Merkez-Yerel Etkileşimini Anlamak: OECD Üyesi Ülkelerde Mali Yerelleşmenin Ekonomik Performans Üzerindeki Rolü ve Etkileri

Selçuk Çağrı Esener; Ahmet Emre Biber

Merkez-Yerel Etkileşimini Anlamak: OECD Üyesi Ülkelerde Mali Yerelleşmenin Ekonomik Performans Üzerindeki Rolü ve Etkileri

Öz

Bu çalışma, mali desantralizasyon ve ekonomik büyüme arasındaki Granger nedensellik ilişkisini 1994-2022 döneminde 23 OECD üyesi ülkenin eksiksiz panel veri seti vasıtasıyla analiz etmektedir. Yerel vergiler ve gayrisafi yurtiçi hasılanın varyasyonları, mali yerelleşme ve büyüme göstergesi olarak kullanılmıştır. Bulgular, federal devletlerde merkeziyetçilikten yerele geçişin güçlü karşılıklı nedensellik oluşturduğunu, ancak kaynakları sınırlı üniter yerel yönetimlerde bu ilişkinin zayıf kaldığını göstermektedir. Ayrıca, yerel mali güçlenmenin ekonomik büyümeyi ve kişi başı gelir artışını desteklediği tespit edilmiştir. Çalışma, yerel yönetimlerin ekonomik performanstaki rolüne ve uyarlanabilir politika gerekliliklerine vurgu yapmaktadır. Sonuçlar, ekonomik gelişme ve mali tevzinin güçlenmesi arasındaki karşılıklı besleme mekanizmalarına da dikkat çekmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Kaynakça

Akadiri, S.S., Lasisi, T.T., Uzuner, G., & Akadiri, A.C. (2020). “Examining The Causal Impacts of Tourism, Globalization, Economic Growth and Carbon Emissions in Tourism Island Territories: Bootstrap Panel Granger Causality Analysis”, Current Issues in Tourism, 23(4), 470-484, DOI: 10.1080/13683500.2018.1539067.
Akai, N., & Sakata, M. (2002). “Fiscal decentralization contributes to economic growth: Evidence from state level cross-section data for the Unites States”, Journal of Urban Economics, 52(1), 93-108.
Akai, N., Hosoi, M., & Nishimura, Y. (2009). “Fiscal decentralization and economic volatility: Evidence from state level cross‐section data of the USA”, Japanese Economic Review, 60(2), 223-235.
Arellano, M. (2003). Panel Data Econometrics, Oxford University Press, New York, 2003.
Arnstein, S.R. (1969). “A Ladder of Citizen Participation”, Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 35(4), 216-224.
Asatryan, Z., & Feld, L.P. (2015). “Revisiting the link between growth and federalism: A Bayesian model averaging approach”, Journal of Comparative Economics, 43(3),772-781.
Asteriou, D., & Hall, S. G. (2007). Applied Econometrics: A Modern Approach Using E-views and Microfit, Palgrave Macmillan, New York.
Baldwin, R., & P. Krugman (2004), “Agglomeration, Integration and Tax Harmonization”, NBER Working Paper, No. 9290.

