Klinik Fonoloji Terimlerinin Tasnifi Denemesi

Öz

Dildeki seslerin üretimi, algılanması ve düzenlenişini inceleyen ses bilgisi; konuşma seslerinin fiziksel ve işitsel özelliklerini ele alan fonetik ile seslerin dildeki işlevlerini, düzenlenişlerini ve karşıtlık ilişkilerini inceleyen fonoloji olmak üzere iki temel alana ayrılır. Seslerin nasıl üretildiği, algılandığı ve hangi kurallara göre yapılan-dığı fonoloji ile açıklanır. Bu nedenle ses bilgisi, dilin yapısal çözümlemesinin yanı sıra konuşma ve dil bozukluklarının anlaşıl-masında da önemlidir. Klinik dilbilim, dilbilimin kuram ve yöntemlerinin konuşma ve dil bozukluklarının tanılanması, değerlendirilmesi ve incelenmesinde kullanıldığı disiplinlerarası bir alandır. Klinik fonoloji ise ses hatalarını artikülasyon düzeyinin ötesinde, seslerin dil içindeki örgütlenişi ve fonolojik süreçler bağlamında inceler. Bu bozuklukla-rın betimlenmesi ve değerlendirilmesinde kullanılan kavramlar klinik fonolojinin terminolojisini oluşturur. Bu çalışmada klinik fonoloji terimleri belirlenmiş ve tasnif edilmeye çalışılmıştır. Doküman analiziyle incelenen 18 makale, 4 kitap ve 2 kitap bölümünden elde edilen veriler betimsel analizle değerlendi-rilmiş; 15 tema altında 167 terim tespit edilmiştir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Fonoloji
• klinik fonoloji
• tasnif denemesi
• ses bilgisi
• terminoloji

Destekleyen Kurum

Yok

Etik Beyan

Bu çalışma Etik Kurul İzni gerektirmemektedir.

Teşekkür

Yok.

An Attempt at Classifying Clinical Phonological Terms

Öz

Phonetics, which studies the production, perception, and organiza-tion of sounds in language, is divided into two main branches: phonetics, which deals with the physical and auditory characteristics of speech sounds, and phonology, which examines the functions, organization, and oppositional relationships of sounds in language. Phonology explains how sounds are produced, perceived, and organized according to specific rules. For this reason, linguistics is important not only for the structural analysis of language but also for understanding speech and language disorders. Clinical linguistics is an interdisciplinary field in which the theories and methods of linguistics are applied to the diagnosis, assessment, and study of speech and language disorders. Clinical phonology, on the other hand, examines sound errors beyond the level of articula-tion, within the context of how sounds are organized within a langu-age and phonological processes. The concepts used to describe and evaluate these disorders form the terminology of clinical phonology. In this study, clinical phonology terms were identified and classified. Data obtained from 18 articles, 4 books, and 2 book chapters analy-zed through document analysis were evaluated using descriptive analysis; 167 terms were identified under 15 themes.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Phonology
• clinical phonology
• classification study
• phonetics
• terminology

Destekleyen Kurum

None

Etik Beyan

This study does not require approval from the Ethics Committee.

