERDE YAPAY ZEKÂ, DİJİTALLEŞME VE ETİK YÖNETİŞİM: BARSELONA, ŞANGHAY VE ANKARA KENTLERİ ÜZERİNDEN KARŞILAŞTIRMALI BİR ANALİZ

Öz

Kamu yönetiminde dijitalleşme süreci, özellikle yerel yönetim ölçeğinde giderek daha belirgin bir dönüşüme işaret etmektedir. Gelişen dijital teknolojiler, hizmet sunumunun niteliğini artırmanın ötesinde, karar alma süreçlerini yeniden yapılandırmakta ve yönetişim anlayışında yapısal değişimlere yol açmaktadır. Bu dönüşümün en dikkat çekici bileşenlerinden biri olan yapay zekâ teknolojileri, yerel yönetimlerin artan toplumsal talepler karşısında daha etkin, katılımcı ve veri temelli çözümler üretmesini mümkün kılmaktadır. Bu çalışmanın amacı, yapay zekâ uygulamalarının yerel yönetimlerdeki dijitalleşme sürecine nasıl entegre edildiğini incelemek, bu entegrasyonun yönetsel verimlilik, vatandaş katılımı ve etik yönetişim üzerindeki etkilerini değerlendirmek ve elde edilen bulgular doğrultusunda geleceğe yönelik politika önerileri sunmaktır. Bu bağlamda uluslararası örnekler teşkil eden Barselona ve Şanghay kentleriyle Türkiye'den Ankara kentinin karşılaştırmalı analizi yapılmıştır. Analiz, yapay zekâ uygulamalarının sunduğu potansiyelin yanı sıra veri güvenliği, dijital eşitsizlik, etik sorumluluklar ve kurumsal kapasite gibi temel sınırlılıkları da ortaya koymaktadır. Bulgular doğrultusunda; etik ve hukuki çerçevenin güçlendirilmesi, veri yönetimi ve dijital altyapı ile kurumsal kapasitesinin geliştirilmesi, açık veri ve algoritmik şeffaflık sağlanması, dijital eşitsizlikle mücadele edilmesi, yerel yapay zekâ stratejileri ve eylem planları hazırlanması ve yerel yönetimler arasında iş birliğinin teşvik edilmesi yönünde politika önerileri geliştirilmiştir. Bu öneriler, yapay zekânın yerel düzeyde kapsayıcı, etik, şeffaf ve sürdürülebilir bir yönetişim aracı olarak kullanılmasını desteklemektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Dijitalleşme
• Yapay zekâ
• Yerel yönetimler
• Etik yönetişim
• Katılımcılık

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, DIGITALIZATION, AND ETHICAL GOVERNANCE IN LOCAL ADMINISTRATIONS: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF BARCELONA, SHANGHAI, AND ANKARA

Öz

The digitalization process in public administration, particularly at the local government level, increasingly points to a marked transformation. Emerging digital technologies not only enhance the quality-of-service delivery but also restructure decision-making processes and lead to structural changes in the understanding of governance. One of the most striking components of this transformation, artificial intelligence (AI) technologies, enables local administrations to develop more effective, participatory, and data-driven solutions in response to growing societal demands. The aim of this study is to examine how AI applications are integrated into the digitalization process of local administrations, to evaluate the impacts of this integration on administrative efficiency, citizen participation, and ethical governance, and to offer policy recommendations for the future based on the findings. In this context, a comparative analysis has been conducted of the cities of Barcelona and Shanghai, which serve as international examples, and Ankara, representing Turkey. The analysis reveals not only the potential benefits offered by AI applications but also fundamental limitations such as data security, digital inequality, ethical responsibilities, and institutional capacity challenges. Based on the findings, policy recommendations have been developed in the following areas: strengthening the ethical and legal framework; enhancing data management, improving digital infrastructure, and institutional capacity; ensuring open data access and algorithmic transparency; combating digital inequality; preparing local AI strategies and action plans; and promoting cooperation among local governments. These recommendations support the use of AI as an inclusive, ethical, transparent, and sustainable governance tool at the local level.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Digitalization
• Artificial intelligence
• Local administrations
• Ethical governance
• Participation

Kaynakça

1. ABB. (2021, Kasım 4). Başkent'te karekod anket dönemi başladı. https://www.ankara.bel.tr/tr/haberler/baskentte-karekod-anket-donemi-basladi-15004
2. ABB. (2022a, Temmuz 7). Mansur Yavaş duyurdu: Başkent araştırmaları merkezi çalışmalarına başladı. https://www.ankara.bel.tr/haberler/mansur-yavas-duyurdu-baskent-arastirmalari-merkezi-calismalarina-basladi-15716
3. ABB. (2022b, Temmuz 28). Dünyada ilk ve tek harita tabanlı açık veri paylaşımı: ‘Şeffaf Ankara’ başladı. https://www.ankara.bel.tr/haberler/dunyada-ilk-ve-tek-harita-tabanli-acik-veri-paylasimi-seffaf-ankara-basladi-15749
4. ABB. (2023). 2022 yılında şeffaflık ilkesiyle bin 233 ihale canlı yayınlandı. https://www.ankara.bel.tr/haberler/2022-yilinda-seffaflik-ilkesiyle-bin-233-ihale-canli-yayinlandi-16162
5. ABB. (2024). Tarım 4.0 Dijital Platformu Projesi (KIRBİS). https://s.ankara.bel.tr/files/2024/12/11/9fb091d73b7ee183f4130ff4ea1d68dc.pdf
6. ABB. (2025a). AKK’den Ankara’nın dijital yolcuğu için önemli adım dijital dönüşüm meclisi ilk toplantısını yaptı. https://www.ankara.bel.tr/haberler/akk-den-ankara-nin-dijital-yolcugu-icin-onemli-adim-17593