Baltagi, B. H. (2001). Econometric Analysis of Panel Data, Second Edition, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., Chichester, 2001.
Baskaran, T., & Feld, L.P. (2013). “Fiscal decentralization and economic growth in OECD countries is there a relationship?”, Public Finance Rev., 41(4), 421-445.
Besley, T. & Case, A.C. (1995). Incumbent Behavior: Vote-Seeking, Tax-Setting, and Yardstick Competition, Working Paper No. 4041.
Besley, T., & Coate, S. (2003). “Centralized Versus Decentralized Provision of Local Public Goods: A Political Economy Approach”. Journal of Public Economics, 87(12), 2611-2637.
Bodman, P. (2011). “Fiscal decentralisation and economic growth in the OECD”, Journal of Applied Economics, vol. 43, 3021-3035.
Brennan, G., & Buchanan, J. M. (1980). The power to tax: Analytic foundations of a fiscal constitution. Cambridge University Press.
Breitung, J. (2005). “A parametric approach to the estimation of cointegration vectors in panel data”, Econometric Reviews, 24, 151-173.
Breusch, T., & Pagan, A. (1980). “The Lagrange Multiplier Test and Its Application to Model Specifications in Econometrics”, Reviews of Economics Studies, Vol: 47, 239-253.
Burki, S., Perry, G., & Dillinger, W. (1999). Beyond The Center: Decentralizing the State. Working Paper, World Bank Latin America and Caribbean Studies. Washington, DC: World Bank.
Buser, W. (2011). “The impact of fiscal decentralization on economics performance in high-income OECD nations: an institutional approach”, Public Choice, 149(1-2), 31-48.
Castles, F. G. (1999). “Decentralization and the post-war political economy”, European Journal of Political Research, vol. 36, 27-53.
Chu, H. P., Chang, T., & Sagafi-nejad, T. (2016). “Globalization and Economic Growth Revisited: A Bootstrap Panel Causality Test. Contemporary Economic and Management Studies in Asia and Africa”, Cyrus Chronicle Journal, May 2016, 1(1): 30-44.
Davoodi, H., & Zou, H. (1998). “Fiscal decentralization and economic growth: a cross-country study”, Journal of Urban Economics, vol. 43, 244-257.
Dünya Bankası (2024). World Development Indicators – Dünya Kalkınma Göstergeleri (WDI), databank.worldbank.org/data/reports.aspx?source=world-development-indicators
Durusu-Ciftci, D., Soytas, U., & Nazlioglu, S. (2020). “Financial Development and Energy Consumption in Emerging Markets: Smooth Structural Shifts and Causal Linkages”, Energy Economics, Elsevier, 87(C).
Ebel, R., & Yilmaz, S. (2001). Fiscal Decentralization: Is It Happening? How Do We Know? Paper Prepared for Public Finance in Developing and Transition Countries: A Conference in Honor of Richard Bird Conference, Andrew Young School of Policy Studies, Georgia State University, Atlanta.
Ebel, R., & Yilmaz, S. (2002). “On the measurement and impact of fiscal decentralization, World Bank”, Policy Research Working Paper, no. 2809.
Enikolopov, R., & Zhuravskaya, E. (2007). “Decentralization and political institutions”, Journal of Public Economics, vol. 91, 2261-2290.
Esener, C., Granville, B., & Matousek, R. (2022). “Choosing the Optimal Tool for Fiscal Adjustment or Living under Fiscal Constraints: Panel Evidence from Selected OECD Countries”, Economic Research Guardian, Weissberg Publishing, 12(1), 2-29.
Esener, S. Ç. (2019a). “Mali Özerklik ve Mali Tevzin Açısından Yerel Yönetim Vergi Gelirlerinin Kişi Başı Gelir ve Ekonomik Büyüme ile Karşılıklı Nedensellik İlişkisi: Seçilmiş OECD Üyesi Ülkelerde Mali Yerelleşme Üzerine Bazı Çıkarımlar”, Akademik Araştırmalar ve Çalışmalar Dergisi, 11 (20), 1-28.
Esener, S. Ç. (2019b). “Gelişmiş ve Gelişmekte Olan Ülkelerde İktisadi Büyüme, Kamu Gelirleri ve Harcamalarının Çift Yönlü Nedenselliğine Dair Ampirik Bir Analiz (A Two-Way Empirical Investigation on Economic Growth, Public Revenue and Expenditure for Developed and Developing Countries)”, Business and Economics Research Journal, Uludag University, 10(5), 1051-1070.
Esener, S. Ç., & Biber, A. E. (2022). “Kamusal Birer Mal ve Hizmet Olarak Savunma ve Sağlık Harcamalarının Gelir Dağılımı Üzerindeki Etkileri: Seçilmiş Avrupa Birliği Ülkeleri Üzerine Bir Analiz”. Fiscaoeconomia, 6(2), 402-438.