Teşekkür

None

Kaynakça

1. Ahmed, H. M. A., Dummer, P. M. H., Camilleri, J., Cooper, P. R., Cushley, S., Galler, K. M., & Duncan, H. F. (2023). Developing a consensus-based glossary of controversial terms in endodontology. International Endodontic Journal, 56(4), 405-422. https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.13878
2. Al-Hindawi, F., & Hussein, M. A. (2018). The basic tenets of generative phonology. Journal of Education and Practice, 9(8), 78-86.
3. Almazova, A. A., Vodyakha, S. A., Drebot, V. V., Zueva, T. V., & Mishina, T. V. (2025). Written foreign-language scientific discourse in speech-language pathology students. Integration of Education, 29(1), 84-101. https://doi.org/10.15507/1991-9468.118.029.202501.084-101
4. Baker, E., & McLeod, S. (2011). Evidence-based practice for children with speech sound disorders: Part 1 narrative review. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 42(2), 102-139. https://doi.org/10.1044/0161-1461(2010/09-0075)
5. Bernhardt Barlow, J. A. (2001). Case study: Optimality theory and the assessment and treatment of phonological disorders. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 32(4), 242-256. https://doi.org/10.1044/0161-1461(2001/022)
6. Barlow, J. A., & Gierut, J. A. (1999). Optimality theory in phonological acquisition. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 42(6), 1482-1498. https://doi.org/10.1044/jslhr.4206.1482
7. Barmak, E., Maviş, İ., & Ege, P. (2025). Investigation of rapid naming and language skills in children with speech sound disorders. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 60(2), e13123. https://doi.org/10.1111/1460-6984.13123
8. Bernhardt, B. (1992). Developmental implications of nonlinear phonological theory. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 6(4), 259-281. https://doi.org/10.3109/02699209208985584

