Toward a Measure of Teachers’ Sense of Efficacy for Character Education: The Character Education Efficacy Belief Instrument and Its Turkish Adaptation Study

Yıl 2003, Cilt: 1 Sayı: 4, 99 - 130, 01.10.2003

Andrew J. Mılson Halil Ekşi

Öz

In this paper, we describe the development and testing of an instrument
designed to measure teachers’ sense of efficacy for character education
and its Turkish Adaptation Study. The relevance of the teacher efficacy construct
for character education is detailed and the results of two surveys of teachers
in the United States of America and a survey of teachers of Turkey are
reported. These results of U.S. samples suggest that: 1) teachers generally
possess a positive sense of efficacy for character education, but doubt their
abilities to provide character education for students who may lack good
character, 2) elementary teachers have significantly higher levels of character
education teaching efficacy than high school teachers, and 3) staff development
training and character education conference sessions have a positive impact
on teachers’ sense of efficacy for character education, but universitybased
coursework provides no significant boost in teacher efficacy. On the other
hand, the studies of bilingual equivalence and reliability reveal that the
Turkish form has satisfactory statistical properties. The implications of these
results are discussed and recommendations for teacher educators are offered.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Character Education, Teachers’ Sense of Efficacy, Scale Construction.

Öğretmenlerin Karakter Eğitiminde Yetkinlik Duygusu Konusunda Bir Ölçme Aracına Doğru: Karakter Eğitimi Yetkinlik İnancı Skalası (KEYİS) ve Türkçeye Uyarlanma Çalışması

Öz

Öğretmenlerin karakter eğitimi konusundaki algılarını ölçmek için hazırlanan bir ölçme aracının geliştirilmesi, test edilmesi ve Türkçeye uyarlanmasının ele alınacağı bu makalede öğretmenlerin yetkinlik yapısının karakter eğitimiyle ilişkisi ayrıntılı olarak incelenmekte ve Amerika'da öğretmenler arasında yapılan iki araştırma ve Türkiye'de öğretmenler üzerinde yapılan bir çalışmanın sonuçları değerlendirilmektedir. Amerika'da yapılan araştırma sonuçları şunları ortaya koymaktadır: (i) Öğretmenler genellikle karakter eğitiminin yetkinlikleri ile ilgili olarak olumlu bir duyguya sahiptirler; ancak kendilerinin iyi karakterden yoksun öğrencilere karakter eğitimi sağlama yetenekleri konusunda kuşku duymaktadırlar. (ii) İlköğretim öğretmenleri lise öğretmenlerine göre daha yüksek düzeyde bir karakter eğitimi yetkinliliği inancına sahiptirler. (iii) Personel geliştirme eğitimi ve karakter eğitimi konferansları öğretmenlerin karakter eğitiminin yetkinliği duyguları üzerinde olumlu bir etki yapmaktadır; ancak üniversiteye dayalı kurs çalışması öğretmen verimliliğinde önemli bir artış sağlamamaktadır. Türkçe uyarlanma çalışması ise ölçeğin gerekli istatistiki yeterlilikleri taşıdığını ortaya koymaktadır. Makalenin sonunda ise bu sonuçlar tartışılmakta ve öğretmenlere yönelik önerilerde bulunulmaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Karakter Eğitimi, Öğretmen Yetkinliği, Ölçek Geliştirme

