Nesne İlişkileri Kuramı ve Tanrı Tasavvuru Üzerine Eleştirel Bir Değerlendirme

Yıl 2010, Cilt: 8 Sayı: 20, 39 - 77, 01.12.2010

Akif Hayta

Öz

Bu araştırmanın amacı nesne ilişkileri perspektifinden Tanrı imgesinin gelişimini tartışmaktır. Tanrı imgesinin psikanalitik yorumu konusunda Freud ile başlayan literatür, bu gün ço geniş bir alana yayılmış durumdadır. Nesne ilişkileri, dürtülerden uzaklaşıp birincil önemde olan nesnelere doğru yaklaşma vurgusunu içeren yeni bir aşamayı bildirir. Nesne ilişkileri perspektifine göre, kişinin Tanrı ile ilşkisini anlama noktasında birbirinde farklı teorisyenler büyük katkıda bulunmuştur. Bu makalede Klein, Winnicott, Rizzuto, Spero ve bunlardan yararlanan diğer yazarların çalışmaları ayrıntılı bir şekilde tartışılmış ve değerlendirmeye çalışılmıştır.Farklı dinlerin farklı Tanrı temsillerine sahip olduğu yönündeki bulgular, nesne ilişkileri teorisini desteklemektedir. Bu araştırma, çeşitli dinlerin nasıl farklı Tanrı tasavvurları ortaya çıkardığını, dolayısıyla Tanrı tasavvurlarının her bir topluluk tarafından nasıl farklı biçimde kullanıldığını göstermeye gayret edecektir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Nesne İlişkileri, Tanrı, Tanrı İmgesi, Tasavvur, Winnicott, Rizzuto

Kaynakça

• Abrevaya, E. (2000). Aynadan ötekine: Çocuk öznelliğinin oluşumu üzerine bir çalışma. İstanbul: Bağlam Yayınları.
• Allmond, J.W. (2009). God images Christian psychology, spiritual direction, and pastoral counseling (basılmamış doktora tezi). Regent University.
• Ardalı, C & Erten Y. (1999). Psikanalizden dinamik psikoterapilere. İstanbul: Alfa Yayınları.
• Bacanlı, H. (1995). Tanrı ve peygamber kavramları: Selçuk Üniversitesinde bir araştırma. Din Eğitimi Araştırmaları Dergisi, 2, 155-160.
• Beck, R. (2006a). God as a secure base: Attachment to God and theological exploration. Journal ofPsychology and Theology, 34 (2), 129-131.
• Beck, R. (2006b). Communion and complaint: Attachment, Object relations and triangular love perspectives on relationship with God. Journal of Psychology and Theology, 34 (I), 43-52.
• Bilmen, Ö. N. (1972). Muvazzah ilm-i kelam. İstanbul: Bilmen Yayınları.
• Birky, I. T. & Beli, S. (1988). Parental trait influence on God as an Object representation. The Journal ofPsychology, 122 (2), 135-137.
• Bradshaw, M., Ellison C. G., Flannelly K. T. (2008). Prayer, God imagery and symptoms of psychopathology. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 47 644-659.
• Buber, M. (2003). Ben ve sen (çev. İnci Palsay). Ankara: Kitabiyat Yayınları.
• Buri, J. R. & Muller R. A. (1992). Psychoanalytic theory and loving God concepts: Parent referencing versus self-referencing. The Journal of Psychology, 127 (1), 21-25.
• Chara, P. S. & Gillet J. N. (2004). Sensory images of God: Divine synesthesia? Journal of Psychology and Christianity, 23 (3), 234-248.
• Chodorow, N. J. (2007). Duyguların gücü: Psikanalizde, cinsiyette ve kültürde kişisel anlam (Çev. J. Ö. Dirlikyapan), İstanbul: Metis Yayınları.
• Choi, K. A. (2006). The relationships among adult attachment, attachment to God, and prayer (basılmamış doktora tezi). Faculty of The Rosemead School of Psychology, Biola University.
• Cicirelli, V. G. (2004). God as the ültimate attachment figure for older adults. Attachment and Human Development, 6 (4), 372-374.