9. Bernhardt, B. M. H., & Stoel-Gammon, C. (1999). Workbook in nonlinear phonology for clinical application. Pro-Ed.
10. Bishop, D. V. M. (2017). Why is it so hard to reach agreement on terminology? The case of developmental language disorder (DLD). International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 52(6), 671-680. https://doi.org/10.1111/1460-6984.12335
11. Bishop, D. V. M., Snowling, M. J., Thompson, P. A., Greenhalgh, T., & the CATALISE-2 Consortium. (2017). Phase 2 of CATALISE: A multinational and multidisciplinary Delphi consensus study of problems with language development: Terminology. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 58(10), 1068-1080. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.12721
12. Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27-40. https://doi.org/10.3316/QRJ0902027
13. Bozděchová, I. (2009). Vývoj moderní teorie terminologie a česká terminologická tradice. Naše Řeč, 92(3), 132-142. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
14. Brin-Henry, F., Felden, S., & Roche, C. (2019). TemPO: Towards a conceptualisation of pathology in speech and language therapy. In TOTh 2019 Proceedings. Chambéry: Institut Porphyre.
15. Browman, C. P., & Goldstein, L. (1986). Towards an articulatory phonology. Phonology Yearbook, 3, 219-252. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0952675700000658
16. Browman, C. P., & Goldstein, L. (1989). Articulatory gestures as phonological units. Phonology, 6(2), 201-251. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0952675700001019
17. Browman, C. P., & Goldstein, L. (1992). Articulatory phonology: An overview. Phonetica, 49, (3–4), 155-180. https://doi.org/10.1159/000261913
18. Budak, Ş. (2025). İşitsel ayırt etme ve fonolojik farkındalık becerileri arasındaki ilişkinin incelenmesi [Yüksek lisans tezi, İzmir Tınaztepe Üniversitesi]. YÖK Ulusal Tez Merkezi.
19. Cabré, M. T. (1999). Terminology: Theory, methods and applications. John Benjamins.
20. Cabré, M. T. (2023). Terminology: Cognition, language and communication. John Benjamins.
21. Cardno, C. (2018). Policy document analysis: A practical educational leadership tool and a qualitative research method. Educational Administration: Theory and Practice, 24(4), 623-640. https://doi.org/10.14527/kuey.2018.016
22. Cederholm, T., Barazzoni, R., Austin, P., Ballmer, P., Biolo, G., Bischoff, S. C., Compher, C., Correia, I., Higashiguchi, T., Holst, M., Jensen, G. L., Malone, A., Muscaritoli, M., Nyulasi, I., Pirlich, M., Rothenberg, E., Schindler, K., Schneider, S. M., de van der Schueren, M. A. E., … Singer, P. (2017). ESPEN guidelines on definitions and terminology of clinical nutrition. Clinical Nutrition, 36(1), 49-64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clnu.2016.09.004
23. Chomsky, N., & Halle, M. (1968). The sound pattern of English. Harper & Row.
24. Cleland, J., Crowe, K., Wren, Y., McLeod, S., Roulstone, S., Marshall, J., & Pring, T. (2025). Towards an agreed labelling system and protocol for the diagnosis of speech sound disorder subtypes in the United Kingdom. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 60(1). https://doi.org/10.1111/1460-6984.13117
25. Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). SAGE.
26. Cummings, L. (2013). Clinical linguistics: A primer. International Journal of Language Studies, 7(2), 1-30.
27. Crystal, D. (1981). Clinical linguistics (Disorders of human communication, Vol. 3). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-4001-7
28. Csercsics, A. L., McLeod, S., Verdon, S., & Cheng, L. (2024). Working toward recommended terminology in the Canadian preschool speech-language pathology context. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 33(2), 765-784. https://doi.org/10.1044/2023_AJSLP-23-00141
29. Çibik, M. (2025). 6-9 yaş arası konuşma sesi bozukluğu olan, özgül öğrenme güçlüğü olan ve tipik gelişim gösteren çocuklarda pragmatik dil becerileri envanteri skorlarının karşılaştırılması [Yüksek lisans tezi, Anadolu Üniversitesi]. YÖK Ulusal Tez.
30. Damico, J. S., Müller, N., & Ball, M. J. (Eds.). (2021). The handbook of language and speech disorders (2nd ed.). Wiley-Blackwell.
31. Demir Ünsal, B. (2025). Rezidüel konuşma sesi bozukluğu olan ve olmayan çocukların anlamsız sözcük tekrarı performanslarının karşılaştırılması ve demografik değişkenler açısından incelenmesi [Yüksek lisans tezi, İzmir Bakırçay Üniversitesi]. YÖK Ulusal Tez Merkezi.