7. ABB. (2025b). Ankara Büyükşehir Belediye Başkanlığı 2025-2029 Stratejik Planı. ABB.
8. ABB. (2025c). Şeffaf Ankara. https://seffaf.ankara.bel.tr/

9. ABB. (2025d). İhaleler. https://www.ankara.bel.tr/ihaleler
10. ABB. (2025e). ABB Instagram gönderisi: 4000 ihale canlı yayınlandı. https://www.instagram.com/p/C4FNdLktTFl/
11. ABB. (2025f). Başkent Mobil. https://www.ankara.bel.tr/projeler/detay/baskent-mobil-18
12. ABB. (2025g). Wi-Fi noktaları. https://wifi.ankara.bel.tr/
13. ABB. (2025h). Askıda plan sorgulama. https://planaski.ankara.bel.tr/planaski
14. ABB. (2025i). E-belediye. https://ebelediye.ankara.bel.tr/ebelediye
15. Agatiello, OR (2008). Ethical governance: beyond good practices and standards, Management Decision, 46 (8), 1132-1145. https://doi.org/10.1108/00251740810901345
16. Ajuntament de Barcelona. (2021). Mesura de govern de l’estratégia municipial d’algoritmes i dades per a l’impuls étic de la intel-ligéncia artificial. https://ajuntament.barcelona.cat/digital/sites/default/files/2023-11/Mesura-de-Govern-Intel-ligencia-artificial_cat-v2.47-ca-ES_.pdf
17. Ajuntament de Barcelona. (2022). Informe 2022. https://ajuntament.barcelona.cat/economiatreball/sites/default/files/2024-01/Observatori%202022_ESP.pdf
18. Ajuntament de Barcelona. (2025a). The municipal algorithms and data strategy for an ethical promotion of artificial ıntelligence. https://ajuntament.barcelona.cat/digital/en/technology-accessible-everyone/ethical-use-artificial/ethical-use-artificial-intelligence/municipal
19. Ajuntament de Barcelona. (2025b). Digital talent. https://ajuntament.barcelona.cat/digital/en/technological-entrepreneurship-and-digital-talent/digital-talent
20. Ajuntament de Barcelona. (2025c). Map of resources to boost digitisation. https://ajuntament.barcelona.cat/digital/mapa-recursos-digitals/en
21. Ajuntament de Barcelona. (2025d). Protocol for incorporating artificial intelligence into all municipal services. https://ajuntament.barcelona.cat/digital/en/technology-accessible-everyone/ethical-use-artificial/ethical-use-artificial-intelligence/protocol
22. Ajuntament de Barcelona. (2025e). Institut Municipal d'Informàtica-IMI. https://ajuntament.barcelona.cat/imi/en
23. Ajuntament de Barcelona. (2025f). Advisory Council on Artificial Intelligence. https://ajuntament.barcelona.cat/digital/en/technology-accessible-everyone/ethical-use-artificial/advisory-council-artificial-intelligence
24. Ajuntament de Barcelona. (2025g). Fight against digital inequality. https://ajuntament.barcelona.cat/digital/en/technology-accessible-everyone/fight-against-digital-inequality
25. Ajuntament de Barcelona. (2025h). Digital and technological training. https://ajuntament.barcelona.cat/digital/en/technology-accessible-everyone/digital-technological-training
26. Ajuntament de Barcelona. (2025i). Decidim Barcelona. https://ajuntament.barcelona.cat/digital/en/technology-accessible-everyone/accessible-and-participatory/accessible-and-participatory-5
27. Ajuntament de Barcelona (2025k). Cities Coalition for Digital Rights https://ajuntament.barcelona.cat/digital/en/technology-accessible-everyone/safeguarding-digital-rights/safeguarding-digital-rights/cities
28. Ajuntament de Barcelona (2025l). Urban mobility. https://ajuntament.barcelona.cat/digital/en/technology-service-citizens/urban-mobility
29. Ajuntament de Barcelona (2025m). Municipal apps. https://ajuntament.barcelona.cat/digital/en/technology-service-citizens/municipal-apps
30. Ajuntament de Barcelona (2025n). Technology for a more sustainable city. https://ajuntament.barcelona.cat/digital/en/technology-service-citizens/technology-sustainable-city
31. Akinade, AO, Adepoju, PA, Ige, AB ve Afolabi, AI (2024). Artificial intelligence in traffic management: A review of smart solutions and urban impact. Iconıc Research And Engıneerıng Journals, 7 (12), 511-522.