Falay, N. (2011). Yönetimler arası Mali İlişkiler ve Hizmetlerin Optimal Yerelleşmesi, Prof. Dr. Sadık Kırbaş’a Armağan Kitabı içerisinde: M. Koçak ve S. Teker (Ed.), Okan Üniversitesi Yayınları, İstanbul, Eylül 2011, 86-92.
Filippetti, A., & Sacchi, A. (2016). “Decentralization and economic growth reconsidered: The role of regional authority”, Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 34(8), 1793-1824.
Gemmell, N., Kneller, R., & Sanz, I. (2013). “Fiscal decentralization and economic growth: spending versus revenue decentralization”, Econ. Inq., 51(4), 1915-1931.
Granger, C. W. J. (1969). “Investigating Causal Relations by Econometric Models and Cross-Spectral Methods”, Econometrica, 37(3), 424-438.
Granger, C. W. J. (2003). “Some Aspects of Causal Relationships”, Journal of Econometrics, 112, 69-71. Greene, W. H. (2003). Econometric Analysis, Prentice Hall, London, 5th Edition, 2003.
Hacker, R. S., & Hatemi-j, A. (2006). “Tests For Causality Between Integrated Variables Using Asymptotic and Bootstrap Distributions: Theory and Application”, Applied Economics, 38(13), 1489-1500.
Heald, D. (2012). “Why is Transparency About Public Expenditure So Elusive?”, International Review of Administrative Sciences, 78(1), 30-49.
Hung, N. T., & Thanh, S. D. (2022). “Fiscal decentralization, economic growth, and human development: Empirical evidence”. Cogent Economics & Finance, 10(1), 2109279.
Hurlin, C. (2008). Testing for Granger Non-Causality in Heterogeneous Panels, Mimeo. Department of Economics: University of Orleans.
Iimi, A. (2005). “Decentralization and economic growth revisited: an empirical note”, Journal of Urban Economics, vol. 57(3), 449-461.
Kar, M., Nazlıoğlu, Ş., & Ağır, H. (2011). “Financial Development and Economic Growth Nexus in the MENA Countries: Bootstrap Panel Granger Causality Analysis”, Economic Modelling, 28(1-2): 685-693.
Kónya, L. (2006). “Exports And Growth: Granger Causality Analysis on OECD Countries with A Panel Data Approach”, Economic Modelling, vol. 23(6): 978-992.
Korkmaz, Ö. (2019). “The Relationship Between Housing Prices and Inflation Rate in Turkey: Evidence from Panel Konya Causality Test”, International Journal of Housing Markets and Analysis, 13(3), 427-452. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJHMA-05-2019-0051.
Kwon, I. (2011). “Fiscal Decentralization and Economic Growth: A Test for Granger Causality”, The Korean Journal of Policy Studies, vol. 26(3), 161-177.
Ligthart, J.E., & Van Oudheusen, P. (2017). “The Fiscal Decentralisation and Economic Growth Nexus Revisited”, Fiscal Studies, vol. 38(1), 141-171.
Martinez-Vazquez, J., & McNab, R. M. (2006). “Fiscal decentralization, macro stability and growth”, Hacienda Publica Espanola, vol. 179, 25-49.
Martinez-Vazquez, J., & McNab, R. (1998). Fiscal Decentralization, Economic Growth, and Democratic Governance. International Studies Program Working Paper. Atlanta: Andrew Young School of Policy Studies, Georgia State University.
Martinez-Vazquez, J., & McNab, R. (2002). Fiscal Decentralization, Macroeconomic Stability, and Economic Growth. International Studies Program Working Paper. Atlanta: Andrew Young School of Policy Studies, Georgia State University.
Martinez-Vazquez, J., Lago-Penas, S., & Sacchi, A. (2017). “The Impact of Fiscal Decentralization: A Survey”, Journal of Economic Surveys, vol. 31(4), 1095-1129.
McKinnon, R. (1997). Market-preserving fiscal federalism in the American Monetary Union. In B. Mairo, & T. Ter-Minassian (Eds.), Macroeconomic dimensions of public finance (73-93). New York: Routledge.
Menyah, K., Nazlıoğlu, S., & Wolde-Rufael, Y. (2014). “Financial Development, Trade Openness and Economic Growth in African Countries: New Insights from a Panel Causality Approach”, Economic Modelling, 37: 386-394.
Musgrave, R.A. (1959). The Theory of Public Finance: A Study in Public Economy, McGraw-Hill, New York.
Nazlıoğlu, Ş., Lebe, F., & Kayhan, S. (2011). “Nuclear Energy Consumption and Economic Growth in OECD Countries: Cross-Sectionally Dependent Heterogeneous Panel Causality Analysis”, Energy Policy, 39(10), 6615-6621.
Oates, W.E. (1972). Fiscal Federalism, Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, New York.