• Dickie, J. , Ajega L., Kobylak, J. & Nixon, K. (2006). Mother, father, and self: Sources of young adult's God concepts. Journal for The Scientific Study of Reiigion, 45 (1), 64-68.
• Eaton, G. (1992). İslam ve insanlığın kaderi (çev. İ. Durdu). İstanbul: İnsan Yayınları.
• Eaton, G. (2003). Tanrıyı hatırlamak (çev. S. L. Gürkan). İstanbul: İnsan Yayınları.
• Engelbrecht, D. A. (2007). The influence of attachments to childhood caregivers, peers, and romantic partners on attachment to divine (basılmamış doktora tezi), University of Missouri- Kansas City.
• Fonagy, P. (2001). Attachment theory andpsychoanalysis. New York: Other Press.
• Freud, S. (1984). Totem ve tabu (çev. K. Sahir Sel). İstanbul: Sosyal Yayınları.
• Georges, G. (2000). İnsan ve tanrı (çev. Zeki Özcan). İstanbul: Alfa Yayınları.
• Goodwin, A. (1998). Freud and Erikson: Their contributions to the psychology of God-image formation. Pastoral Psychology, 47 (2), 98-102.
• Göka, E. (2006). İnsan kısım kısım: Toplumlar, zihniyetler, kimlikler. Ankara: Aşina Kitaplar.
• Göka, E., Yüksel, F. V. & Göral, F. S. (2006). İnsan ilişkilerinde yansıtmalı özdeşim. Türk Psikiyatri Dergisi, 17 (l), 47-54.
• Greenberg, J. R. & Mitchell, Stephen A. (1983). Object relations in psychoanalytic theory. London: Harvard University Press.
• Grimes, C. (2007). God image research: A literatüre review. Journal of Spirituality in Mental Health, 9 (3/4), 11-32.
• Gülerce, A. (2008). On the absence of a presence / The presence of an absence: Psychoanalysis in the Turkish context. Theory & Psychology, 18 (2), 241.
• Hali, T. W. , Brokaw, B. F., Edwards, K. J. & Pike, P. L. (1998). An empirical exploration of psychoanalysis and religion: Spiritual maturity and object-relations development. Journalfor The Scientific Study of Religion, 37 (2), 307-310.
• Hallahmi, B. B. (1995). Object relations theory and religious experience. Handbook of Religious Experience içinde (ed. Ralph W.Hood), Birmingham: Religious Education Press, 259-265
• Hardy, D. S. (2003). A Winnicottian redescription of Christian spiritual direction relationships: Illustrating the potential contribution of psychology of religion to Christian spiritual practice. Spiritual Formation, Counseling And Psychotherapy içinde (ed. Todd W. Hail, Mark R. McMinn). New York: Nova science Publishers, 130-141.
• Harry, G. (2000). Fairbairn ve Winnicott ile analiz deneyimim (çev. Kemal Atakay). Defter, (39), 42-43.
• Heisler, D. M. (2006). The effect of adult attachment and attachment to God on stress reactivity and recovery (basılmamış doktora tezi). Seattle Pasific University.
• Herrera, J. D. (2006). The space for meaning: A Winnicottian perspective on re ligious experience (basılmamış doktora tezi), Wright Institute Graduate School.
• Hick, J. (2002). İnançların gökkuşağı (çev. M. Aydın). Ankara: Ankara Okulu Yayınları.
• Hick, J. (2005a). Bizler aynı Tanrı'ya mı ibadet ediyoruz? Dinsel Çoğulculuk ve Mutlaklık İddiaları içinde (ed. M. Aydın). Ankara: Ankara Okulu Yayınları.
• Hick, J. (2005b). Yahudilikte ve Hristiyanlıkta Tanrı kavramı (çev. A. Topaloğlu). Marmara Üniversitesi İlahiyat Fakültesi Dergisi, 28 (l), 212-215.
• Hill, P. C., Hail, T. & Todd, W. (2002). Relational schemas in processing one's image of God and self. Journal of Psychology and Christianity, 21 (4), 365-371.
• Hinselwood, R. D. (1991). A dictionary of Kleinian thought. 2nd ed, London.
• Hoffman, L. (2005). A developmental perspective on the God image. Spirituality and Psychological Health içinde (ed. R. H. Cox, B. E. Cox & L. Hoffman), Colorado: Psychology Press, 133-145.