32. Akıllı Şehir. (2025). Ankara. https://www.akillisehir.com/idet/11/680/ankara
33. Akıllı Şehirler. (2019). Akıllı şehir dönüşümü yol haritası. https://www.akillisehirler.gov.tr/akilli-sehir-donusumu/
34. Akıllı Şehirler Portalı. (2021). What is smart city? https://www.akillisehirler.gov.tr/what-is-smart-city/
35. Algorithm Register. (2023). Algorithmic transparency standard. https://www.algorithmregister.org/
36. Andersson, C., Hallin, A. ve Ivory, C. (2022). Unpacking the digitalisation of public services: Configuring work during automation in local government. Government Information Quarterly, 39 (1), 101662. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2021.101662
37. Androniceanu, A., Georgescu, I. ve Kinnunen, J. (2022). Public administration digitalization and corruption in the EU member states. A comparative and correlative research analysis. Transylvanian Review of Administrative Sciences, 65E, 5-22. https://doi.org/10.24193/tras.65E.1
38. Androniceanu, A. ve Georgescu, I. (2023). Public administration digitalization and government effectiveness in the EU countries. Central European Public Administration Review, 21 (1), 7-30. https://doi.org/10.17573/cepar.2023.1.01
39. Androniceanu, A. (2024). Generative artificial intelligence, present and perspectives in public administration. Administratie si Management Public, 43, 105-119. https://doi.org/10.24818/amp/2024.43-06
40. Ankara Kent Konseyi. (2025a, Ocak 30). Dijital Dönüşümden Üretken Yapay Zekâya. https://ankarakentkonseyi.org.tr/dijital-donusumden-uretken-yapay-zekaya/
41. Ankara Kent Konseyi. (2025b). Hakkımızda. https://ankarakentkonseyi.org.tr/hakkimizda/
42. Arabacı, A. (2021). Yerel yönetimlerde dijitalleşme: Eskişehir Tepebaşı belediyesi örneği. Atlas Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 1 (7), 65-8.
43. Arumugam, N. (2022, October 2). What made Shanghai the world’s No.1 Smart City? https://www.citiesforum.org/news/what-made-shanghai-the-worlds-no-1-smart-city/
44. ASO-İLTEK. (2024). İllerin teknolojik gelişmişlik endeksi. https://www.aso.org.tr/uploads/ortam/ASO-ILTEK_IllerinTeknolojikGeli%C5%9FmislikEndeksiRaporu.pdf
45. Baig, A. ve Hasan, A. (2023, September 26). Understanding the Shanghai AI Regulations. https://securiti.ai/shanghai-ai-regulation/
46. Balatsky, EV ve Ekimova, NA (2021). Public administration tools: Forecasting vs designing. Upravlenets, 12 (1), 18-31. https://doi.org/10.15838/sa.2022.4.36.2
47. Bisogno, M., Cuadrado-Ballesteros, B. ve Abate, F. (2025). The role of institutional and operational factors in the digitalization of large local governments: insights from Italy. International Journal of Public Sector Management,38 (2), 238-258. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPSM-10-2023-0291
48. Bozeman, B., ve Bretschneider, S. (1986). Public management information systems: Theory and prescription. Public Administration Review, 46 (6), 575-586.
49. Brand, DJ (2023). Ensuring the ethical development and use of AI in local governance. Journal of Ethics and Legal Technologies, 5, (2), 95-110. https://doi.org/10.14658/pupj-JELT-2023-2-6
50. Brown, D. (2005). Electronic government and public administration. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 71 (2), 241-254. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852305053883
51. Bulut, Y. ve Aslan, MM (2019). Yerel yönetimlerde bilişim teknolojilerinin ve yapay zekânın kullanımı: akıllı park Ankara harikalar diyarı örneği. A. Çekiç Akyol (Ed.), 1. Uluslararası İletişim ve Yönetim Bilimleri Kongresi Bildiri Tam Metin Kitabı (s. 761-776). İnönü Üniversitesi.
52. Calzada, I. (2018). (Smart) citizens from data providers to decision-makers? the case study of Barcelona. Sustainability, 10 (8), 3252. . https://doi.org/10.3390/SU10093252.
53. Castilla, R., Pacheco, A. ve Franco, J. (2023). Digital government: Mobile applications and their impact on access to public information. SoftwareX, 22, 101382. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.softx.2023.101382
54. Савченко, OC (2021). Систематизація наукових підходів до поняття «цифровізація у публічному управлінні». Серія: Публічне управління і адміністрування, 2 (76), 72-76. https://doi.org/10.32840/1813-3401.2022.2.12
55. Cellat, M. (2023). Yerel yönetimlerde metaverse denemeleri: Türkiye ve Güney Kore örneği. Kamu Yönetimi ve Teknoloji Dergisi, 5 (1), 26-50. https://doi.org/10.58307/kaytek.1257990
56. Challoumis, C. (2024). Building a sustainable economy-how ai can optimize resource allocation. XVI International Scientific Conference (s. 190-224). https://conference-w.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/USA.P-0304102024.pdf#page=191
57. Charnock, G., March, H. ve Ribera-Fumaz, R. (2019). From smart to rebel city? Worlding, provincialising and the Barcelona Model. Urban Studies, 58 (3), 581-600. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098019872119
58. Chen, Z., Gan, W., Wu, J., Lin, H. ve Chen, C.M. Metaverse for smart cities: A survey. Internet of Things Cyber-Physical Systems, 4, 203–216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iotcps.2023.12.002
59. Commsworld. (2017). What is a Gigabit city? https://www.commsworld.com/insights/blog/2017/june/what-is-a-gigabit-city/#:~:text=Gigabit%20cities%20enjoy%20a%20pure,and%20also%20for%20mobile%20connectivity.
60. Criado, JI ve de Zarate-Alcarazo, LO (2022). Technological frames, CIOs, and artificial ıntelligence in public administration: A socio-cognitive exploratory study in Spanish local governments. Government Information Quarterly, 39 (3), 101688.