32. Demir, N., & Yılmaz, E. (2018). Türkçe ses bilgisi. Anadolu Üniversitesi Yayınları.
33. Diepeveen, S., Haaften, L. van, Terband, H., de Swart, B., & Maassen, B. (2022). Process-oriented profiling of speech sound disorders. Children, 9(10), 1502. https://doi.org/10.3390/children9101502
34. Dodd, B. (1995). Differential diagnosis and treatment of children with speech disorder. Whurr.
35. Dodd, B. (Ed.). (2005). Differential diagnosis and treatment of children with speech disorder (2nd ed.). Whurr.
36. Dodd, B. (2014). Differential diagnosis of pediatric speech sound disorder. Current Developmental Disorders Reports, 1(3), 189-196. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40474-014-0017-3
37. Durand, J. (2014). Generative and non-linear phonology. Routledge.
38. Ege, P. (2010). Türkçe'deki ünsüzlerin edinimi: Bir norm çalışması. Türk Psikoloji Dergisi, 25(65), 16-34. https://doi.org/10.31828/tpd1300443320100000m000108
39. Eslam, M., Newsome, P. N., Sarin, S. K., Anstee, Q. M., Targher, G., Romero-Gomez, M., Zelber-Sagi, S., Wong, V. W.-S., Dufour, J.-F., Schattenberg, J. M., Kawaguchi, T., Arrese, M., Valenti, L., Shiha, G., Tiribelli, C., Yki-Järvinen, H., Fan, J.-G., Grønbæk, H., Yilmaz, Y., … George, J. (2020). A new definition for metabolic associated fatty liver disease: An international expert consensus statement. Journal of Hepatology, 73(1), 202-209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhep.2020.03.039
40. Feralan, G. (2025). 4-6 yaş aralığındaki konuşma sesi bozukluğu olan ve tipik gelişim gösteren çocukların işitsel işlemleme becerilerinin karşılaştırılması [Yüksek lisans tezi, Bahçeşehir Üniversitesi]. YÖK Ulusal Tez Merkezi.
41. Geytenbeek, J. (2019). The use of Dodd's model for differential diagnosis to classify childhood speech sound disorders. Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology, (61), 622-630. https://doi.org/10.1111/dmcn.14022
42. Gierut, J. A., & Morrisette, M. L. (2005). The clinical significance of optimality theory for phonological disorders. Topics in Language Disorders, 25(3), 266-280. https://doi.org/10.1097/00011363-200507000-00007
43. Igisheva, L. N., Ivancha, O. P., & Demina, M. A. (2022). Genesis of clinical linguistics: Cognitive-communication disorders and their research directions. Bulletin of Kemerovo State University. Series: Humanities and Social Sciences, 6(4), 433-442. https://doi.org/10.21603/2542-1840-2022-6-4-433-442
44. ISO. (2022). ISO 704:2022 -Terminology work- Principles and methods. International Organization for Standardization.
45. İskender, H. (2023). Syncope through gemination in Turkish: Exploring the role of sufficiently identical flanking consonants. Dünya Dilleri, Edebiyatları ve Çeviri Çalışmaları Dergisi, 4(2), 145-168.
46. İşgören, Ş. A., Sezer Yıldız, Z., & Topbaş, S. (2025). The relationship between the phonological loop and receptive language and nonverbal intelligence in speech sound disorders. Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Fakültesi Özel Eğitim Dergisi, 26(1), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.21565/ozelegitimdergisi.1402843
47. Kalender, G. (2025). Konuşma sesi bozukluğu olan okul çağı çocuklarının okuma ve fonolojik farkındalık becerilerinin incelenmesi [Yüksek lisans tezi, İzmir Bakırçay Üniversitesi]. YÖK Ulusal Tez Merkezi.
48. Karakulak Şıklar, N. (2025). Okul öncesi dönem konuşma sesi bozukluğu: Ebeveyn değerlendirmeleri ile çocukların kendi konuşmalarına tutumları [Yüksek lisans tezi, İstanbul Atlas Üniversitesi]. YÖK Ulusal Tez Merkezi.
49. Kehoe, M. (2025). Distinguishing usual and unusual phonological processes in French-speaking children with speech sound disorders. Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica, 77(2), 89-104. https://doi.org/10.1159/000542082
50. Kerremans, K., Temmerman, R., & De Baer, P. (2021). Construing domain knowledge via terminological understanding. Linguistica Antverpiensia, New Series – Themes in Translation Studies, 20, 134-151.
51. Kılıç, M. A. (2020). Konuşma sesi ve prozodi bozuklukları. Prozodi (Bürün Bilimi) ve Konuşma Çalıştayı Bildiri Kitabı içinde (ss. 119-131). https://www.academia.edu/44350794
52. Küçüköksüz, S. (2025). Konuşma sesi bozukluğunun 5-7 yaş arası çocukların sözel akıcılık becerilerine olan etkisinin değerlendirilmesi [Yüksek lisans tezi, İstinye Üniversitesi]. YÖK Ulusal Tez Merkezi.
53. Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33(1), 159-174. https://doi.org/10.2307/2529310
54. Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. SAGE.
55. Littlejohn, M., & Maas, E. (2024). How to cut the pie is no piece of cake: Toward a process-oriented approach to assessment and diagnosis of speech sound disorders. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 59(6), 2158-2180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1460-6984.13097
56. Lüke, C., Ritterfeld, U., Grimm, A., Mehler, K., Pomnitz, P., & Spreer, M. (2023). Definition and terminology of developmental language disorders-Interdisciplinary consensus across German-speaking countries. PLOS ONE, 18(7), e0287504. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0287504
57. Maas, E. (2024). A goal-writing framework for motor-based intervention for childhood apraxia of speech. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 33(5), 2147-2167. https://doi.org/10.1044/2024_AJSLP-24-00014
58. Maas, E., Gildersleeve-Neumann, C. E., Jakielski, K. J., & Stoeckel, R. (2014). Motor-based intervention protocols in treatment of childhood apraxia of speech (CAS). Current Developmental Disorders Reports, 1(3), 197–206. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40474-014-0016-4
59. Matlar, Z. (2025). 7-8 yaşındaki çocuklarda konuşma sesi bozukluğu ve akademik başarı arasındaki ilişkinin incelenmesi [Yüksek lisans tezi, İzmir Tınaztepe Üniversitesi]. YÖK Ulusal Tez Merkezi.
60. McLeod, S., & Crowe, K. (2018). Children's consonant acquisition in 27 languages: A cross-linguistic review. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 27(4), 1546-1571. https://doi.org/10.1044/2018_AJSLP-17-0100
61. Namasivayam, A. K., Coleman, D., O'Dwyer, A., & van Lieshout, P. (2020). Speech sound disorders in children: An articulatory phonology perspective. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, Article 2998. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02998
62. Namasivayam, A. K., Coleman, D., O'Dwyer, A., & van Lieshout, P. (2025). The articulatory basis of phonological error patterns in childhood speech sound disorders. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 19, 1487521. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2025.1487521
63. Nas, N. (2025). Dil konuşma bozukluğu (kekemelik, gecikmiş dil ve konuşma, konuşma sesi bozukluğu, artikülasyon bozukluğu, fonolojik bozukluk) olan çocuklarda ebeveyn tutumu ve ebeveyn stres indeksinin incelenmesi [Yüksek lisans tezi, Kapadokya Üniversitesi]. YÖK Ulusal Tez Merkezi.
64. Özçelik, Ö. (2024). The phonology of Turkish. Routledge.
65. Parker, F. (1976). Distinctive features in speech pathology: Phonology or phonemics? Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 41(1), 23-39. https://doi.org/10.1044/jshd.4101.23
66. Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (4th ed.). SAGE.
67. Perkins, M. (2007). Pragmatic impairment. Cambridge University Press.
68. Petinou-Loizou, K., Ttofari, K., & Filippou, E. (2024). What is in a name: Taxonomy of speech sound disorders from a cross-linguistic perspective. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 59(6), 2123-2130. https://doi.org/10.1111/1460-6984.13092
69. Robles, M. C., Pollack, C. C., Adolph, J., Goold, S., & Firn, J. (2024). Role of terminology for linguistic preferences in clinical and public health communication. The American Journal of Bioethics, 24(4), 88–90. https://doi.org/10.1080/15265161.2024.2323682
70. Rvachew, S., & Matthews, T. (2024). Considerations for identifying subtypes of speech sound disorder. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 59(6), 2146-2157. https://doi.org/10.1111/1460-6984.13108
71. Sert Alliş, Ö. (2025). Konuşma sesi bozukluğunda klinik karar verme: Karma yöntem çalışması [Yüksek lisans tezi, İzmir Bakırçay Üniversitesi]. YÖK Ulusal Tez Merkezi.
72. Shriberg, L. D. (1993). Four new speech and prosody-voice measures for genetics research and other studies in developmental phonological disorders. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 36(1), 105-140. https://doi.org/10.1044/jshr.3601.105
73. Shriberg, L. D., Austin, D., Lewis, B. A., McSweeny, J. L., & Wilson, D. L. (1997). The Speech Disorders Classification System (SDCS): Extensions and lifespan reference data. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 40(4), 723–740. https://doi.org/10.1044/jslhr.4004.723