OECD (2024). OECD Statistics, “Fiscal Decentralisation Database” (oecd.stat), stats.oecd.org.
Pesaran, M. H. (2004). General Diagnostic Tests for Cross Section Dependence in Panels, CESifo WP, 1229, IZA Discussion Paper, 1240.
Pesaran, M. H., & Yamagata, T. (2008). “Testing Slope Homogeneity in Large Panels”, Journal of Econometrics, Vol: 142(1), 50-93.
Pesaran, M. H., Ullah, A., & Yamagata, T. (2008). “A Bias-Adjusted LM Test of Error Cross-section Independence”, Econometrics Journal, Vol: 11 (1), 105-127.
Qiao, Y., Martinez-Vazquez, J., & Xu, J. (2008). “The trade-off between growth and equity in decentralization policy: China’s experience”, Journal of Development Economics, 86(1): 112-128.
Rodriguez-Pose, A., & Ezcurra, R. (2011). “Is fiscal decentralization harmful for economic growth? Evidence from the OECD countries”, J. Econ. Geogr., 11(4), 619-643.
Rodríguez-Pose, A., & Kroijer, A. (2009). “Fiscal decentralization and economic growth in central and eastern Europe”, Growth and Change, vol. 40, 387-417.
Sadeghi, P., Shahrestani, H., Hojhabr Kiani, K., & Torabi, T. (2018). “The Impact of Human Capital on FDI with New Evidence from Bootstrap Panel Granger Causality Analysis”, Iranian Economic Review, 22(1), 215-233. doi: 10.22059/ier.2018.65359.
Sima, M., Liang, P. ve Qingjie, Z. (2023). “The impact of fiscal decentralization on economic growth: A comparative analysis of selected African and OECD countries”. Heliyon, 9(9).
Song, J., Geng, L., Fahad, S. ve Liu, L. (2022). “Fiscal decentralization and economic growth revisited: an empirical analysis of poverty governance”. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29(19), 28020-28030.
Spolaore, E. (2015). The political economy of European integration. In Routledge handbook of the economics of European integration (pp. 435-448). Routledge.
Stansel, D. (2005). “Local Decentralization and Local Economic Growth: A Cross-Sectional Examination of US Metropolitan Areas”, Journal of Urban Economics, 57(1), 55-72.
Stegarescu, D. (2005). “Public Sector Decentralisation: Measurement Concepts and Recent International Trends”, Fiscal Studies, 26(3), 301-333.
Swamy, P.A.V.B. (1970). “Efficient Inference in a Random Coefficient Regression Model”, Econometrica, 38 (2), 311-323.
Taillant, D. (1994). Decentralization: Local and Regional Government Development. A Literature Review. LATPS Mimeo. Washington, DC: World Bank.
Thiessen, U. (2000). “Fiscal federalism in Western European and selected other Countries: Centralization or decentralization? What is better for economic growth?”, Deutsches Institut für Wirtschanftsforschung DP, No. 224. Thiessen, U. (2003). “Fiscal decentralisation and economic growth in high-income OECD countries”, Fiscal Studies, vol. 24, 237-274.
Thornton, J. (2007). “Fiscal decentralization and economic growth reconsidered”, Journal of Urban Economics, vol. 61(1), 64-70.
Tiebout, C. (1956). “A Pure Theory of Local Expenditures”, J. Polit. Econ., 64, 416-424.
Weingast, B. (1995), “The Economic Role of Political Institutions: Market-Preserving Federalism and Economic Development”, Journal of Law, Economics and Organization, Vol. 20.
Wildasin, D. E. (1989), “Interjurisdictional Capital Mobility: Fiscal Externality and A Corrective Subsidy”, Journal of Urban Economics, Vol. 25.
Woller, G. M., & Phillips, K. (1998). “Fiscal decentralisation and LDC economic growth: an empirical investigation”, Journal of Development Studies, vol. 34, 139-48.
Xie, D., Zou, H., & Davoodi, H. (1999). “Fiscal decentralization and economic growth in the United States”, Journal of Urban Economics, 45(2): 228-239.
Zellner, A. (1962). “An Efficiency Method of Estimating Seemingly Unrelated Regression Equations and Tests for Aggregation Bias”, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 57, 348-368.
Zhang, T., & Zou, H. (1998). “Fiscal decentralization, public spending, and economic growth in China”, Journal of Public Economics, 67(2): 221-240.
Zodrow, G.R. & Mieszkowski, P. (1986). “Pigou, Tiebout, Property Taxation, and the Underprovision of Local Public Goods”. Journal of Urban Economics, 19, 356-370.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