61. Crawford, K., ve Calo, R. (2016). There is a blind spot in AI research. Nature, 538(7625), 311-313. https://doi.org/10.1038/538311a
62. CSET. (2021, November 4). Shanghai municipal “14th five-year” plan for building a science and technology innovation center with global influence. https://cset.georgetown.edu/publication/shanghai-municipal-14th-five-year-plan-for-building-a-science-and-technology-innovation-center-with-global-influence/
63. Cugurullo, F. ve Xu, Y. (2025). When AIs become oracles: Generative artificial intelligence, anticipatory urban governance, and the future of cities. Policy and Society, 44 (1), 98–115. https://doi.org/10.1093/polsoc/puae025
64. Cui, Q., Chen, R., Wei, R., Hu, X. ve Wang, G. (2023). Smart mega-city development in practice: A case of Shanghai, China. Sustainability, 15 (2), 1591. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15021591
65. Da Costa Alexandre, A. ve Pereira, LM (2022). European Union fosters ethical AI in the public administration. DH de la Iglesia, JF de Paz Santana, AJ López Rivero (Eds.), International Conference on Disruptive Technologies, Tech Ethics and Artificial Intelligence (s. 103-113). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-14859-0_9
66. Damar, M., Köse, HÖ., Cagle, MN ve Özen, A. (2024). Mapping the digital frontier: Bibliometric and machine learning ınsights into public administration transformation. Sayıştay Dergisi, 35 (132), 9-41. https://doi.org/10.52836/sayistay.1455036
67. David, G. (2024). Artificial intelligence: opportunities and challenges for public administration. Canadian Public Administration, 67 (3), 388-406. https://doi.org/10.1111/capa.12580
68. David, A., Yigitcanlar, T., Desouza, K., Li, RYM, Cheong, PH, Mehmood, R. ve Corchado, J. (2024). Understanding local government responsible AI strategy: An international municipal policy document analysis. Cities, 155, 105502. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2024.105502
69. Decidim. (2025). Faetures. https://decidim.org/features/
70. Deniz, G. ve Aksu, D. (2025). Yerel yönetimlerde yapay zekâ araştırmalarının ağ analizi ile değerlendirilmesi. Çağdaş Yerel Yönetimler, 34 (2), 119-146.
71. Di Giulio, M., ve Vecchi, G. (2021). Implementing digitalization in the public sector. Technologies, agency, and governance. Public Policy and Administration, 38 (2), 133-158. https://doi.org/10.1177/09520767211023283
72. Diorditsa, IV (2024). Legal aspects of local government digitalization. The XI International Science Conference-Modern trends of youth: Advantages and significant disadvantages (s. 59-62). European Conference.
73. Dunleavy, P., Margetts, H., Bastow, S., ve Tinkler, J. (2006). Digital era governance: IT corporations, the state, and e-government. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199296194.001.0001
74. Eco Renewable Energy. (2025). 5 Key elements of smart city: Developing smart cities. https://www.ecorenewableenergy.com.au/articles/key-elements-to-establish-a-smart-city/
75. EC. (2023, September 27). eGovernment benchmark 2023. https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/library/egovernment-benchmark-2023
76. EC. (2024, August 1). AI Act enters into force. https://commission.europa.eu/news/ai-act-enters-force-2024-08-01_en
77. EC. (2025). What are smart cities? https://commission.europa.eu/eu-regional-and-urban-development/topics/cities-and-urban-development/city-initiatives/smart-cities_en
78. EGO. (2019). Başkent’te dijital dönüşüm başlıyor. https://www.ego.gov.tr/tr/haber/5328/baskentte-dijital-donusum-basliyor
79. Erdem, AD ve Emini, FT (2021). Ankara büyükşehir belediyesinin e-belediye uygulamalarının kamu bürokrasisinin sorunları bağlamında incelenmesi. OPUS, 18 (Yönetim ve Organizasyon Özel Sayısı), 1909-1942. https://doi.org/10.26466/opus.846600
80. Fantin Irudaya Raj, E. ve Baladi, M. (2022). Application of deep learning and machine learning in pattern recognition. N. Kumar, C. Shahnaz, K. Kumar, M. Abed Mohammed, RS Raw (Eds.), Advance concepts of image processing and pattern recognition. transactions on computer systems and networks (s. 63-89). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-9324-3_4
81. Floridi, L., ve Taddeo, M. (2016). What is data ethics? Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 374 (2083), 20160360. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2016.0360
82. Floridi, L. ve Cowls, J. (2019). Floridi, L., & Cowls, J. (2019). A Unified framework of five principles for AI in society. Harvard Data Science Review, 1 (1), 5-18. https://doi.org/10.1162/99608f92.8cd550d1
83. Gil de Zúñiga, H., Goyanes, M., ve Durotoye, T. (2023). A scholarly definition of artificial ıntelligence (AI): advancing AI as a conceptual framework in communication research. Political Communication, 41 (2), 317–334. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2023.2290497
84. Global Observatory of Urban Artificial Intelligence. (2025). Barcelona’s AI Strategy. https://gouai.cidob.org/resources/barcelonas-ai-strategy/
85. Gomstyn, A. ve Jonker, A. (2023, November 22). What is a smart city? https://www.ibm.com/think/topics/smart-city
86. Google Play. (2025). Başkent Mobil. https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=tr.bel.ankara.baskentmobil&hl=tr
87. Gökçek, SG (2022). Yerel yönetimlerde nüfusa bağlı olarak dijitalleşmenin performansa etkisi. Yüksek Lisans Tezi. İstanbul Ticaret Üniversitesi.