74. Shriberg, L. D., Fourakis, M., Hall, S. D., Karlsson, H. B., Lohmeier, H. L., McSweeny, J. L., & Wilson, D. L. (2010). Extensions to the Speech Disorders Classification System (SDCS). Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 24(10), 795-824. https://doi.org/10.3109/02699206.2010.503006
75. Shriberg, L. D., Strand, E. A., Fourakis, M., Jakielski, K. J., Hall, S. D., Karlsson, H. B., Mabie, H. L., McSweeny, J. L., Tilkens, C. M., & Wilson, D. L. (2017). A diagnostic marker to discriminate childhood apraxia of speech from speech delay: I. Development and description of the pause marker. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 60(4), S1096-S1117. https://doi.org/10.1044/2016_JSLHR-S-15-0296
76. So, L. K. H., & Dodd, B. J. (1994). Phonologically disordered Cantonese-speaking children. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 8(3), 235–255. https://doi.org/10.3109/02699209408985314
77. Stackhouse, J., & Wells, B. (1997). Children's speech and literacy difficulties: A psycholinguistic framework. Whurr Publishers.
78. Stringer, H., Cleland, J., Wren, Y., Rees, R., & Williams, P. (2023). Speech sound disorder or DLD (phonology)? Towards a consensus agreement on terminology. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 59(6), 2131-2145. https://doi.org/10.1111/1460-6984.12986
79. Sugden, E., Lloyd, S., Lam, J., & Cleland, J. (2019). Systematic review of ultrasound visual biofeedback in intervention for speech sound disorders. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 54(5), 705-728. https://doi.org/10.1111/1460-6984.12478
80. Sugden, E., Munro, N., Trivette, C. M., Baker, E., & Williams, A. L. (2018). Service delivery and intervention intensity for phonology-based speech sound disorders. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 53(4), 718-734. https://doi.org/10.1111/1460-6984.12387
81. Temmerman, R. (2000). Towards new ways of terminology description: The sociocognitive-approach. John Benjamins.
82. Topbaş, S. (1997). Phonological acquisition of Turkish children: Implications for phonological disorders. European Journal of Disorders of Communication, 32(4), 377-396. https://doi.org/10.3109/13682829709021457
83. Topbaş, S. (2005). Türkçe sesletim-sesbilgisi testi (SST). Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı–Türk Dil Kurumu Yayınları.
84. Topbaş, S. (2006). Does the speech of Turkish-speaking phonologically disordered children differ from that of children speaking other languages? Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 20(7–8), 509-522. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699200500266396
85. Topbaş, S. (2006). Türkçe sesletim sesbilgisi testi: Geçerlik-güvenirlik ve standardizasyon çalışması. Türk Psikoloji Dergisi, 21(58), 39–56.
86. Topbaş, S., & Güven, S. (2013). Türkçe erken dil gelişim testi kullanım kılavuzu (1. baskı). Detay Yayıncılık.
87. Topbaş, S., & Güven, S. (2014). Erken dil gelişimi testi üçüncü versiyonunun Türkçe'ye uyarlama, geçerlik ve güvenirlik ön çalışması. International Journal of Early Childhood Special Education, 6(2), 151-176.
88. Topbaş, S. (2017). Sesletim sesbilgisi testi kullanım yönergesi. Detay Yayıncılık.
89. Ttofari Eecen, K., Eadie, P., Morgan, A. T., & Reilly, S. (2018). Validation of Dodd's model for differential diagnosis of childhood speech sound disorders: A longitudinal community cohort study. Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology, 60(7), 689-696. https://doi.org/10.1111/dmcn.13675
90. Volenec, V., & Reiss, C. (2018). Cognitive phonetics: The transduction of distinctive features at the phonology-phonetics interface. Biolinguistics, 11, 251–294. https://doi.org/10.5964/bioling.9200
91. Wren, Y. E. (2024). Editorial for special issue on terminology in speech sound disorder. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 59(4), 1183–1186. https://doi.org/10.1111/1460-6984.13074
92. Wüster, E. (1979). Einführung in die Allgemeine Terminologielehre und Terminologische Lexikographie. Springer.
93. Yıldırım, A., & Şimşek, H. (2021). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri (12. baskı). Seçkin.
94. Yıldırım, M., Topcuoğlu, V., Topbaş, S., & Bahar, G. (2023). Turkish validity and reliability study on the quick aphasia battery. Brain and Behavior, 14(1), e3325. https://doi.org/10.1002/brb3.3325
95. Yüksel, Ş. (2025). Kekemeliği ve konuşma sesi bozukluğu olan çocuklarda işleyen bellek ve fonolojik farkındalık becerileri ile kekemelik şiddeti arasındaki ilişkinin incelenmesi [Yüksek lisans tezi, Üsküdar Üniversitesi]. YÖK Ulusal Tez Merkezi.