Türkçe

Konular

Yerel Yönetimler, Politika ve Yönetim (Diğer)

Bölüm

Araştırma Makalesi

Yazarlar

Selçuk Çağrı Esener ^*
0000-0002-5722-9549
Türkiye

Ahmet Emre Biber
0000-0001-5251-3156
Türkiye

Erken Görünüm Tarihi

16 Ekim 2025

Yayımlanma Tarihi

20 Ekim 2025

Gönderilme Tarihi

27 Mayıs 2025

Kabul Tarihi

22 Temmuz 2025

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 2025 Cilt: 34 Sayı: 4

IZ

https://izlik.org/JA55NY77UM

Kaynak Göster

RIS / Bibtex

APA

Esener, S. Ç., & Biber, A. E. (2025). Merkez-Yerel Etkileşimini Anlamak: OECD Üyesi Ülkelerde Mali Yerelleşmenin Ekonomik Performans Üzerindeki Rolü ve Etkileri. Çağdaş Yerel Yönetimler, 34(4), 77-116. https://izlik.org/JA55NY77UM

AMA

1.Esener SÇ, Biber AE. Merkez-Yerel Etkileşimini Anlamak: OECD Üyesi Ülkelerde Mali Yerelleşmenin Ekonomik Performans Üzerindeki Rolü ve Etkileri. ÇYY. 2025;34(4):77-116. https://izlik.org/JA55NY77UM

Chicago

Esener, Selçuk Çağrı, ve Ahmet Emre Biber. 2025. “Merkez-Yerel Etkileşimini Anlamak: OECD Üyesi Ülkelerde Mali Yerelleşmenin Ekonomik Performans Üzerindeki Rolü ve Etkileri”. Çağdaş Yerel Yönetimler 34 (4): 77-116. https://izlik.org/JA55NY77UM.

EndNote

Esener SÇ, Biber AE (01 Ekim 2025) Merkez-Yerel Etkileşimini Anlamak: OECD Üyesi Ülkelerde Mali Yerelleşmenin Ekonomik Performans Üzerindeki Rolü ve Etkileri. Çağdaş Yerel Yönetimler 34 4 77–116.

IEEE

[1]S. Ç. Esener ve A. E. Biber, “Merkez-Yerel Etkileşimini Anlamak: OECD Üyesi Ülkelerde Mali Yerelleşmenin Ekonomik Performans Üzerindeki Rolü ve Etkileri”, ÇYY, c. 34, sy 4, ss. 77–116, Eki. 2025, [çevrimiçi]. Erişim adresi: https://izlik.org/JA55NY77UM

ISNAD

Esener, Selçuk Çağrı - Biber, Ahmet Emre. “Merkez-Yerel Etkileşimini Anlamak: OECD Üyesi Ülkelerde Mali Yerelleşmenin Ekonomik Performans Üzerindeki Rolü ve Etkileri”. Çağdaş Yerel Yönetimler 34/4 (01 Ekim 2025): 77-116. https://izlik.org/JA55NY77UM.

JAMA

1.Esener SÇ, Biber AE. Merkez-Yerel Etkileşimini Anlamak: OECD Üyesi Ülkelerde Mali Yerelleşmenin Ekonomik Performans Üzerindeki Rolü ve Etkileri. ÇYY. 2025;34:77–116.

MLA

Esener, Selçuk Çağrı, ve Ahmet Emre Biber. “Merkez-Yerel Etkileşimini Anlamak: OECD Üyesi Ülkelerde Mali Yerelleşmenin Ekonomik Performans Üzerindeki Rolü ve Etkileri”. Çağdaş Yerel Yönetimler, c. 34, sy 4, Ekim 2025, ss. 77-116, https://izlik.org/JA55NY77UM.

Vancouver

1.Selçuk Çağrı Esener, Ahmet Emre Biber. Merkez-Yerel Etkileşimini Anlamak: OECD Üyesi Ülkelerde Mali Yerelleşmenin Ekonomik Performans Üzerindeki Rolü ve Etkileri. ÇYY [Internet]. 01 Ekim 2025;34(4):77-116. Erişim adresi: https://izlik.org/JA55NY77UM