88. Hammerschmid, G., Palaric, E., Rackwitz, M. ve Wegrich, K. (2024). A shift in paradigm? Collaborative public administration in the context of national digitalization strategies. Governance, 37 (2), 411–430. https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12778
89. Helbing, D., Mahajan, S., Fricker, RH, Musso, A., Hausladen, CI, Carissimo, C., ... ve Pournaras, E. (2023). Democracy by design: Perspectives for digitally assisted, participatory upgrades of society. Journal of Computational Science, 71, 102061. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocs.2023.102061
90. Hollands, R. G. (2008). Will the real smart city please stand up? Intelligent, progressive or neo-liberal? City, 12 (3), 303-320. https://doi.org/10.1080/13604810802479126
91. Houy, C., Hamberg, M., ve Fettke, P. (2019). Robotic process automation in public administrations. Digitalisierung von Staat und Verwaltung (s. 62-74). Gesellschaft für Informatik eV.
92. İçişleri Bakanlığı. (2023). Ankara’da yılbaşı denetimleri KGYS merkezi’nden takip ediliyor. https://www.icisleri.gov.tr/ankarada-yilbasi-denetimleri-kgys-merkezinden-takip-ediliyor
93. Işıklı, Ş. (2015). Digital citizenship: An actual contribution to theory of participatory democracy. AJIT-e: Academic Journal of Information Technology, 6 (18), 21-37. https://doi.org/10.5824/1309-1581.2015.1.002.x
94. Jiménez, DL, Dittmar, EC ve Portillo, JPV (2025). Political, regulatory, and ethical concerns of AI, blockchain, and cloud computing in public administration. K. Wongmahesak, J. Ahmad ve A. Mustanir (Eds.), Public Governance Practices in the Age of AI (s. 207-238). IGI Global Scientific Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-9894-4.ch008
95. Juniper Research. (2023, May). Shanghai Ranked World’s Number 1 Smart City in 2023. https://www.juniperresearch.com/press/shanghai-ranked-worlds-number-1-smart-city/
96. Karaca, Y., ve Öztürk, NK (2019). Yeni nesil belediyecilik: Dijital belediye uygulamaları. Uluslararası Yönetim Akademisi Dergisi, 2 (3), 528-537. https://doi.org/10.33712/mana.649557
97. Karpenko, O., Osmak, A. ve Karpenko, Y. (2020). Mechanisms of the overcoming the digital inequality of the population in Ukraine: interoperable governance, educational technologies of artificial intelligence and geoinformational startups. Prace Komisji Geografii Komunikacji PTG, 2020, 84-90. https://doi.org/10.4467/2543859XPKG.20.022.12790
98. Karpenko , O., Vasiuk , N. ve Osmak , A. (2024). Artificial intelligence as a digital tool for the project approach in public administration and local governance. Strategy of Economic Development of Ukraine, 55, 189-200. https://doi.org/10.33111/sedu.2024.55.189.200
99. Khan, W., Daud, A., Khan, K., Muhammed, S. ve Haq, R. (2023). Exploring the frontiers of deep learning and natural language processing: A comprehensive overview of key challenges and emerging trends. Natural Language Processing Journal, 4, 100026. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nlp.2023.100026
100. Kimari, AM, Niyitunga, EB ve Mohammad, J. (2023). The Effects of Artificial Intelligence on Service Delivery in South African Local Municipalities. African Journal of Development Studies, 13 (4), 267.
101. Klarić, M. (2023). Smart digitalization and public services in the EU. EU and comparative law issues and challenges series (ECLIC), 7, 151–174. https://doi.org/10.25234/eclic/27446
102. Koekemoer, S. ve Van Solms, R. (2021). Does the 4th industrial revolution provide solutions for sustainable basic service delivery in south African municipalities? Journal of Public Administration, 56 (2), 339-351.
103. Köse, H. Ö. ve Polat, N. (2021). Dijital dönüşüm ve denetimin geleceğine etkisi. Sayıştay Dergisi, 32 (123), 9-41. https://doi.org/10.52836/sayistay.1068328
104. Kukharenko, MV (2024). The impact of digitalization on modern democratic processes and public administration. http://journal-app.uzhnu.edu.ua/article/view/311024
105. Langa, VG ve Thakhathi, RD (2022). The role of smart cities to promote smart governance in municipalities. Smart Cities and Regional Development (SCRD) Journal. 6 (2), 9–22. https://doi.org/10.25019/scrd.v6i2.125
106. Lazarova, E., Veselinova, N. (2023). The digital transformation of Bulgarian municipal administration in the era of artificial intelligence. CompSysTech '23: Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on Computer Systems and Technologies (s. 54-58). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3606305.3606319
107. Lee, Y. ve Sun, Z. (2023). Managed transparency: Chinese government transparency. Asian Journal of Comparative Politics, 9(3), 388-401. https://doi.org/10.1177/20578911231199162
108. Li, Y., Fan, Y., ve Nie, L. (2023). Making governance agile: Exploring the role of artificial intelligence in China’s local governance. Public Policy and Administration, 40 (2), 276-301. https://doi.org/10.1177/09520767231188229
109. Lin, Y. (2018). A comparison of selected Western and Chinese smart governance: The application of ICT in governmental management, participation and collaboration. Telecommunications Policy, 42 (10), 800-809. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2018.07.003
110. Liu, J., Lee, J. ve Zhou, R. (2023). Review of big-data and AI application in typhoon-related disaster risk early warning in Typhoon Committee region. Tropical Cyclone Research and Review, 12 (4), 341-353. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tcrr.2023.12.004
111. Liu, T., ve Zhou, B. (2024). The impact of artificial intelligence on the green and low‐carbon transformation of Chinese enterprises. Managerial and Decision Economics. https://doi.org/10.1002/mde.4164
112. Liu, H., Wang, Y. ve Yan, Z. (2024). Artificial intelligence and food processing firms productivity: Evidence from China. Sustainability, 16 (14), 5928. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16145928
113. Lutz, C. (2024). Social Inequalities and artificial intelligence: how digital inequality scholarship enhances our understanding. Algorithms, Artificial Intelligence and Beyond (s. 193-210). Routledge.