• Hoffman, L. , ve ark. (2008). Diversity and the God image: Examining ethnic differences in the experience of God for a college-age population. Journal of Psychology and Theology, 36 (I), 26-39.
• Hood, R. W. ve ark. (1996). The psychology of religion: An emprical approach. 2nd ed., New York and London: The Guilford Press.
• Hoover, J. (2004). Revelation and the Islamic and Christian doctrines of God. Islamochristiana, 30, 1-13.
• Hughes, J. M. (1989). Reshaping the psychoanalytic domain - The work of Melanie Klein, IV.R.D. Fairbairn, and D. W. Winnicott. Los Angeles and London: University of California Press.
• İzmirli, İ. H. (1981). Yeni ilm-i kelâm. Ankara: Umran Yayınları.
• Jones, W. J. (1996). Religion andpsychology in transition, New Haven and London.
• Jones, W. J. (1997). The real is the relational: Relational psychoanalysis as a model of human understanding. Hermeneutical Approaches in Psychology of Religion içinde (ed. J. A. Belzen), Amsterdam: Rodopi, 51-62.
• Jones, W. J. (2007). Psychodynamic theories of the evolution of the God image. Journal of Spirituality in Mental Health, 9 (3/4), 46.
• Joyce, N. (2006). Theory and application of attachment to God in Christian soul care (basılmamış doktora tezi). The Faculty of Southern Baptist Theological Seminary.
• Kakar, S. (1991). The analyst and the mystic: Psychoanalytic reflections on religion and msyticism. Chicago: The University of Chicago.
• Kari O'G & Richards P. S. (2007). Theistic psychotherapy and the God image. Journal of Spirituality in Mental Health, 9 (3/4), 186-199.
• Kavaler, S. A. (1993). The conflict and process theory of Melanie Klein. The American Journal of Psychoanalysis, 53 (3), 187-195.
• Kavaler, S. A. (2003). Mourning, spirituality andpsyhic change: A new Object relations View of psychoanalysis. New York: Brunner-Routledge.
• Kernberg, O. F. (2000). Psychoanalytic perspectives on the religious experience.American Journal of Psychotherapy, 54 (4), 460-462.
• Kim, J. M. (2005). Internal Object representations of God of religious people (basılmamış doktora tezi). Long Island University
• Kim, J. M. (2007). Adult attachment, attachment to God, and cultural values in Korean and Caucasian
• Kim, S. S. (2006). A Korean feminist perspective on God representation. Pastoral Psychology, 55, 42-44.
• Kirkpatrick, A. L. (1998). God as substitute attachment figure: A longitudinal study of adult attachment Style and religious change in college students. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24 (9), 961-973.
• Klein, M. (1996). Ruhsal sağlık üstüne (çev. A. Tümertekin). Yüzyılın Psikanalizi, COGİTO, (9), 120.
• Klein, M. (1999). Haset ve şükran (çev. O. Koçak, Y. Erten). İstanbul: Metis Yayınları.
• Klein, M. (2008). Sevgi, suçluluk ve onarım (Yay. haz. Bella Habib). İstanbul: Kanat Yayınları.
• Kwon, S. Y. (2005). God may not be a person: A case of cultural construction of God representations. Pastoral Psychology, 35 (5), 405-414.
• LaMonte, R. (2004). I think of God, in order not to be aware: Defensive dissociation and the use of religious objects. International Journal of Applied Psychoanalytic Studies, I (2), 145-146.
• LaMonte, R. (2009). The clash of Gods: Changes in a patient's use of God representations. Journal of The American Academy of Psychoanalysis and Dynamic Psychiatry, 37 73-83.
• Lawrence, R. T. (1997). Measuring the image of God: The God image inventory and the God image scales. Journal of Pyschology and Theology, 25 (2), 214.
• Lee, C & A. Early. (2000). Religiosity and family values: Correlates of God-image in a protestant sample. Journal of Psychology and Theology, 28 (3), 232-237.
• Liebman, S. J. & Abell, S. C. (2000). Reconstructing the sacred: Evolving conceptualizations of religious faith in psychonalytic theory and practice. Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy, 30 (I), 15-19.
