Une Etude Sur Les Choix Aspecto temporels Des Apprenants De Fle Dans Leurs Recits Oraux

Öz

-

Anahtar Kelimeler

• -

Une Etude Sur Les Choix Aspecto temporels Des Apprenants De Fle Dans Leurs Recits Oraux

Öz

Dil edinimi alanında zaman ve görünüş edinimi ile ilgili çalışmalar gün geçtikçe artmaktadır Bu çalışmanın amacı Fransızca konuşan Türk öğrencilerin sözel üretimlerindeki eylem ve görünüşleri incelemektir Bu doğrultuda öğrencilere Fransızca iki ünlü çizgi sinema izletilmiş ve her katılımcıdan filmlerle ilgili sözel anlatı verileri elde edilmiştir Verilerin çözümlenmesinin ardından ulaşılan sonuçlar öğrencilerin sözel anlatılarında kullanacakları zamanı seçmelerinde sözlüksel görünüşün etkili olmadığını göstermiştir Anahtar Sözcükler : Zaman Görünüş Sözlüksel Görünüş Sözel Anlatı RESUME Le nombre de travaux traitant de l’aspect et du temps augmentent de plus en plus dans le domaine de l’acquisition de langue étrangère La présente étude vise à examiner les préférences aspecto temporelles dans les récits oraux des apprenants turcs A cet effet deux dessins animés ont été passés aux apprenants pour qu’ils fournissent des données orales Les résultats de l’analyse de ces données ont montré que l’aspect lexical n’avait pas de contôle sur les choix de temps des apprenants Mots Clé : Temps Aspect Aspect Lexical Récits Oral

Anahtar Kelimeler

• -

Kaynakça

1. Andersen, R. W. (1991). Developmental sequences: The emergence of aspect marking in second language acquisition. In C. A. Ferguson & T. Huebner (Eds.), Second language acquisition and linguistic theories (pp. 305–324). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
2. Bada, E. & Genc, B. (2007) An investigation into the tense/aspect preferences of Turkish speakers of english and native english speakers in their oral narration The Reading Matrix Vol.7, No.1, April 2007
3. Bardovi-Harlig, K. (1992). The Relationship of form and meaning: A cross-sectional study of tense and aspect in the interlanguage of learners of English as a second language. Applied Psycholinguistics, 13, 253-278.
4. Bardovi-Harlig, K. (1994). Anecdote or evidence? Evaluating support for hypotheses concerning the development of tense and aspect. In S. Gass, A. Cohen, & E. Tarone (Eds.), Research Methodology in Second Language Acquisition (pp. 41-60). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
5. Bardovi-Harlig, K. (1998). Narrative structure and lexical aspect: Conspiring factors in second language acquisition of tense-aspect morphology. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 20, 471-508.
6. Bayley, R. (1994). Interlanguage Variation and the Quantitative Paradigm: Past Tense Marking in Chinese-English. In S. Gass, A. Cohen, & E. Tarone (Eds.), Research Methodology in Second Language Acquisition (pp. 157-181). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
7. Camps, J. (2002). Aspectual Distinctions in Spanish as a foreign language: The early stages of oral production. International Review of Applied Linguistics (IRAL) 40 (2002), 179-210.
8. Carruthers, J. (2003). Tense, Orality and Narration: The Case of the Neo-Conte. French Studies 57 (4), 501-520.

9. Comajoan, L. (2005). The Early L2 Acquisition of Past Morphology: Perfective Morphology as an Aspectual Marker or Default Tense Marker? In D. Eddington (Ed.), Selected Proceedings of the 6th Conference on the Acquisition of Spanish and Portuguese as First and Second Languages (pp. 31-43). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.
10. Conseil de l'Europe (2007) Cadre Européen Commun de Référence pour les Langues: Apprendre, Enseigner, Évaluer. Les Editions de Didier. Paris
11. Haznedar, B. (2006). The acquisition of tense/aspect morphology in child L2 acquisition: http://www.hw.ac.uk/langWWW/eurosla/abstracts/bhaznedar.htm [22.06.2007]
12. Howard, M. (2004). On the interactional effect of linguistic constraints on interlanguage variation: The case of past time marking. International Review of Applied Linguistics (IRAL) 42 (2004), 319-334.
13. Labelle, M., Godard, L., Longtin, C. (2002). Grammatical and situational aspect in French: a developmental study. Journal of Child Language 29 (2002), 301-326.
14. Lakshmanan, U., & Selinker, L. (2001). Analysing interlanguage: How do we know what learners know? Second Language Research 17, 393-420.
15. Lardiere, D. (2003). Revisiting the comparative fallacy: A reply to Lakshmanan and Selinker, 2001. Second Language Research, 19, 129-143.
16. Major, R. C. (1987). A Model for Interlanguage Phonology. In G. Ioup & S. H. Weinberger (Eds.), Interlanguage Phonology: The Acquisition of Second Language Sound System (pp. 101-125). New York: Newbury House/Harper & Row.
17. Purdy, J. D. (2005). Commentaries on the Comparative Fallacy in Second Language Research: http://www.tc.columbia.edu/academic/tesol/Webjournal/forum2004.htm [05 .06.2007].
18. Slabakova, R. (2002). Recent research on the acquisition of aspect: an embarrassment of riches? Second Language Research 18 (2), 172–188.
19. Victorri, B. (2005). The role of narration in the emergence of human language: http://www.infres.enst.fr/confs/evolang/actes/_actes75.html [16.06.2007]
20. Vendler, Z. (1967). Linguistics in philosophy. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press Wagner, L. (2001). Aspectual Influences on Early Tense Comprehension. Journal of Child Language 28, 661-681.
21. O’Grady, W. & Archibald, J. (Eds.) (2004). Contemporary Linguistic Analysis: An Introduction (pp.477-508). Toronto: Pearson-Longman.