114. Ma, Z. ve Cao, Y. (2023). Political participation in China: Towards a new definition and typology. Social Sciences, 12 (10), 531. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci12100531
115. Mäntysalo, V. (2015). The importance of transparency in ethical governance: Current research and finnish citizens’ perceptions. Halduskultuur, 16 (1), 48-67.
116. Marvin, S., While, A., Chen, B. ve Kovacic, M. (2022). Urban AI in China: Social control or hyper-capitalist development in the post-smart city? Frontiers in Sustainable Cities, 4. https://doi.org/10.3389/frsc.2022.1030318
117. Mehta, N. ve Devarakonda, MV (2018). Machine learning, natural language programming, and electronic health records: The next step in the artificial intelligence journey? Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, 141 (6), 2019-2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaci.2018.02.025
118. Mezgec, S., Eftimov, T., Bucher, T., ve Seljak, BK (2019). Mixed deep learning and natural language processing method for fake-food image recognition and standardization to help automated dietary assessment. Public health nutrition, 22 (7), 1193-1202. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1368980018000708
119. Milakovich, ME (2021). Digital governance: Applying advanced technologies to ımprove public service (2th edition). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003215875
120. Mittal, P. (2020). Big data and analytics: a data management perspective in public administration. International Journal of Big Data Management, 1 (2), 152-165. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJBDM.2020.112415
121. Mukta, MY, Rahman, MA, Asyhari, AT ve Bhuiyan, MZA (2020). IoT for energy efficient green highway lighting systems: Challenges and issues. Journal of Network and Computer Applications, 158, 102575. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnca.2020.102575
122. Mynenko, S. ve Lyulyov, O. (2022). The impact of digitalization on the transparency of public authorities. Business Ethics and Leadership, 6 (2), 103-115. https://doi.org/10.21272/bel.6(2).103-115.2022
123. Novachenko, TV, Bielska, TV, Afonin, EA, Lashkina, MH, Kozhemiakina, OM ve Diachenko, NP (2020). Use of information technology to increase economic efficiency and credibility in public administration in the context of digitization. International Journal of Economics and Business Administration, 8 (1), 374-382.
124. Obiuto, NC, Adebayo, RA, Olajiga, OK, ve Festus-Ikhuoria, IC (2024). Integrating artificial intelligence in construction management: Improving project efficiency and cost-effectiveness. International Journal of Advanced Multidisciplinary Research and Studies, 4(2), 639-647.
125. Odilov, J. (2024). Digital use of artificial intelligence in public administration. International Journal of Law and Policy, 2 (3), 7-15. https://doi.org/10.59022/ijlp.161
126. OECD. (2019). Recommendation of the Council on Artificial Intelligence. OECD Legal Instruments, OECD/LEGAL/0449. https://legalinstruments.oecd.org/en/instruments/oecd-legal-0449
127. OECD. (2023). Digital government review of Türkiye: Towards a digitally-enabled government. OECD Digital Government Studies, OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/3958d102-en.
128. Okcu, M. (2024). Yerel yönetimler ve vatandaş iletişiminde dijitalleşme. SETA.
129. Omar, SS, Nayef, JM, Qasim, NH, Kawad, RT ve Kalenychenko, R. (2024). The role of digitalization in improving accountability and efficiency in public services. Revista Investigacion Operacional, 45 (2), 203-224.
130. Özyardımcı, EE (2022). Dijitalleşmenin yerel yönetimlere etkisi: Türkiye ve İngiltere yerel yönetimleri örnekleri. Erzincan Binali Yıldırım Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 4 (2), 35-52. https://doi.org/10.46482/ebyuiibfdergi.1206590
131. Panda, M., Hossain, MM, Puri, R. ve Ahmad, A. (2025). Artificial intelligence in action: Shaping the future of public sector. Digital Policy, Regulation and Governance, https://doi.org/10.1108/DPRG-10-2024-0272
132. Patrucco, AS, Agasisti, T., ve Glas, AH (2020). Structuring public procurement in local governments: The effect of centralization, standardization and digitalization on performance. Public Performance & Management Review, 44 (3), 630–656. https://doi.org/10.1080/15309576.2020.1851267
133. Pislaru, M., Vlad, CS, Ivascu, L., ve Mircea, II (2024). Citizen-centric governance: Enhancing citizen engagement through artificial ıntelligence tools. Sustainability, 16 (7), 2686. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16072686
134. Rehr, D., ve Munteanu, D. (2021). The promise of robotic process automation for the public sector. https://cbce. gmu. edu/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/The-Promise-of-RPA-For-The-Public-Sector. pdf.