• Marsh, R. & Low, J. (2006). God as other, God as self, God as beyond: A cognitive analytic perspective on the relationship with God. Psychology and Psychotherapy: Theory, Research and Practise, 79, 237-255.
• McDargh, J. (1983). Psychoanalytic Object relations theory and the study of religion: On faith and the imaging of God. New York and London: University Press of America Inc.
• McDonald, A. W & Gorsuch, R. L. (2004). A multivariate theory of God concept, religious motivation, locus of control, coping, and spiritual well-being. Journal of Psychology and Theology, 32 (4), 326-332.
• Mehmedoğlu, A. U. (2007). Tanrıyı tasavvur etmek: Türk insanının Allah tasavvuru. İstanbul: Dem Yayınları.
• Meier, A & Meier, M. (2005). The formation of adolescents' image of God: Predictors and age and gender differences. The Image of God and The Pscyhology of Religion içinde (ed. R.Dayringer, David Oler), Binghamton: The Haworth Pastoral Press, 91-109.
• Meissner, W. W. (1984). Psychoanalysis and religious experience. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.
• Meissner, W W. (2001). so help me God! Do ı help God or does God help me, does God help? Developmental and Clinical Aspects of Religious Belief içinde (ed. S. Akthar & H. Parens), Northvale: Aronson, 81-112.
• Meissner, W. W. (2009). Religion in the psychoanalytic relationship: Some aspects of transference and countertransference. Journal of The American Academy of Psychoanalysis and Dynamic Psychiaty, 37, 125-135.
• Mitchell, S. A. (2009). Psikanalizde ilişkisel kavramlar: Bir bütünleşme (çev. G. Algaç, İ. Anıl). İstanbul: Bilgi Üniversitesi Yayınları.
• Monteiro, D. (2005). Images of God, forgiveness and attachment among Hindus, Muslims and Christians in India (basılmamış doktora tezi). The University of Southern Mississippi.
• Morgenstern, A. (2009). Saving grace: The Role of attachment to God in the relationship between adult attachment patterns and bereavement among the elderiy (basılmamış doktora tezi). Richard R. Conolly College of Long Island University.
• Moriarty, G. L., Hoffman, L. & Grimes, C. (2006). Understanding the God image through attachment theory: Theory, research, and practice. Journal of Spirituality in Mental Health, 9 (2), 43-56.
• Nasio, J. D. (2006). Psikanalizin yedi temel kavramı (çev. Ö. Erşen - M. Erşen). Ankara: İmge Kitabevi.
• Nasr, S. H. (2001). Kulluk edilecek ve bilinecek hakikat: Allah (çev. A. Çaksu). Divan, 2, 8-12.
• Nelson, C. E. (1996). Formation of a God representation. Religious Education, 91 30-31.
• Nesefi, Ebu'l M. (2007). Tevhidin esasları (çev. H. Alper). İstanbul: İz Yayıncılık.
• Noffke, J. L. & McFadden, S. H. (2001). Denominational and age comparisons of God concepts. Journalfor The Scientific Study of Religion, 40 (4), 747-755.
• Olds, V. S. (2008). The relationships between object-relations development, God images, spiritual maturity and religious fundamentalism among Christians (basılmamış doktora tezi). Texas A. and M. University.
• Owen, S.D. (2004). Spiritual intimacy: A qualitative investigation of relationships with God and their association with well-being (basılmamış doktora tezi). Brigham Young University.
• Palik, L. E. (2001). Image of God and object-relations theory of human development: Their integration and mutual contribution to development of God images, God-concepts, and relationship with God (basılmamış doktora tezi). George Fox University.
• Palmer, M. (1997). Freud and Jung on religion. New York: Routledge.
• Paloutzian, R. F. (1996). Invitiation to psychology of religion. 2nd ed., Boston and London: Allyn and Bacon.
• Parker, S. (2008). Winnicott's object-relations theory and the work of The Holy Spirit. Journal of Psychology and Theology. 36 (4), 287-291.
• Peterson, A. O. (2005). The dynamic God image: Psychoanalytic object-relational, developmental and Jungian theories of God image and their implications for psychotherapy (basılmamış doktora tezi). California Institute of İntegral Studies.