Kaynakça

• Armor, D., Conroy-Oseguera, P., Cox, M., King, N., McDonnell, L., Pascal, A. et al. (1976). Analysis of the school preferred reading programs in selected Los Angeles minority schools, REPORT NO. R-2007-LAUSD. Santa Monica, CA: Rand Corporation (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. 130 243).
• Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavior change. Psychological Review, 84, 191-215.
• Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.
• Bennett, W. J. (1991). Moral literacy and the formation of character. In J. S. Benninga(Ed.), Moral, character, and civic education in the elementary school (pp. 131-138). New York: Teachers College.
• Berkowitz, M. (1999). Building a good person. In M. M. Williams & E. Schaps (Eds.). Character education: The foundation for teacher education. Washington, DC: Character Education Partnership and Association of Teacher Educators.
• Brownell, M. T., & Pajares, F. (1999). Teacher efficacy and perceived success in mainstreaming students with learning and behavior problems. Teacher Education and Special Education, 22, (3), 154-164.
• Center for the Advancement of Ethics and Character & Character Education Partnership (1999). Teachers as educators of character: Are the nation’s schools of education comingup short? Washington, DC: Character Education Partnership.
• Coladarci, T., & Breton, W. (1997). Teacher efficacy, supervision, and the special education resource-room teacher. Journal of Educational Research, 90, 230-239.
• Deemer, S. A., & Minke, K. M. (1999). An investigation of the factor structure of the teacher efficacy scale. Journal of Educational Research, 93, 3-10.
• DeRoche, E. F., & Williams, M. M. (1998). Educating hearts and minds: A comprehensive character education framework. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
• Gibson, S., & Dembo, M. H. (1984). Teacher efficacy: A construct validation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 569-582.
• Glass, G. V., & Hopkins, K. D. (1996). Statistical methods in education and psychology (3rd ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
• Greenawalt, C. E. (1996). Character Education in America. Harrisburg, PA: Commonwealth Foundation for Public Policy Alternatives. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 398 327)
• Guskey, T. R., & Passaro, P. D. (1994). Teacher efficacy: A study of construct dimensions. American Educational Research Journal, 31, 627-643.
• Haynes, C., Leming, J., Groth, J., Lindquist, T., Lockwood, A., Marshall, P. et al.(1997). Fostering civic virtue: Character education in the social studies. Social Education, 61, 225-227.
• Henson, R. K., Kogan, L. R., & Vacha-Haase, T. (2001). A reliability generalization study of the teacher efficacy scale and related instruments. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 61, 404-420.
• Heslep, R. D. (1995). Moral education for Americans. Westport, CT: Praeger.
• Jones, E. N., Ryan, K., & Bohlin, K. (1998). Character education and teacher education: How are prospective teachers being prepared to foster good character in students? Action in Teacher Education, 20, 11-28.
• Kirschenbaum, H. (1977). In support of values clarification. Social Education, 41, 398 - 402 .
• Kirschenbaum, H., Harmin, M., Howe, L., & Simon, S. B. (1977). In defense of values clarification. Phi Delta Kappan, 58, 743-746.
• Kohn, A. (1997). How not to teach values: A critical look at character education. PhiDelta Kappan, 78, 429-439.
• Lickona, T. (1991). Educating for character: How our schools can teach respect and responsibility. New York: Bantam.
• Lickona, T. (1993). The return of character education. Educational Leadership, 51, 6-11.
• Lickona, T. (1998). A more complex analysis is needed. Phi Delta Kappan, 79, 449 - 454 .
• McClellan, B. E., (1992). Schools and the shaping of character: Moral education in America, 1607-present. Bloomington, IN: ERIC Clearinghouse for Social Studies /Social Science Education.
• Milbraith, Y. L., & Kinzie, M. B. (2000). Computer technology training for prospective teachers: Computer attitudes and perceived self-efficacy. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 8, 373-396.
• Milson, A. J. (2000a). Creating a curriculum for character development: A case study. The Clearing House, 74 (2), 89-93.
• Milson, A. J. (2000b). Seeking thoughtful dialogue on character education: A rejoinder to Singer. Theory and Research in Social Education, 28, 278-279.
• Milson, A. J. (2002). Developing a comprehensive approach to character education in the social studies. The Social Studies, 93 (3), 101-102.
• Milson, A. J., & Mehlig, L. M. (2001). The efficacy beliefs of elementary teachers regarding character education. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Seattle, WA.
• Milson, A. J., & Mehlig, L. M. (2002). Elementary school teachers’ sense of efficacy for character education. Journal of Educational Research, 96, 47-53. National Character Counts Week Proclamation of 1994, Pub. L. No. 103-301, 108 Stat. 1558-1559 (1994).
• Nielsen, L. (1998). New study shows states returning to character education. Character Educator, 6, 9.
• Pajares, F. (1997). Self-efficacy beliefs in academic settings. Review of EducationalResearch, 66, 543-578.
• Purpel, D. E. (1997). The politics of character education. In A. Molnar (Ed.), The construction of children’s character: Ninety-sixth yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, part two (pp. 140-153). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
• Raths, L., Harmin, M., & Simon, S. B., (1966). Values and teaching. Columbus: Merrill.
• Riggs, I. M. & Enochs, L. G. (1990). Toward the development of an elementary teacher’s science teaching efficacy belief instrument. Science Education, 74, 625-638.
• Ritter, J. M., Boone, W. J., & Rubba, P. A. (2001). Development of an instrument toassess prospective elementary teacher self-efficacy beliefs about equitable science teaching and learning (SEBEST). Journal of Science Teacher Education, 12 (3), 175-198.
• Ross, J. A., Hogaboam-Gray, A., & Hannay, L. (2001). Effects of teacher efficacy on computer skills and computer cognitions of Canadian students in grades K-3. The Elementary School Journal, 102 (2), 141-156.
• Rotter, J. B. (1966). Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement. Psychological Monographs, 80, 1-28.
• Ryan, K. A. (1986). The new moral education. Phi Delta Kappan, 68, 228-233.
• Ryan, K., & Bohlin, K. E. (1999). Building character in schools: Practical ways to bring moral instruction to life. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
• Thornton, S. J. (1991). Teacher as curricular-instructional gatekeeper in social studies. In J. P. Shaver (Ed.), Handbook of research on social studies teaching and learning (pp. 237-248). New York: Macmillan.
• Tschannen-Moran, M., Hoy, A. W., & Hoy, W. K. (1998). Teacher efficacy: Its meaning and measure. Review of Educational Research, 68, 202-248.
• Tschannen-Moran, M., & Hoy, A. W. (2001). Teacher efficacy: Capturing an elusive construct. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17, 783-805.
• Vessels, G. G. (1998). Character and community development: A school planning and teacher training handbook. Westport, CT: Praeger.
• Wheatley, K. F. (2000). Positive teacher efficacy as an obstacle to educational reform. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 34 (1), 14-27.
• Wheatley, K. F. (2002). The potential benefits of teacher efficacy doubts for educational reform. Teaching and Teacher Education, 18, 5-22.
• Wiley, L. S. (1998). Comprehensive character-building classroom: A handbook for teachers. DeBary, FL: Longwood Communications.
• Williams, M. M., & Schaps, E. (1999). Character education: The foundation for teacher education. Washington, DC: Character Education Partnership.
• Woolfolk, A. E. & Hoy, W. K. (1990). Prospective teachers’ sense of efficacy and beliefs about control. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 81-91.
• Wynne, E. A. (1991). Character and academics in the elementary school. In J. S. Benninga (Ed.), Moral, character, and civic education in the elementary school (pp. 139-155). New York: Teachers College.
• Wynne, E. A. (1997). For-character education. In A. Molnar (Ed.), The construction of children’s character: Ninety-sixth yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, part two (pp. 63-76). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.