135. Ren, C. (2025). Smart governance in Shanghai in the context of public health emergencies. Advances in Economics, Management and Political Sciences, 148, 67-73. https://doi.org/10.54254/2754-1169/2024.LD19170
136. Rudenko, O., Zaika, O., Varynskyi, V., Kulchii, I., ve Myroshnychenko, A. (2024). Digitization of local self-government based on the use of artificial intelligence in the context of sustainable development. Edelweiss Applied Science and Technology, 8 (6), 1467-1480. https://doi.org/10.55214/25768484.v8i6.2263
137. Ruhana, F., Alimuddin, A., Hidayat, YS, Afrilia, UA ve Zulfikar, W. (2023). Optimizing public services through the application of artificial intelligence a case study of integrated administrative services at the sub-district level. Visioner : Jurnal Pemerintahan Daerah Di Indonesia, 15 (2), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.54783/jv.v15i2.860
138. Russell, SJ ve Norvig, P. (2016). Artificial intelligence: A modern approach. Pearson Education Limited.
139. Saldanha, DMF, Dias, CN ve Guillaumon, S. (2022). Transparency and accountability in digital public services: Learning from the Brazilian cases. Government Information Quarterly, 39 (2), 101680. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2022.101680
140. Sanayi ve Teknoloji Bakanlığı ve Dijital Dönüşüm Ofisi. (2021). Ulusal yapay zekâ stratejisi 2021-2025. https://cbddo.gov.tr/SharedFolderServer/Genel/File/TR-UlusalYZStratejisi2021-2025.pdf
141. Sarker, MNI, Wu, M. ve Hossin, MA (2018). Smart governance through bigdata: Digital transformation of public agencies. 2018 International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Big Data (ICAIBD) (s. 62-70). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICAIBD.2018.8396168
142. Saxena, D., Muzellec, L. ve McDonagh, J. (2022). From bureaucracy to citizen-centricity: How the citizen-journey should ınform the digital transformation of public services. International Journal of Electronic Government Research (IJEGR), 18 (1), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJEGR.305230
143. Schuett, J. (2019). A legal definition of AI. SSRN Electronic Journal, 2019, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3453632
144. Shanghai Ecology and Environment Bureau. (2019). Shanghai Ecological and Environmental Bulletin. https://sthj.sh.gov.cn/cmsres/46/466ec89fc615435aa3cad653304f0a8e/5d8cc2b97461048222d072e8e77d7790.pdf
145. Shangai Electric. (2025). Company profile. https://www.shanghai-electric.com/group_en/segit/
146. Shanghai International Service. (2025a). International Science and Technology Innovation Center. https://english.shanghai.gov.cn/en-ThisisShanghai/20231207/c2e35579c22641fb9d5a51ab9f0066ba.html
147. Shanghai International Service. (2025b, April 11). Shanghai launches transport plan to improve business ecosystem. https://english.shanghai.gov.cn/en-BusinessEnvironmentActionPlan/20250411/c39c9978cb864deeb377b7928a78f79d.html
148. Shangai Supercomputer Center. (2021). About Shanghai Big data Alliance. https://www.ssc.net.cn/en/about-bigdata.html
149. Simon, J., Bass, T., Boelman, V., ve Mulgan, G. (2017). Digital democracy. The tools transforming political engagement. Nesta.
150. Singh, B., Ragvar, A. ve Wongmahesak, K. (2025a). Public administration 5.0 in super smart society: Focusing policies and innovative solutions. K. Wongmahesak, J. Ahmad ve A. Mustanir (Eds.), Public Governance Practices in the Age of AI (s. 187-199). IGI Global Scientific Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-9286-7.ch009
151. Singh, B., Ahmed, S., ve Wongmahesak, K. (2025b). Digitalization in public administration: Enhancing digital government and digital governance. K. Wongmahesak, J. Ahmad ve A. Mustanir (Eds.), Public Governance Practices in the Age of AI (s. 69-80). IGI Global Scientific Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-9286-7.ch004
152. Strateji ve Bütçe Başkanlığı. (2023). On ikinci kalkınma planı (2024-2028). Strateji ve Bütçe Başkanlığı.
153. Sundberg, L., ve Holmström, J. (2024). Citizen-centricity in digital government research: A literature review and integrative framework. Information Polity, 29 (1), 55-72. https://doi.org/10.3233/IP-220047
154. Sutton, RS (2020). John McCarthy’s definition of intelligence. Journal of Artificial General Intelligence 11 (2) 66-67. https://doi.org/10.2478/jagi-2020-0003
155. Şen, E. (2023). Yerel yönetimlerde dijital dönüşüm ve akıllı kent uygulamaları: eleştirel bir bakış. Ekonomi İşletme Siyaset ve Uluslararası İlişkiler Dergisi, 9 (2-1), 141-165.
156. Şen, AT (2024). From traditional public administration to digital hybrid public administration. Administration Quantrade Journal of Complex Systems in Social Sciences, 6 (1) , 81-93. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11408035
157. Tekgül, Ç., (2024). Yerel yönetimlerde dijital devrim: stratejiler ve uygulamalar. Journal of Management Theory and Practices Research, 5 (2), 110-126.