• Prout, T. A. (2009). Do image of God and attachment to God moderate the effects of Object relations on recovery among outpatients with schizophrenia-spectrum disorders? (basılmamış doktora tezi). Fordham University.
• Rackley, B. (2007). God image and early maladaptive schemas: A correlational study (basılmamış doktora tezi). Faculty of The School Psychology & Counseling- Regent University.
• Rahman, F. (2000). Ana konularıyla Kuran (çev. A. Açıkgenç). 6. baskı, Ankara: Ankara Okulu Yayınları.
• Reber, A. S. (1995). Dictionary of psychology. 2nd ed., London: Penguin Books.
• Rehberg, K. L. (2008). D. W. Winnicott and Dark Night of the soul: A literatüre review and theoretical analysis (basılmamış doktora tezi). Azusa Pacific University.
• Reiber, M. R. (2004). The interrelationship of God representations, object-relations, and the individual capacity for intimacy (basılmamış doktora tezi). California School of Professional Psychology-Alliant Int. Un.
• Rizzuto, A. M. (1979). The birth of the living God: Apsychoanalytic study. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.
• Rizzuto, A. M. (1996). Psychoanalytic treatment and the religious person. Religion and The Clinical Practise of Psychology içinde (ed. Edward P. Shafranske), Washington DC: American Psychological Association, 419-429.
• Rizzuto, A. M. (2001a). Religious development beyond the modern paradigm discussion: The psychoanalytic point of view. The International Journal for The Psychology of Religion, II (3), 203-214.
• Rizzuto, A. M. (2001 b). Does God help? What God'? Helping whom'? The convolutions of divine help, Does God help? Develpomental and Clinical Aspects of Religious Belief içinde (ed. S.Akhtar and H.Parens), New Jersey and London: Jason Aronson Inc., 21-24.
• Rizzuto, A. M. (2009). Sacred space, analytic space, the self, and God. Journal of The American Academy of Psychoanalysis and Dynamic Psychiatry, 37 (I), 175-188.
• Rosalind, M. (1996). Psychonalysis and gender. London and New York: Routledge.
• Ross, M. E. (2001). The humanity of the Gods: The past and future of Freud's psychoanalytic interpretation of religion. Annual of Psychoanalysis, 29, 263-275.
• Rycroft, C. (1989). Psikanaliz Sözlüğü (çev. M. S. Kayatekin). İstanbul: Ara Yayınları.
• Saffran, S. K. (2009). The effect of adult attachment, God, and faith tradition on religious orientation (basılmamış doktora tezi). School of Psychology, Family & Community-Seatle Pasific University.
• Samir T. Genevieue, V & Etienne, M. (2006). individual differences in the theological concept of God. The International Journal for The Psychology of Reiigion, 16 (2), 86.
• Schermer, V. L. (2003). Spirit andpsyche: A new paradigmfor psychology, psychoanalysis and psychotherapy. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
• Schlauch, C. R. (2006). Deeper affinities: Fundamental resonances between psychoanalysis and religion. Pastoral Psychology, 55, 74-77.
• Schoun, F. (1988). İslamı anlamak (çev. Mahmut Kanık). İstanbul: İklim Yayınları.
• Schoun, F. (1996). İslamın metafizik boyutları (çev. Mahmut Kanık). İstanbul: İz Yayınları.
• Schoun, F. (1998). İslam ve ezeli hikmet (çev. ş. Yalçın). İstanbul: İz Yayınları.
• Simmonds, J. G. (2006). Being and potential: Psychoanalytic clinicians' concepts of God. International Journal of Applied Psychoanalytic Studies, 3 (3).
• Soo-Yong, K. (2003). God representations: A psychological and cultural model (basılmamış doktora tezi). San Francisco Theological Seminary Berkeley-California.
• Spero, M. H. & Cohen, M. (2009). Introduction to a symposium: The God representation in the psychoanalytic relationship: When is three a crowd? Journal of The American Academy of Psychoanalysis and Dynamic Psychiatry, 37 (1)-14.
• Spero, M. H. (1992). Religious Objects as psychological structures: A critical integration of object relations theory, psychotherapy, andJudaism. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.
• Spero, M. H. (2008). The experience of religious trasnformation during psychoanalysis as an event horizon. Psychoanalytic Inquiry, 28, 621-633.
• Spero, M. H. (2009). When the light shed by God is dimmer than the light shed upon God: Countertransference illumination of latent religious Object representations of a Jewish patient in psychoanalysis. Journal of The American Academy of Psychoanalysis and Dynamic Psychiatry, 37 (I), 190-198.
• Strawn, B. D. (2007). Slouching toward integration: Psychoanalysis and religion in dialogue. Journal of Psychology and Theology, 35 (I), 3-9.
• Swinborne, R. (1994). The Christian God. New York: Oxford University Press.
• Tamminen, K. & Nurmi, K. E. (1995). Developmental theory and religious experience. Handbook of Religious Experience içinde (ed. Ralph W. Hood), Birmingham, Alabama: Religious Education Press.
• Tarakeshwar, N., Stanton, J. & Pargament, K. I. (2003). Religion: An overlooked dimension in cross-cultural psychology. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 34 (4), 382-385.
• Taylan, N. (1998). Düşünce tarihinde Tanrı sorunu. İstanbul: Şehir Yayınları.
• Thomas, M. J. (2009). The effect of a manualized group treatment protocol on God image and attachment to God (basılmamış doktora tezi). Regent University.
• Tisdale, T. C. (1997). A comparison of Jewish, Muslim, and Protestant faith groups on the relationship between level of Object relations development and experience of God and self (yayınlanmamış doktora tezi). Rosemead School of Psychology of Biola University.
• Tisdale, T. C. ve ark. (1997). Impact of treatment on God image and personal adjustment, and correlations of God image to personal adjustment and Object relations development. Journal of Pscyhology and Theology, 25 (2), 227-239.
• Topaloğlu, B. (2006). Allah inancı. İstanbul: İSAM Yayınları.
• Tyson, P. (1996). The development of object constancy and its deviations. The Internal Mother: Conceptual and Technical Aspects of Object Constancy içinde (ed. S.Akhtar, S: Kramer,H. Parens), New Jersey and London: Jason Aronson Inc.
• Ulanov, A.B. (2002). Picturing in God. Einsiedeln: Daimon Verlag.
• Ventimiglia, G. (2008). Martin Buber, God, and psychoanalysis. Psychoanalytic İnquiry, 28, 613-620.
• Volkan, V. D. & Zintli, E. (2003). Gidenin ardından (çev. I. Vahip, M.Kocadere). İstanbul: Okuyanus Yayınları.
• Volkan, V. D. (1997). Psikanaliz yazıları (çev. B. Ceyhan-A. Çevik). 2. basım, Ankara: H YB Yayınları.
• Volkan, V. D. (2009). Fanustaki insanlar (çev. Serap Erdoğan). İstanbul: Alfa Yayınları.
• Winnicott, D. W. (1987). The Child, thefamily and the outside world. Cambridge: Perseus Publishing.
• Winnicott, D. W. (1990). Homes is where we startfrom: Essays by a psychoanalyst. New York and London: W. W. Norton Company.
• Winnicott, D. W. (1998). Oyun ve gerçeklik (çev. Tuncay Birkan). İstanbul: Metis Yayınları.
• Winnicott, D. W. (2002). Winnicott on the Child. Cambridge: Perseus Publishing.
• Winter, T. S. (2007). İslam ve Hıristiyanlık: Politik-teoloji denemeleri (çev. Oğuz Atalay). İstanbul: Etkileşim Yayınları.
• Wotton, R. J. (1991). God-representation and its relation to object-relations and defensive functioning (basılmamış doktora tezi). Boston University.
• Wulff, D. M. (1996). The pscyhology of religion: An Overview. Religion and The Clinical Practise of Psychology içinde (ed. Edward P. Shafranske), Washington DC: American Psychological Association.
• Wulff, D. M. (1997). Psychology of religion: Classic and comtemporary. 2nd ed, New York: John Wiley & Sons ınc.
• Yapıcı, A. (2004). Allah ve kutsal kavramlarının çağrıştırdıkları anlamlara sosyo-psikolojik bir bakış. Değerler Eğitimi Dergisi, 2 (7-8), 169-206.
• Zeldman, A. (2006). Religion and mental health: Correlates in internalization, centrality, and God representations (basılmamış doktora tezi). University of Rochester.