158. The State Council of China (2019). Shanghai unveils plan to promote AI industry. https://english.www.gov.cn/news/topnews/201909/01/content_WS5d6afee7c6d0c6695ff7f99a.html
159. Tian, Y., ve Wang, Q. (2024). Priority setting and resource allocation in coastal local government marine regulatory reform: Application of machine learning in resource optimization. Water, 16 (11), 1544. https://doi.org/10.3390/w16111544
160. Tonka, A., Demirdoven, B., & Cubuk, E. (2021). Preliminary study on Turkey's AI Policy:: Strategic Ambiguity or Long-term Uncertainty?. Proceedings of the 22nd Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research (s. 569-571). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3463677.3463790
161. Trincă, VT, Stegerean, R., Petre, A., ve Nistor RL (2025). The key factors for a sustainable smart city – A case study of 22 international smart municipalities. Studia Universitatis Babeș-Bolyai Negotia, 70 (1), 27–59. https://doi.org/10.24193/subbnegotia.2025.1.02
162. Tuğaç, Ç. (2023a). İklim değişikliği ve yapay zekâ: Fırsatlar ve sorunlar. Hitit Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 16 (1), 74-94. https://doi.org/10.17218/hititsbd.1240744
163. Tuğaç, Ç. (2023b). Birleşmiş milletler sürdürülebilir kalkınma amaçlarının gerçekleştirilmesinde yapay zekâ uygulamalarının rolü. Sayıştay Dergisi, 128, 73-99. https://doi.org/10.52836/sayistay.1245051
164. TÜİK. (2025). Adrese dayalı nüfus kayıt sistemi sonuçları, 2024. https://data.tuik.gov.tr/Bulten/Index?p=Adrese-Dayali-Nufus-Kayit-Sistemi-Sonuclari-2024-53783
165. United Nations. (2024a). Global Digital Compact (A/79/I.2). https://www.un.org/global-digital-compact/sites/default/files/2024-09/Global%20Digital%20Compact%20-%20English_0.pdf
166. United Nations. (2024b). Summit of the future: Outcome Documents: Pact for the future, global digital compact and declaration on future generations. https://www.un.org/sites/un2.un.org/files/sotf-pact_for_the_future_adopted.pdf
167. US Department of Transportation (2021, June 9). Putting people first: Smart cities and communities. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/58182
168. Usta, S. ve Bilici, G. (2022). Analysis of the digitization process of Turkish public administration based on the perspective of digital government ındex and e-government development index. Uluslararası Yönetim Akademisi Dergisi, 5 (3), 588-601. https://doi.org/10.33712/mana.1201122
169. Uzun, MM, Yıldız, M. ve Önder, M. (2022). Big Questions of AI in Public Administration and Policy. Siyasal: Journal of Political Sciences, 31 (2), 423-442. https://doi.org/10.26650/siyasal.2022.31.1121900
170. Valle-Cruz, D. ve Sandoval-Almazán, R. (2014). E-gov 4.0: a literature review towards the new government. Proceedings of the 15th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research (dg.o '14) (s.333-334). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/2612733.2612788
171. Vasilenko, LA ve Zotov, VV (2020). Digitalization of public administration in Russia: risks, casuses, problems. Digital Society, 3 (2), 4-16. https://doi.org/10.26425/2658-347X-2020-2-4-16
172. Vrabie, C. (2023). E-government 3.0: An AI model to use for enhanced local democracies. Sustainability, 15 (12), 9572. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15129572
173. Wirtz, BW, Weyerer, JC ve Geyer, C. (2018). Artificial intelligence and the public sector—Applications and challenges. International Journal of Public Administration, 42 (7), 596–615. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2018.1498103
174. Wirtz, BW, Weyerer, JC ve Sturm, BJ (2020). The dark sides of artificial intelligence: An integrated AI governance framework for public administration. International Journal of Public Administration, 43 (9), 818-829. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2020.1749851
175. World Population Review. (2025a). Barcelona. https://worldpopulationreview.com/cities/spain/barcelona
176. World Population Review. (2025b). Shanghai. https://worldpopulationreview.com/cities/china/shanghai
177. Yang, S., Hussain, M., Zahid, R. ve Maqsood, U. (2024). The role of artificial intelligence in corporate digital strategies: evidence from China. Kybernetes, 54 (5), 3062-3082. https://doi.org/10.1108/k-08-2023-1583
178. Yigitcanlar, T., Corchado, JM, Mehmood, R., Li, RYM, Mossberger, K., ve Desouza, K. (2021). Responsible urban innovation with local government artificial intelligence (AI): A conceptual framework and research agenda. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 7 (1), 71. https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc7010071
179. Yigitcanlar, T., Agdas, D., ve Degirmenci, K. (2023). Artificial intelligence in local governments: perceptions of city managers on prospects, constraints and choices. AI & Society, 38 (3), 1135-1150. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-022-01450-x
180. Yigitcanlar, T., David, A., Li, W., Fookes, C., Bibri, SE ve Ye, X. (2024). Unlocking artificial intelligence adoption in local governments: Best practice lessons from real-world implementations. Smart Cities, 7 (4), 1576-1625. https://doi.org/10.3390/smartcities7040064
181. Zhang, Y. (2023). Citizens’ trust and digital attitudes: Evidence from city digital transformation in Shanghai, China. Public Administration and Policy, 26 (3), 258-271. https://doi.org/10.1108/PAP-01-2023-0014